Investigation on the Performance of Dosimeters for Individual Monitoring Applications at the O-arai Engineering Center

An investigation on the performance of various dosimeters to be used for individual monitoring at the O-arai Engineering Center (OEC) was executed. The present TLD system was compared with recently produced dosimeters, such as OSL, Glass dosimeter, EPD and SSTD. The practical use of these dosimeters...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hoken butsuri 2004, Vol.39(3), pp.231-237
Hauptverfasser: HASHIMOTO, Tomoharu, HASHIMOTO, Makoto, ISHIKAWA, Masayasu, EMORI, Syuuichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 237
container_issue 3
container_start_page 231
container_title Hoken butsuri
container_volume 39
creator HASHIMOTO, Tomoharu
HASHIMOTO, Makoto
ISHIKAWA, Masayasu
EMORI, Syuuichi
description An investigation on the performance of various dosimeters to be used for individual monitoring at the O-arai Engineering Center (OEC) was executed. The present TLD system was compared with recently produced dosimeters, such as OSL, Glass dosimeter, EPD and SSTD. The practical use of these dosimeters was also taken into account. There were no problems for any of the dosimeters for γ-ray individual monitoring. The OSL and glass dosimeters, which have good characteristics for γ-ray, can be used in various radiation environments without correction. On the other hand, the conversion factor is needed for low-energy γ-ray dosimetory when using EPD or TLD. None of the individual neutron dosimeters' responses relative to the neutron dose are adequate. Respective dose corrections according to the field conditions should be applied to the dosimeter outputs. The directional dependence of the relative response of EPD and SSTD are significant, and attention should be paid to the directional distribution of incident neutrons when using EPD or SSTD. The operational characteristics of each dosimeter were discussed, such as batch processing availability, robustness, fading characteristic, and reusability. As the result of the investigation, EPD was found to be the best γ-ray individual dosimeter for OEC applications, because of its flexibility in operation. On the other hand, the best neutron dosimeter for OEC is the TLD because of the low directional dependence of response.
doi_str_mv 10.5453/jhps.39.231
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5453_jhps_39_231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>article_jhps1966_39_3_39_3_231_article_char_en</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2331-150489ccd328fb1ccf106502a79880fd60eeeb69ec4158db6c9ed2b8a533a3db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFFLwzAQx4MoOHRPfoG8S2fStFn6OLapg8l80OeSJpcuo0tLEgd-e7NOFo4c3P3u9_BH6ImSWVmU7OWwH8KMVbOc0Rs0oUIU2bzk5BZNCOPzjFNK7tE0hANJryAkERN02rgThGhbGW3vcKq4B_wJ3vT-KJ0C3Bu86oM9QgQfcBrjjdP2ZPWP7PBH72zsvXUtXgxDZ9WoCVjG0bPLpJcWr11rHcCILcEl0SO6M7ILMP3vD-j7df21fM-2u7fNcrHNVM4YzWhJClEppVkuTEOVMpTwkuRyXglBjOYEABpegSpoKXTDVQU6b4QsGZNMN-wBPV-8yvcheDD14O1R-t-akvqcWn1OrWZVnVJL9OpCH0KULVxZ6aNVHYwsrTg_8-zypbPrWu2lr8GxPxl6ew0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation on the Performance of Dosimeters for Individual Monitoring Applications at the O-arai Engineering Center</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>HASHIMOTO, Tomoharu ; HASHIMOTO, Makoto ; ISHIKAWA, Masayasu ; EMORI, Syuuichi</creator><creatorcontrib>HASHIMOTO, Tomoharu ; HASHIMOTO, Makoto ; ISHIKAWA, Masayasu ; EMORI, Syuuichi</creatorcontrib><description>An investigation on the performance of various dosimeters to be used for individual monitoring at the O-arai Engineering Center (OEC) was executed. The present TLD system was compared with recently produced dosimeters, such as OSL, Glass dosimeter, EPD and SSTD. The practical use of these dosimeters was also taken into account. There were no problems for any of the dosimeters for γ-ray individual monitoring. The OSL and glass dosimeters, which have good characteristics for γ-ray, can be used in various radiation environments without correction. On the other hand, the conversion factor is needed for low-energy γ-ray dosimetory when using EPD or TLD. None of the individual neutron dosimeters' responses relative to the neutron dose are adequate. Respective dose corrections according to the field conditions should be applied to the dosimeter outputs. The directional dependence of the relative response of EPD and SSTD are significant, and