Artificial Insemination Training Program for Smallholder Pig Farms in Gauteng Province, South Africa
The aim of this study was to facilitate artificial insemination training to enhance sustainable pig production within the developing smallholder pig production sector in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Eighteen smallholder pig farmers with requisite structures (pig house, pens), pigs (large white, l...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of agricultural science (Toronto) 2020-11, Vol.12 (12), p.89 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | Journal of agricultural science (Toronto) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Thivhilaheli, Richard Netshirovha Tsatsimpe, Mammikele Muller, Thabo Ramukhithi, Fhulufhelo Vincent Mphaphathi, Masindi Lotus Makgothi, Gogamatsamang Thomas, Ronald Sylvester |
description | The aim of this study was to facilitate artificial insemination training to enhance sustainable pig production within the developing smallholder pig production sector in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Eighteen smallholder pig farmers with requisite structures (pig house, pens), pigs (large white, landrace duroc or South African indigenous) and management (feeding, cleaning and record keeping) capacity were trained on routine pig management and artificial insemination procedures in a "learning by doing" on-farm supervised programme administered by Agricultural Research Council, Animal Production pig training team. Following estrus detection, 96 sows were artificially inseminated and 31 naturally served (NS). Farrowing rates (FR), total born (TB) and born alive (BA) piglets were recorded. The occurrence ccurrence of mummified fetuses (0.019 vs. 0.022%) and weak piglets (0.038 vs. 0.049%) did not differ between artificially inseminated sows and naturally mated sows. Born alive, birth weight and weaning weight were higher for artificial inseminated sows. The average litter size was 15± and 13±, birth weight 1.98±0.79 kg and 1.48±0.58 kg and weaning weight 9.89±0.87 kg and 7.23±0.71 kg for the AI and NS litters, respectively. Farmer demographic factors (age, gender and educational level) had no effect on farrowing rate, total born and piglets born alive. Therefore, implementation of artificial insemination techniques and pig production training was feasible under a smallholder pig production system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5539/jas.v12n12p89 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5539_jas_v12n12p89</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5539_jas_v12n12p89</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5539_jas_v12n12p893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj7tuwkAQRVdRIoGCy_TzATF4_YC4RFEc6JCgX43Mrhm0DzRrW8rfhyiR-9zm3OI0R4gXmS2rqqhXV4zLUeZe5re3-kHMZS3Xab1ZZ4_Tr_KZSGK8ZvcVsqyKci7OW-7JUEtoYe-jduSxp-DhxEiefAcHDh2jAxMYjg6tvQR71gwH6qBBdhHIwycOvf6VR_KtfoVjGPoLbA1TiwvxZNBGnfzxWaTNx-l9l7YcYmRt1I3JIX8pmamfGnWvUVNN8V__G5P7VK8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Artificial Insemination Training Program for Smallholder Pig Farms in Gauteng Province, South Africa</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Thivhilaheli, Richard Netshirovha ; Tsatsimpe, Mammikele ; Muller, Thabo ; Ramukhithi, Fhulufhelo Vincent ; Mphaphathi, Masindi Lotus ; Makgothi, Gogamatsamang ; Thomas, Ronald Sylvester</creator><creatorcontrib>Thivhilaheli, Richard Netshirovha ; Tsatsimpe, Mammikele ; Muller, Thabo ; Ramukhithi, Fhulufhelo Vincent ; Mphaphathi, Masindi Lotus ; Makgothi, Gogamatsamang ; Thomas, Ronald Sylvester</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to facilitate artificial insemination training to enhance sustainable pig production within the developing smallholder pig production sector in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Eighteen smallholder pig farmers with requisite structures (pig house, pens), pigs (large white, landrace duroc or South African indigenous) and management (feeding, cleaning and record keeping) capacity were trained on routine pig management and artificial insemination procedures in a "learning by doing" on-farm supervised programme administered by Agricultural Research Council, Animal Production pig training team. Following estrus detection, 96 sows were artificially inseminated and 31 naturally served (NS). Farrowing rates (FR), total born (TB) and born alive (BA) piglets were recorded. The occurrence ccurrence of mummified fetuses (0.019 vs. 0.022%) and weak piglets (0.038 vs. 0.049%) did not differ between artificially inseminated sows and naturally mated sows. Born alive, birth weight and weaning weight were higher for artificial inseminated sows. The average litter size was 15± and 13±, birth weight 1.98±0.79 kg and 1.48±0.58 kg and weaning weight 9.89±0.87 kg and 7.23±0.71 kg for the AI and NS litters, respectively. Farmer demographic factors (age, gender and educational level) had no effect on farrowing rate, total born and piglets born alive. Therefore, implementation of artificial insemination techniques and pig production training was feasible under a smallholder pig production system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1916-9752</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1916-9760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5539/jas.v12n12p89</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of agricultural science (Toronto), 2020-11, Vol.12 (12), p.89</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thivhilaheli, Richard Netshirovha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsatsimpe, Mammikele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, Thabo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramukhithi, Fhulufhelo Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mphaphathi, Masindi Lotus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makgothi, Gogamatsamang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Ronald Sylvester</creatorcontrib><title>Artificial Insemination Training Program for Smallholder Pig Farms in Gauteng Province, South Africa</title><title>Journal of agricultural science (Toronto)</title><description>The aim of this study was to facilitate artificial insemination training to enhance sustainable pig production within the developing smallholder pig production sector in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Eighteen smallholder pig farmers with requisite structures (pig house, pens), pigs (large white, landrace duroc or South African indigenous) and management (feeding, cleaning and record keeping) capacity were trained on routine pig management and artificial insemination procedures in a "learning by doing" on-farm supervised programme administered by Agricultural Research Council, Animal Production pig training team. Following estrus detection, 96 sows were artificially inseminated and 31 naturally served (NS). Farrowing rates (FR), total born (TB) and born alive (BA) piglets were recorded. The occurrence ccurrence of mummified fetuses (0.019 vs. 0.022%) and weak piglets (0.038 vs. 0.049%) did not differ between artificially inseminated sows and naturally mated sows. Born alive, birth weight and weaning weight were higher for artificial inseminated sows. The average litter size was 15± and 13±, birth weight 1.98±0.79 kg and 1.48±0.58 kg and weaning weight 9.89±0.87 kg and 7.23±0.71 kg for the AI and NS litters, respectively. Farmer demographic factors (age, gender and educational level) had no effect on farrowing rate, total born and piglets born alive. Therefore, implementation of artificial insemination techniques and pig production training was feasible under a smallholder pig production system.</description><issn>1916-9752</issn><issn>1916-9760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVj7tuwkAQRVdRIoGCy_TzATF4_YC4RFEc6JCgX43Mrhm0DzRrW8rfhyiR-9zm3OI0R4gXmS2rqqhXV4zLUeZe5re3-kHMZS3Xab1ZZ4_Tr_KZSGK8ZvcVsqyKci7OW-7JUEtoYe-jduSxp-DhxEiefAcHDh2jAxMYjg6tvQR71gwH6qBBdhHIwycOvf6VR_KtfoVjGPoLbA1TiwvxZNBGnfzxWaTNx-l9l7YcYmRt1I3JIX8pmamfGnWvUVNN8V__G5P7VK8</recordid><startdate>20201115</startdate><enddate>20201115</enddate><creator>Thivhilaheli, Richard Netshirovha</creator><creator>Tsatsimpe, Mammikele</creator><creator>Muller, Thabo</creator><creator>Ramukhithi, Fhulufhelo Vincent</creator><creator>Mphaphathi, Masindi Lotus</creator><creator>Makgothi, Gogamatsamang</creator><creator>Thomas, Ronald Sylvester</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201115</creationdate><title>Artificial Insemination Training Program for Smallholder Pig Farms in Gauteng Province, South Africa</title><author>Thivhilaheli, Richard Netshirovha ; Tsatsimpe, Mammikele ; Muller, Thabo ; Ramukhithi, Fhulufhelo Vincent ; Mphaphathi, Masindi Lotus ; Makgothi, Gogamatsamang ; Thomas, Ronald Sylvester</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5539_jas_v12n12p893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thivhilaheli, Richard Netshirovha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsatsimpe, Mammikele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, Thabo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramukhithi, Fhulufhelo Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mphaphathi, Masindi Lotus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makgothi, Gogamatsamang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Ronald Sylvester</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural science (Toronto)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thivhilaheli, Richard Netshirovha</au><au>Tsatsimpe, Mammikele</au><au>Muller, Thabo</au><au>Ramukhithi, Fhulufhelo Vincent</au><au>Mphaphathi, Masindi Lotus</au><au>Makgothi, Gogamatsamang</au><au>Thomas, Ronald Sylvester</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Artificial Insemination Training Program for Smallholder Pig Farms in Gauteng Province, South Africa</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural science (Toronto)</jtitle><date>2020-11-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>89</spage><pages>89-</pages><issn>1916-9752</issn><eissn>1916-9760</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to facilitate artificial insemination training to enhance sustainable pig production within the developing smallholder pig production sector in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Eighteen smallholder pig farmers with requisite structures (pig house, pens), pigs (large white, landrace duroc or South African indigenous) and management (feeding, cleaning and record keeping) capacity were trained on routine pig management and artificial insemination procedures in a "learning by doing" on-farm supervised programme administered by Agricultural Research Council, Animal Production pig training team. Following estrus detection, 96 sows were artificially inseminated and 31 naturally served (NS). Farrowing rates (FR), total born (TB) and born alive (BA) piglets were recorded. The occurrence ccurrence of mummified fetuses (0.019 vs. 0.022%) and weak piglets (0.038 vs. 0.049%) did not differ between artificially inseminated sows and naturally mated sows. Born alive, birth weight and weaning weight were higher for artificial inseminated sows. The average litter size was 15± and 13±, birth weight 1.98±0.79 kg and 1.48±0.58 kg and weaning weight 9.89±0.87 kg and 7.23±0.71 kg for the AI and NS litters, respectively. Farmer demographic factors (age, gender and educational level) had no effect on farrowing rate, total born and piglets born alive. Therefore, implementation of artificial insemination techniques and pig production training was feasible under a smallholder pig production system.</abstract><doi>10.5539/jas.v12n12p89</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1916-9752 |
ispartof | Journal of agricultural science (Toronto), 2020-11, Vol.12 (12), p.89 |
issn | 1916-9752 1916-9760 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_5539_jas_v12n12p89 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
title | Artificial Insemination Training Program for Smallholder Pig Farms in Gauteng Province, South Africa |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T20%3A35%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Artificial%20Insemination%20Training%20Program%20for%20Smallholder%20Pig%20Farms%20in%20Gauteng%20Province,%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20science%20(Toronto)&rft.au=Thivhilaheli,%20Richard%20Netshirovha&rft.date=2020-11-15&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=89&rft.pages=89-&rft.issn=1916-9752&rft.eissn=1916-9760&rft_id=info:doi/10.5539/jas.v12n12p89&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_5539_jas_v12n12p89%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |