The Artificial Philosophical Counselor: On the Possibility of Automating Philosophical Counseling

Till date most people still believe that compute grows exponentially in accordance with Moore’s law, meaning that computational capacity doubles approximately every 18 months. This, however, does not hold for Machine Learning. Since 2012, the computational capacity of Machine Learning has doubled ev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of philosophical practice 2022, Vol.8 (1), p.124-136
1. Verfasser: Nutas, Andrei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 136
container_issue 1
container_start_page 124
container_title International journal of philosophical practice
container_volume 8
creator Nutas, Andrei
description Till date most people still believe that compute grows exponentially in accordance with Moore’s law, meaning that computational capacity doubles approximately every 18 months. This, however, does not hold for Machine Learning. Since 2012, the computational capacity of Machine Learning has doubled every 3.4 months.1 Given this incredible growth rate we need to start considering whether Artificial Intelligence through the practice of Machine Learning will be able to automate the philosophical counseling profession. I will begin by giving an overview of AI and of GPT3 the AI model used in the experiments run for this paper. Next, I will define a job description for the philosophical counselor. Using GPT3 I will reveal that a surprising number of activities that are performed by philosophical counselors already fall under the purview of AI. I will also dedicate a segment to reflecting on the limits of the AIs capabilities and how with a bit of fine tuning some of these limitations can be overcome. Finally, I will present those limitations which I doubt that the current version of GPT3 can overcome.
doi_str_mv 10.5840/ijpp2022819
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5840_ijpp2022819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5840_ijpp2022819</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5840_ijpp20228193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYBA2NNAztTAx0M_MKigwMjAysjC0ZGLgNDQ1NtQ1tzQwYEFiczBwFRdnGRiYmllYmHEyqIVkpCo4FpVkpmUmZybmKARkZObkF-cXZGQmA3nO-aV5xak5-UU8DKxpiTnFqbxQmptB2801xNlDN7kov7i4KDUtvqAoMzexqDLe0CAe5JR4JKcYk6YaAPLqOok</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Artificial Philosophical Counselor: On the Possibility of Automating Philosophical Counseling</title><source>Philosophy Documentation Center Collection</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Nutas, Andrei</creator><creatorcontrib>Nutas, Andrei ; National Philosophical Counseling Association</creatorcontrib><description>Till date most people still believe that compute grows exponentially in accordance with Moore’s law, meaning that computational capacity doubles approximately every 18 months. This, however, does not hold for Machine Learning. Since 2012, the computational capacity of Machine Learning has doubled every 3.4 months.1 Given this incredible growth rate we need to start considering whether Artificial Intelligence through the practice of Machine Learning will be able to automate the philosophical counseling profession. I will begin by giving an overview of AI and of GPT3 the AI model used in the experiments run for this paper. Next, I will define a job description for the philosophical counselor. Using GPT3 I will reveal that a surprising number of activities that are performed by philosophical counselors already fall under the purview of AI. I will also dedicate a segment to reflecting on the limits of the AIs capabilities and how with a bit of fine tuning some of these limitations can be overcome. Finally, I will present those limitations which I doubt that the current version of GPT3 can overcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1531-7900</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-7900</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5840/ijpp2022819</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>International journal of philosophical practice, 2022, Vol.8 (1), p.124-136</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3799,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nutas, Andrei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Philosophical Counseling Association</creatorcontrib><title>The Artificial Philosophical Counselor: On the Possibility of Automating Philosophical Counseling</title><title>International journal of philosophical practice</title><description>Till date most people still believe that compute grows exponentially in accordance with Moore’s law, meaning that computational capacity doubles approximately every 18 months. This, however, does not hold for Machine Learning. Since 2012, the computational capacity of Machine Learning has doubled every 3.4 months.1 Given this incredible growth rate we need to start considering whether Artificial Intelligence through the practice of Machine Learning will be able to automate the philosophical counseling profession. I will begin by giving an overview of AI and of GPT3 the AI model used in the experiments run for this paper. Next, I will define a job description for the philosophical counselor. Using GPT3 I will reveal that a surprising number of activities that are performed by philosophical counselors already fall under the purview of AI. I will also dedicate a segment to reflecting on the limits of the AIs capabilities and how with a bit of fine tuning some of these limitations can be overcome. Finally, I will present those limitations which I doubt that the current version of GPT3 can overcome.</description><issn>1531-7900</issn><issn>1531-7900</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYBA2NNAztTAx0M_MKigwMjAysjC0ZGLgNDQ1NtQ1tzQwYEFiczBwFRdnGRiYmllYmHEyqIVkpCo4FpVkpmUmZybmKARkZObkF-cXZGQmA3nO-aV5xak5-UU8DKxpiTnFqbxQmptB2801xNlDN7kov7i4KDUtvqAoMzexqDLe0CAe5JR4JKcYk6YaAPLqOok</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Nutas, Andrei</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>The Artificial Philosophical Counselor</title><author>Nutas, Andrei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5840_ijpp20228193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nutas, Andrei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Philosophical Counseling Association</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of philosophical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nutas, Andrei</au><aucorp>National Philosophical Counseling Association</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Artificial Philosophical Counselor: On the Possibility of Automating Philosophical Counseling</atitle><jtitle>International journal of philosophical practice</jtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>124</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>124-136</pages><issn>1531-7900</issn><eissn>1531-7900</eissn><abstract>Till date most people still believe that compute grows exponentially in accordance with Moore’s law, meaning that computational capacity doubles approximately every 18 months. This, however, does not hold for Machine Learning. Since 2012, the computational capacity of Machine Learning has doubled every 3.4 months.1 Given this incredible growth rate we need to start considering whether Artificial Intelligence through the practice of Machine Learning will be able to automate the philosophical counseling profession. I will begin by giving an overview of AI and of GPT3 the AI model used in the experiments run for this paper. Next, I will define a job description for the philosophical counselor. Using GPT3 I will reveal that a surprising number of activities that are performed by philosophical counselors already fall under the purview of AI. I will also dedicate a segment to reflecting on the limits of the AIs capabilities and how with a bit of fine tuning some of these limitations can be overcome. Finally, I will present those limitations which I doubt that the current version of GPT3 can overcome.</abstract><doi>10.5840/ijpp2022819</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1531-7900
ispartof International journal of philosophical practice, 2022, Vol.8 (1), p.124-136
issn 1531-7900
1531-7900
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5840_ijpp2022819
source Philosophy Documentation Center Collection; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title The Artificial Philosophical Counselor: On the Possibility of Automating Philosophical Counseling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A25%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Artificial%20Philosophical%20Counselor:%20On%20the%20Possibility%20of%20Automating%20Philosophical%20Counseling&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20philosophical%20practice&rft.au=Nutas,%20Andrei&rft.aucorp=National%20Philosophical%20Counseling%20Association&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=124&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=124-136&rft.issn=1531-7900&rft.eissn=1531-7900&rft_id=info:doi/10.5840/ijpp2022819&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_5840_ijpp2022819%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true