Wrestling with Giants

It is unquestionable that the companies that hold the public eye today are mostly from the technology sector. Growing rapidly from the 1990s and onwards, the current leaders in the field now see themselves at the center of concerns over monopoly and trust forming issues that have led to renewed inte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Elements (Chestnut Hill, Mass.) Mass.), 2022-03, Vol.17 (1), p.57-65
Hauptverfasser: Elements, Riordan, Luc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 65
container_issue 1
container_start_page 57
container_title Elements (Chestnut Hill, Mass.)
container_volume 17
creator Elements
Riordan, Luc
description It is unquestionable that the companies that hold the public eye today are mostly from the technology sector. Growing rapidly from the 1990s and onwards, the current leaders in the field now see themselves at the center of concerns over monopoly and trust forming issues that have led to renewed interest form the US Attorney General's Office. Trust busting has been a staple of American Competition Law, particularly in the past few decades and focus is not being turned on the social media giants that have become key players in everyday life. This paper looks to analyze the reasons for such action and the concerns surrounding litigation of this type with particular reference to current complaints against Google, Facebook and Microsoft. While showing the benefits of action to protect legitimate competition, the paper seeks to caution against the notion of overlitigation and the perverse incentives it may provide. Finally, it offers some alternatives to the standard trust-busting solution of company breakups to account for the advent of the digital afe in which these tech giants exist.
doi_str_mv 10.6017/eurj.v17i1.14951
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_6017_eurj_v17i1_14951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6017_eurj_v17i1_14951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_6017_eurj_v17i1_149513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYJAwNNAzMzA0108tLcrSKzM0zzTUMzSxNDVkYuA0MrYw0DUzsDBnAbHNLXQNDC1MORh4i4uzDAwMDM0MjY3NTTkZRMOLUotLcjLz0hXKM0syFNwzE_NKinkYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4OBm2uIs4duclF-cXFRalp8QVFmbmJRZbyhQTzIBfEgF8SDXRAPdoExGVoAmqk51g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wrestling with Giants</title><source>Open Access Journals at Boston College</source><creator>Elements ; Riordan, Luc</creator><creatorcontrib>Elements ; Riordan, Luc</creatorcontrib><description>It is unquestionable that the companies that hold the public eye today are mostly from the technology sector. Growing rapidly from the 1990s and onwards, the current leaders in the field now see themselves at the center of concerns over monopoly and trust forming issues that have led to renewed interest form the US Attorney General's Office. Trust busting has been a staple of American Competition Law, particularly in the past few decades and focus is not being turned on the social media giants that have become key players in everyday life. This paper looks to analyze the reasons for such action and the concerns surrounding litigation of this type with particular reference to current complaints against Google, Facebook and Microsoft. While showing the benefits of action to protect legitimate competition, the paper seeks to caution against the notion of overlitigation and the perverse incentives it may provide. Finally, it offers some alternatives to the standard trust-busting solution of company breakups to account for the advent of the digital afe in which these tech giants exist.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2378-0185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2380-6087</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.6017/eurj.v17i1.14951</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Elements (Chestnut Hill, Mass.), 2022-03, Vol.17 (1), p.57-65</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elements</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riordan, Luc</creatorcontrib><title>Wrestling with Giants</title><title>Elements (Chestnut Hill, Mass.)</title><description>It is unquestionable that the companies that hold the public eye today are mostly from the technology sector. Growing rapidly from the 1990s and onwards, the current leaders in the field now see themselves at the center of concerns over monopoly and trust forming issues that have led to renewed interest form the US Attorney General's Office. Trust busting has been a staple of American Competition Law, particularly in the past few decades and focus is not being turned on the social media giants that have become key players in everyday life. This paper looks to analyze the reasons for such action and the concerns surrounding litigation of this type with particular reference to current complaints against Google, Facebook and Microsoft. While showing the benefits of action to protect legitimate competition, the paper seeks to caution against the notion of overlitigation and the perverse incentives it may provide. Finally, it offers some alternatives to the standard trust-busting solution of company breakups to account for the advent of the digital afe in which these tech giants exist.</description><issn>2378-0185</issn><issn>2380-6087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYJAwNNAzMzA0108tLcrSKzM0zzTUMzSxNDVkYuA0MrYw0DUzsDBnAbHNLXQNDC1MORh4i4uzDAwMDM0MjY3NTTkZRMOLUotLcjLz0hXKM0syFNwzE_NKinkYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4OBm2uIs4duclF-cXFRalp8QVFmbmJRZbyhQTzIBfEgF8SDXRAPdoExGVoAmqk51g</recordid><startdate>20220331</startdate><enddate>20220331</enddate><creator>Elements</creator><creator>Riordan, Luc</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220331</creationdate><title>Wrestling with Giants</title><author>Elements ; Riordan, Luc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_6017_eurj_v17i1_149513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elements</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riordan, Luc</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Elements (Chestnut Hill, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elements</au><au>Riordan, Luc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wrestling with Giants</atitle><jtitle>Elements (Chestnut Hill, Mass.)</jtitle><date>2022-03-31</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>57-65</pages><issn>2378-0185</issn><eissn>2380-6087</eissn><abstract>It is unquestionable that the companies that hold the public eye today are mostly from the technology sector. Growing rapidly from the 1990s and onwards, the current leaders in the field now see themselves at the center of concerns over monopoly and trust forming issues that have led to renewed interest form the US Attorney General's Office. Trust busting has been a staple of American Competition Law, particularly in the past few decades and focus is not being turned on the social media giants that have become key players in everyday life. This paper looks to analyze the reasons for such action and the concerns surrounding litigation of this type with particular reference to current complaints against Google, Facebook and Microsoft. While showing the benefits of action to protect legitimate competition, the paper seeks to caution against the notion of overlitigation and the perverse incentives it may provide. Finally, it offers some alternatives to the standard trust-busting solution of company breakups to account for the advent of the digital afe in which these tech giants exist.</abstract><doi>10.6017/eurj.v17i1.14951</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2378-0185
ispartof Elements (Chestnut Hill, Mass.), 2022-03, Vol.17 (1), p.57-65
issn 2378-0185
2380-6087
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_6017_eurj_v17i1_14951
source Open Access Journals at Boston College
title Wrestling with Giants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T07%3A03%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wrestling%20with%20Giants&rft.jtitle=Elements%20(Chestnut%20Hill,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Elements&rft.date=2022-03-31&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=57-65&rft.issn=2378-0185&rft.eissn=2380-6087&rft_id=info:doi/10.6017/eurj.v17i1.14951&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_6017_eurj_v17i1_14951%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true