Ensemble Forecasting of Return Flow over the Gulf of Mexico

Errors in operational forecasts of return flow events (RFEs) over the Gulf of Mexico have dictated the search for sources of these errors. Based on earlier studies, likely candidates for these errors are: incorrect parameterization of turbulent transfer processes at the air-sea interface, uncertain...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Electronic journal of severe storms meteorology 2021-10, Vol.11 (4), p.1-26
Hauptverfasser: Lewis, John M., Lakshmivarahan, S., Hu, Junjun, Edwards, Roger, Maddox, Robert A., Thompson, Richard L., Corfidi, Stephen F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 26
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1
container_title Electronic journal of severe storms meteorology
container_volume 11
creator Lewis, John M.
Lakshmivarahan, S.
Hu, Junjun
Edwards, Roger
Maddox, Robert A.
Thompson, Richard L.
Corfidi, Stephen F.
description Errors in operational forecasts of return flow events (RFEs) over the Gulf of Mexico have dictated the search for sources of these errors. Based on earlier studies, likely candidates for these errors are: incorrect parameterization of turbulent transfer processes at the air-sea interface, uncertain vertical motion above the mixed layer, and incorrect initial conditions. We investigate these possible sources of error by performing numerical experiments with a Monte Carlo ensemble prediction model applied to a well-observed case in February 1988. In essence, we examine uncertainty in prediction due to uncertainty in the model’s elements of control. A mixed-layer model with roughly 50 elements of control is used to determine forecast uncertainty due to initial conditions alone, boundary conditions alone, parameterization alone, as well as the full complement of uncertainty in these elements of control. The uncertainty is calculated at points along a predetermined outflow trajectory that originates over shelf waters in the northeastern Gulf, passes north of the Yucatan Peninsula, and terminates in the west-central Gulf-all points along the trajectory are characterized by convective heating at the sea-air interface. Results from the numerical experiments led to the following results: 1) parameterization of physical processes exerts the greatest influence on forecast uncertainty, and 2) the water-vapor mass in the mixed-layer column is uncertain by a factor of two at the trajectory’s terminal point. The latter result confirms forecasters’ long-held view that vapor return is the most suspect product in operational prediction of RFEs. In addition to these numerical experiments with the 1988 case, a recent RFE is examined in the context of operational model performance at the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP). The paper ends with discussion of steps to be taken that hold promise for improved operational prediction of RFEs over the Gulf of Mexico.
doi_str_mv 10.55599/ejssm.v11i4.64
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_55599_ejssm_v11i4_64</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_55599_ejssm_v11i4_64</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_55599_ejssm_v11i4_643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjj0LwjAURYMoWD9m1_yBtgkmheIorS4u4h5qedGUtJG8tuq_V4uDq9O93MOFQ8iKs0hKmaYxVIh11HNuRJSIEQn4ew6lYGL806dkhlgxljCeyoBssgahPlugufNQFtia5kKdpkdoO9_Q3Lo7dT142l6B7jqrP_AAD1O6BZnowiIsvzkncZ6dtvuw9A7Rg1Y3b-rCPxVnanBUg6MaHFUi1v8_XgPvRuY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ensemble Forecasting of Return Flow over the Gulf of Mexico</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lewis, John M. ; Lakshmivarahan, S. ; Hu, Junjun ; Edwards, Roger ; Maddox, Robert A. ; Thompson, Richard L. ; Corfidi, Stephen F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewis, John M. ; Lakshmivarahan, S. ; Hu, Junjun ; Edwards, Roger ; Maddox, Robert A. ; Thompson, Richard L. ; Corfidi, Stephen F.</creatorcontrib><description>Errors in operational forecasts of return flow events (RFEs) over the Gulf of Mexico have dictated the search for sources of these errors. Based on earlier studies, likely candidates for these errors are: incorrect parameterization of turbulent transfer processes at the air-sea interface, uncertain vertical motion above the mixed layer, and incorrect initial conditions. We investigate these possible sources of error by performing numerical experiments with a Monte Carlo ensemble prediction model applied to a well-observed case in February 1988. In essence, we examine uncertainty in prediction due to uncertainty in the model’s elements of control. A mixed-layer model with roughly 50 elements of control is used to determine forecast uncertainty due to initial conditions alone, boundary conditions alone, parameterization alone, as well as the full complement of uncertainty in these elements of control. The uncertainty is calculated at points along a predetermined outflow trajectory that originates over shelf waters in the northeastern Gulf, passes north of the Yucatan Peninsula, and terminates in the west-central Gulf-all points along the trajectory are characterized by convective heating at the sea-air interface. Results from the numerical experiments led to the following results: 1) parameterization of physical processes exerts the greatest influence on forecast uncertainty, and 2) the water-vapor mass in the mixed-layer column is uncertain by a factor of two at the trajectory’s terminal point. The latter result confirms forecasters’ long-held view that vapor return is the most suspect product in operational prediction of RFEs. In addition to these numerical experiments with the 1988 case, a recent RFE is examined in the context of operational model performance at the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP). The paper ends with discussion of steps to be taken that hold promise for improved operational prediction of RFEs over the Gulf of Mexico.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-5404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-5404</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.55599/ejssm.v11i4.64</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Electronic journal of severe storms meteorology, 2021-10, Vol.11 (4), p.1-26</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewis, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakshmivarahan, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Junjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddox, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corfidi, Stephen F.