Praise as a Reinforcer: Pairing with a Preferred Stimulus to Produce Similar Sensory Responses of a Given Modality
This study aimed to explore whether praise alone could serve as a conditioned reinforcer after being paired with a preferred stimulus assumed to produce analogous sensory consequences of a given modality. Two children (5 years old) with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) received praise as a neutral sti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Special Education Research 2022/08/31, Vol.11(1), pp.23-29 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 29 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 23 |
container_title | Journal of Special Education Research |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Aoki, Yasuhiko Noro, Fumiyuki |
description | This study aimed to explore whether praise alone could serve as a conditioned reinforcer after being paired with a preferred stimulus assumed to produce analogous sensory consequences of a given modality. Two children (5 years old) with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) received praise as a neutral stimulus with a toy as a reinforcement element. Toys were selected as tools that could deliver the same putative sensory outcomes of stereotypical behaviors. One participant was seated at a desk, and the other could move freely around the test room where other competing reinforcement objects were available. Praise was successfully established as a conditioned reinforcer for the seated participant but not for the other. The percentage of 10-s intervals with competing reinforcer interaction was higher in the baseline and praise periods than during the pairing period. Results suggest that practitioners should consider pairing praise with toys (assumed as having the same sensory results as stereotypy) while the child remains stationary, thus promoting praise as a conditioned reinforcer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.6033/specialeducation.11.23 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_6033_specialeducation_11_23</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>article_specialeducation_11_1_11_21_P010_article_char_en</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2563-f63a7e7f0cb6ec9b95832104dbd59802cd46eff01984ebe20654e69752dae7f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkN1KAzEQhYMoWGpfQfICW_Ozm2a9k6JVqLpYvQ7Z7KRN2W5KslX69sZWvRCvZpiZ75zhIHRJyVgQzq_iFozTLTQ7o3vnuzGlY8ZP0IBRKbNccnl66CdZQWh-jkYxrgkhlOecFmSAQhW0i4B1xBq_gOusDwbCNa60C65b4g_Xr9KqCmAhBGjwonebXbuLuPdp6pMx4IXbuFYHvIAu-rBPQnHruwgRe5vgmXuHDj_6Rreu31-gM6vbCKPvOkRvd7ev0_ts_jx7mN7MM8MKwTMruJ7AxBJTCzBlXRaSM0rypm6KUhJmmlyAtYSWMocaGBFFDqKcFKzRCZN8iMRR1wQfY_pfbYPb6LBXlKiv8NTf8BSlivEEPh3Bdez1En4xHXpnWvgXoweWqook8Z9Ds9JBQcc_AThchlE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Praise as a Reinforcer: Pairing with a Preferred Stimulus to Produce Similar Sensory Responses of a Given Modality</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><creator>Aoki, Yasuhiko ; Noro, Fumiyuki</creator><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Yasuhiko ; Noro, Fumiyuki</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to explore whether praise alone could serve as a conditioned reinforcer after being paired with a preferred stimulus assumed to produce analogous sensory consequences of a given modality. Two children (5 years old) with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) received praise as a neutral stimulus with a toy as a reinforcement element. Toys were selected as tools that could deliver the same putative sensory outcomes of stereotypical behaviors. One participant was seated at a desk, and the other could move freely around the test room where other competing reinforcement objects were available. Praise was successfully established as a conditioned reinforcer for the seated participant but not for the other. The percentage of 10-s intervals with competing reinforcer interaction was higher in the baseline and praise periods than during the pairing period. Results suggest that practitioners should consider pairing praise with toys (assumed as having the same sensory results as stereotypy) while the child remains stationary, thus promoting praise as a conditioned reinforcer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2187-5014</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2188-4838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.6033/specialeducation.11.23</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION</publisher><subject>autism spectrum disorder ; conditioned reinforcement ; praise ; preferred stimulus pairing ; similar sensory consequences</subject><ispartof>Journal of Special Education Research, 2022/08/31, Vol.11(1), pp.23-29</ispartof><rights>2022 The Japanese Association of Special Education</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2563-f63a7e7f0cb6ec9b95832104dbd59802cd46eff01984ebe20654e69752dae7f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1877,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Yasuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noro, Fumiyuki</creatorcontrib><title>Praise as a Reinforcer: Pairing with a Preferred Stimulus to Produce Similar Sensory Responses of a Given Modality</title><title>Journal of Special Education Research</title><addtitle>JSER</addtitle><description>This study aimed to explore whether praise alone could serve as a conditioned reinforcer after being paired with a preferred stimulus assumed to produce analogous sensory consequences of a given modality. Two children (5 years old) with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) received praise as a neutral stimulus with a toy as a reinforcement element. Toys were selected as tools that could deliver the same putative sensory outcomes of stereotypical behaviors. One participant was seated at a desk, and the other could move freely around the test room where other competing reinforcement objects were available. Praise was successfully established as a conditioned reinforcer for the seated participant but not for the other. The percentage of 10-s intervals with competing reinforcer interaction was higher in the baseline and praise periods than during the pairing period. Results suggest that practitioners should consider pairing praise with toys (assumed as having the same sensory results as stereotypy) while the child remains stationary, thus promoting praise as a conditioned reinforcer.</description><subject>autism spectrum disorder</subject><subject>conditioned reinforcement</subject><subject>praise</subject><subject>preferred stimulus pairing</subject><subject>similar sensory consequences</subject><issn>2187-5014</issn><issn>2188-4838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkN1KAzEQhYMoWGpfQfICW_Ozm2a9k6JVqLpYvQ7Z7KRN2W5KslX69sZWvRCvZpiZ75zhIHRJyVgQzq_iFozTLTQ7o3vnuzGlY8ZP0IBRKbNccnl66CdZQWh-jkYxrgkhlOecFmSAQhW0i4B1xBq_gOusDwbCNa60C65b4g_Xr9KqCmAhBGjwonebXbuLuPdp6pMx4IXbuFYHvIAu-rBPQnHruwgRe5vgmXuHDj_6Rreu31-gM6vbCKPvOkRvd7ev0_ts_jx7mN7MM8MKwTMruJ7AxBJTCzBlXRaSM0rypm6KUhJmmlyAtYSWMocaGBFFDqKcFKzRCZN8iMRR1wQfY_pfbYPb6LBXlKiv8NTf8BSlivEEPh3Bdez1En4xHXpnWvgXoweWqook8Z9Ds9JBQcc_AThchlE</recordid><startdate>20220831</startdate><enddate>20220831</enddate><creator>Aoki, Yasuhiko</creator><creator>Noro, Fumiyuki</creator><general>THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220831</creationdate><title>Praise as a Reinforcer: Pairing with a Preferred Stimulus to Produce Similar Sensory Responses of a Given Modality</title><author>Aoki, Yasuhiko ; Noro, Fumiyuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2563-f63a7e7f0cb6ec9b95832104dbd59802cd46eff01984ebe20654e69752dae7f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>autism spectrum disorder</topic><topic>conditioned reinforcement</topic><topic>praise</topic><topic>preferred stimulus pairing</topic><topic>similar sensory consequences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Yasuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noro, Fumiyuki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of Special Education Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aoki, Yasuhiko</au><au>Noro, Fumiyuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Praise as a Reinforcer: Pairing with a Preferred Stimulus to Produce Similar Sensory Responses of a Given Modality</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Special Education Research</jtitle><addtitle>JSER</addtitle><date>2022-08-31</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>23-29</pages><artnum>21-P010</artnum><issn>2187-5014</issn><eissn>2188-4838</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to explore whether praise alone could serve as a conditioned reinforcer after being paired with a preferred stimulus assumed to produce analogous sensory consequences of a given modality. Two children (5 years old) with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) received praise as a neutral stimulus with a toy as a reinforcement element. Toys were selected as tools that could deliver the same putative sensory outcomes of stereotypical behaviors. One participant was seated at a desk, and the other could move freely around the test room where other competing reinforcement objects were available. Praise was successfully established as a conditioned reinforcer for the seated participant but not for the other. The percentage of 10-s intervals with competing reinforcer interaction was higher in the baseline and praise periods than during the pairing period. Results suggest that practitioners should consider pairing praise with toys (assumed as having the same sensory results as stereotypy) while the child remains stationary, thus promoting praise as a conditioned reinforcer.</abstract><pub>THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION</pub><doi>10.6033/specialeducation.11.23</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2187-5014 |
ispartof | Journal of Special Education Research, 2022/08/31, Vol.11(1), pp.23-29 |
issn | 2187-5014 2188-4838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_6033_specialeducation_11_23 |
source | J-STAGE Free |
subjects | autism spectrum disorder conditioned reinforcement praise preferred stimulus pairing similar sensory consequences |
title | Praise as a Reinforcer: Pairing with a Preferred Stimulus to Produce Similar Sensory Responses of a Given Modality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T10%3A27%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Praise%20as%20a%20Reinforcer:%20Pairing%20with%20a%20Preferred%20Stimulus%20to%20Produce%20Similar%20Sensory%20Responses%20of%20a%20Given%20Modality&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Special%20Education%20Research&rft.au=Aoki,%20Yasuhiko&rft.date=2022-08-31&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=23-29&rft.artnum=21-P010&rft.issn=2187-5014&rft.eissn=2188-4838&rft_id=info:doi/10.6033/specialeducation.11.23&rft_dat=%3Cjstage_cross%3Earticle_specialeducation_11_1_11_21_P010_article_char_en%3C/jstage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |