Jejunal Interposition as a Reconstruction for Radical Distal Gastrectomy

To compare the postoperative status between Billroth-I anastomosis and jejunal interposition after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer, patients were divided, according to the method of surgery, into three groups as follows: 1) extensive nodal dissection and subtotal gastrectomy with jejunal inter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nippon Shokaki Geka Gakkai zasshi 1993, Vol.26(1), pp.26-31
Hauptverfasser: Funabiki, Takahiko, Ochiai, Masahiro, Amano, Hiroshi, Yamaguchi, Hisashi, Marugami, Yoshihisa, Fukui, Hiroshi, Hasegawa, Shigeru, Imazu, Hiroki, Arai, Kazufumi, Mori, Kikuo, Nakamura, Kohji, Morishita, Hiroshi, Shikata, Atsuschi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:jpn
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 31
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
container_title Nippon Shokaki Geka Gakkai zasshi
container_volume 26
creator Funabiki, Takahiko
Ochiai, Masahiro
Amano, Hiroshi
Yamaguchi, Hisashi
Marugami, Yoshihisa
Fukui, Hiroshi
Hasegawa, Shigeru
Imazu, Hiroki
Arai, Kazufumi
Mori, Kikuo
Nakamura, Kohji
Morishita, Hiroshi
Shikata, Atsuschi
description To compare the postoperative status between Billroth-I anastomosis and jejunal interposition after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer, patients were divided, according to the method of surgery, into three groups as follows: 1) extensive nodal dissection and subtotal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition (Group A), 2) the same dissection and gastrectomy as Group A but reconstructed by Billroth-I (Group B), 3) no or slight nodal dissection and partial gastrectomy with Billroth-I anastomosis (Group C). Endoscopy was conducted postoperatively and yielded the following results. Bile reflux and remnant gastritis were not seen at all in Group A, while they were obvious in Group B (52.6%, 57.9%, respectively) and in Group C (33.3%, 46.7%). Reflux esophagitis was seen only in Group B and its incidence was 21.1%. Gastro-biliary scintigraphy was conducted to determine RI reflux to the stomach, which was seen in 8.3% of Group A patients and in 40.0% of Group B patients. His angle was calculated from postoperative UGI series and was the smallest in Group A (97°) while it was 133° in Group B and 105° in Group C. Intraluminal pressure of LES was also studied and was 13.5 cm H2O in Group A and 11.8cm H2O in Grout B. Postoperative complaints were investigated by interview. Weight loss, reflux esophagitis and dumping were the highest in Group B (15.6%, 26.7%, 20.0%, respectively) in comparison with Group A (6.4%, 6.3%, 6.3%) and Group C (5.7%, 0%, 0%). Operating time in Group A was about one hour longer than in Group B; however, there was no difference in incidence of anastomotic leakage and of postoperative intestinal obstruction.
doi_str_mv 10.5833/jjgs.26.26
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5833_jjgs_26_26</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>article_jjgs1969_26_1_26_1_26_article_char_en</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c152n-f023816f2812795de44b602595bcd45482f0f3d3c725f92dd48518721def20b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9LAzEQxYMouNRe_AR7FrYmk002OUrVtlIQip6XbP7ULO1uSbaHfnuzrRYeM8y8H8PwEHokeMYEpc9tu40z4Ek3KCO0FIWkFdyiDFPBC1lxcY-mMfoGYyaqNJMMLT9se-zULl91gw2HPvrB912uYq7yjdV9F4dw1Oed60O-UcbrRL_6OKS2UMm2euj3pwd059Qu2ulfn6Dv97ev-bJYfy5W85d1oQmDrnAYqCDcgSBQSWZsWTYcA5Os0aZkpQCHHTVUV8CcBGNKwYiogBjrADeMTtDT5a4OfYzBuvoQ_F6FU01wPcZQjzHUwJMSPL_AbXp3a6-oCoPXO3tGieRyxMm1_Lv6R4XadvQXd8xokw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Jejunal Interposition as a Reconstruction for Radical Distal Gastrectomy</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>Open Access Titles of Japan</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Funabiki, Takahiko ; Ochiai, Masahiro ; Amano, Hiroshi ; Yamaguchi, Hisashi ; Marugami, Yoshihisa ; Fukui, Hiroshi ; Hasegawa, Shigeru ; Imazu, Hiroki ; Arai, Kazufumi ; Mori, Kikuo ; Nakamura, Kohji ; Morishita, Hiroshi ; Shikata, Atsuschi</creator><creatorcontrib>Funabiki, Takahiko ; Ochiai, Masahiro ; Amano, Hiroshi ; Yamaguchi, Hisashi ; Marugami, Yoshihisa ; Fukui, Hiroshi ; Hasegawa, Shigeru ; Imazu, Hiroki ; Arai, Kazufumi ; Mori, Kikuo ; Nakamura, Kohji ; Morishita, Hiroshi ; Shikata, Atsuschi</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the postoperative status between Billroth-I anastomosis and jejunal interposition after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer, patients were divided, according to the method of surgery, into three groups as follows: 1) extensive nodal dissection and subtotal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition (Group A), 2) the same dissection and gastrectomy as Group A but reconstructed by Billroth-I (Group B), 3) no or slight nodal dissection and partial gastrectomy with Billroth-I anastomosis (Group C). Endoscopy was conducted postoperatively and yielded the following results. Bile reflux and remnant gastritis were not seen at all in Group A, while they were obvious in Group B (52.6%, 57.9%, respectively) and in Group C (33.3%, 46.7%). Reflux esophagitis was seen only in Group B and its incidence was 21.1%. Gastro-biliary scintigraphy was