The Vanguardist Good Professor in Natural and Social Sciences

The aim of this study is to identify what features make good professors in the social and natural sciences. Are these qualities the same? Through gathering data from undergraduate business and engineering students, we searched for educator's characteristics considered positive or ideal for the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of education and learning 2019-02, Vol.8 (2), p.47
Hauptverfasser: Klafke, Renata, Oliveira, Marta Chaves Vasconcelos de, Ferreira, Jane Mendes
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 47
container_title Journal of education and learning
container_volume 8
creator Klafke, Renata
Oliveira, Marta Chaves Vasconcelos de
Ferreira, Jane Mendes
description The aim of this study is to identify what features make good professors in the social and natural sciences. Are these qualities the same? Through gathering data from undergraduate business and engineering students, we searched for educator's characteristics considered positive or ideal for the learning process. This research used primary data resources collected through online survey. Technical analysis of the content was used for interpretation of the results. Students from the social and natural sciences have similar points of view and expectations about towards their professors. Scholars believe docents should be more comprehensive and prepare students for the market, and not use the classes to expose their (students') ignorance, lack of mastery of the subject, difficulties, nor poke fun at them. Fortunately, these behaviors are not common place, but are known to exist, and represent a display of a remarkably unprofessional, egotistical, and arrogant conduct by the instructor. Social science professors are often more communicative and show more empathy, while natural science professors are more technicians and follow the syllabus, texts and material in a more rigid manner. This research is relevant for docents to reflect on their teaching persona and about the importance of self-awareness during their Master and Doctor programs. It is equally important for educators to see themselves through their students' eyes, so they can endlessly strengthen their own practice.
doi_str_mv 10.5539/jel.v8n2p47
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5539_jel_v8n2p47</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5539_jel_v8n2p47</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5539_jel_v8n2p473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVzk8LgjAcxvERBUl56g3sHtqmreWhU_TnFIHSdQydNbFN9tOgd5-BdO_0fA_P4YPQgpKQsThZVaoOX1sTNWs-Qh5NIh6waJOMf83IFPkAFSGEEh4zzj20yx4K36S5d9IVGlp8srbAV2dLBWAd1gZfZNs5WWNpCpzaXPeZ5lqZXMEcTUpZg_KHnaHl8ZDtz0HuLIBTpWicfkr3FpSIL1L0SDEg4__eHx2SRPY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Vanguardist Good Professor in Natural and Social Sciences</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Klafke, Renata ; Oliveira, Marta Chaves Vasconcelos de ; Ferreira, Jane Mendes</creator><creatorcontrib>Klafke, Renata ; Oliveira, Marta Chaves Vasconcelos de ; Ferreira, Jane Mendes</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study is to identify what features make good professors in the social and natural sciences. Are these qualities the same? Through gathering data from undergraduate business and engineering students, we searched for educator's characteristics considered positive or ideal for the learning process. This research used primary data resources collected through online survey. Technical analysis of the content was used for interpretation of the results. Students from the social and natural sciences have similar points of view and expectations about towards their professors. Scholars believe docents should be more comprehensive and prepare students for the market, and not use the classes to expose their (students') ignorance, lack of mastery of the subject, difficulties, nor poke fun at them. Fortunately, these behaviors are not common place, but are known to exist, and represent a display of a remarkably unprofessional, egotistical, and arrogant conduct by the instructor. Social science professors are often more communicative and show more empathy, while natural science professors are more technicians and follow the syllabus, texts and material in a more rigid manner. This research is relevant for docents to reflect on their teaching persona and about the importance of self-awareness during their Master and Doctor programs. It is equally important for educators to see themselves through their students' eyes, so they can endlessly strengthen their own practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1927-5250</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1927-5269</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5539/jel.v8n2p47</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of education and learning, 2019-02, Vol.8 (2), p.47</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klafke, Renata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Marta Chaves Vasconcelos de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Jane Mendes</creatorcontrib><title>The Vanguardist Good Professor in Natural and Social Sciences</title><title>Journal of education and learning</title><description>The aim of this study is to identify what features make good professors in the social and natural sciences. Are these qualities the same? Through gathering data from undergraduate business and engineering students, we searched for educator's characteristics considered positive or ideal for the learning process. This research used primary data resources collected through online survey. Technical analysis of the content was used for interpretation of the results. Students from the social and natural sciences have similar points of view and expectations about towards their professors. Scholars believe docents should be more comprehensive and prepare students for the market, and not use the classes to expose their (students') ignorance, lack of mastery of the subject, difficulties, nor poke fun at them. Fortunately, these behaviors are not common place, but are known to exist, and represent a display of a remarkably unprofessional, egotistical, and arrogant conduct by the instructor. Social science professors are often more communicative and show more empathy, while natural science professors are more technicians and follow the syllabus, texts and material in a more rigid manner. This research is relevant for docents to reflect on their teaching persona and about the importance of self-awareness during their Master and Doctor programs. It is equally important for educators to see themselves through their students' eyes, so they can endlessly strengthen their own practice.</description><issn>1927-5250</issn><issn>1927-5269</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVzk8LgjAcxvERBUl56g3sHtqmreWhU_TnFIHSdQydNbFN9tOgd5-BdO_0fA_P4YPQgpKQsThZVaoOX1sTNWs-Qh5NIh6waJOMf83IFPkAFSGEEh4zzj20yx4K36S5d9IVGlp8srbAV2dLBWAd1gZfZNs5WWNpCpzaXPeZ5lqZXMEcTUpZg_KHnaHl8ZDtz0HuLIBTpWicfkr3FpSIL1L0SDEg4__eHx2SRPY</recordid><startdate>20190225</startdate><enddate>20190225</enddate><creator>Klafke, Renata</creator><creator>Oliveira, Marta Chaves Vasconcelos de</creator><creator>Ferreira, Jane Mendes</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190225</creationdate><title>The Vanguardist Good Professor in Natural and Social Sciences</title><author>Klafke, Renata ; Oliveira, Marta Chaves Vasconcelos de ; Ferreira, Jane Mendes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5539_jel_v8n2p473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klafke, Renata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Marta Chaves Vasconcelos de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Jane Mendes</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of education and learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klafke, Renata</au><au>Oliveira, Marta Chaves Vasconcelos de</au><au>Ferreira, Jane Mendes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Vanguardist Good Professor in Natural and Social Sciences</atitle><jtitle>Journal of education and learning</jtitle><date>2019-02-25</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>47</spage><pages>47-</pages><issn>1927-5250</issn><eissn>1927-5269</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study is to identify what features make good professors in the social and natural sciences. Are these qualities the same? Through gathering data from undergraduate business and engineering students, we searched for educator's characteristics considered positive or ideal for the learning process. This research used primary data resources collected through online survey. Technical analysis of the content was used for interpretation of the results. Students from the social and natural sciences have similar points of view and expectations about towards their professors. Scholars believe docents should be more comprehensive and prepare students for the market, and not use the classes to expose their (students') ignorance, lack of mastery of the subject, difficulties, nor poke fun at them. Fortunately, these behaviors are not common place, but are known to exist, and represent a display of a remarkably unprofessional, egotistical, and arrogant conduct by the instructor. Social science professors are often more communicative and show more empathy, while natural science professors are more technicians and follow the syllabus, texts and material in a more rigid manner. This research is relevant for docents to reflect on their teaching persona and about the importance of self-awareness during their Master and Doctor programs. It is equally important for educators to see themselves through their students' eyes, so they can endlessly strengthen their own practice.</abstract><doi>10.5539/jel.v8n2p47</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1927-5250
ispartof Journal of education and learning, 2019-02, Vol.8 (2), p.47
issn 1927-5250
1927-5269
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5539_jel_v8n2p47
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free E- Journals
title The Vanguardist Good Professor in Natural and Social Sciences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T09%3A09%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Vanguardist%20Good%20Professor%20in%20Natural%20and%20Social%20Sciences&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20education%20and%20learning&rft.au=Klafke,%20Renata&rft.date=2019-02-25&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=47&rft.pages=47-&rft.issn=1927-5250&rft.eissn=1927-5269&rft_id=info:doi/10.5539/jel.v8n2p47&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_5539_jel_v8n2p47%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true