attention should be paid to the directional distribution of incident neutrons when using EPD or SSTD. The operational characteristics of each dosimeter were discussed, such as batch processing availability, robustness, fading characteristic, and reusability. As the result of the investigation, EPD was found to be the best γ-ray individual dosimeter for OEC applications, because of its flexibility in operation. On the other hand, the best neutron dosimeter for OEC is the TLD because of the low directional dependence of response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0367-6110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1884-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5453/jhps.39.231</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan Health Physics Society</publisher><subject>electric pocket dosimeter (EPD) ; glass dosimeter ; operation method ; optical stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSL) ; radiation environment ; solid-state track detector (SSTD) ; Thermo-luminescence dosimeter (TLD)</subject><ispartof>Japanese Journal of Health Physics, 2004, Vol.39(3), pp.231-237</ispartof><rights>Japan Health Physics Society</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2331-150489ccd328fb1ccf106502a79880fd60eeeb69ec4158db6c9ed2b8a533a3db3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27904,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>HASHIMOTO, Tomoharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HASHIMOTO, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISHIKAWA, Masayasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EMORI, Syuuichi</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation on the Performance of Dosimeters for Individual Monitoring Applications at the O-arai Engineering Center</title><title>Hoken butsuri</title><addtitle>Jpn. J. Health Phys.</addtitle><description>An investigation on the performance of various dosimeters to be used for individual monitoring at the O-arai Engineering Center (OEC) was executed. The present TLD system was compared with recently produced dosimeters, such as OSL, Glass dosimeter, EPD and SSTD. The practical use of these dosimeters was also taken into account. There were no problems for any of the dosimeters for γ-ray individual monitoring. The OSL and glass dosimeters, which have good characteristics for γ-ray, can be used in various radiation environments without correction. On the other hand, the conversion factor is needed for low-energy γ-ray dosimetory when using EPD or TLD. None of the individual neutron dosimeters' responses relative to the neutron dose are adequate. Respective dose corrections according to the field conditions should be applied to the dosimeter outputs. The directional dependence of the relative response of EPD and SSTD are significant, and attention should be paid to the directional distribution of incident neutrons when using EPD or SSTD. The operational characteristics of each dosimeter were discussed, such as batch processing availability, robustness, fading characteristic, and reusability. As the result of the investigation, EPD was found to be the best γ-ray individual dosimeter for OEC applications, because of its flexibility in operation. On the other hand, the best neutron dosimeter for OEC is the TLD because of the low directional dependence of response.</description><subject>electric pocket dosimeter (EPD)</subject><subject>glass dosimeter</subject><subject>operation method</subject><subject>optical stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSL)</subject><subject>radiation environment</subject><subject>solid-state track detector (SSTD)</subject><subject>Thermo-luminescence dosimeter (TLD)</subject><issn>0367-6110</issn><issn>1884-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kFFLwzAQx4MoOHRPfoG8S2fStFn6OLapg8l80OeSJpcuo0tLEgd-e7NOFo4c3P3u9_BH6ImSWVmU7OWwH8KMVbOc0Rs0oUIU2bzk5BZNCOPzjFNK7tE0hANJryAkERN02rgThGhbGW3vcKq4B_wJ3vT-KJ0C3Bu86oM9QgQfcBrjjdP2ZPWP7PBH72zsvXUtXgxDZ9WoCVjG0bPLpJcWr11rHcCILcEl0SO6M7ILMP3vD-j7df21fM-2u7fNcrHNVM4YzWhJClEppVkuTEOVMpTwkuRyXglBjOYEABpegSpoKXTDVQU6b4QsGZNMN-wBPV-8yvcheDD14O1R-t-akvqcWn1OrWZVnVJL9OpCH0KULVxZ6aNVHYwsrTg_8-zypbPrWu2lr8GxPxl6ew0</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>HASHIMOTO, Tomoharu</creator><creator>HASHIMOTO, Makoto</creator><creator>ISHIKAWA, Masayasu</creator><creator>EMORI, Syuuichi</creator><general>Japan Health