Optimal Sensor Placement with Minimal Predicted Posterior Variance

The performance of each monitoring system critically depends on the sensor layout and typical optimization criteria are based on the accessibility to the structure on site, experience with similar structures, and an optimal signal-to-noise ratio. More advanced criteria aim to optimize the feature ex...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:E-journal of Nondestructive Testing 2024-07, Vol.29 (7)
Hauptverfasser: Mendler, Alexander, Marsili, Francesca, Kessler, Sylvia, Grosse, Christian U.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page
container_title E-journal of Nondestructive Testing
container_volume 29
creator Mendler, Alexander
Marsili, Francesca
Kessler, Sylvia
Grosse, Christian U.
description The performance of each monitoring system critically depends on the sensor layout and typical optimization criteria are based on the accessibility to the structure on site, experience with similar structures, and an optimal signal-to-noise ratio. More advanced criteria aim to optimize the feature extraction process, and this paper aims to develop a sensor placement strategy for optimal damage diagnosis. The approach is based on Bayesian updating and the optimization goal is to find a sensor layout that is the most sensitive to small changes in the examined system parameters. It is shown that such layouts manifest themselves through a minimum variance in the posterior distribution. Using Kalman filters, the posterior variance can be “predicted” based on the measurement error and numerical models, so no data from and no simulations in the damaged state are required. By employing a polynomial chaos expansion (PCE)-based Kalman filter, the method becomes applicable for structures with many measurement channels, multiple examined system parameters, and for a large number of sensor combinations. Gaussian distributions are assumed for both system inputs and outputs. For proof of concept, the sensor placement is optimized on a numerical cantilever beam, demonstrating that the method can efficiently find the optimal sensor layout. Moreover, arbitrary measurement quantities (inclinations, vibrations, etc.) or damage-sensitive features (statistical values, modal parameters, etc.) can be used as observations, and multiple system parameters can be considered at the same time. Among other factors, an optimal sensor layout leads to large measurement responses, a small measurement error, and more advanced statistical quantities that will be elaborated on in detail.
doi_str_mv 10.58286/29612
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_58286_29612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_58286_29612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_58286_296123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjj0LwjAURYMoWLT-hkxu1Xy0tV0VxUUsKK4lpK8YadPyEhD_vVIcHJ3uhXu4HEIWnK2STGTpWuQpFyMS8FgmUZzLePzTpyR07sEYE1kuN4IFZHvuvWlVQy9gXYe0aJSGFqynT-Pv9GTssBYIldEeKlp0zgOaD3pTaJTVMCeTWjUOwm_OyPKwv-6OkcbOOYS67PFzgq-Ss3KQLAdJ-Tf4BvZfP_I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal Sensor Placement with Minimal Predicted Posterior Variance</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Mendler, Alexander ; Marsili, Francesca ; Kessler, Sylvia ; Grosse, Christian U.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mendler, Alexander ; Marsili, Francesca ; Kessler, Sylvia ; Grosse, Christian U. ; Technical University of Munich (TUM) ; Helmut-Schmidt-University / University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg</creatorcontrib><description>The performance of each monitoring system critically depends on the sensor layout and typical optimization criteria are based on the accessibility to the structure on site, experience with similar structures, and an optimal signal-to-noise ratio. More advanced criteria aim to optimize the feature extraction process, and this paper aims to develop a sensor placement strategy for optimal damage diagnosis. The approach is based on Bayesian updating and the optimization goal is to find a sensor layout that is the most sensitive to small changes in the examined system parameters. It is shown that such layouts manifest themselves through a minimum variance in the posterior distribution. Using Kalman filters, the posterior variance can be “predicted” based on the measurement error and numerical models, so no data from and no simulations in the damaged state are required. By employing a polynomial chaos expansion (PCE)-based Kalman filter, the method becomes applicable for structures with many measurement channels, multiple examined system parameters, and for a large number of sensor combinations. Gaussian distributions are assumed for both system inputs and outputs. For proof of concept, the sensor placement is optimized on a numerical cantilever beam, demonstrating that the method can efficiently find the optimal sensor layout. Moreover, arbitrary measurement quantities (inclinations, vibrations, etc.) or damage-sensitive features (statistical values, modal parameters, etc.) can be used as observations, and multiple system parameters can be considered at the same time. Among other factors, an optimal sensor layout leads to large measurement responses, a small measurement error, and more advanced statistical quantities that will be elaborated on in detail.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-4934</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-4934</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.58286/29612</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>E-journal of Nondestructive Testing, 2024-07, Vol.29 (7)</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-0098-3428 ; 0000-0002-7492-6194 ; 0000-0002-1335-1104 ; 0000-0002-7956-0558</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mendler, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsili, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grosse, Christian U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Technical University of Munich (TUM)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helmut-Schmidt-University / University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal Sensor Placement with Minimal Predicted Posterior Variance</title><title>E-journal of Nondestructive Testing</title><description>The performance of each monitoring system critically depends on the sensor layout and typical optimization criteria are based on the accessibility to the structure on site, experience with similar structures, and an optimal signal-to-noise ratio. More advanced criteria aim to optimize the feature extraction process, and this paper aims to develop a sensor placement strategy for optimal damage diagnosis. The approach is based on Bayesian updating and the optimization goal is to find a sensor layout that is the most sensitive to small changes in the examined system parameters. It is shown that such layouts manifest themselves through a minimum variance in the posterior distribution. Using Kalman filters, the posterior variance can be “predicted” based on the measurement error and numerical models, so no data from and no simulations in the damaged state are required. By employing a polynomial chaos expansion (PCE)-based Kalman filter, the method becomes applicable for structures with many measurement channels, multiple examined system parameters, and for a large number of sensor combinations. Gaussian distributions are assumed for both system inputs and outputs. For proof of concept, the sensor placement is optimized on a numerical cantilever beam, demonstrating that the method can efficiently find the optimal sensor layout. Moreover, arbitrary measurement quantities (inclinations, vibrations, etc.) or damage-sensitive features (statistical values, modal parameters, etc.) can be used as observations, and multiple system parameters can be considered at the same time. Among other factors, an optimal sensor layout leads to large measurement responses, a small measurement error, and more advanced statistical quantities that will be elaborated on in detail.</description><issn>1435-4934</issn><issn>1435-4934</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjj0LwjAURYMoWLT-hkxu1Xy0tV0VxUUsKK4lpK8YadPyEhD_vVIcHJ3uhXu4HEIWnK2STGTpWuQpFyMS8FgmUZzLePzTpyR07sEYE1kuN4IFZHvuvWlVQy9gXYe0aJSGFqynT-Pv9GTssBYIldEeKlp0zgOaD3pTaJTVMCeTWjUOwm_OyPKwv-6OkcbOOYS67PFzgq-Ss3KQLAdJ-Tf4BvZfP_I</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Mendler, Alexander</creator><creator>Marsili, Francesca</creator><creator>Kessler, Sylvia</creator><creator>Grosse, Christian U.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0098-3428</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7492-6194</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1335-1104</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7956-0558</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Optimal Sensor Placement with Minimal Predicted Posterior Variance</title><author>Mendler, Alexander ; Marsili, Francesca ; Kessler, Sylvia ; Grosse, Christian U.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_58286_296123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mendler, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsili, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grosse, Christian U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Technical University of Munich (TUM)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helmut-Schmidt-University / University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>E-journal of Nondestructive Testing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mendler, Alexander</au><au>Marsili, Francesca</au><au>Kessler, Sylvia</au><au>Grosse, Christian U.</au><aucorp>Technical University of Munich (TUM)</aucorp><aucorp>Helmut-Schmidt-University / University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal Sensor Placement with Minimal Predicted Posterior Variance</atitle><jtitle>E-journal of Nondestructive Testing</jtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>7</issue><issn>1435-4934</issn><eissn>1435-4934</eissn><abstract>The performance of each monitoring system critically depends on the sensor layout and typical optimization criteria are based on the accessibility to the structure on site, experience with similar structures, and an optimal signal-to-noise ratio. More advanced criteria aim to optimize the feature extraction process, and this paper aims to develop a sensor placement strategy for optimal damage diagnosis. The approach is based on Bayesian updating and the optimization goal is to find a sensor layout that is the most sensitive to small changes in the examined system parameters. It is shown that such layouts manifest themselves through a minimum variance in the posterior distribution. Using Kalman filters, the posterior variance can be “predicted” based on the measurement error and numerical models, so no data from and no simulations in the damaged state are required. By employing a polynomial chaos expansion (PCE)-based Kalman filter, the method becomes applicable for structures with many measurement channels, multiple examined system parameters, and for a large number of sensor combinations. Gaussian distributions are assumed for both system inputs and outputs. For proof of concept, the sensor placement is optimized on a numerical cantilever beam, demonstrating that the method can efficiently find the optimal sensor layout. Moreover, arbitrary measurement quantities (inclinations, vibrations, etc.) or damage-sensitive features (statistical values, modal parameters, etc.) can be used as observations, and multiple system parameters can be considered at the same time. Among other factors, an optimal sensor layout leads to large measurement responses, a small measurement error, and more advanced statistical quantities that will be elaborated on in detail.</abstract><doi>10.58286/29612</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0098-3428</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7492-6194</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1335-1104</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7956-0558</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1435-4934
ispartof E-journal of Nondestructive Testing, 2024-07, Vol.29 (7)
issn 1435-4934
1435-4934
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_58286_29612
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
title Optimal Sensor Placement with Minimal Predicted Posterior Variance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A50%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20Sensor%20Placement%20with%20Minimal%20Predicted%20Posterior%20Variance&rft.jtitle=E-journal%20of%20Nondestructive%20Testing&rft.au=Mendler,%20Alexander&rft.aucorp=Technical%20University%20of%20Munich%20(TUM)&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=7&rft.issn=1435-4934&rft.eissn=1435-4934&rft_id=info:doi/10.58286/29612&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_58286_29612%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true