Soybean Yield, Soil Porosity and Soil Penetration Resistance under Mechanical Scarification in No-Tillage System
Technological development has triggered a steady increase in Brazilian agricultural production, but also brought problems due to the excessive land use. The lack of care with proper management practices has led to soil physical degradation, mainly the formation of impermeable layers, which can lead...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of agricultural science (Toronto) 2018-03, Vol.10 (4), p.268 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 268 |
container_title | Journal of agricultural science (Toronto) |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Seidel, Edleusa Pereira Schneider, Ana Paula Heck Sustakowski, Monica Carolina Matté, Lucas Murakami Mottin, Marcos Cesar Silva, João Henrique |
description | Technological development has triggered a steady increase in Brazilian agricultural production, but also brought problems due to the excessive land use. The lack of care with proper management practices has led to soil physical degradation, mainly the formation of impermeable layers, which can lead to a reverse effect, a reduction in crop yield. It can be potentiated in silage production and with the lack of cover crops. To minimize the negative impacts of soil compaction, scarification is recommended, but its effectiveness has been questioned in no-tillage system. Thus, an experimental field was implemented in Brazil in 2015-2016 season, to evaluate the mechanical scarification on soybean production in succession to silage and grain corn intercropped with Brachiaria (Urochloa ruziziensis) as well as the physical properties of the soil. The experimental layout was a complete randomized block design with four replications. The plots were composed of second crop maize (autumn) intercropped with brachiaria, in two systems: silage and dry grains. The subplots were composed of three management system: no-tillage, reduced tillage cultivation with Terrus scarifier and Fox scarifier. Corn harvesting systems as well the scarifiers use did not affect soybean production and its yield components. The use of scarifiers reduced soil coverage, plant population, and soil penetration resistance. The data suggest that there was no persistence in the benefits presented by scarification. Soybean was able to break through the compacted layers, even above the critical level, corroborating with the hypothesis that the use of scarifiers does not bring benefits in no-tillage system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5539/jas.v10n4p268 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5539_jas_v10n4p268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5539_jas_v10n4p268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c828-15020cbd858a24b858ad3c4a694dce29390ffa7b32719029f1f8ff6920e58bb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtrwzAQhEVpoSHNsXf9gDrVw7KlYwl9QfqgzqUns5ZXrYIjB8kt-N_XaUvmMsOwLMxHyCVnS6Wkud5CWn5zFvK9KPQJmXHDi8yUBTs9ZiXOySKlLZskea5kPiP7qh8bhEDfPXbtFa1639HXPvbJDyOF0P43GHCIMPg-0DdMPg0QLNKv0GKkT2g_IXgLHa0sRO-m-HvpA33us43vOvhAWo1pwN0FOXPQJVz8-5xs7m43q4ds_XL_uLpZZ1YLnXHFBLNNq5UGkTcHa6XNoTB5a1EYaZhzUDZSlNwwYRx32rnCCIZKN00p5yT7e2unKSmiq_fR7yCONWf1AVg9AauPwOQPp0Rg1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soybean Yield, Soil Porosity and Soil Penetration Resistance under Mechanical Scarification in No-Tillage System</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Seidel, Edleusa Pereira ; Schneider, Ana Paula Heck ; Sustakowski, Monica Carolina ; Matté, Lucas Murakami ; Mottin, Marcos Cesar ; Silva, João Henrique</creator><creatorcontrib>Seidel, Edleusa Pereira ; Schneider, Ana Paula Heck ; Sustakowski, Monica Carolina ; Matté, Lucas Murakami ; Mottin, Marcos Cesar ; Silva, João Henrique</creatorcontrib><description>Technological development has triggered a steady increase in Brazilian agricultural production, but also brought problems due to the excessive land use. The lack of care with proper management practices has led to soil physical degradation, mainly the formation of impermeable layers, which can lead to a reverse effect, a reduction in crop yield. It can be potentiated in silage production and with the lack of cover crops. To minimize the negative impacts of soil compaction, scarification is recommended, but its effectiveness has been questioned in no-tillage system. Thus, an experimental field was implemented in Brazil in 2015-2016 season, to evaluate the mechanical scarification on soybean production in succession to silage and grain corn intercropped with Brachiaria (Urochloa ruziziensis) as well as the physical properties of the soil. The experimental layout was a complete randomized block design with four replications. The plots were composed of second crop maize (autumn) intercropped with brachiaria, in two systems: silage and dry grains. The subplots were composed of three management system: no-tillage, reduced tillage cultivation with Terrus scarifier and Fox scarifier. Corn harvesting systems as well the scarifiers use did not affect soybean production and its yield components. The use of scarifiers reduced soil coverage, plant population, and soil penetration resistance. The data suggest that there was no persistence in the benefits presented by scarification. Soybean was able to break through the compacted layers, even above the critical level, corroborating with the hypothesis that the use of scarifiers does not bring benefits in no-tillage system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1916-9752</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1916-9760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5539/jas.v10n4p268</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of agricultural science (Toronto), 2018-03, Vol.10 (4), p.268</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c828-15020cbd858a24b858ad3c4a694dce29390ffa7b32719029f1f8ff6920e58bb73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seidel, Edleusa Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Ana Paula Heck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sustakowski, Monica Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matté, Lucas Murakami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottin, Marcos Cesar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, João Henrique</creatorcontrib><title>Soybean Yield, Soil Porosity and Soil Penetration Resistance under Mechanical Scarification in No-Tillage System</title><title>Journal of agricultural science (Toronto)</title><description>Technological development has triggered a steady increase in Brazilian agricultural production, but also brought problems due to the excessive land use. The lack of care with proper management practices has led to soil physical degradation, mainly the formation of impermeable layers, which can lead to a reverse effect, a reduction in crop yield. It can be potentiated in silage production and with the lack of cover crops. To minimize the negative impacts of soil compaction, scarification is recommended, but its effectiveness has been questioned in no-tillage system. Thus, an experimental field was implemented in Brazil in 2015-2016 season, to evaluate the mechanical scarification on soybean production in succession to silage and grain corn intercropped with Brachiaria (Urochloa ruziziensis) as well as the physical properties of the soil. The experimental layout was a complete randomized block design with four replications. The plots were composed of second crop maize (autumn) intercropped with brachiaria, in two systems: silage and dry grains. The subplots were composed of three management system: no-tillage, reduced tillage cultivation with Terrus scarifier and Fox scarifier. Corn harvesting systems as well the scarifiers use did not affect soybean production and its yield components. The use of scarifiers reduced soil coverage, plant population, and soil penetration resistance. The data suggest that there was no persistence in the benefits presented by scarification. Soybean was able to break through the compacted layers, even above the critical level, corroborating with the hypothesis that the use of scarifiers does not bring benefits in no-tillage system.</description><issn>1916-9752</issn><issn>1916-9760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtrwzAQhEVpoSHNsXf9gDrVw7KlYwl9QfqgzqUns5ZXrYIjB8kt-N_XaUvmMsOwLMxHyCVnS6Wkud5CWn5zFvK9KPQJmXHDi8yUBTs9ZiXOySKlLZskea5kPiP7qh8bhEDfPXbtFa1639HXPvbJDyOF0P43GHCIMPg-0DdMPg0QLNKv0GKkT2g_IXgLHa0sRO-m-HvpA33us43vOvhAWo1pwN0FOXPQJVz8-5xs7m43q4ds_XL_uLpZZ1YLnXHFBLNNq5UGkTcHa6XNoTB5a1EYaZhzUDZSlNwwYRx32rnCCIZKN00p5yT7e2unKSmiq_fR7yCONWf1AVg9AauPwOQPp0Rg1g</recordid><startdate>20180305</startdate><enddate>20180305</enddate><creator>Seidel, Edleusa Pereira</creator><creator>Schneider, Ana Paula Heck</creator><creator>Sustakowski, Monica Carolina</creator><creator>Matté, Lucas Murakami</creator><creator>Mottin, Marcos Cesar</creator><creator>Silva, João Henrique</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180305</creationdate><title>Soybean Yield, Soil Porosity and Soil Penetration Resistance under Mechanical Scarification in No-Tillage System</title><author>Seidel, Edleusa Pereira ; Schneider, Ana Paula Heck ; Sustakowski, Monica Carolina ; Matté, Lucas Murakami ; Mottin, Marcos Cesar ; Silva, João Henrique</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c828-15020cbd858a24b858ad3c4a694dce29390ffa7b32719029f1f8ff6920e58bb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seidel, Edleusa Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Ana Paula Heck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sustakowski, Monica Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matté, Lucas Murakami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottin, Marcos Cesar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, João Henrique</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural science (Toronto)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seidel, Edleusa Pereira</au><au>Schneider, Ana Paula Heck</au><au>Sustakowski, Monica Carolina</au><au>Matté, Lucas Murakami</au><au>Mottin, Marcos Cesar</au><au>Silva, João Henrique</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soybean Yield, Soil Porosity and Soil Penetration Resistance under Mechanical Scarification in No-Tillage System</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural science (Toronto)</jtitle><date>2018-03-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>268</spage><pages>268-</pages><issn>1916-9752</issn><eissn>1916-9760</eissn><abstract>Technological development has triggered a steady increase in Brazilian agricultural production, but also brought problems due to the excessive land use. The lack of care with proper management practices has led to soil physical degradation, mainly the formation of impermeable layers, which can lead to a reverse effect, a reduction in crop yield. It can be potentiated in silage production and with the lack of cover crops. To minimize the negative impacts of soil compaction, scarification is recommended, but its effectiveness has been questioned in no-tillage system. Thus, an experimental field was implemented in Brazil in 2015-2016 season, to evaluate the mechanical scarification on soybean production in succession to silage and grain corn intercropped with Brachiaria (Urochloa ruziziensis) as well as the physical properties of the soil. The experimental layout was a complete randomized block design with four replications. The plots were composed of second crop maize (autumn) intercropped with brachiaria, in two systems: silage and dry grains. The subplots were composed of three management system: no-tillage, reduced tillage cultivation with Terrus scarifier and Fox scarifier. Corn harvesting systems as well the scarifiers use did not affect soybean production and its yield components. The use of scarifiers reduced soil coverage, plant population, and soil penetration resistance. The data suggest that there was no persistence in the benefits presented by scarification. Soybean was able to break through the compacted layers, even above the critical level, corroborating with the hypothesis that the use of scarifiers does not bring benefits in no-tillage system.</abstract><doi>10.5539/jas.v10n4p268</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1916-9752 |
ispartof | Journal of agricultural science (Toronto), 2018-03, Vol.10 (4), p.268 |
issn | 1916-9752 1916-9760 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_5539_jas_v10n4p268 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
title | Soybean Yield, Soil Porosity and Soil Penetration Resistance under Mechanical Scarification in No-Tillage System |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A03%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soybean%20Yield,%20Soil%20Porosity%20and%20Soil%20Penetration%20Resistance%20under%20Mechanical%20Scarification%20in%20No-Tillage%20System&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20science%20(Toronto)&rft.au=Seidel,%20Edleusa%20Pereira&rft.date=2018-03-05&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=268&rft.pages=268-&rft.issn=1916-9752&rft.eissn=1916-9760&rft_id=info:doi/10.5539/jas.v10n4p268&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_5539_jas_v10n4p268%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |