Broadening the Ecclesiocentric Claim: Possible Futures for Christian Nonviolence

Much discussion surrounding Christian nonviolence in the late twentieth century has centered around the ecclesiocentric version popularized by Stanley Hauerwas. In this essay, I assess the manner in which virtue is connected to internal church practices for Hauerwas, such that displaying nonviolence...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 2019, Vol.39 (2), p.303-318
1. Verfasser: Werntz, Myles
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 318
container_issue 2
container_start_page 303
container_title Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics
container_volume 39
creator Werntz, Myles
description Much discussion surrounding Christian nonviolence in the late twentieth century has centered around the ecclesiocentric version popularized by Stanley Hauerwas. In this essay, I assess the manner in which virtue is connected to internal church practices for Hauerwas, such that displaying nonviolence external to the church risks losing the formative nature of church life. Using examples from contemporary proponents, I argue that when internal church practices, such as prayer, economic sharing, and interpersonal reconciliation are performed publically, they form their practitioners in the virtues which Hauerwas values, but in a way which transposes nonviolence into a public key.
doi_str_mv 10.5840/jsce2019102314
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5840_jsce2019102314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48617078</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48617078</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-d5723ae5518843e356cd8e0bcff50c1b6d9fb26646dde97482c8cf6cee3e98963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkLtOw0AQRVcIJEygpUNyQeuws-8twQoPKRIFUK-c8RhsJXa06xT8PY6MkKhude7MuYxdA19qp_hdl5AEBw9cSFAnLBNSmEKANacsA614Yb0S5-wipY5z4Z2VGbt9iENVU9_2n_n4RfkKcUupHZD6MbaYl9uq3V2ys6baJrr6zQX7eFy9l8_F-vXppbxfFygMjEWtrZAVaQ3OKUlSG6wd8Q02jeYIG1P7ZiOMUaauyVvlBDpsDBJJ8s4buWDLuRfjkFKkJuxju6vidwAejo7hv-MEqBnYx6EjHHeHRKEbDrGf3gxWgZYqvB13OM4AXkzexk_YzYx1aRzi3xHlDFhunfwBsupeAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Broadening the Ecclesiocentric Claim: Possible Futures for Christian Nonviolence</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Werntz, Myles</creator><creatorcontrib>Werntz, Myles ; Philosophy Documentation Center</creatorcontrib><description>Much discussion surrounding Christian nonviolence in the late twentieth century has centered around the ecclesiocentric version popularized by Stanley Hauerwas. In this essay, I assess the manner in which virtue is connected to internal church practices for Hauerwas, such that displaying nonviolence external to the church risks losing the formative nature of church life. Using examples from contemporary proponents, I argue that when internal church practices, such as prayer, economic sharing, and interpersonal reconciliation are performed publically, they form their practitioners in the virtues which Hauerwas values, but in a way which transposes nonviolence into a public key.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1540-7942</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2326-2176</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5840/jsce2019102314</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philosophy Documentation Center</publisher><ispartof>Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics, 2019, Vol.39 (2), p.303-318</ispartof><rights>Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 39, no. 2 (2019)</rights><rights>Copyright © Society of Christian Ethics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48617078$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48617078$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Werntz, Myles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philosophy Documentation Center</creatorcontrib><title>Broadening the Ecclesiocentric Claim: Possible Futures for Christian Nonviolence</title><title>Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics</title><description>Much discussion surrounding Christian nonviolence in the late twentieth century has centered around the ecclesiocentric version popularized by Stanley Hauerwas. In this essay, I assess the manner in which virtue is connected to internal church practices for Hauerwas, such that displaying nonviolence external to the church risks losing the formative nature of church life. Using examples from contemporary proponents, I argue that when internal church practices, such as prayer, economic sharing, and interpersonal reconciliation are performed publically, they form their practitioners in the virtues which Hauerwas values, but in a way which transposes nonviolence into a public key.</description><issn>1540-7942</issn><issn>2326-2176</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkLtOw0AQRVcIJEygpUNyQeuws-8twQoPKRIFUK-c8RhsJXa06xT8PY6MkKhude7MuYxdA19qp_hdl5AEBw9cSFAnLBNSmEKANacsA614Yb0S5-wipY5z4Z2VGbt9iENVU9_2n_n4RfkKcUupHZD6MbaYl9uq3V2ys6baJrr6zQX7eFy9l8_F-vXppbxfFygMjEWtrZAVaQ3OKUlSG6wd8Q02jeYIG1P7ZiOMUaauyVvlBDpsDBJJ8s4buWDLuRfjkFKkJuxju6vidwAejo7hv-MEqBnYx6EjHHeHRKEbDrGf3gxWgZYqvB13OM4AXkzexk_YzYx1aRzi3xHlDFhunfwBsupeAg</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Werntz, Myles</creator><general>Philosophy Documentation Center</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Broadening the Ecclesiocentric Claim</title><author>Werntz, Myles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-d5723ae5518843e356cd8e0bcff50c1b6d9fb26646dde97482c8cf6cee3e98963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Werntz, Myles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philosophy Documentation Center</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Werntz, Myles</au><aucorp>Philosophy Documentation Center</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Broadening the Ecclesiocentric Claim: Possible Futures for Christian Nonviolence</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics</jtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>303</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>303-318</pages><issn>1540-7942</issn><eissn>2326-2176</eissn><abstract>Much discussion surrounding Christian nonviolence in the late twentieth century has centered around the ecclesiocentric version popularized by Stanley Hauerwas. In this essay, I assess the manner in which virtue is connected to internal church practices for Hauerwas, such that displaying nonviolence external to the church risks losing the formative nature of church life. Using examples from contemporary proponents, I argue that when internal church practices, such as prayer, economic sharing, and interpersonal reconciliation are performed publically, they form their practitioners in the virtues which Hauerwas values, but in a way which transposes nonviolence into a public key.</abstract><pub>Philosophy Documentation Center</pub><doi>10.5840/jsce2019102314</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1540-7942
ispartof Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics, 2019, Vol.39 (2), p.303-318
issn 1540-7942
2326-2176
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5840_jsce2019102314
source Jstor Complete Legacy
title Broadening the Ecclesiocentric Claim: Possible Futures for Christian Nonviolence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T01%3A28%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Broadening%20the%20Ecclesiocentric%20Claim:%20Possible%20Futures%20for%20Christian%20Nonviolence&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Society%20of%20Christian%20Ethics&rft.au=Werntz,%20Myles&rft.aucorp=Philosophy%20Documentation%20Center&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=303-318&rft.issn=1540-7942&rft.eissn=2326-2176&rft_id=info:doi/10.5840/jsce2019102314&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E48617078%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48617078&rfr_iscdi=true