Physics Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>Investigation on the Performance of Dosimeters for Individual Monitoring Applications at the O-arai Engineering Center</title><author>HASHIMOTO, Tomoharu ; HASHIMOTO, Makoto ; ISHIKAWA, Masayasu ; EMORI, Syuuichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2331-150489ccd328fb1ccf106502a79880fd60eeeb69ec4158db6c9ed2b8a533a3db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>electric pocket dosimeter (EPD)</topic><topic>glass dosimeter</topic><topic>operation method</topic><topic>optical stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSL)</topic><topic>radiation environment</topic><topic>solid-state track detector (SSTD)</topic><topic>Thermo-luminescence dosimeter (TLD)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HASHIMOTO, Tomoharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HASHIMOTO, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISHIKAWA, Masayasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EMORI, Syuuichi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Hoken butsuri</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HASHIMOTO, Tomoharu</au><au>HASHIMOTO, Makoto</au><au>ISHIKAWA, Masayasu</au><au>EMORI, Syuuichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation on the Performance of Dosimeters for Individual Monitoring Applications at the O-arai Engineering Center</atitle><jtitle>Hoken butsuri</jtitle><addtitle>Jpn. J. Health Phys.</addtitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>231</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>231-237</pages><issn>0367-6110</issn><eissn>1884-7560</eissn><abstract>An investigation on the performance of various dosimeters to be used for individual monitoring at the O-arai Engineering Center (OEC) was executed. The present TLD system was compared with recently produced dosimeters, such as OSL, Glass dosimeter, EPD and SSTD. The practical use of these dosimeters was also taken into account. There were no problems for any of the dosimeters for γ-ray individual monitoring. The OSL and glass dosimeters, which have good characteristics for γ-ray, can be used in various radiation environments without correction. On the other hand, the conversion factor is needed for low-energy γ-ray dosimetory when using EPD or TLD. None of the individual neutron dosimeters' responses relative to the neutron dose are adequate. Respective dose corrections according to the field conditions should be applied to the dosimeter outputs. The directional dependence of the relative response of EPD and SSTD are significant, and attention should be paid to the directional distribution of incident neutrons when using EPD or SSTD. The operational characteristics of each dosimeter were discussed, such as batch processing availability, robustness, fading characteristic, and reusability. As the result of the investigation, EPD was found to be the best γ-ray individual dosimeter for OEC applications, because of its flexibility in operation. On the other hand, the best neutron dosimeter for OEC is the TLD because of the low directional dependence of response.</abstract><pub>Japan Health Physics Society</pub><doi>10.5453/jhps.39.231</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0367-6110
ispartof Japanese Journal of Health Physics, 2004, Vol.39(3), pp.231-237
issn 0367-6110
1884-7560
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5453_jhps_39_231
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects electric pocket dosimeter (EPD)
glass dosimeter
operation method
optical stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSL)
radiation environment
solid-state track detector (SSTD)
Thermo-luminescence dosimeter (TLD)
title Investigation on the Performance of Dosimeters for Individual Monitoring Applications at the O-arai Engineering Center
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T18%3A05%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20on%20the%20Performance%20of%20Dosimeters%20for%20Individual%20Monitoring%20Applications%20at%20the%20O-arai%20Engineering%20Center&rft.jtitle=Hoken%20butsuri&rft.au=HASHIMOTO,%20Tomoharu&rft.date=2004&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=231&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=231-237&rft.issn=0367-6110&rft.eissn=1884-7560&rft_id=info:doi/10.5453/jhps.39.231&rft_dat=%3Cjstage_cross%3Earticle_jhps1966_39_3_39_3_231_article_char_en%3C/jstage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true