The use of polymerase chain reaction in laboratory diagnosis of dermatophytosis

Dermatophytes are among the common causes of fungal infections in the community. Classical diagnostic tests for dermatophytosis have some disadvantages such as failure of direct microscopy in species differentiation and culture methods being time consuming and having low sensitivity. The aim of this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mikrobiyoloji bülteni 2015-04, Vol.49 (2), p.201-209
Hauptverfasser: Tiryaki, Yasin, Gültekin Korkmazgil, Berna, Eyigör, Mete, Aydın, Neriman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; tur
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 209
container_issue 2
container_start_page 201
container_title Mikrobiyoloji bülteni
container_volume 49
creator Tiryaki, Yasin
Gültekin Korkmazgil, Berna
Eyigör, Mete
Aydın, Neriman
description Dermatophytes are among the common causes of fungal infections in the community. Classical diagnostic tests for dermatophytosis have some disadvantages such as failure of direct microscopy in species differentiation and culture methods being time consuming and having low sensitivity. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the identification of dermatophytes directly from the clinical samples and the cultures. A total of 123 samples that comprise 63 skin and 60 nail scrapings obtained from 110 patients (69 female, 41 male; age range: 4-82 years) who were prediagnosed as dermatophytosis, were included in the study. Samples were examined with routine direct microscopy, culture and two different nested PCR (nPCR) protocols. The first was a pan-dermatophyte nPCR protocol targeting chitin synthase gene (CHS-1) of dermatophytes and the second was a nPCR protocol which targets specific ITS-1 genes of Trichophyton rubrum and T.mentagrophytes. Similar PCR methods were also applied to cultivated strains. Sequence analysis was performed for the samples that yielded positive results in pan-dermatophyte nPCR and negative results in T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes - specific nPCR. Hyphae and/or spore structures were observed in 62 (50%) samples with direct microscopic examination and dermatophytes were isolated in 30 (24%) samples. Twenty-eight of the isolates grown in culture were identified as T.rubrum, and two as T.mentagrophytes with T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes-specific nPCR protocol. In direct application, 67 (55%) of the clinical samples were found positive with pan-dermatophyte nPCR and 65 (53%) were positive with T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes-specific nPCR. Samples which were negative in direct microscopic examination were also negative in culture. Nine of them were found positive with pan-dermatophyte nPCR and eight were positive with T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes-specific nPCR. Two of the 30 samples which were positive in culture were negative in direct pan-dermatophyte nPCR, and one of them was negative in T.rubrum/T. mentagrophytes-specific nPCR. Three samples which were positive by pan-dermatophyte nPCR, gave negative result with T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes-specific nPCR. Sequence analysis was performed for these three samples and all were identified as T.rubrum. In evaluation of concordance between the methods, the agreement of direct microscopy and culture was moderate (kappa value; κ= 0.48), the agreement of direct mi
doi_str_mv 10.5578/mb.8703
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5578_mb_8703</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>26167820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c140t-1080cbf028a3d8e57967c4c61918764549a0dddde65b8265a72496ebce2f0c2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kD9PwzAQxT2AaFUqvgHKxpRydhz_GVEFFKlSlzJHtuOQoDiO7HTIt8dRgbfc3dO70-mH0AOGXVly8ez0TnAobtAaCk5zCZKt0DbGb0iiEgsJd2hFGGZcEFij07m12SXazDfZ6PvZ2aDSZFrVDVmwykydH7LU90r7oCYf5qzu1NfgYxeXpdoGl-yxnafFuke3jeqj3f7WDfp8ez3vD_nx9P6xfznmBlOYcgwCjG6ACFXUwpZcMm6oYTh9yBktqVRQJ1lWakFYqTihklltLGnAEFNs0NP1rgk-xmCbagydU2GuMFQLicrpaiGRko_X5HjRztb_uT8GxQ_TyVtq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of polymerase chain reaction in laboratory diagnosis of dermatophytosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Tiryaki, Yasin ; Gültekin Korkmazgil, Berna ; Eyigör, Mete ; Aydın, Neriman</creator><creatorcontrib>Tiryaki, Yasin ; Gültekin Korkmazgil, Berna ; Eyigör, Mete ; Aydın, Neriman</creatorcontrib><description>Dermatophytes are among the common causes of fungal infections in the community. Classical diagnostic tests for dermatophytosis have some disadvantages such as failure of direct microscopy in species differentiation and culture methods being time consuming and having low sensitivity. