Comparison between Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy : A Cohort Study

Comparison between Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy : A Cohort Study

Objective. To compare the operative outcomes in patients who underwent robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (RLH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Study Design. Retrospective chart review. All women who underwent RLH in hospital A and TLH in hospital B by a single surgeon were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ISRN minimally invasive surgery 2012-08, Vol.2012 (2012), p.1-4
Hauptverfasser: Sakhel, Khaled, Kirakosyan, Armen, Chauhan, Suneet, Lukban, James, Hines, James
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4
container_issue 2012
container_start_page 1
container_title ISRN minimally invasive surgery
container_volume 2012
creator Sakhel, Khaled
Kirakosyan, Armen
Chauhan, Suneet
Lukban, James
Hines, James
description Objective. To compare the operative outcomes in patients who underwent robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (RLH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Study Design. Retrospective chart review. All women who underwent RLH in hospital A and TLH in hospital B by a single surgeon were included. Results. 136 patients were included (73 in the RLH group and 63 in the TLH group). There were no conversions to laparotomy in the RLH group versus 7 (11.1%) in the TLH group (P=0.004). The mean induction time was significantly greater (by 6 minutes) for RLH, independent of docking time, as compared to TLH (P
doi_str_mv 10.5402/2012/408127
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>emarefa_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5402_2012_408127</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>469762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1307-91a4b8e9d0cb89066701dc0de11777a0702b32d212bebea9e8c4775e16b0b4a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1Lw0AQBuBFFCy1J8_CnpXYmc02m_VWgl9QELSew35MaaTNhmyk5N-bEhFPOpcZhodheBm7RLhdSBBzASjmEnIU6oRNBGhItEzz01_zOZvF-AFD5YAoFxPWFGHfmLaKoeaWugNRzV-DDV2yjLGKHXm-MgMI0YWmcvypH3YtuS7se25qz9ehM7s_zB1f8iJsQ9vxt-7T9xfsbGN2kWbffcreH-7XxVOyenl8LparxGEKKtFopM1Je3A215BlCtA78ISolDKgQNhUeIHCkiWjKXdSqQVhZsFKg-mU3Yx33fBXbGlTNm21N21fIpTHvMpjXuWY16CvR72tam8O1T_4asQ0ENqYHywzrTKRfgFsHXTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy : A Cohort Study</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Sakhel, Khaled ; Kirakosyan, Armen ; Chauhan, Suneet ; Lukban, James ; Hines, James</creator><contributor>Scheidbach, H. ; Al-Mulhim, A. S. ; Dedes, K. J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sakhel, Khaled ; Kirakosyan, Armen ; Chauhan, Suneet ; Lukban, James ; Hines, James ; Scheidbach, H. ; Al-Mulhim, A. S. ; Dedes, K. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To compare the operative outcomes in patients who underwent robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (RLH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Study Design. Retrospective chart review. All women who underwent RLH in hospital A and TLH in hospital B by a single surgeon were included. Results. 136 patients were included (73 in the RLH group and 63 in the TLH group). There were no conversions to laparotomy in the RLH group versus 7 (11.1%) in the TLH group (P=0.004). The mean induction time was significantly greater (by 6 minutes) for RLH, independent of docking time, as compared to TLH (P&lt;0.001). Total procedure time was significantly less in the RLH group (82 minutes) as compared to TLH (108 minutes) (P=0.001). Mean blood loss was less for RLH (46 mL) as compared to TLH (114 mL) (P&lt;0.001). A greater number of patients who underwent RLH were discharged on postoperative day 0 as compared to those receiving TLH (P=0.055). Conclusion. RLH is a safe alternative to TLH and may offer some operative advantages, including fewer conversions to laparotomy, reduced procedure time, less blood loss, and earlier discharge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2090-9438</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2090-9438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5402/2012/408127</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</publisher><ispartof>ISRN minimally invasive surgery, 2012-08, Vol.2012 (2012), p.1-4</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Khaled Sakhel et al.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1307-91a4b8e9d0cb89066701dc0de11777a0702b32d212bebea9e8c4775e16b0b4a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Scheidbach, H.</contributor><contributor>Al-Mulhim, A. S.</contributor><contributor>Dedes, K. J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sakhel, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirakosyan, Armen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chauhan, Suneet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukban, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hines, James</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy : A Cohort Study</title><title>ISRN minimally invasive surgery</title><description>Objective. To compare the operative outcomes in patients who underwent robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (RLH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Study Design. Retrospective chart review. All women who underwent RLH in hospital A and TLH in hospital B by a single surgeon were included. Results. 136 patients were included (73 in the RLH group and 63 in the TLH group). There were no conversions to laparotomy in the RLH group versus 7 (11.1%) in the TLH group (P=0.004). The mean induction time was significantly greater (by 6 minutes) for RLH, independent of docking time, as compared to TLH (P&lt;0.001). Total procedure time was significantly less in the RLH group (82 minutes) as compared to TLH (108 minutes) (P=0.001). Mean blood loss was less for RLH (46 mL) as compared to TLH (114 mL) (P&lt;0.001). A greater number of patients who underwent RLH were discharged on postoperative day 0 as compared to those receiving TLH (P=0.055). Conclusion. RLH is a safe alternative to TLH and may offer some operative advantages, including fewer conversions to laparotomy, reduced procedure time, less blood loss, and earlier discharge.</description><issn>2090-9438</issn><issn>2090-9438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1Lw0AQBuBFFCy1J8_CnpXYmc02m_VWgl9QELSew35MaaTNhmyk5N-bEhFPOpcZhodheBm7RLhdSBBzASjmEnIU6oRNBGhItEzz01_zOZvF-AFD5YAoFxPWFGHfmLaKoeaWugNRzV-DDV2yjLGKHXm-MgMI0YWmcvypH3YtuS7se25qz9ehM7s_zB1f8iJsQ9vxt-7T9xfsbGN2kWbffcreH-7XxVOyenl8LparxGEKKtFopM1Je3A215BlCtA78ISolDKgQNhUeIHCkiWjKXdSqQVhZsFKg-mU3Yx33fBXbGlTNm21N21fIpTHvMpjXuWY16CvR72tam8O1T_4asQ0ENqYHywzrTKRfgFsHXTQ</recordid><startdate>20120807</startdate><enddate>20120807</enddate><creator>Sakhel, Khaled</creator><creator>Kirakosyan, Armen</creator><creator>Chauhan, Suneet</creator><creator>Lukban, James</creator><creator>Hines, James</creator><general>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</general><general>International Scholarly Research Network</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120807</creationdate><title>Comparison between Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy : A Cohort Study</title><author>Sakhel, Khaled ; Kirakosyan, Armen ; Chauhan, Suneet ; Lukban, James ; Hines, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1307-91a4b8e9d0cb89066701dc0de11777a0702b32d212bebea9e8c4775e16b0b4a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakhel, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirakosyan, Armen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chauhan, Suneet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukban, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hines, James</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>ISRN minimally invasive surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakhel, Khaled</au><au>Kirakosyan, Armen</au><au>Chauhan, Suneet</au><au>Lukban, James</au><au>Hines, James</au><au>Scheidbach, H.</au><au>Al-Mulhim, A. S.</au><au>Dedes, K. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy : A Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>ISRN minimally invasive surgery</jtitle><date>2012-08-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2012</volume><issue>2012</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>4</epage><pages>1-4</pages><issn>2090-9438</issn><eissn>2090-9438</eissn><abstract>Objective. To compare the operative outcomes in patients who underwent robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (RLH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Study Design. Retrospective chart review. All women who underwent RLH in hospital A and TLH in hospital B by a single surgeon were included. Results. 136 patients were included (73 in the RLH group and 63 in the TLH group). There were no conversions to laparotomy in the RLH group versus 7 (11.1%) in the TLH group (P=0.004). The mean induction time was significantly greater (by 6 minutes) for RLH, independent of docking time, as compared to TLH (P&lt;0.001). Total procedure time was significantly less in the RLH group (82 minutes) as compared to TLH (108 minutes) (P=0.001). Mean blood loss was less for RLH (46 mL) as compared to TLH (114 mL) (P&lt;0.001). A greater number of patients who underwent RLH were discharged on postoperative day 0 as compared to those receiving TLH (P=0.055). Conclusion. RLH is a safe alternative to TLH and may offer some operative advantages, including fewer conversions to laparotomy, reduced procedure time, less blood loss, and earlier discharge.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</pub><doi>10.5402/2012/408127</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2090-9438
ispartof ISRN minimally invasive surgery, 2012-08, Vol.2012 (2012), p.1-4
issn 2090-9438
2090-9438
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5402_2012_408127
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Comparison between Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy : A Cohort Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T00%3A32%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-emarefa_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20Robot-Assisted%20Laparoscopic%20Hysterectomy%20and%20Total%20Laparoscopic%20Hysterectomy%20:%20A%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=ISRN%20minimally%20invasive%20surgery&rft.au=Sakhel,%20Khaled&rft.date=2012-08-07&rft.volume=2012&rft.issue=2012&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=4&rft.pages=1-4&rft.issn=2090-9438&rft.eissn=2090-9438&rft_id=info:doi/10.5402/2012/408127&rft_dat=%3Cemarefa_cross%3E469762%3C/emarefa_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true