Malpractice Claims against Psychiatrists Related to Psychopharmacologic Agents: File series

Objective: Psychiatrists are considered to be the least frequently sued among other medical specialties. Of the 28 medical specialties, psychiatry ranked 22nd in terms of number of malpractice claims. We aimed to investigate psychopharmacotherapeutic malpractice claims against psychiatrists in Turke...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Klinik psikofarmakoloji bülteni 2013-12, Vol.23 (4), p.320-325
Hauptverfasser: Ozver, Ismail, Sahin, Esat, Sevindir, Emine, Demirel, Omer Faruk, Emul, Murat, Ozen, Sakir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 325
container_issue 4
container_start_page 320
container_title Klinik psikofarmakoloji bülteni
container_volume 23
creator Ozver, Ismail
Sahin, Esat
Sevindir, Emine
Demirel, Omer Faruk
Emul, Murat
Ozen, Sakir
description Objective: Psychiatrists are considered to be the least frequently sued among other medical specialties. Of the 28 medical specialties, psychiatry ranked 22nd in terms of number of malpractice claims. We aimed to investigate psychopharmacotherapeutic malpractice claims against psychiatrists in Turkey. Methods: Data from claim files were extracted between the years of 2003 and 2012 in which expert witness testimony of psychiatrist and forensic specialists in the Council of Forensic Medicine were requested by the court. Only, claim files about psychopharmacotherapeutic issues were included in the study. Results: There were eight malpractice claim files selected according to the inclusion criteria. There were 3 female and 5 male patients in the related claims; four of them had a diagnosis of depression while the remaining four had schizophrenia. Four wrong treatments, one neglect and wrong treatment, one severe adverse effect, one accountability for death, one persecutory complaint about the prescribed drugs were cited in the claims. Conclusion: Malpractice claims against psychiatrists have been rising and this issue might have some negative influences on interrelations between psychiatrists. Therefore, psychiatrists should improve their awareness about malpractice subjects.
doi_str_mv 10.5455/bcp.20130407011756
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5455_bcp_20130407011756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3227283491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-55723444bc52274359a647ceb328cdccc8119ae432dea82126c68f686b1e19d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGr_gKeA5635zq7goRSrgqKInjyEbDbbRtLNmqRI_72RevEic5gZZt53mAeAc4zmnHF-2ZpxThCmiCGJMJZcHIFJaUnVCC6PS42wrGRN6SmYpeRahJDkCAk8Ae-P2o9Rm-yMhUuv3TZBvdZuSBk-p73ZOJ2jSznBF-t1th3M4TAI40bHrTbBh7UzcLG2Q05XcOW8hclGZ9MZOOm1T3b2m6fgbXXzuryrHp5u75eLh8pQRHPFuSSUMdYaTohklDdaMGlsS0ltOmNMjXGjLaOks7ommAgj6l7UosUWN52gU3Bx8B1j-NzZlNVH2MWhnFSYFy6S8hJTQA5bJoaUou3VGN1Wx73CSP1wVIWj-suxiK4PIjf0oXz7FaLvVNZ7H2If9WBcUvQf_TefDnnx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1501373535</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Malpractice Claims against Psychiatrists Related to Psychopharmacologic Agents: File series</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Ozver, Ismail ; Sahin, Esat ; Sevindir, Emine ; Demirel, Omer Faruk ; Emul, Murat ; Ozen, Sakir</creator><creatorcontrib>Ozver, Ismail ; Sahin, Esat ; Sevindir, Emine ; Demirel, Omer Faruk ; Emul, Murat ; Ozen, Sakir</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Psychiatrists are considered to be the least frequently sued among other medical specialties. Of the 28 medical specialties, psychiatry ranked 22nd in terms of number of malpractice claims. We aimed to investigate psychopharmacotherapeutic malpractice claims against psychiatrists in Turkey. Methods: Data from claim files were extracted between the years of 2003 and 2012 in which expert witness testimony of psychiatrist and forensic specialists in the Council of Forensic Medicine were requested by the court. Only, claim files about psychopharmacotherapeutic issues were included in the study. Results: There were eight malpractice claim files selected according to the inclusion criteria. There were 3 female and 5 male patients in the related claims; four of them had a diagnosis of depression while the remaining four had schizophrenia. Four wrong treatments, one neglect and wrong treatment, one severe adverse effect, one accountability for death, one persecutory complaint about the prescribed drugs were cited in the claims. Conclusion: Malpractice claims against psychiatrists have been rising and this issue might have some negative influences on interrelations between psychiatrists. Therefore, psychiatrists should improve their awareness about malpractice subjects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1017-7833</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2475-0573</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1302-9657</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-0581</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5455/bcp.20130407011756</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Istanbul: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>claim ; dava ; indemnity payment ; malpractice issues ; malpraktis konuları ; psikiyatri ; psychiatry ; tazminat davaları</subject><ispartof>Klinik psikofarmakoloji bülteni, 2013-12, Vol.23 (4), p.320-325</ispartof><rights>2013 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Kure Iletism Grubu A.S. 2013</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-55723444bc52274359a647ceb328cdccc8119ae432dea82126c68f686b1e19d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-55723444bc52274359a647ceb328cdccc8119ae432dea82126c68f686b1e19d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ozver, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahin, Esat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sevindir, Emine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirel, Omer Faruk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emul, Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozen, Sakir</creatorcontrib><title>Malpractice Claims against Psychiatrists Related to Psychopharmacologic Agents: File series</title><title>Klinik psikofarmakoloji bülteni</title><description>Objective: Psychiatrists are considered to be the least frequently sued among other medical specialties. Of the 28 medical specialties, psychiatry ranked 22nd in terms of number of malpractice claims. We aimed to investigate psychopharmacotherapeutic malpractice claims against psychiatrists in Turkey. Methods: Data from claim files were extracted between the years of 2003 and 2012 in which expert witness testimony of psychiatrist and forensic specialists in the Council of Forensic Medicine were requested by the court. Only, claim files about psychopharmacotherapeutic issues were included in the study. Results: There were eight malpractice claim files selected according to the inclusion criteria. There were 3 female and 5 male patients in the related claims; four of them had a diagnosis of depression while the remaining four had schizophrenia. Four wrong treatments, one neglect and wrong treatment, one severe adverse effect, one accountability for death, one persecutory complaint about the prescribed drugs were cited in the claims. Conclusion: Malpractice claims against psychiatrists have been rising and this issue might have some negative influences on interrelations between psychiatrists. Therefore, psychiatrists should improve their awareness about malpractice subjects.</description><subject>claim</subject><subject>dava</subject><subject>indemnity payment</subject><subject>malpractice issues</subject><subject>malpraktis konuları</subject><subject>psikiyatri</subject><subject>psychiatry</subject><subject>tazminat davaları</subject><issn>1017-7833</issn><issn>2475-0573</issn><issn>1302-9657</issn><issn>2475-0581</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGr_gKeA5635zq7goRSrgqKInjyEbDbbRtLNmqRI_72RevEic5gZZt53mAeAc4zmnHF-2ZpxThCmiCGJMJZcHIFJaUnVCC6PS42wrGRN6SmYpeRahJDkCAk8Ae-P2o9Rm-yMhUuv3TZBvdZuSBk-p73ZOJ2jSznBF-t1th3M4TAI40bHrTbBh7UzcLG2Q05XcOW8hclGZ9MZOOm1T3b2m6fgbXXzuryrHp5u75eLh8pQRHPFuSSUMdYaTohklDdaMGlsS0ltOmNMjXGjLaOks7ommAgj6l7UosUWN52gU3Bx8B1j-NzZlNVH2MWhnFSYFy6S8hJTQA5bJoaUou3VGN1Wx73CSP1wVIWj-suxiK4PIjf0oXz7FaLvVNZ7H2If9WBcUvQf_TefDnnx</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Ozver, Ismail</creator><creator>Sahin, Esat</creator><creator>Sevindir, Emine</creator><creator>Demirel, Omer Faruk</creator><creator>Emul, Murat</creator><creator>Ozen, Sakir</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Aves Yayincilik Ltd. STI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Malpractice Claims against Psychiatrists Related to Psychopharmacologic Agents: File series</title><author>Ozver, Ismail ; Sahin, Esat ; Sevindir, Emine ; Demirel, Omer Faruk ; Emul, Murat ; Ozen, Sakir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-55723444bc52274359a647ceb328cdccc8119ae432dea82126c68f686b1e19d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>claim</topic><topic>dava</topic><topic>indemnity payment</topic><topic>malpractice issues</topic><topic>malpraktis konuları</topic><topic>psikiyatri</topic><topic>psychiatry</topic><topic>tazminat davaları</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ozver, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahin, Esat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sevindir, Emine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirel, Omer Faruk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emul, Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozen, Sakir</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Klinik psikofarmakoloji bülteni</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ozver, Ismail</au><au>Sahin, Esat</au><au>Sevindir, Emine</au><au>Demirel, Omer Faruk</au><au>Emul, Murat</au><au>Ozen, Sakir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Malpractice Claims against Psychiatrists Related to Psychopharmacologic Agents: File series</atitle><jtitle>Klinik psikofarmakoloji bülteni</jtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>320</spage><epage>325</epage><pages>320-325</pages><issn>1017-7833</issn><issn>2475-0573</issn><eissn>1302-9657</eissn><eissn>2475-0581</eissn><abstract>Objective: Psychiatrists are considered to be the least frequently sued among other medical specialties. Of the 28 medical specialties, psychiatry ranked 22nd in terms of number of malpractice claims. We aimed to investigate psychopharmacotherapeutic malpractice claims against psychiatrists in Turkey. Methods: Data from claim files were extracted between the years of 2003 and 2012 in which expert witness testimony of psychiatrist and forensic specialists in the Council of Forensic Medicine were requested by the court. Only, claim files about psychopharmacotherapeutic issues were included in the study. Results: There were eight malpractice claim files selected according to the inclusion criteria. There were 3 female and 5 male patients in the related claims; four of them had a diagnosis of depression while the remaining four had schizophrenia. Four wrong treatments, one neglect and wrong treatment, one severe adverse effect, one accountability for death, one persecutory complaint about the prescribed drugs were cited in the claims. Conclusion: Malpractice claims against psychiatrists have been rising and this issue might have some negative influences on interrelations between psychiatrists. Therefore, psychiatrists should improve their awareness about malpractice subjects.</abstract><cop>Istanbul</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.5455/bcp.20130407011756</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1017-7833
ispartof Klinik psikofarmakoloji bülteni, 2013-12, Vol.23 (4), p.320-325
issn 1017-7833
2475-0573
1302-9657
2475-0581
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5455_bcp_20130407011756
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects claim
dava
indemnity payment
malpractice issues
malpraktis konuları
psikiyatri
psychiatry
tazminat davaları
title Malpractice Claims against Psychiatrists Related to Psychopharmacologic Agents: File series
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T16%3A11%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Malpractice%20Claims%20against%20Psychiatrists%20Related%20to%20Psychopharmacologic%20Agents:%20File%20series&rft.jtitle=Klinik%20psikofarmakoloji%20b%C3%BClteni&rft.au=Ozver,%20Ismail&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=320&rft.epage=325&rft.pages=320-325&rft.issn=1017-7833&rft.eissn=1302-9657&rft_id=info:doi/10.5455/bcp.20130407011756&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3227283491%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1501373535&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true