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the identification of dermatophytes directly from the clinical samples and the cultures. A total of 123 samples that comprise 63 skin and 60 nail scrapings obtained from 110 patients (69 female, 41 male; age range: 4-82 years) who were prediagnosed as dermatophytosis, were included in the study. Samples were examined with routine direct microscopy, culture and two different nested PCR (nPCR) protocols. The first was a pan-dermatophyte nPCR protocol targeting chitin synthase gene (CHS-1) of dermatophytes and the second was a nPCR protocol which targets specific ITS-1 genes of Trichophyton rubrum and T.mentagrophytes. Similar PCR methods were also applied to cultivated strains. Sequence analysis was performed for the samples that yielded positive results in pan-dermatophyte nPCR and negative results in T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes - specific nPCR. Hyphae and/or spore structures were observed in 62 (50%) samples with direct microscopic examination and dermatophytes were isolated in 30 (24%) samples. Twenty-eight of the isolates grown in culture were identified as T.rubrum, and two as T.mentagrophytes with T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes-specific nPCR protocol. In direct application, 67 (55%) of the clinical samples were found positive with pan-dermatophyte nPCR and 65 (53%) were positive with T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes-specific nPCR. Samples which were negative in direct microscopic examination were also negative in culture. Nine of them were found positive with pan-dermatophyte nPCR and eight were positive with T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes-specific nPCR. Two of the 30 samples which were positive in culture were negative in direct pan-dermatophyte nPCR, and one of them was negative in T.rubrum/T. mentagrophytes-specific nPCR. Three samples which were positive by pan-dermatophyte nPCR, gave negative result with T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes-specific nPCR. Sequence analysis was performed for these three samples and all were identified as T.rubrum. In evaluation of concordance between the methods, the agreement of direct microscopy and culture was moderate (kappa value; κ= 0.48), the agreement of direct microscopy and both protocols of nPCR was high (κ= 0.78) and the agreement of both nPCR protocols with each other was excellent (κ= 0.93). Our data indicated that two different nPCR methods used for the laboratory diagnosis of dermatophytosis yielded higher positivity in less time than the culture method. In conclusion, nPCR was considered to be useful in identification of dermatophytosis from either direct clinical samples or culture-isolated strains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0374-9096</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5578/mb.8703</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26167820</identifier><language>eng ; tur</language><publisher>Turkey</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthrodermataceae - genetics ; Arthrodermataceae - isolation &amp; purification ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; DNA, Fungal - isolation &amp; purification ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nails - microbiology ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Skin - microbiology ; Tinea - diagnosis ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Mikrobiyoloji bülteni, 2015-04, Vol.49 (2), p.201-209</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26167820$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tiryaki, Yasin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gültekin Korkmazgil, Berna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eyigör, Mete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydın, Neriman</creatorcontrib><title>The use of polymerase chain reaction in laboratory diagnosis of dermatophytosis</title><title>Mikrobiyoloji bülteni</title><addtitle>Mikrobiyol Bul</addtitle><description>Dermatophytes are among the common causes of fungal infections in the community. Classical diagnostic tests for dermatophytosis have some disadvantages such as failure of direct microscopy in species differentiation and culture methods being time consuming and having low sensitivity. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the identification of dermatophytes directly from the clinical samples and the cultures. A total of 123 samples that comprise 63 skin and 60 nail scrapings obtained from 110 patients (69 female, 41 male; age range: 4-82 years) who were prediagnosed as dermatophytosis, were included in the study. Samples were examined with routine direct microscopy, culture and two different nested PCR (nPCR) protocols. The first was a pan-dermatophyte nPCR protocol targeting chitin synthase gene (CHS-1) of dermatophytes and the second was a nPCR protocol which targets specific ITS-1 genes of Trichophyton rubrum and T.mentagrophytes. Similar PCR methods were also applied to cultivated strains. Sequence analysis was performed for the samples that yielded positive results in pan-dermatophyte nPCR and negative results in T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes - specific nPCR. Hyphae and/or spore structures were observed in 62 (50%) samples with direct microscopic examination and dermatophytes were isolated in 30 (24%) samples. Twenty-eight of the isolates grown in culture were identified as T.rubrum, and two as T.mentagrophytes with T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes-specific nPCR protocol. In direct application, 67 (55%) of the clinical samples were found positive with pan-dermatophyte nPCR and 65 (53%) were positive with T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes-specific nPCR. Samples which were negative in direct microscopic examination were also negative in culture. Nine of them were found positive with pan-dermatophyte nPCR and eight were positive with T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes-specific nPCR. Two of the 30 samples which were positive in culture were negative in direct pan-dermatophyte nPCR, and one of them was negative in T.rubrum/T. mentagrophytes-specific nPCR. Three samples which were positive by pan-dermatophyte nPCR, gave negative result with T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes-specific nPCR. Sequence analysis was performed for these three samples and all were identified as T.rubrum. In evaluation of concordance between the methods, the agreement of direct microscopy and culture was moderate (kappa value; κ= 0.48), the agreement of direct microscopy and both protocols of nPCR was high (κ= 0.78) and the agreement of both nPCR protocols with each other was excellent (κ= 0.93). Our data indicated that two different nPCR methods used for the laboratory diagnosis of dermatophytosis yielded higher positivity in less time than the culture method. In conclusion, nPCR was considered to be useful in identification of dermatophytosis from either direct clinical samples or culture-isolated strains.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthrodermataceae - genetics</subject><subject>Arthrodermataceae - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>DNA, Fungal - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nails - microbiology</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Skin - microbiology</subject><subject>Tinea - diagnosis</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0374-9096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kD9PwzAQxT2AaFUqvgHKxpRydhz_GVEFFKlSlzJHtuOQoDiO7HTIt8dRgbfc3dO70-mH0AOGXVly8ez0TnAobtAaCk5zCZKt0DbGb0iiEgsJd2hFGGZcEFij07m12SXazDfZ6PvZ2aDSZFrVDVmwykydH7LU90r7oCYf5qzu1NfgYxeXpdoGl-yxnafFuke3jeqj3f7WDfp8ez3vD_nx9P6xfznmBlOYcgwCjG6ACFXUwpZcMm6oYTh9yBktqVRQJ1lWakFYqTihklltLGnAEFNs0NP1rgk-xmCbagydU2GuMFQLicrpaiGRko_X5HjRztb_uT8GxQ_TyVtq</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Tiryaki, Yasin</creator><creator>Gültekin Korkmazgil, Berna</creator><creator>Eyigör, Mete</creator><creator>Aydın, Neriman</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>The use of polymerase chain reaction in laboratory diagnosis of dermatophytosis</title><author>Tiryaki, Yasin ; Gültekin Korkmazgil, Berna ; Eyigör, Mete ; Aydın, Neriman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c140t-1080cbf028a3d8e57967c4c61918764549a0dddde65b8265a72496ebce2f0c2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; tur</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthrodermataceae - genetics</topic><topic>Arthrodermataceae - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>DNA, Fungal - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nails - microbiology</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Skin - microbiology</topic><topic>Tinea - diagnosis</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tiryaki, Yasin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gültekin Korkmazgil, Berna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eyigör, Mete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydın, Neriman</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Mikrobiyoloji bülteni</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tiryaki, Yasin</au><au>Gültekin Korkmazgil, Berna</au><au>Eyigör, Mete</au><au>Aydın, Neriman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of polymerase chain reaction in laboratory diagnosis of dermatophytosis</atitle><jtitle>Mikrobiyoloji bülteni</jtitle><addtitle>Mikrobiyol Bul</addtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>209</epage><pages>201-209</pages><issn>0374-9096</issn><abstract>Dermatophytes are among the common causes of fungal infections in the community. Classical diagnostic tests for dermatophytosis have some disadvantages such as failure of direct microscopy in species differentiation and culture methods being time consuming and having low sensitivity. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the identification of dermatophytes directly from the clinical samples and the cultures. A total of 123 samples that comprise 63 skin and 60 nail scrapings obtained from 110 patients (69 female, 41 male; age range: 4-82 years) who were prediagnosed as dermatophytosis, were included in the study. Samples were examined with routine direct microscopy, culture and two different nested PCR (nPCR) protocols. The first was a pan-dermatophyte nPCR protocol targeting chitin synthase gene (CHS-1) of dermatophytes and the second was a nPCR protocol which targets specific ITS-1 genes of Trichophyton rubrum and T.mentagrophytes. Similar PCR methods were also applied to cultivated strains. Sequence analysis was performed for the samples that yielded positive results in pan-dermatophyte nPCR and negative results in T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes - specific nPCR. Hyphae and/or spore structures were observed in 62 (50%) samples with direct microscopic examination and dermatophytes were isolated in 30 (24%) samples. Twenty-eight of the isolates grown in culture were identified as T.rubrum, and two as T.mentagrophytes with T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes-specific nPCR protocol. In direct application, 67 (55%) of the clinical samples were found positive with pan-dermatophyte nPCR and 65 (53%) were positive with T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes-specific nPCR. Samples which were negative in direct microscopic examination were also negative in culture. Nine of them were found positive with pan-dermatophyte nPCR and eight were positive with T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes-specific nPCR. Two of the 30 samples which were positive in culture were negative in direct pan-dermatophyte nPCR, and one of them was negative in T.rubrum/T. mentagrophytes-specific nPCR. Three samples which were positive by pan-dermatophyte nPCR, gave negative result with T.rubrum/T.mentagrophytes-specific nPCR. Sequence analysis was performed for these three samples and all were identified as T.rubrum. In evaluation of concordance between the methods, the agreement of direct microscopy and culture was moderate (kappa value; κ= 0.48), the agreement of direct microscopy and both protocols of nPCR was high (κ= 0.78) and the agreement of both nPCR protocols with each other was excellent (κ= 0.93). Our data indicated that two different nPCR methods used for the laboratory diagnosis of dermatophytosis yielded higher positivity in less time than the culture method. In conclusion, nPCR was considered to be useful in identification of dermatophytosis from either direct clinical samples or culture-isolated strains.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pmid>26167820</pmid><doi>10.5578/mb.8703</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0374-9096
ispartof Mikrobiyoloji bülteni, 2015-04, Vol.49 (2), p.201-209
issn 0374-9096
language eng ; tur
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5578_mb_8703
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthrodermataceae - genetics
Arthrodermataceae - isolation & purification
Child
Child, Preschool
DNA, Fungal - isolation & purification
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Nails - microbiology
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Skin - microbiology
Tinea - diagnosis
Young Adult
title The use of polymerase chain reaction in laboratory diagnosis of dermatophytosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T19%3A24%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20polymerase%20chain%20reaction%20in%20laboratory%20diagnosis%20of%20dermatophytosis&rft.jtitle=Mikrobiyoloji%20b%C3%BClteni&rft.au=Tiryaki,%20Yasin&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=209&rft.pages=201-209&rft.issn=0374-9096&rft_id=info:doi/10.5578/mb.8703&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E26167820%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/26167820&rfr_iscdi=true