Praise as a Reinforcer: Pairing with a Preferred Stimulus to Produce Similar Sensory Responses of a Given Modality

This study aimed to explore whether praise alone could serve as a conditioned reinforcer after being paired with a preferred stimulus assumed to produce analogous sensory consequences of a given modality. Two children (5 years old) with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) received praise as a neutral sti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Special Education Research 2022/08/31, Vol.11(1), pp.23-29
Hauptverfasser: Aoki, Yasuhiko, Noro, Fumiyuki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29
container_issue 1
container_start_page 23
container_title Journal of Special Education Research
container_volume 11
creator Aoki, Yasuhiko
Noro, Fumiyuki
description This study aimed to explore whether praise alone could serve as a conditioned reinforcer after being paired with a preferred stimulus assumed to produce analogous sensory consequences of a given modality. Two children (5 years old) with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) received praise as a neutral stimulus with a toy as a reinforcement element. Toys were selected as tools that could deliver the same putative sensory outcomes of stereotypical behaviors. One participant was seated at a desk, and the other could move freely around the test room where other competing reinforcement objects were available. Praise was successfully established as a conditioned reinforcer for the seated participant but not for the other. The percentage of 10-s intervals with competing reinforcer interaction was higher in the baseline and praise periods than during the pairing period. Results suggest that practitioners should consider pairing praise with toys (assumed as having the same sensory results as stereotypy) while the child remains stationary, thus promoting praise as a conditioned reinforcer.
doi_str_mv 10.6033/specialeducation.11.23
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_6033_specialeducation_11_23</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>article_specialeducation_11_1_11_21_P010_article_char_en</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2563-f63a7e7f0cb6ec9b95832104dbd59802cd46eff01984ebe20654e69752dae7f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkN1KAzEQhYMoWGpfQfICW_Ozm2a9k6JVqLpYvQ7Z7KRN2W5KslX69sZWvRCvZpiZ75zhIHRJyVgQzq_iFozTLTQ7o3vnuzGlY8ZP0IBRKbNccnl66CdZQWh-jkYxrgkhlOecFmSAQhW0i4B1xBq_gOusDwbCNa60C65b4g_Xr9KqCmAhBGjwonebXbuLuPdp6pMx4IXbuFYHvIAu-rBPQnHruwgRe5vgmXuHDj_6Rreu31-gM6vbCKPvOkRvd7ev0_ts_jx7mN7MM8MKwTMruJ7AxBJTCzBlXRaSM0rypm6KUhJmmlyAtYSWMocaGBFFDqKcFKzRCZN8iMRR1wQfY_pfbYPb6LBXlKiv8NTf8BSlivEEPh3Bdez1En4xHXpnWvgXoweWqook8Z9Ds9JBQcc_AThchlE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Praise as a Reinforcer: Pairing with a Preferred Stimulus to Produce Similar Sensory Responses of a Given Modality</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><creator>Aoki, Yasuhiko ; Noro, Fumiyuki</creator><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Yasuhiko ; Noro, Fumiyuki</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to explore whether praise alone could serve as a conditioned reinforcer after being paired with a preferred stimulus assumed to produce analogous sensory consequences of a given modality. Two children (5 years old) with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) received praise as a neutral stimulus with a toy as a reinforcement element. Toys were selected as tools that could deliver the same putative sensory outcomes of stereotypical behaviors. One participant was seated at a desk, and the other could move freely around the test room where other competing reinforcement objects were available. Praise was successfully established as a conditioned reinforcer for the seated participant but not for the other. The percentage of 10-s intervals with competing reinforcer interaction was higher in the baseline and praise periods than during the pairing period. Results suggest that practitioners should consider pairing praise with toys (assumed as having the same sensory results as stereotypy) while the child remains stationary, thus promoting praise as a conditioned reinforcer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2187-5014</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2188-4838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.6033/specialeducation.11.23</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION</publisher><subject>autism spectrum disorder ; conditioned reinforcement ; praise ; preferred stimulus pairing ; similar sensory consequences</subject><ispartof>Journal of Special Education Research, 2022/08/31, Vol.11(1), pp.23-29</ispartof><rights>2022 The Japanese Association of Special Education</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2563-f63a7e7f0cb6ec9b95832104dbd59802cd46eff01984ebe20654e69752dae7f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1877,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Yasuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noro, Fumiyuki</creatorcontrib><title>Praise as a Reinforcer: Pairing with a Preferred Stimulus to Produce Similar Sensory Responses of a Given Modality</title><title>Journal of Special Education Research</title><addtitle>JSER</addtitle><description>This study aimed to explore whether praise alone could serve as a conditioned reinforcer after being paired with a preferred stimulus assumed to produce analogous sensory consequences of a given