Identifying Toys

Signs of a toy are distinguished upon different materials: archaeological, ethnographic, of folk art and of personal experience. In the shape of the toy, there are signs of the impossibility of using it as a real prototype object: the nonconformance in the material, size, and simplification of the d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stratum 2023-11 (5), p.15-35
1. Verfasser: Zhilina, Natalia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; rus
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 35
container_issue 5
container_start_page 15
container_title Stratum
container_volume
creator Zhilina, Natalia
description Signs of a toy are distinguished upon different materials: archaeological, ethnographic, of folk art and of personal experience. In the shape of the toy, there are signs of the impossibility of using it as a real prototype object: the nonconformance in the material, size, and simplification of the design. Appearance of a toy accurately points to the real prototype. Unlike sacred images, the toy focuses on the reality and pleasantness of the look, unlike decorative ones, it subordinates the decorative features to the concrete features of the prototype, although the toy is associated with the style of the time. The toy’s features point at its use in the game, possibility of free movement in the game space: absence of any details tightly fastening it with other objects; presence of details contributing to movement and change of position. Concrete toys go out of use due to a change in the nature of the games, a change in the attitude of the player: growing up, propensity to admire, rejection due to taste preferences. Works of folk crafts called “toys” become interior decorations, figurines, beautiful gifts. But they preserve the idea of a game, looking at them the human mind recreates the game, and for some time homo becomes homo ludens.
doi_str_mv 10.55086/sp2351535
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_55086_sp2351535</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_55086_sp2351535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c120t-a91364d1ffd8d3d7e7fe5fd1155e10979e18959edb15278fd895665ecc0198d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j8tqAkEQRRuJoKgQ_ALXgU6qpqzurmWQmAiCG10Pk-lqGfHFtJv5-0giWZ27OFw4xkwRXpkhuLd8LYiRiXtmiIG9JSZ6um8HwQqwH5hJzgcAQCx4zjI0z6uo51uTuua8n20vXR6bfqqOWScPjsxu-bFdfNn15nO1eF_bGgu42UqQ3DxiSjFEil59Uk4RkVkRxItiEBaN38iFD3dL2DnWugaUEIVG5uXvt24vObeaymvbnKq2KxHK35zyP4d-AFYXOuU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying Toys</title><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</source><creator>Zhilina, Natalia</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhilina, Natalia ; Institute of Archaeology of the Russian Academy of Sciences</creatorcontrib><description>Signs of a toy are distinguished upon different materials: archaeological, ethnographic, of folk art and of personal experience. In the shape of the toy, there are signs of the impossibility of using it as a real prototype object: the nonconformance in the material, size, and simplification of the design. Appearance of a toy accurately points to the real prototype. Unlike sacred images, the toy focuses on the reality and pleasantness of the look, unlike decorative ones, it subordinates the decorative features to the concrete features of the prototype, although the toy is associated with the style of the time. The toy’s features point at its use in the game, possibility of free movement in the game space: absence of any details tightly fastening it with other objects; presence of details contributing to movement and change of position. Concrete toys go out of use due to a change in the nature of the games, a change in the attitude of the player: growing up, propensity to admire, rejection due to taste preferences. Works of folk crafts called “toys” become interior decorations, figurines, beautiful gifts. But they preserve the idea of a game, looking at them the human mind recreates the game, and for some time homo becomes homo ludens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1608-9057</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1857-3533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.55086/sp2351535</identifier><language>eng ; rus</language><ispartof>Stratum, 2023-11 (5), p.15-35</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-0880-6434</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhilina, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Institute of Archaeology of the Russian Academy of Sciences</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying Toys</title><title>Stratum</title><description>Signs of a toy are distinguished upon different materials: archaeological, ethnographic, of folk art and of personal experience. In the shape of the toy, there are signs of the impossibility of using it as a real prototype object: the nonconformance in the material, size, and simplification of the design. Appearance of a toy accurately points to the real prototype. Unlike sacred images, the toy focuses on the reality and pleasantness of the look, unlike decorative ones, it subordinates the decorative features to the concrete features of the prototype, although the toy is associated with the style of the time. The toy’s features point at its use in the game, possibility of free movement in the game space: absence of any details tightly fastening it with other objects; presence of details contributing to movement and change of position. Concrete toys go out of use due to a change in the nature of the games, a change in the attitude of the player: growing up, propensity to admire, rejection due to taste preferences. Works of folk crafts called “toys” become interior decorations, figurines, beautiful gifts. But they preserve the idea of a game, looking at them the human mind recreates the game, and for some time homo becomes homo ludens.</description><issn>1608-9057</issn><issn>1857-3533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j8tqAkEQRRuJoKgQ_ALXgU6qpqzurmWQmAiCG10Pk-lqGfHFtJv5-0giWZ27OFw4xkwRXpkhuLd8LYiRiXtmiIG9JSZ6um8HwQqwH5hJzgcAQCx4zjI0z6uo51uTuua8n20vXR6bfqqOWScPjsxu-bFdfNn15nO1eF_bGgu42UqQ3DxiSjFEil59Uk4RkVkRxItiEBaN38iFD3dL2DnWugaUEIVG5uXvt24vObeaymvbnKq2KxHK35zyP4d-AFYXOuU</recordid><startdate>20231115</startdate><enddate>20231115</enddate><creator>Zhilina, Natalia</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0880-6434</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231115</creationdate><title>Identifying Toys</title><author>Zhilina, Natalia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c120t-a91364d1ffd8d3d7e7fe5fd1155e10979e18959edb15278fd895665ecc0198d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; rus</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhilina, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Institute of Archaeology of the Russian Academy of Sciences</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Stratum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhilina, Natalia</au><aucorp>Institute of Archaeology of the Russian Academy of Sciences</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying Toys</atitle><jtitle>Stratum</jtitle><date>2023-11-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><issue>5</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>15-35</pages><issn>1608-9057</issn><eissn>1857-3533</eissn><abstract>Signs of a toy are distinguished upon different materials: archaeological, ethnographic, of folk art and of personal experience. In the shape of the toy, there are signs of the impossibility of using it as a real prototype object: the nonconformance in the material, size, and simplification of the design. Appearance of a toy accurately points to the real prototype. Unlike sacred images, the toy focuses on the reality and pleasantness of the look, unlike decorative ones, it subordinates the decorative features to the concrete features of the prototype, although the toy is associated with the style of the time. The toy’s features point at its use in the game, possibility of free movement in the game space: absence of any details tightly fastening it with other objects; presence of details contributing to movement and change of position. Concrete toys go out of use due to a change in the nature of the games, a change in the attitude of the player: growing up, propensity to admire, rejection due to taste preferences. Works of folk crafts called “toys” become interior decorations, figurines, beautiful gifts. But they preserve the idea of a game, looking at them the human mind recreates the game, and for some time homo becomes homo ludens.</abstract><doi>10.55086/sp2351535</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0880-6434</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1608-9057
ispartof Stratum, 2023-11 (5), p.15-35
issn 1608-9057
1857-3533
language eng ; rus
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_55086_sp2351535
source Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals
title Identifying Toys
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A39%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20Toys&rft.jtitle=Stratum&rft.au=Zhilina,%20Natalia&rft.aucorp=Institute%20of%20Archaeology%20of%20the%20Russian%20Academy%20of%20Sciences&rft.date=2023-11-15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=15-35&rft.issn=1608-9057&rft.eissn=1857-3533&rft_id=info:doi/10.55086/sp2351535&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_55086_sp2351535%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true