Foreign election interference as a hybrid threat to national security: Presidential elections in the USA in 2016 and 2020

The second decade of the twenty-first century was marked by an expansion of interest in hybrid threats to national security. Foreign election interference became actual during the 2016 US presidential elections. As one of the modalities of subversive activities, foreign election interference faced a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Politička revija 2023, Vol.76 (2), p.71-89
1. Verfasser: Tadić, Dejan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 89
container_issue 2
container_start_page 71
container_title Politička revija
container_volume 76
creator Tadić, Dejan
description The second decade of the twenty-first century was marked by an expansion of interest in hybrid threats to national security. Foreign election interference became actual during the 2016 US presidential elections. As one of the modalities of subversive activities, foreign election interference faced a practical transformation along with the development of new technologies and the expansion of the social networks' influence. The hybrid character of foreign election interference is shown both in the fact that it can be realized in physical cyberspace by state or non-state actors. This hybrid threat is limited only by the imagination of its creators and the ability of its implementers. 2016 and 2020 United States presidential elections have shown that countries with the most complex security systems are not able to predict where the hybrid threat will realize. The author concludes that foreign election interference will remain actual in contemporary international relations, because of avoiding direct armed confrontation in gaining dominance in the interest zones of great and regional powers.
doi_str_mv 10.5937/pr76-43809
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5937_pr76_43809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5937_pr76_43809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5937_pr76_438093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj8tKA0EQRZugkKDZ-AW1Fkare16JOxGDy4AK2TWdmZqkw9gTqtrF_L09QT_AVR2Key8cpe40PpTrvH48c11lRb7C9UwtdFGaTNfl7urCOivMSs_VUuSEiKbEVKkWatwMTP4QgHpqoh8C-BCJO2IKDYETcHAc9-xbiEcmFyEOENyUdD0INd_s4_gEWybxLYXo0_tvS9JYqhF8vj9PaFBX4EKbwOCtuu5cL7T8vTfqfvP68fKWNTyIMHX2zP7L8Wg12snPTn724pf_K_wD_UtWhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Foreign election interference as a hybrid threat to national security: Presidential elections in the USA in 2016 and 2020</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Tadić, Dejan</creator><creatorcontrib>Tadić, Dejan</creatorcontrib><description>The second decade of the twenty-first century was marked by an expansion of interest in hybrid threats to national security. Foreign election interference became actual during the 2016 US presidential elections. As one of the modalities of subversive activities, foreign election interference faced a practical transformation along with the development of new technologies and the expansion of the social networks' influence. The hybrid character of foreign election interference is shown both in the fact that it can be realized in physical cyberspace by state or non-state actors. This hybrid threat is limited only by the imagination of its creators and the ability of its implementers. 2016 and 2020 United States presidential elections have shown that countries with the most complex security systems are not able to predict where the hybrid threat will realize. The author concludes that foreign election interference will remain actual in contemporary international relations, because of avoiding direct armed confrontation in gaining dominance in the interest zones of great and regional powers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1451-4281</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1452-175X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5937/pr76-43809</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Politička revija, 2023, Vol.76 (2), p.71-89</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5937_pr76_438093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tadić, Dejan</creatorcontrib><title>Foreign election interference as a hybrid threat to national security: Presidential elections in the USA in 2016 and 2020</title><title>Politička revija</title><description>The second decade of the twenty-first century was marked by an expansion of interest in hybrid threats to national security. Foreign election interference became actual during the 2016 US presidential elections. As one of the modalities of subversive activities, foreign election interference faced a practical transformation along with the development of new technologies and the expansion of the social networks' influence. The hybrid character of foreign election interference is shown both in the fact that it can be realized in physical cyberspace by state or non-state actors. This hybrid threat is limited only by the imagination of its creators and the ability of its implementers. 2016 and 2020 United States presidential elections have shown that countries with the most complex security systems are not able to predict where the hybrid threat will realize. The author concludes that foreign election interference will remain actual in contemporary international relations, because of avoiding direct armed confrontation in gaining dominance in the interest zones of great and regional powers.</description><issn>1451-4281</issn><issn>1452-175X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVj8tKA0EQRZugkKDZ-AW1Fkare16JOxGDy4AK2TWdmZqkw9gTqtrF_L09QT_AVR2Key8cpe40PpTrvH48c11lRb7C9UwtdFGaTNfl7urCOivMSs_VUuSEiKbEVKkWatwMTP4QgHpqoh8C-BCJO2IKDYETcHAc9-xbiEcmFyEOENyUdD0INd_s4_gEWybxLYXo0_tvS9JYqhF8vj9PaFBX4EKbwOCtuu5cL7T8vTfqfvP68fKWNTyIMHX2zP7L8Wg12snPTn724pf_K_wD_UtWhQ</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Tadić, Dejan</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Foreign election interference as a hybrid threat to national security: Presidential elections in the USA in 2016 and 2020</title><author>Tadić, Dejan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5937_pr76_438093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tadić, Dejan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Politička revija</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tadić, Dejan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Foreign election interference as a hybrid threat to national security: Presidential elections in the USA in 2016 and 2020</atitle><jtitle>Politička revija</jtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>71-89</pages><issn>1451-4281</issn><eissn>1452-175X</eissn><abstract>The second decade of the twenty-first century was marked by an expansion of interest in hybrid threats to national security. Foreign election interference became actual during the 2016 US presidential elections. As one of the modalities of subversive activities, foreign election interference faced a practical transformation along with the development of new technologies and the expansion of the social networks' influence. The hybrid character of foreign election interference is shown both in the fact that it can be realized in physical cyberspace by state or non-state actors. This hybrid threat is limited only by the imagination of its creators and the ability of its implementers. 2016 and 2020 United States presidential elections have shown that countries with the most complex security systems are not able to predict where the hybrid threat will realize. The author concludes that foreign election interference will remain actual in contemporary international relations, because of avoiding direct armed confrontation in gaining dominance in the interest zones of great and regional powers.</abstract><doi>10.5937/pr76-43809</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1451-4281
ispartof Politička revija, 2023, Vol.76 (2), p.71-89
issn 1451-4281
1452-175X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5937_pr76_43809
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Foreign election interference as a hybrid threat to national security: Presidential elections in the USA in 2016 and 2020
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T17%3A13%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Foreign%20election%20interference%20as%20a%20hybrid%20threat%20to%20national%20security:%20Presidential%20elections%20in%20the%20USA%20in%202016%20and%202020&rft.jtitle=Politi%C4%8Dka%20revija&rft.au=Tadi%C4%87,%20Dejan&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=71-89&rft.issn=1451-4281&rft.eissn=1452-175X&rft_id=info:doi/10.5937/pr76-43809&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_5937_pr76_43809%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true