Impact of Acetochlor Rate and Application Timing on Multiple-Herbicide-Resistant Waterhemp Control in Corn and Soybean

Documented 6-way (Groups 2, 4, 5, 9, 14, and 27) and 5-way (Groups 2, 5, 9, 14, and 27) multiple-herbicide-resistant (MHR) waterhemp have been confirmed in the US and Canada, respectively causing corn and soybean yield losses > 70%. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of aceto...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of agricultural science (Toronto) 2023-01, Vol.15 (2), p.1
Hauptverfasser: Symington, Hannah E., Soltani, Nader, Kaastra, Allan C., Hooker, David C., Robinson, Darren E., Sikkema, Peter H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of agricultural science (Toronto)
container_volume 15
creator Symington, Hannah E.
Soltani, Nader
Kaastra, Allan C.
Hooker, David C.
Robinson, Darren E.
Sikkema, Peter H.
description Documented 6-way (Groups 2, 4, 5, 9, 14, and 27) and 5-way (Groups 2, 5, 9, 14, and 27) multiple-herbicide-resistant (MHR) waterhemp have been confirmed in the US and Canada, respectively causing corn and soybean yield losses > 70%. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of acetochlor application timing and rate on non-emerged MHR waterhemp control in corn and soybean. Acetochlor is not yet registered in Canada, but it could be useful component of an integrated MHR waterhemp control program. Two studies, one in corn and one in soybean, were conducted in southwestern Ontario, Canada from 2020 to 2022. Three rates of acetochlor were applied preplant (PP), preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) to non-emerged waterhemp. In corn, acetochlor [Emulsifiable Concentrate (EC)] applied at 1,225, 2,100 and 2,950 g ai ha-1 controlled MHR waterhemp 81, 85, and 90%, respectively, at 8 weeks after POST application (WAC). Acetochlor EC applied POST or PRE provided better control than when applied PP at 4, 8, and 12 WAC. In soybean, acetochlor [Capsule suspension (CS)] applied at 1,050, 1,375, and 1,700 g ai ha-1 controlled MHR waterhemp 63, 70, and 74%, respectively, at 8 WAC. The timing of acetochlor CS application did not affect MHR waterhemp control. Acetochlor applied at the low, medium, and high rate reduced waterhemp density by 87, 89, and 92% in corn, and by 82, 84, and 87% in soybean, respectively. The high rate of acetochlor provides acceptable control of MHR waterhemp in corn; control in soybean was inadequate.
doi_str_mv 10.5539/jas.v15n2p1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5539_jas_v15n2p1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5539_jas_v15n2p1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5539_jas_v15n2p13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj0FrAjEQhUOxULGe-gfmXtZuXGPZo0jFHnqxQo8hxtk6kp2EJBX896ZFencu7zu8N_AJ8STriVJN-3I0aXKSiqdB3omhbOW8al_n9eCf1fRBjFM61uUaOVPNbChO730wNoPvYGExe3twPsLGZATDe1iE4MiaTJ5hSz3xNxT6-HGZgsNqjXFHlvZYbTBRyoYzfJVtPGAfYOk5R--AuGDkv4ef_rxDw4_ivjMu4fiaI_G8etsu15WNPqWInQ6RehPPWtb6104XO321a25rXwA3CVn_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Acetochlor Rate and Application Timing on Multiple-Herbicide-Resistant Waterhemp Control in Corn and Soybean</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Symington, Hannah E. ; Soltani, Nader ; Kaastra, Allan C. ; Hooker, David C. ; Robinson, Darren E. ; Sikkema, Peter H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Symington, Hannah E. ; Soltani, Nader ; Kaastra, Allan C. ; Hooker, David C. ; Robinson, Darren E. ; Sikkema, Peter H.</creatorcontrib><description>Documented 6-way (Groups 2, 4, 5, 9, 14, and 27) and 5-way (Groups 2, 5, 9, 14, and 27) multiple-herbicide-resistant (MHR) waterhemp have been confirmed in the US and Canada, respectively causing corn and soybean yield losses &gt; 70%. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of acetochlor application timing and rate on non-emerged MHR waterhemp control in corn and soybean. Acetochlor is not yet registered in Canada, but it could be useful component of an integrated MHR waterhemp control program. Two studies, one in corn and one in soybean, were conducted in southwestern Ontario, Canada from 2020 to 2022. Three rates of acetochlor were applied preplant (PP), preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) to non-emerged waterhemp. In corn, acetochlor [Emulsifiable Concentrate (EC)] applied at 1,225, 2,100 and 2,950 g ai ha-1 controlled MHR waterhemp 81, 85, and 90%, respectively, at 8 weeks after POST application (WAC). Acetochlor EC applied POST or PRE provided better control than when applied PP at 4, 8, and 12 WAC. In soybean, acetochlor [Capsule suspension (CS)] applied at 1,050, 1,375, and 1,700 g ai ha-1 controlled MHR waterhemp 63, 70, and 74%, respectively, at 8 WAC. The timing of acetochlor CS application did not affect MHR waterhemp control. Acetochlor applied at the low, medium, and high rate reduced waterhemp density by 87, 89, and 92% in corn, and by 82, 84, and 87% in soybean, respectively. The high rate of acetochlor provides acceptable control of MHR waterhemp in corn; control in soybean was inadequate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1916-9752</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1916-9760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5539/jas.v15n2p1</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of agricultural science (Toronto), 2023-01, Vol.15 (2), p.1</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Symington, Hannah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltani, Nader</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaastra, Allan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooker, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Darren E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikkema, Peter H.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Acetochlor Rate and Application Timing on Multiple-Herbicide-Resistant Waterhemp Control in Corn and Soybean</title><title>Journal of agricultural science (Toronto)</title><description>Documented 6-way (Groups 2, 4, 5, 9, 14, and 27) and 5-way (Groups 2, 5, 9, 14, and 27) multiple-herbicide-resistant (MHR) waterhemp have been confirmed in the US and Canada, respectively causing corn and soybean yield losses &gt; 70%. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of acetochlor application timing and rate on non-emerged MHR waterhemp control in corn and soybean. Acetochlor is not yet registered in Canada, but it could be useful component of an integrated MHR waterhemp control program. Two studies, one in corn and one in soybean, were conducted in southwestern Ontario, Canada from 2020 to 2022. Three rates of acetochlor were applied preplant (PP), preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) to non-emerged waterhemp. In corn, acetochlor [Emulsifiable Concentrate (EC)] applied at 1,225, 2,100 and 2,950 g ai ha-1 controlled MHR waterhemp 81, 85, and 90%, respectively, at 8 weeks after POST application (WAC). Acetochlor EC applied POST or PRE provided better control than when applied PP at 4, 8, and 12 WAC. In soybean, acetochlor [Capsule suspension (CS)] applied at 1,050, 1,375, and 1,700 g ai ha-1 controlled MHR waterhemp 63, 70, and 74%, respectively, at 8 WAC. The timing of acetochlor CS application did not affect MHR waterhemp control. Acetochlor applied at the low, medium, and high rate reduced waterhemp density by 87, 89, and 92% in corn, and by 82, 84, and 87% in soybean, respectively. The high rate of acetochlor provides acceptable control of MHR waterhemp in corn; control in soybean was inadequate.</description><issn>1916-9752</issn><issn>1916-9760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVj0FrAjEQhUOxULGe-gfmXtZuXGPZo0jFHnqxQo8hxtk6kp2EJBX896ZFencu7zu8N_AJ8STriVJN-3I0aXKSiqdB3omhbOW8al_n9eCf1fRBjFM61uUaOVPNbChO730wNoPvYGExe3twPsLGZATDe1iE4MiaTJ5hSz3xNxT6-HGZgsNqjXFHlvZYbTBRyoYzfJVtPGAfYOk5R--AuGDkv4ef_rxDw4_ivjMu4fiaI_G8etsu15WNPqWInQ6RehPPWtb6104XO321a25rXwA3CVn_</recordid><startdate>20230115</startdate><enddate>20230115</enddate><creator>Symington, Hannah E.</creator><creator>Soltani, Nader</creator><creator>Kaastra, Allan C.</creator><creator>Hooker, David C.</creator><creator>Robinson, Darren E.</creator><creator>Sikkema, Peter H.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230115</creationdate><title>Impact of Acetochlor Rate and Application Timing on Multiple-Herbicide-Resistant Waterhemp Control in Corn and Soybean</title><author>Symington, Hannah E. ; Soltani, Nader ; Kaastra, Allan C. ; Hooker, David C. ; Robinson, Darren E. ; Sikkema, Peter H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5539_jas_v15n2p13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Symington, Hannah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltani, Nader</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaastra, Allan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooker, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Darren E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikkema, Peter H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural science (Toronto)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Symington, Hannah E.</au><au>Soltani, Nader</au><au>Kaastra, Allan C.</au><au>Hooker, David C.</au><au>Robinson, Darren E.</au><au>Sikkema, Peter H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Acetochlor Rate and Application Timing on Multiple-Herbicide-Resistant Waterhemp Control in Corn and Soybean</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural science (Toronto)</jtitle><date>2023-01-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>1916-9752</issn><eissn>1916-9760</eissn><abstract>Documented 6-way (Groups 2, 4, 5, 9, 14, and 27) and 5-way (Groups 2, 5, 9, 14, and 27) multiple-herbicide-resistant (MHR) waterhemp have been confirmed in the US and Canada, respectively causing corn and soybean yield losses &gt; 70%. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of acetochlor application timing and rate on non-emerged MHR waterhemp control in corn and soybean. Acetochlor is not yet registered in Canada, but it could be useful component of an integrated MHR waterhemp control program. Two studies, one in corn and one in soybean, were conducted in southwestern Ontario, Canada from 2020 to 2022. Three rates of acetochlor were applied preplant (PP), preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) to non-emerged waterhemp. In corn, acetochlor [Emulsifiable Concentrate (EC)] applied at 1,225, 2,100 and 2,950 g ai ha-1 controlled MHR waterhemp 81, 85, and 90%, respectively, at 8 weeks after POST application (WAC). Acetochlor EC applied POST or PRE provided better control than when applied PP at 4, 8, and 12 WAC. In soybean, acetochlor [Capsule suspension (CS)] applied at 1,050, 1,375, and 1,700 g ai ha-1 controlled MHR waterhemp 63, 70, and 74%, respectively, at 8 WAC. The timing of acetochlor CS application did not affect MHR waterhemp control. Acetochlor applied at the low, medium, and high rate reduced waterhemp density by 87, 89, and 92% in corn, and by 82, 84, and 87% in soybean, respectively. The high rate of acetochlor provides acceptable control of MHR waterhemp in corn; control in soybean was inadequate.</abstract><doi>10.5539/jas.v15n2p1</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1916-9752
ispartof Journal of agricultural science (Toronto), 2023-01, Vol.15 (2), p.1
issn 1916-9752
1916-9760
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5539_jas_v15n2p1
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Impact of Acetochlor Rate and Application Timing on Multiple-Herbicide-Resistant Waterhemp Control in Corn and Soybean
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T03%3A02%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Acetochlor%20Rate%20and%20Application%20Timing%20on%20Multiple-Herbicide-Resistant%20Waterhemp%20Control%20in%20Corn%20and%20Soybean&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20science%20(Toronto)&rft.au=Symington,%20Hannah%20E.&rft.date=2023-01-15&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=1916-9752&rft.eissn=1916-9760&rft_id=info:doi/10.5539/jas.v15n2p1&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_5539_jas_v15n2p1%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true