Impact of Povidone-iodine Versus Chlorhexidine for Periurethral Cleaning Before Catheterization on Pyuria and Bacteriuria Among Emergency Department Patients
Background: We aimed to determine the effect of periurethral cleaning before catheterization using chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine on bacteriuria and pyuria. Methods: This study was a single-blind clinical trial on a sample selected by convenience sampling. Demographic and clinical questionnaires...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Shiraz e-medical journal 2022-06, Vol.23 (6) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Shiraz e-medical journal |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Movahedi, Maryam Ghafari, Somayeh Vahabi, Elham Haghighat, Somayeh |
description | Background: We aimed to determine the effect of periurethral cleaning before catheterization using chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine on bacteriuria and pyuria. Methods: This study was a single-blind clinical trial on a sample selected by convenience sampling. Demographic and clinical questionnaires were completed, and patients were randomly divided into two groups) 36 patients each of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine using Minimization Software based on confounding variables including age, consciousness level, triage level, nutritional status, and underlying disease. The periurethral areas were cleaned with the given antiseptics and catheterized using standard and sterile procedures. Then, specimens were taken for urinalysis and urine culture immediately, 72 hours, and five days after catheterization. Then, bacteriuria rate, pyuria rate, and the number of microorganisms were determined through examinations. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 19. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the bacteriuria rate between the two groups immediately (P = 0.76), 72 hours (P = 0.22), and five days (P = 0.50) after catheterization. The positive pyuria rate was not significantly different between the two groups immediately after catheterization. However, it was significantly higher in the povidone-iodine group 72 hours (P = 0.03) and five days (P = 0.004) after catheterization. The Mann-Whitney test compared the mean number of microorganisms between the two groups at different times. This test showed no significant difference in the number of microorganisms immediately (P = 0.93), 72 hours (P = 0.43), and five days (P = 0.61) after catheterization. Conclusions: Due to the lower side effects of chlorhexidine than povidone-iodine, it is suggested that similar studies be performed in other hospital wards with more stable patients to obtain more statistically significant results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5812/semj.113673 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5812_semj_113673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5812_semj_113673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1853-c9ab541181398775ac6f2bd41b8da66eb53c86d0a873e5e0e60a99aa83f4c0523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQtBBIlMKJH_Adpdh1nMexDa9KlcgBuEYbZ9O4auzKThHlX_hX3JYD0kqzr5nVDiG3nE1kxqf3Hvv1hHORpOKMjHgqZMRFzs__5Zfkyvs1Y7GIczkiP4t-C2qgtqWl_dSNNRhp22iD9AOd33ladBvrOvzSx2ZrHS3R6Z3DoXOwocUGwWizonMMM6QFDB0OYeMbBm0NDVHud04DBdPQebh1ZId61ttAe-zRrdCoPX3ALbihRzPQMnAD-mty0cLG480fjsn70-Nb8RItX58XxWwZKZ5JEakcahlznoUHszSVoJJ2Wjcxr7MGkgRrKVSWNAyyVKBEhgmDPAfIRBsrJqdiTO5OuspZ7x221dbpHty-4qw6OFsdnK1Ozopf6O5wbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Povidone-iodine Versus Chlorhexidine for Periurethral Cleaning Before Catheterization on Pyuria and Bacteriuria Among Emergency Department Patients</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Movahedi, Maryam ; Ghafari, Somayeh ; Vahabi, Elham ; Haghighat, Somayeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Movahedi, Maryam ; Ghafari, Somayeh ; Vahabi, Elham ; Haghighat, Somayeh</creatorcontrib><description>Background: We aimed to determine the effect of periurethral cleaning before catheterization using chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine on bacteriuria and pyuria. Methods: This study was a single-blind clinical trial on a sample selected by convenience sampling. Demographic and clinical questionnaires were completed, and patients were randomly divided into two groups) 36 patients each of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine using Minimization Software based on confounding variables including age, consciousness level, triage level, nutritional status, and underlying disease. The periurethral areas were cleaned with the given antiseptics and catheterized using standard and sterile procedures. Then, specimens were taken for urinalysis and urine culture immediately, 72 hours, and five days after catheterization. Then, bacteriuria rate, pyuria rate, and the number of microorganisms were determined through examinations. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 19. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the bacteriuria rate between the two groups immediately (P = 0.76), 72 hours (P = 0.22), and five days (P = 0.50) after catheterization. The positive pyuria rate was not significantly different between the two groups immediately after catheterization. However, it was significantly higher in the povidone-iodine group 72 hours (P = 0.03) and five days (P = 0.004) after catheterization. The Mann-Whitney test compared the mean number of microorganisms between the two groups at different times. This test showed no significant difference in the number of microorganisms immediately (P = 0.93), 72 hours (P = 0.43), and five days (P = 0.61) after catheterization. Conclusions: Due to the lower side effects of chlorhexidine than povidone-iodine, it is suggested that similar studies be performed in other hospital wards with more stable patients to obtain more statistically significant results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1735-1391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1735-1391</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5812/semj.113673</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Shiraz e-medical journal, 2022-06, Vol.23 (6)</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1853-c9ab541181398775ac6f2bd41b8da66eb53c86d0a873e5e0e60a99aa83f4c0523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1853-c9ab541181398775ac6f2bd41b8da66eb53c86d0a873e5e0e60a99aa83f4c0523</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9331-0902 ; 0000-0003-3255-4035</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Movahedi, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafari, Somayeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahabi, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haghighat, Somayeh</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Povidone-iodine Versus Chlorhexidine for Periurethral Cleaning Before Catheterization on Pyuria and Bacteriuria Among Emergency Department Patients</title><title>Shiraz e-medical journal</title><description>Background: We aimed to determine the effect of periurethral cleaning before catheterization using chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine on bacteriuria and pyuria. Methods: This study was a single-blind clinical trial on a sample selected by convenience sampling. Demographic and clinical questionnaires were completed, and patients were randomly divided into two groups) 36 patients each of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine using Minimization Software based on confounding variables including age, consciousness level, triage level, nutritional status, and underlying disease. The periurethral areas were cleaned with the given antiseptics and catheterized using standard and sterile procedures. Then, specimens were taken for urinalysis and urine culture immediately, 72 hours, and five days after catheterization. Then, bacteriuria rate, pyuria rate, and the number of microorganisms were determined through examinations. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 19. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the bacteriuria rate between the two groups immediately (P = 0.76), 72 hours (P = 0.22), and five days (P = 0.50) after catheterization. The positive pyuria rate was not significantly different between the two groups immediately after catheterization. However, it was significantly higher in the povidone-iodine group 72 hours (P = 0.03) and five days (P = 0.004) after catheterization. The Mann-Whitney test compared the mean number of microorganisms between the two groups at different times. This test showed no significant difference in the number of microorganisms immediately (P = 0.93), 72 hours (P = 0.43), and five days (P = 0.61) after catheterization. Conclusions: Due to the lower side effects of chlorhexidine than povidone-iodine, it is suggested that similar studies be performed in other hospital wards with more stable patients to obtain more statistically significant results.</description><issn>1735-1391</issn><issn>1735-1391</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQtBBIlMKJH_Adpdh1nMexDa9KlcgBuEYbZ9O4auzKThHlX_hX3JYD0kqzr5nVDiG3nE1kxqf3Hvv1hHORpOKMjHgqZMRFzs__5Zfkyvs1Y7GIczkiP4t-C2qgtqWl_dSNNRhp22iD9AOd33ladBvrOvzSx2ZrHS3R6Z3DoXOwocUGwWizonMMM6QFDB0OYeMbBm0NDVHud04DBdPQebh1ZId61ttAe-zRrdCoPX3ALbihRzPQMnAD-mty0cLG480fjsn70-Nb8RItX58XxWwZKZ5JEakcahlznoUHszSVoJJ2Wjcxr7MGkgRrKVSWNAyyVKBEhgmDPAfIRBsrJqdiTO5OuspZ7x221dbpHty-4qw6OFsdnK1Ozopf6O5wbQ</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Movahedi, Maryam</creator><creator>Ghafari, Somayeh</creator><creator>Vahabi, Elham</creator><creator>Haghighat, Somayeh</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9331-0902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3255-4035</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Impact of Povidone-iodine Versus Chlorhexidine for Periurethral Cleaning Before Catheterization on Pyuria and Bacteriuria Among Emergency Department Patients</title><author>Movahedi, Maryam ; Ghafari, Somayeh ; Vahabi, Elham ; Haghighat, Somayeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1853-c9ab541181398775ac6f2bd41b8da66eb53c86d0a873e5e0e60a99aa83f4c0523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Movahedi, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafari, Somayeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahabi, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haghighat, Somayeh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Shiraz e-medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Movahedi, Maryam</au><au>Ghafari, Somayeh</au><au>Vahabi, Elham</au><au>Haghighat, Somayeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Povidone-iodine Versus Chlorhexidine for Periurethral Cleaning Before Catheterization on Pyuria and Bacteriuria Among Emergency Department Patients</atitle><jtitle>Shiraz e-medical journal</jtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><issn>1735-1391</issn><eissn>1735-1391</eissn><abstract>Background: We aimed to determine the effect of periurethral cleaning before catheterization using chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine on bacteriuria and pyuria. Methods: This study was a single-blind clinical trial on a sample selected by convenience sampling. Demographic and clinical questionnaires were completed, and patients were randomly divided into two groups) 36 patients each of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine using Minimization Software based on confounding variables including age, consciousness level, triage level, nutritional status, and underlying disease. The periurethral areas were cleaned with the given antiseptics and catheterized using standard and sterile procedures. Then, specimens were taken for urinalysis and urine culture immediately, 72 hours, and five days after catheterization. Then, bacteriuria rate, pyuria rate, and the number of microorganisms were determined through examinations. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 19. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the bacteriuria rate between the two groups immediately (P = 0.76), 72 hours (P = 0.22), and five days (P = 0.50) after catheterization. The positive pyuria rate was not significantly different between the two groups immediately after catheterization. However, it was significantly higher in the povidone-iodine group 72 hours (P = 0.03) and five days (P = 0.004) after catheterization. The Mann-Whitney test compared the mean number of microorganisms between the two groups at different times. This test showed no significant difference in the number of microorganisms immediately (P = 0.93), 72 hours (P = 0.43), and five days (P = 0.61) after catheterization. Conclusions: Due to the lower side effects of chlorhexidine than povidone-iodine, it is suggested that similar studies be performed in other hospital wards with more stable patients to obtain more statistically significant results.</abstract><doi>10.5812/semj.113673</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9331-0902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3255-4035</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1735-1391 |
ispartof | Shiraz e-medical journal, 2022-06, Vol.23 (6) |
issn | 1735-1391 1735-1391 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_5812_semj_113673 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Impact of Povidone-iodine Versus Chlorhexidine for Periurethral Cleaning Before Catheterization on Pyuria and Bacteriuria Among Emergency Department Patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A25%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Povidone-iodine%20Versus%20Chlorhexidine%20for%20Periurethral%20Cleaning%20Before%20Catheterization%20on%20Pyuria%20and%20Bacteriuria%20Among%20Emergency%20Department%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Shiraz%20e-medical%20journal&rft.au=Movahedi,%20Maryam&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.issn=1735-1391&rft.eissn=1735-1391&rft_id=info:doi/10.5812/semj.113673&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_5812_semj_113673%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |