The Scope of Donor-Conceived Person’s Right to Access Information about the Gamete Donor in Europe – A Comparative Review

Legal regulations concerning infertility treatment differ among European jurisdictions. Broadly speaking, three types of gamete donation are distinguished - anonymous donation, identifiable donation, and known donation. However, using only these terms during a debate on international standard of gam...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of politics and law (Toronto) 2020-10, Vol.13 (4), p.88
1. Verfasser: Lukasiewicz, Rafal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 88
container_title Journal of politics and law (Toronto)
container_volume 13
creator Lukasiewicz, Rafal
description Legal regulations concerning infertility treatment differ among European jurisdictions. Broadly speaking, three types of gamete donation are distinguished - anonymous donation, identifiable donation, and known donation. However, using only these terms during a debate on international standard of gamete donation is a significant simplification. Even in those jurisdictions in which the same model of gamete donation occurs, the scope of information about a donor that is accessible for a child differs. Moreover, in some jurisdictions, the law permits donors and recipients to choose between two or more types of gamete donation. This paper therefore analyses the extent to which the donor's data is accessible to a donor-conceived person within these different regimes. It argues that a balanced international standard for data exchange concerning gamete donation could be acceptable for all European countries. This paper concludes that it would be a positive first step to harmonise legal framework of gamete donation in Europe to reach a position that would be acceptable for countries in which donor's anonymity is protected, as well as in countries in which the donor's identity is always open for a donor conceived-person.
doi_str_mv 10.5539/jpl.v13n4p88
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5539_jpl_v13n4p88</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5539_jpl_v13n4p88</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5539_jpl_v13n4p883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj01OwzAQhS0EEqWw4wBzAFJs5YdmWYVC2aHSvWXMhLpqPNY4DWKB1Duw4no9Camg7FnNk-a9T_qEuFRylOdpeb0K61GnUp-F8fhIDFSp0qSUeX78l7ObU3EW40rKoiiyciA-FkuEJ0sBgWq4JU-cVOQtug5f4BE5kt9tvyLM3euyhZZgYi3GCA--Jm5M68iDeaZN_-tJ96bBFn844DxMN7xH77afMIGKmmC4n3QIc-wcvp2Lk9qsI1783qG4upsuqllimWJkrHVg1xh-10rqvaLuFfVBMf1n_RvDBl2m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Scope of Donor-Conceived Person’s Right to Access Information about the Gamete Donor in Europe – A Comparative Review</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Lukasiewicz, Rafal</creator><creatorcontrib>Lukasiewicz, Rafal</creatorcontrib><description>Legal regulations concerning infertility treatment differ among European jurisdictions. Broadly speaking, three types of gamete donation are distinguished - anonymous donation, identifiable donation, and known donation. However, using only these terms during a debate on international standard of gamete donation is a significant simplification. Even in those jurisdictions in which the same model of gamete donation occurs, the scope of information about a donor that is accessible for a child differs. Moreover, in some jurisdictions, the law permits donors and recipients to choose between two or more types of gamete donation. This paper therefore analyses the extent to which the donor's data is accessible to a donor-conceived person within these different regimes. It argues that a balanced international standard for data exchange concerning gamete donation could be acceptable for all European countries. This paper concludes that it would be a positive first step to harmonise legal framework of gamete donation in Europe to reach a position that would be acceptable for countries in which donor's anonymity is protected, as well as in countries in which the donor's identity is always open for a donor conceived-person.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1913-9047</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1913-9055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5539/jpl.v13n4p88</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of politics and law (Toronto), 2020-10, Vol.13 (4), p.88</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lukasiewicz, Rafal</creatorcontrib><title>The Scope of Donor-Conceived Person’s Right to Access Information about the Gamete Donor in Europe – A Comparative Review</title><title>Journal of politics and law (Toronto)</title><description>Legal regulations concerning infertility treatment differ among European jurisdictions. Broadly speaking, three types of gamete donation are distinguished - anonymous donation, identifiable donation, and known donation. However, using only these terms during a debate on international standard of gamete donation is a significant simplification. Even in those jurisdictions in which the same model of gamete donation occurs, the scope of information about a donor that is accessible for a child differs. Moreover, in some jurisdictions, the law permits donors and recipients to choose between two or more types of gamete donation. This paper therefore analyses the extent to which the donor's data is accessible to a donor-conceived person within these different regimes. It argues that a balanced international standard for data exchange concerning gamete donation could be acceptable for all European countries. This paper concludes that it would be a positive first step to harmonise legal framework of gamete donation in Europe to reach a position that would be acceptable for countries in which donor's anonymity is protected, as well as in countries in which the donor's identity is always open for a donor conceived-person.</description><issn>1913-9047</issn><issn>1913-9055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVj01OwzAQhS0EEqWw4wBzAFJs5YdmWYVC2aHSvWXMhLpqPNY4DWKB1Duw4no9Camg7FnNk-a9T_qEuFRylOdpeb0K61GnUp-F8fhIDFSp0qSUeX78l7ObU3EW40rKoiiyciA-FkuEJ0sBgWq4JU-cVOQtug5f4BE5kt9tvyLM3euyhZZgYi3GCA--Jm5M68iDeaZN_-tJ96bBFn844DxMN7xH77afMIGKmmC4n3QIc-wcvp2Lk9qsI1783qG4upsuqllimWJkrHVg1xh-10rqvaLuFfVBMf1n_RvDBl2m</recordid><startdate>20201013</startdate><enddate>20201013</enddate><creator>Lukasiewicz, Rafal</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201013</creationdate><title>The Scope of Donor-Conceived Person’s Right to Access Information about the Gamete Donor in Europe – A Comparative Review</title><author>Lukasiewicz, Rafal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5539_jpl_v13n4p883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lukasiewicz, Rafal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of politics and law (Toronto)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lukasiewicz, Rafal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Scope of Donor-Conceived Person’s Right to Access Information about the Gamete Donor in Europe – A Comparative Review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of politics and law (Toronto)</jtitle><date>2020-10-13</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>88</spage><pages>88-</pages><issn>1913-9047</issn><eissn>1913-9055</eissn><abstract>Legal regulations concerning infertility treatment differ among European jurisdictions. Broadly speaking, three types of gamete donation are distinguished - anonymous donation, identifiable donation, and known donation. However, using only these terms during a debate on international standard of gamete donation is a significant simplification. Even in those jurisdictions in which the same model of gamete donation occurs, the scope of information about a donor that is accessible for a child differs. Moreover, in some jurisdictions, the law permits donors and recipients to choose between two or more types of gamete donation. This paper therefore analyses the extent to which the donor's data is accessible to a donor-conceived person within these different regimes. It argues that a balanced international standard for data exchange concerning gamete donation could be acceptable for all European countries. This paper concludes that it would be a positive first step to harmonise legal framework of gamete donation in Europe to reach a position that would be acceptable for countries in which donor's anonymity is protected, as well as in countries in which the donor's identity is always open for a donor conceived-person.</abstract><doi>10.5539/jpl.v13n4p88</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1913-9047
ispartof Journal of politics and law (Toronto), 2020-10, Vol.13 (4), p.88
issn 1913-9047
1913-9055
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5539_jpl_v13n4p88
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
title The Scope of Donor-Conceived Person’s Right to Access Information about the Gamete Donor in Europe – A Comparative Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T22%3A11%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Scope%20of%20Donor-Conceived%20Person%E2%80%99s%20Right%20to%20Access%20Information%20about%20the%20Gamete%20Donor%20in%20Europe%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Comparative%20Review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20politics%20and%20law%20(Toronto)&rft.au=Lukasiewicz,%20Rafal&rft.date=2020-10-13&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=88&rft.pages=88-&rft.issn=1913-9047&rft.eissn=1913-9055&rft_id=info:doi/10.5539/jpl.v13n4p88&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_5539_jpl_v13n4p88%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true