Panopticon Advising: Surveillance Capitalism in Service of the Completion Agenda

As academic advising has been subsumed under the banner of institutional retention and the completion agenda, advising technologies have created new opportunities for tracking and sorting students. This has resulted in what we call panopticon advising, a philosophy and approach to advising character...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The mentor (University Park, Pa.) Pa.), 2024-10, Vol.26, p.5-27
Hauptverfasser: Venable, CJ, Howard, Sarah, Rudy, Jake, Scheckel, Ryan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue
container_start_page 5
container_title The mentor (University Park, Pa.)
container_volume 26
creator Venable, CJ
Howard, Sarah
Rudy, Jake
Scheckel, Ryan
description As academic advising has been subsumed under the banner of institutional retention and the completion agenda, advising technologies have created new opportunities for tracking and sorting students. This has resulted in what we call panopticon advising, a philosophy and approach to advising characterized by intensive surveillance, intrusive outreach, and pursuit of retention above all other goals. We define and critique panopticon advising through the lens of Michel Foucault’s disciplinary society and Byung-Chul Han’s notion of psychopolitics, considering how surveillance technologies and friendly power lead to increasingly extractive and prescriptive relationships between students and advisers. We conclude without easy solutions, but rather questions that advisers must grapple with to determine if a future of panopticon advising is one they can live with.
doi_str_mv 10.59236/mj2663320
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_59236_mj2663320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_59236_mj2663320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_59236_mj26633203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjrsKwjAYhYMoWC-LT5BZUJPURnSTojgW6h5Cm9a_pElJasG3t4qIq9M5nAt8CC0oWUd7FvJNXTHOw5CRAQpoxOiKMUqHP36MJt5XhHCy49sAJYk0tmkhswYf8w48mPKA07vrFGgtTaZwLBtopQZfYzA4Va6DPrUFbm99aetGqxZe91KZXM7QqJDaq_lHp2h5Pl3jyypz1nunCtE4qKV7CErEm1l8mcO_xk-nCEfS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Panopticon Advising: Surveillance Capitalism in Service of the Completion Agenda</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Venable, CJ ; Howard, Sarah ; Rudy, Jake ; Scheckel, Ryan</creator><creatorcontrib>Venable, CJ ; Howard, Sarah ; Rudy, Jake ; Scheckel, Ryan</creatorcontrib><description>As academic advising has been subsumed under the banner of institutional retention and the completion agenda, advising technologies have created new opportunities for tracking and sorting students. This has resulted in what we call panopticon advising, a philosophy and approach to advising characterized by intensive surveillance, intrusive outreach, and pursuit of retention above all other goals. We define and critique panopticon advising through the lens of Michel Foucault’s disciplinary society and Byung-Chul Han’s notion of psychopolitics, considering how surveillance technologies and friendly power lead to increasingly extractive and prescriptive relationships between students and advisers. We conclude without easy solutions, but rather questions that advisers must grapple with to determine if a future of panopticon advising is one they can live with.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1521-2211</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-2211</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.59236/mj2663320</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The mentor (University Park, Pa.), 2024-10, Vol.26, p.5-27</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-3359-789X ; 0000-0002-1412-4923 ; 0000-0003-4598-5723</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Venable, CJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudy, Jake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheckel, Ryan</creatorcontrib><title>Panopticon Advising: Surveillance Capitalism in Service of the Completion Agenda</title><title>The mentor (University Park, Pa.)</title><description>As academic advising has been subsumed under the banner of institutional retention and the completion agenda, advising technologies have created new opportunities for tracking and sorting students. This has resulted in what we call panopticon advising, a philosophy and approach to advising characterized by intensive surveillance, intrusive outreach, and pursuit of retention above all other goals. We define and critique panopticon advising through the lens of Michel Foucault’s disciplinary society and Byung-Chul Han’s notion of psychopolitics, considering how surveillance technologies and friendly power lead to increasingly extractive and prescriptive relationships between students and advisers. We conclude without easy solutions, but rather questions that advisers must grapple with to determine if a future of panopticon advising is one they can live with.</description><issn>1521-2211</issn><issn>1521-2211</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjrsKwjAYhYMoWC-LT5BZUJPURnSTojgW6h5Cm9a_pElJasG3t4qIq9M5nAt8CC0oWUd7FvJNXTHOw5CRAQpoxOiKMUqHP36MJt5XhHCy49sAJYk0tmkhswYf8w48mPKA07vrFGgtTaZwLBtopQZfYzA4Va6DPrUFbm99aetGqxZe91KZXM7QqJDaq_lHp2h5Pl3jyypz1nunCtE4qKV7CErEm1l8mcO_xk-nCEfS</recordid><startdate>20241017</startdate><enddate>20241017</enddate><creator>Venable, CJ</creator><creator>Howard, Sarah</creator><creator>Rudy, Jake</creator><creator>Scheckel, Ryan</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3359-789X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1412-4923</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4598-5723</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241017</creationdate><title>Panopticon Advising: Surveillance Capitalism in Service of the Completion Agenda</title><author>Venable, CJ ; Howard, Sarah ; Rudy, Jake ; Scheckel, Ryan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_59236_mj26633203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Venable, CJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudy, Jake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheckel, Ryan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The mentor (University Park, Pa.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Venable, CJ</au><au>Howard, Sarah</au><au>Rudy, Jake</au><au>Scheckel, Ryan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Panopticon Advising: Surveillance Capitalism in Service of the Completion Agenda</atitle><jtitle>The mentor (University Park, Pa.)</jtitle><date>2024-10-17</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><spage>5</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>5-27</pages><issn>1521-2211</issn><eissn>1521-2211</eissn><abstract>As academic advising has been subsumed under the banner of institutional retention and the completion agenda, advising technologies have created new opportunities for tracking and sorting students. This has resulted in what we call panopticon advising, a philosophy and approach to advising characterized by intensive surveillance, intrusive outreach, and pursuit of retention above all other goals. We define and critique panopticon advising through the lens of Michel Foucault’s disciplinary society and Byung-Chul Han’s notion of psychopolitics, considering how surveillance technologies and friendly power lead to increasingly extractive and prescriptive relationships between students and advisers. We conclude without easy solutions, but rather questions that advisers must grapple with to determine if a future of panopticon advising is one they can live with.</abstract><doi>10.59236/mj2663320</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3359-789X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1412-4923</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4598-5723</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1521-2211
ispartof The mentor (University Park, Pa.), 2024-10, Vol.26, p.5-27
issn 1521-2211
1521-2211
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_59236_mj2663320
source EBSCOhost Education Source
title Panopticon Advising: Surveillance Capitalism in Service of the Completion Agenda
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T16%3A41%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Panopticon%20Advising:%20Surveillance%20Capitalism%20in%20Service%20of%20the%20Completion%20Agenda&rft.jtitle=The%20mentor%20(University%20Park,%20Pa.)&rft.au=Venable,%20CJ&rft.date=2024-10-17&rft.volume=26&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=5-27&rft.issn=1521-2211&rft.eissn=1521-2211&rft_id=info:doi/10.59236/mj2663320&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_59236_mj2663320%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true