modality. Two children (5 years old) with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) received praise as a neutral stimulus with a toy as a reinforcement element. Toys were selected as tools that could deliver the same putative sensory outcomes of stereotypical behaviors. One participant was seated at a desk, and the other could move freely around the test room where other competing reinforcement objects were available. Praise was successfully established as a conditioned reinforcer for the seated participant but not for the other. The percentage of 10-s intervals with competing reinforcer interaction was higher in the baseline and praise periods than during the pairing period. Results suggest that practitioners should consider pairing praise with toys (assumed as having the same sensory results as stereotypy) while the child remains stationary, thus promoting praise as a conditioned reinforcer.</description><subject>autism spectrum disorder</subject><subject>conditioned reinforcement</subject><subject>praise</subject><subject>preferred stimulus pairing</subject><subject>similar sensory consequences</subject><issn>2187-5014</issn><issn>2188-4838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkN1KAzEQhYMoWGpfQfICW_Ozm2a9k6JVqLpYvQ7Z7KRN2W5KslX69sZWvRCvZpiZ75zhIHRJyVgQzq_iFozTLTQ7o3vnuzGlY8ZP0IBRKbNccnl66CdZQWh-jkYxrgkhlOecFmSAQhW0i4B1xBq_gOusDwbCNa60C65b4g_Xr9KqCmAhBGjwonebXbuLuPdp6pMx4IXbuFYHvIAu-rBPQnHruwgRe5vgmXuHDj_6Rreu31-gM6vbCKPvOkRvd7ev0_ts_jx7mN7MM8MKwTMruJ7AxBJTCzBlXRaSM0rypm6KUhJmmlyAtYSWMocaGBFFDqKcFKzRCZN8iMRR1wQfY_pfbYPb6LBXlKiv8NTf8BSlivEEPh3Bdez1En4xHXpnWvgXoweWqook8Z9Ds9JBQcc_AThchlE</recordid><startdate>20220831</startdate><enddate>20220831</enddate><creator>Aoki, Yasuhiko</creator><creator>Noro, Fumiyuki</creator><general>THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220831</creationdate><title>Praise as a Reinforcer: Pairing with a Preferred Stimulus to Produce Similar Sensory Responses of a Given Modality</title><author>Aoki, Yasuhiko ; Noro, Fumiyuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2563-f63a7e7f0cb6ec9b95832104dbd59802cd46eff01984ebe20654e69752dae7f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>autism spectrum disorder</topic><topic>conditioned reinforcement</topic><topic>praise</topic><topic>preferred stimulus pairing</topic><topic>similar sensory consequences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Yasuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noro, Fumiyuki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of Special Education Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aoki, Yasuhiko</au><au>Noro, Fumiyuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Praise as a Reinforcer: Pairing with a Preferred Stimulus to Produce Similar Sensory Responses of a Given Modality</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Special Education Research</jtitle><addtitle>JSER</addtitle><date>2022-08-31</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>23-29</pages><artnum>21-P010</artnum><issn>2187-5014</issn><eissn>2188-4838</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to explore whether praise alone could serve as a conditioned reinforcer after being paired with a preferred stimulus assumed to produce analogous sensory consequences of a given modality. Two children (5 years old) with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) received praise as a neutral stimulus with a toy as a reinforcement element. Toys were selected as tools that could deliver the same putative sensory outcomes of stereotypical behaviors. One participant was seated at a desk, and the other could move freely around the test room where other competing reinforcement objects were available. Praise was successfully established as a conditioned reinforcer for the seated participant but not for the other. The percentage of 10-s intervals with competing reinforcer interaction was higher in the baseline and praise periods than during the pairing period. Results suggest that practitioners should consider pairing praise with toys (assumed as having the same sensory results as stereotypy) while the child remains stationary, thus promoting praise as a conditioned reinforcer.</abstract><pub>THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION</pub><doi>10.6033/specialeducation.11.23</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2187-5014
ispartof Journal of Special Education Research, 2022/08/31, Vol.11(1), pp.23-29
issn 2187-5014
2188-4838
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_6033_specialeducation_11_23
source J-STAGE Free
subjects autism spectrum disorder
conditioned reinforcement
praise
preferred stimulus pairing
similar sensory consequences
title Praise as a Reinforcer: Pairing with a Preferred Stimulus to Produce Similar Sensory Responses of a Given Modality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T10%3A27%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Praise%20as%20a%20Reinforcer:%20Pairing%20with%20a%20Preferred%20Stimulus%20to%20Produce%20Similar%20Sensory%20Responses%20of%20a%20Given%20Modality&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Special%20Education%20Research&rft.au=Aoki,%20Yasuhiko&rft.date=2022-08-31&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=23-29&rft.artnum=21-P010&rft.issn=2187-5014&rft.eissn=2188-4838&rft_id=info:doi/10.6033/specialeducation.11.23&rft_dat=%3Cjstage_cross%3Earticle_specialeducation_11_1_11_21_P010_article_char_en%3C/jstage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true