conducted to determine RI reflux to the stomach, which was seen in 8.3% of Group A patients and in 40.0% of Group B patients. His angle was calculated from postoperative UGI series and was the smallest in Group A (97°) while it was 133° in Group B and 105° in Group C. Intraluminal pressure of LES was also studied and was 13.5 cm H2O in Group A and 11.8cm H2O in Grout B. Postoperative complaints were investigated by interview. Weight loss, reflux esophagitis and dumping were the highest in Group B (15.6%, 26.7%, 20.0%, respectively) in comparison with Group A (6.4%, 6.3%, 6.3%) and Group C (5.7%, 0%, 0%). Operating time in Group A was about one hour longer than in Group B; however, there was no difference in incidence of anastomotic leakage and of postoperative intestinal obstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0386-9768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1348-9372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5833/jjgs.26.26</identifier><language>jpn</language><publisher>The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery</publisher><subject>Billroth-1 anastomosis ; jejunal interposition between remnant stomach and duodenum ; quality of life after distal gastrectomy</subject><ispartof>The Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery, 1993, Vol.26(1), pp.26-31</ispartof><rights>The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surg</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1883,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Funabiki, Takahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochiai, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amano, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Hisashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marugami, Yoshihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukui, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imazu, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arai, Kazufumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Kikuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Kohji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morishita, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shikata, Atsuschi</creatorcontrib><title>Jejunal Interposition as a Reconstruction for Radical Distal Gastrectomy</title><title>Nippon Shokaki Geka Gakkai zasshi</title><addtitle>Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg</addtitle><description>To compare the postoperative status between Billroth-I anastomosis and jejunal interposition after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer, patients were divided, according to the method of surgery, into three groups as follows: 1) extensive nodal dissection and subtotal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition (Group A), 2) the same dissection and gastrectomy as Group A but reconstructed by Billroth-I (Group B), 3) no or slight nodal dissection and partial gastrectomy with Billroth-I anastomosis (Group C). Endoscopy was conducted postoperatively and yielded the following results. Bile reflux and remnant gastritis were not seen at all in Group A, while they were obvious in Group B (52.6%, 57.9%, respectively) and in Group C (33.3%, 46.7%). Reflux esophagitis was seen only in Group B and its incidence was 21.1%. Gastro-biliary scintigraphy was conducted to determine RI reflux to the stomach, which was seen in 8.3% of Group A patients and in 40.0% of Group B patients. His angle was calculated from postoperative UGI series and was the smallest in Group A (97°) while it was 133° in Group B and 105° in Group C. Intraluminal pressure of LES was also studied and was 13.5 cm H2O in Group A and 11.8cm H2O in Grout B. Postoperative complaints were investigated by interview. Weight loss, reflux esophagitis and dumping were the highest in Group B (15.6%, 26.7%, 20.0%, respectively) in comparison with Group A (6.4%, 6.3%, 6.3%) and Group C (5.7%, 0%, 0%). Operating time in Group A was about one hour longer than in Group B; however, there was no difference in incidence of anastomotic leakage and of postoperative intestinal obstruction.</description><subject>Billroth-1 anastomosis</subject><subject>jejunal interposition between remnant stomach and duodenum</subject><subject>quality of life after distal gastrectomy</subject><issn>0386-9768</issn><issn>1348-9372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE9LAzEQxYMouNRe_AR7FrYmk002OUrVtlIQip6XbP7ULO1uSbaHfnuzrRYeM8y8H8PwEHokeMYEpc9tu40z4Ek3KCO0FIWkFdyiDFPBC1lxcY-mMfoGYyaqNJMMLT9se-zULl91gw2HPvrB912uYq7yjdV9F4dw1Oed60O-UcbrRL_6OKS2UMm2euj3pwd059Qu2ulfn6Dv97ev-bJYfy5W85d1oQmDrnAYqCDcgSBQSWZsWTYcA5Os0aZkpQCHHTVUV8CcBGNKwYiogBjrADeMTtDT5a4OfYzBuvoQ_F6FU01wPcZQjzHUwJMSPL_AbXp3a6-oCoPXO3tGieRyxMm1_Lv6R4XadvQXd8xokw</recordid><startdate>1993</startdate><enddate>1993</enddate><creator>Funabiki, Takahiko</creator><creator>Ochiai, Masahiro</creator><creator>Amano, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Yamaguchi, Hisashi</creator><creator>Marugami, Yoshihisa</creator><creator>Fukui, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Hasegawa, Shigeru</creator><creator>Imazu, Hiroki</creator><creator>Arai, Kazufumi</creator><creator>Mori, Kikuo</creator><creator>Nakamura, Kohji</creator><creator>Morishita, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Shikata, Atsuschi</creator><general>The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1993</creationdate><title>Jejunal