Keeping Privacy Labels Honest

At the end of 2020, Apple introduced privacy nutritional labels, requiring app developers to state what data is collected by their apps and for what purpose. In this paper, we take an in-depth look at the privacy labels and how they relate to actual transmitted data. First, we give an exploratory st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2022-10, Vol.2022 (4), p.486-506
Hauptverfasser: Koch, Simon, Wessels, Malte, Altpeter, Benjamin, Olvermann, Madita, Johns, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 506
container_issue 4
container_start_page 486
container_title Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
container_volume 2022
creator Koch, Simon
Wessels, Malte
Altpeter, Benjamin
Olvermann, Madita
Johns, Martin
description At the end of 2020, Apple introduced privacy nutritional labels, requiring app developers to state what data is collected by their apps and for what purpose. In this paper, we take an in-depth look at the privacy labels and how they relate to actual transmitted data. First, we give an exploratory statistically evaluation of 11074 distinct apps across 22 categories and their corresponding privacy label or lack thereof. Our dataset shows that only some apps provide privacy labels, and a small number self-declare that they do not collect any data. Additionally, our statistical methods showcase the differences of the privacy labels across application categories. We then select a subset of 1687 apps across 22 categories from the German App Store to conduct a no-touch traffic collection study. We analyse the traffic against a set of 18 honey-data points and a list of known advertisement and tracking domains. At least 276 of these apps violate their privacy label by transmitting data without declaration, showing that the privacy labels’ correctness was not validated during the app approval process. In addition, we evaluate the apps’ adherence to the GDPR in respect of providing a privacy consent form, through collected screenshots, and identify numerous potential violations of the directive.
doi_str_mv 10.56553/popets-2022-0119
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_56553_popets_2022_0119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_56553_popets_2022_0119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c859-e88312476a143b8206fb5b0f802c5bbea6c7f9ac02f9ee8aff7c80ba69c4723b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNz8FKAzEUheEgFiy1D9CFMC8QvfdmkkmWUtQWB3TRfUjCjYzUzpAUoW8vtS5cnX914BNihXCvjdbqYRonPlZJQCQB0V2JOZFzEpxtr__1jVjW-gkAaDSitnNx98o8DYeP5r0M3yGdmj5E3tdmMx64Hm_FLId95eXfLsTu-Wm33sj-7WW7fuxlstpJtlYhtZ0J2KpoCUyOOkK2QEnHyMGkLruQgLJjtiHnLlmIwbjUdqSiWgi83KYy1lo4-6kMX6GcPIL_FfqL0J-F_ixUP8mgRI0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Keeping Privacy Labels Honest</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Koch, Simon ; Wessels, Malte ; Altpeter, Benjamin ; Olvermann, Madita ; Johns, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Koch, Simon ; Wessels, Malte ; Altpeter, Benjamin ; Olvermann, Madita ; Johns, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>At the end of 2020, Apple introduced privacy nutritional labels, requiring app developers to state what data is collected by their apps and for what purpose. In this paper, we take an in-depth look at the privacy labels and how they relate to actual transmitted data. First, we give an exploratory statistically evaluation of 11074 distinct apps across 22 categories and their corresponding privacy label or lack thereof. Our dataset shows that only some apps provide privacy labels, and a small number self-declare that they do not collect any data. Additionally, our statistical methods showcase the differences of the privacy labels across application categories. We then select a subset of 1687 apps across 22 categories from the German App Store to conduct a no-touch traffic collection study. We analyse the traffic against a set of 18 honey-data points and a list of known advertisement and tracking domains. At least 276 of these apps violate their privacy label by transmitting data without declaration, showing that the privacy labels’ correctness was not validated during the app approval process. In addition, we evaluate the apps’ adherence to the GDPR in respect of providing a privacy consent form, through collected screenshots, and identify numerous potential violations of the directive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2299-0984</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2299-0984</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.56553/popets-2022-0119</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2022-10, Vol.2022 (4), p.486-506</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koch, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wessels, Malte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altpeter, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olvermann, Madita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johns, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Keeping Privacy Labels Honest</title><title>Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies</title><description>At the end of 2020, Apple