</creatorcontrib><title>Ensemble Forecasting of Return Flow over the Gulf of Mexico</title><title>Electronic journal of severe storms meteorology</title><description>Errors in operational forecasts of return flow events (RFEs) over the Gulf of Mexico have dictated the search for sources of these errors. Based on earlier studies, likely candidates for these errors are: incorrect parameterization of turbulent transfer processes at the air-sea interface, uncertain vertical motion above the mixed layer, and incorrect initial conditions. We investigate these possible sources of error by performing numerical experiments with a Monte Carlo ensemble prediction model applied to a well-observed case in February 1988. In essence, we examine uncertainty in prediction due to uncertainty in the model’s elements of control. A mixed-layer model with roughly 50 elements of control is used to determine forecast uncertainty due to initial conditions alone, boundary conditions alone, parameterization alone, as well as the full complement of uncertainty in these elements of control. The uncertainty is calculated at points along a predetermined outflow trajectory that originates over shelf waters in the northeastern Gulf, passes north of the Yucatan Peninsula, and terminates in the west-central Gulf-all points along the trajectory are characterized by convective heating at the sea-air interface. Results from the numerical experiments led to the following results: 1) parameterization of physical processes exerts the greatest influence on forecast uncertainty, and 2) the water-vapor mass in the mixed-layer column is uncertain by a factor of two at the trajectory’s terminal point. The latter result confirms forecasters’ long-held view that vapor return is the most suspect product in operational prediction of RFEs. In addition to these numerical experiments with the 1988 case, a recent RFE is examined in the context of operational model performance at the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP). The paper ends with discussion of steps to be taken that hold promise for improved operational prediction of RFEs over the Gulf of Mexico.</description><issn>1559-5404</issn><issn>1559-5404</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjj0LwjAURYMoWD9m1_yBtgkmheIorS4u4h5qedGUtJG8tuq_V4uDq9O93MOFQ8iKs0hKmaYxVIh11HNuRJSIEQn4ew6lYGL806dkhlgxljCeyoBssgahPlugufNQFtia5kKdpkdoO9_Q3Lo7dT142l6B7jqrP_AAD1O6BZnowiIsvzkncZ6dtvuw9A7Rg1Y3b-rCPxVnanBUg6MaHFUi1v8_XgPvRuY</recordid><startdate>20211005</startdate><enddate>20211005</enddate><creator>Lewis, John M.</creator><creator>Lakshmivarahan, S.</creator><creator>Hu, Junjun</creator><creator>Edwards, Roger</creator><creator>Maddox, Robert A.</creator><creator>Thompson, Richard L.</creator><creator>Corfidi, Stephen F.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211005</creationdate><title>Ensemble Forecasting of Return Flow over the Gulf of Mexico</title><author>Lewis, John M. ; Lakshmivarahan, S. ; Hu, Junjun ; Edwards, Roger ; Maddox, Robert A. ; Thompson, Richard L. ; Corfidi, Stephen F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_55599_ejssm_v11i4_643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewis, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakshmivarahan, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Junjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddox, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corfidi, Stephen F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Electronic journal of severe storms meteorology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewis, John M.</au><au>Lakshmivarahan, S.</au><au>Hu, Junjun</au><au>Edwards, Roger</au><au>Maddox, Robert A.</au><au>Thompson, Richard L.</au><au>Corfidi, Stephen F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ensemble Forecasting of Return Flow over the Gulf of Mexico</atitle><jtitle>Electronic journal of severe storms meteorology</jtitle><date>2021-10-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>1-26</pages><issn>1559-5404</issn><eissn>1559-5404</eissn><abstract>Errors in operational forecasts of return flow events (RFEs) over the Gulf of Mexico have dictated the search for sources of these errors. Based on earlier studies, likely candidates for these errors are: incorrect parameterization of turbulent transfer processes at the air-sea interface, uncertain vertical motion above the mixed layer, and incorrect initial conditions. We investigate these possible sources of error by performing numerical experiments with a Monte Carlo ensemble prediction model applied to a well-observed case in February 1988. In essence, we examine uncertainty in prediction due to uncertainty in the model’s elements of control. A mixed-layer model with roughly 50 elements of control is used to determine forecast uncertainty due to initial conditions alone, boundary conditions alone, parameterization alone, as well as the full complement of uncertainty in these elements of control. The uncertainty is calculated at points along a predetermined outflow trajectory that originates over shelf waters in the northeastern Gulf, passes north of the Yucatan Peninsula, and terminates in the west-central Gulf-all points along the trajectory are characterized by convective heating at the sea-air interface. Results from the numerical experiments led to the following results: 1) parameterization of physical processes exerts the greatest influence on forecast uncertainty, and 2) the water-vapor mass in the mixed-layer column is uncertain by a factor of two at the trajectory’s terminal point. The latter result confirms forecasters’ long-held view that vapor return is the most suspect product in operational prediction of RFEs. In addition to these numerical experiments with the 1988 case, a recent RFE is examined in the context of operational model performance at the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP). The paper ends with discussion of steps to be taken that hold promise for improved operational prediction of RFEs over the Gulf of Mexico.</abstract><doi>10.55599/ejssm.v11i4.64</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1559-5404
ispartof Electronic journal of severe storms meteorology, 2021-10, Vol.11 (4), p.1-26
issn 1559-5404
1559-5404
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_55599_ejssm_v11i4_64
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Ensemble Forecasting of Return Flow over the Gulf of Mexico
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A41%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ensemble%20Forecasting%20of%20Return%20Flow%20over%20the%20Gulf%20of%20Mexico&rft.jtitle=Electronic%20journal%20of%20severe%20storms%20meteorology&rft.au=Lewis,%20John%20M.&rft.date=2021-10-05&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=1-26&rft.issn=1559-5404&rft.eissn=1559-5404&rft_id=info:doi/10.55599/ejssm.v11i4.64&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_55599_ejssm_v11i4_64%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true