Notes on the expressive status of photography

With a history spanning almost two centuries, during which technological advancements on the one hand, and the fluidity of social life on the other, have constantly posed new challenges, photography keeps redefining its place among visual artifacts, and its functions among self-regulatory societal m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Balkan journal of philosophy 2019, Vol.11 (2), p.155-168
1. Verfasser: Popescu, Costin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 168
container_issue 2
container_start_page 155
container_title Balkan journal of philosophy
container_volume 11
creator Popescu, Costin
description With a history spanning almost two centuries, during which technological advancements on the one hand, and the fluidity of social life on the other, have constantly posed new challenges, photography keeps redefining its place among visual artifacts, and its functions among self-regulatory societal mechanisms.As a widespread practice, photography has generated analyses and commentaries from many theorists of various fields, as well as from more than a few working photographers. Arguments and judgments on the status of photography with regard to its expressive possibilities, adhere to vastly different and often divergent points of view, and most importantly, raise considerable difficulties that prevent these discussions from relying on any methodological coherence.The present text presents some of these arguments and judgments. It aims to provide grounds for more orderly future debates on the artistic quality of photography and especially on the methods of investigating photographic artifacts.
doi_str_mv 10.5840/bjp201911216
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5840_bjp201911216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5840_bjp201911216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-51b6e7591393e79e2b7fcb5feebc86d3ff1250492c9b373a8f45f9d4f886cbbe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNj8tKQzEURTNQsNTO_IB8gNGcvG4ylOILik4UnF2S9MTboiYkUezfW7ED12QPFmxYhJwBv9BW8cuwLYKDAxBgjsgMJEhmrX05IYvWtnyPBGWcnRH2kDs2mj9on5Did6nY2uYLaeu-f-5FomXKPb9WX6bdKTlO_q3h4rBz8nxz_bS8Y6vH2_vl1YpFcKIzDcHgoB1IJ3FwKMKQYtAJMURr1jIlEJorJ6ILcpDeJqWTW6tkrYkhoJyT87_fWHNrFdNY6ubd190IfPwtHP8Xyh_wxkYq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Notes on the expressive status of photography</title><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library</source><creator>Popescu, Costin</creator><creatorcontrib>Popescu, Costin ; Bulgarian Academy of Sciences</creatorcontrib><description>With a history spanning almost two centuries, during which technological advancements on the one hand, and the fluidity of social life on the other, have constantly posed new challenges, photography keeps redefining its place among visual artifacts, and its functions among self-regulatory societal mechanisms.As a widespread practice, photography has generated analyses and commentaries from many theorists of various fields, as well as from more than a few working photographers. Arguments and judgments on the status of photography with regard to its expressive possibilities, adhere to vastly different and often divergent points of view, and most importantly, raise considerable difficulties that prevent these discussions from relying on any methodological coherence.The present text presents some of these arguments and judgments. It aims to provide grounds for more orderly future debates on the artistic quality of photography and especially on the methods of investigating photographic artifacts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1313-888X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5840/bjp201911216</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Balkan journal of philosophy, 2019, Vol.11 (2), p.155-168</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Popescu, Costin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulgarian Academy of Sciences</creatorcontrib><title>Notes on the expressive status of photography</title><title>Balkan journal of philosophy</title><description>With a history spanning almost two centuries, during which technological advancements on the one hand, and the fluidity of social life on the other, have constantly posed new challenges, photography keeps redefining its place among visual artifacts, and its functions among self-regulatory societal mechanisms.As a widespread practice, photography has generated analyses and commentaries from many theorists of various fields, as well as from more than a few working photographers. Arguments and judgments on the status of photography with regard to its expressive possibilities, adhere to vastly different and often divergent points of view, and most importantly, raise considerable difficulties that prevent these discussions from relying on any methodological coherence.The present text presents some of these arguments and judgments. It aims to provide grounds for more orderly future debates on the artistic quality of photography and especially on the methods of investigating photographic artifacts.</description><issn>1313-888X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNj8tKQzEURTNQsNTO_IB8gNGcvG4ylOILik4UnF2S9MTboiYkUezfW7ED12QPFmxYhJwBv9BW8cuwLYKDAxBgjsgMJEhmrX05IYvWtnyPBGWcnRH2kDs2mj9on5Did6nY2uYLaeu-f-5FomXKPb9WX6bdKTlO_q3h4rBz8nxz_bS8Y6vH2_vl1YpFcKIzDcHgoB1IJ3FwKMKQYtAJMURr1jIlEJorJ6ILcpDeJqWTW6tkrYkhoJyT87_fWHNrFdNY6ubd190IfPwtHP8Xyh_wxkYq</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Popescu, Costin</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Notes on the expressive status of photography</title><author>Popescu, Costin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-51b6e7591393e79e2b7fcb5feebc86d3ff1250492c9b373a8f45f9d4f886cbbe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Popescu, Costin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulgarian Academy of Sciences</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Balkan journal of philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Popescu, Costin</au><aucorp>Bulgarian Academy of Sciences</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Notes on the expressive status of photography</atitle><jtitle>Balkan journal of philosophy</jtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>155-168</pages><issn>1313-888X</issn><abstract>With a history spanning almost two centuries, during which technological advancements on the one hand, and the fluidity of social life on the other, have constantly posed new challenges, photography keeps redefining its place among visual artifacts, and its functions among self-regulatory societal mechanisms.As a widespread practice, photography has generated analyses and commentaries from many theorists of various fields, as well as from more than a few working photographers. Arguments and judgments on the status of photography with regard to its expressive possibilities, adhere to vastly different and often divergent points of view, and most importantly, raise considerable difficulties that prevent these discussions from relying on any methodological coherence.The present text presents some of these arguments and judgments. It aims to provide grounds for more orderly future debates on the artistic quality of photography and especially on the methods of investigating photographic artifacts.</abstract><doi>10.5840/bjp201911216</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1313-888X
ispartof Balkan journal of philosophy, 2019, Vol.11 (2), p.155-168
issn 1313-888X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5840_bjp201911216
source Central and Eastern European Online Library
title Notes on the expressive status of photography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T10%3A15%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Notes%20on%20the%20expressive%20status%20of%20photography&rft.jtitle=Balkan%20journal%20of%20philosophy&rft.au=Popescu,%20Costin&rft.aucorp=Bulgarian%20Academy%20of%20Sciences&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=155-168&rft.issn=1313-888X&rft_id=info:doi/10.5840/bjp201911216&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_5840_bjp201911216%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true