introduced privacy nutritional labels, requiring app developers to state what data is collected by their apps and for what purpose. In this paper, we take an in-depth look at the privacy labels and how they relate to actual transmitted data. First, we give an exploratory statistically evaluation of 11074 distinct apps across 22 categories and their corresponding privacy label or lack thereof. Our dataset shows that only some apps provide privacy labels, and a small number self-declare that they do not collect any data. Additionally, our statistical methods showcase the differences of the privacy labels across application categories. We then select a subset of 1687 apps across 22 categories from the German App Store to conduct a no-touch traffic collection study. We analyse the traffic against a set of 18 honey-data points and a list of known advertisement and tracking domains. At least 276 of these apps violate their privacy label by transmitting data without declaration, showing that the privacy labels’ correctness was not validated during the app approval process. In addition, we evaluate the apps’ adherence to the GDPR in respect of providing a privacy consent form, through collected screenshots, and identify numerous potential violations of the directive.</description><issn>2299-0984</issn><issn>2299-0984</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNz8FKAzEUheEgFiy1D9CFMC8QvfdmkkmWUtQWB3TRfUjCjYzUzpAUoW8vtS5cnX914BNihXCvjdbqYRonPlZJQCQB0V2JOZFzEpxtr__1jVjW-gkAaDSitnNx98o8DYeP5r0M3yGdmj5E3tdmMx64Hm_FLId95eXfLsTu-Wm33sj-7WW7fuxlstpJtlYhtZ0J2KpoCUyOOkK2QEnHyMGkLruQgLJjtiHnLlmIwbjUdqSiWgi83KYy1lo4-6kMX6GcPIL_FfqL0J-F_ixUP8mgRI0</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Koch, Simon</creator><creator>Wessels, Malte</creator><creator>Altpeter, Benjamin</creator><creator>Olvermann, Madita</creator><creator>Johns, Martin</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Keeping Privacy Labels Honest</title><author>Koch, Simon ; Wessels, Malte ; Altpeter, Benjamin ; Olvermann, Madita ; Johns, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c859-e88312476a143b8206fb5b0f802c5bbea6c7f9ac02f9ee8aff7c80ba69c4723b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koch, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wessels, Malte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altpeter, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olvermann, Madita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johns, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koch, Simon</au><au>Wessels, Malte</au><au>Altpeter, Benjamin</au><au>Olvermann, Madita</au><au>Johns, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Keeping Privacy Labels Honest</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>2022</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>486</spage><epage>506</epage><pages>486-506</pages><issn>2299-0984</issn><eissn>2299-0984</eissn><abstract>At the end of 2020, Apple introduced privacy nutritional labels, requiring app developers to state what data is collected by their apps and for what purpose. In this paper, we take an in-depth look at the privacy labels and how they relate to actual transmitted data. First, we give an exploratory statistically evaluation of 11074 distinct apps across 22 categories and their corresponding privacy label or lack thereof. Our dataset shows that only some apps provide privacy labels, and a small number self-declare that they do not collect any data. Additionally, our statistical methods showcase the differences of the privacy labels across application categories. We then select a subset of 1687 apps across 22 categories from the German App Store to conduct a no-touch traffic collection study. We analyse the traffic against a set of 18 honey-data points and a list of known advertisement and tracking domains. At least 276 of these apps violate their privacy label by transmitting data without declaration, showing that the privacy labels’ correctness was not validated during the app approval process. In addition, we evaluate the apps’ adherence to the GDPR in respect of providing a privacy consent form, through collected screenshots, and identify numerous potential violations of the directive.</abstract><doi>10.56553/popets-2022-0119</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2299-0984
ispartof Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2022-10, Vol.2022 (4), p.486-506
issn 2299-0984
2299-0984
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_56553_popets_2022_0119
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
title Keeping Privacy Labels Honest
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A55%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Keeping%20Privacy%20Labels%20Honest&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20on%20Privacy%20Enhancing%20Technologies&rft.au=Koch,%20Simon&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=2022&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=486&rft.epage=506&rft.pages=486-506&rft.issn=2299-0984&rft.eissn=2299-0984&rft_id=info:doi/10.56553/popets-2022-0119&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_56553_popets_2022_0119%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true