Interposition as a Reconstruction for Radical Distal Gastrectomy</title><author>Funabiki, Takahiko ; Ochiai, Masahiro ; Amano, Hiroshi ; Yamaguchi, Hisashi ; Marugami, Yoshihisa ; Fukui, Hiroshi ; Hasegawa, Shigeru ; Imazu, Hiroki ; Arai, Kazufumi ; Mori, Kikuo ; Nakamura, Kohji ; Morishita, Hiroshi ; Shikata, Atsuschi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c152n-f023816f2812795de44b602595bcd45482f0f3d3c725f92dd48518721def20b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>jpn</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Billroth-1 anastomosis</topic><topic>jejunal interposition between remnant stomach and duodenum</topic><topic>quality of life after distal gastrectomy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Funabiki, Takahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochiai, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amano, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Hisashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marugami, Yoshihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukui, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imazu, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arai, Kazufumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Kikuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Kohji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morishita, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shikata, Atsuschi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Nippon Shokaki Geka Gakkai zasshi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Funabiki, Takahiko</au><au>Ochiai, Masahiro</au><au>Amano, Hiroshi</au><au>Yamaguchi, Hisashi</au><au>Marugami, Yoshihisa</au><au>Fukui, Hiroshi</au><au>Hasegawa, Shigeru</au><au>Imazu, Hiroki</au><au>Arai, Kazufumi</au><au>Mori, Kikuo</au><au>Nakamura, Kohji</au><au>Morishita, Hiroshi</au><au>Shikata, Atsuschi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Jejunal Interposition as a Reconstruction for Radical Distal Gastrectomy</atitle><jtitle>Nippon Shokaki Geka Gakkai zasshi</jtitle><addtitle>Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg</addtitle><date>1993</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>26-31</pages><issn>0386-9768</issn><eissn>1348-9372</eissn><abstract>To compare the postoperative status between Billroth-I anastomosis and jejunal interposition after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer, patients were divided, according to the method of surgery, into three groups as follows: 1) extensive nodal dissection and subtotal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition (Group A), 2) the same dissection and gastrectomy as Group A but reconstructed by Billroth-I (Group B), 3) no or slight nodal dissection and partial gastrectomy with Billroth-I anastomosis (Group C). Endoscopy was conducted postoperatively and yielded the following results. Bile reflux and remnant gastritis were not seen at all in Group A, while they were obvious in Group B (52.6%, 57.9%, respectively) and in Group C (33.3%, 46.7%). Reflux esophagitis was seen only in Group B and its incidence was 21.1%. Gastro-biliary scintigraphy was conducted to determine RI reflux to the stomach, which was seen in 8.3% of Group A patients and in 40.0% of Group B patients. His angle was calculated from postoperative UGI series and was the smallest in Group A (97°) while it was 133° in Group B and 105° in Group C. Intraluminal pressure of LES was also studied and was 13.5 cm H2O in Group A and 11.8cm H2O in Grout B. Postoperative complaints were investigated by interview. Weight loss, reflux esophagitis and dumping were the highest in Group B (15.6%, 26.7%, 20.0%, respectively) in comparison with Group A (6.4%, 6.3%, 6.3%) and Group C (5.7%, 0%, 0%). Operating time in Group A was about one hour longer than in Group B; however, there was no difference in incidence of anastomotic leakage and of postoperative intestinal obstruction.</abstract><pub>The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery</pub><doi>10.5833/jjgs.26.26</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0386-9768
ispartof The Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery, 1993, Vol.26(1), pp.26-31
issn 0386-9768
1348-9372
language jpn
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5833_jjgs_26_26
source J-STAGE Free; Open Access Titles of Japan; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Billroth-1 anastomosis
jejunal interposition between remnant stomach and duodenum
quality of life after distal gastrectomy
title Jejunal Interposition as a Reconstruction for Radical Distal Gastrectomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T07%3A16%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Jejunal%20Interposition%20as%20a%20Reconstruction%20for%20Radical%20Distal%20Gastrectomy&rft.jtitle=Nippon%20Shokaki%20Geka%20Gakkai%20zasshi&rft.au=Funabiki,%20Takahiko&rft.date=1993&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=26-31&rft.issn=0386-9768&rft.eissn=1348-9372&rft_id=info:doi/10.5833/jjgs.26.26&rft_dat=%3Cjstage_cross%3Earticle_jjgs1969_26_1_26_1_26_article_char_en%3C/jstage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true