Comparison of the Neuromuscular Profile of the First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle and the Flexor Hallucis Brevis Muscle as Measured by Electromyography

Lower limb muscles recover faster than upper limb muscles following administration of nondepolarizing neuromuscular relaxants until the train-of-four ratio (TOFR) reached 0.7. However, no study has been conducted to evaluate the recovery time of the flexor hallucis brevis muscle (FHBM), up to a TOFR...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ISRN anesthesiology 2011-12, Vol.2011 (2011), p.1-3
Hauptverfasser: Sugi, Yasuyuki, Nitahara, Keiichi, Higa, Kazuo, Kusumoto, Go, Shono, Shinjiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3
container_issue 2011
container_start_page 1
container_title ISRN anesthesiology
container_volume 2011
creator Sugi, Yasuyuki
Nitahara, Keiichi
Higa, Kazuo
Kusumoto, Go
Shono, Shinjiro
description Lower limb muscles recover faster than upper limb muscles following administration of nondepolarizing neuromuscular relaxants until the train-of-four ratio (TOFR) reached 0.7. However, no study has been conducted to evaluate the recovery time of the flexor hallucis brevis muscle (FHBM), up to a TOFR of 0.9, which indicates satisfactory recovery of neuromuscular blockade. The aim of this study was to determine electromyographically the relationship between the TOFRs of the FHBM and the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDIM), following 0.1 mg/kg of vecuronium. Eighteen patients were enrolled in this study. Electromyography of the FDIM and the FHBM was monitored. Onset times and recovery times to TOFRs of 0.7 and 0.9 of both muscles after administration of vecuronium were measured. The onset time in the FDIM was not different from that in the FHBM (P = 0.10). Recovery time to TOFR 0.7 was significantly faster in the FHBM than in the FDIM (P < 0.013). There was no significant difference in the meantime to reach TOFR 0.9 between the FDIM and the FHBM (P = 0.11). There is no clinical importance in the difference of neuromuscular recovery between the FHBM and the FDIM after TOFR reached 0.9 following administration of vecuronium.
doi_str_mv 10.5402/2011/298983
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>emarefa_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5402_2011_298983</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>461563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1723-7f27d7c4b805cfac829d78272144a46a972f0c42c42193afc283ecc68035f7d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1PwyAYB3BiNHHRnTybcNbM8VroUefmlsyXg54bRsFhurJAq_aD-H1lqc6j5El4kucHhD8AZxhdcYbImCCMxySXuaQHYEBQjkac8-xw3zN5DIYxvqG0MsS5zAfga-I3WxVc9DX0FjZrAx9MG_ymjbqtVIBPwVtXmd_hzIXYwFsfoqrgom5M8DEa30Z4n04kp-qyh5X59AHOVVW12kV4E8y7-1OpMyq2wZRw1cFpZXSTHu38a1DbdXcKjqyqohn-7CfgZTZ9nsxHy8e7xeR6OdJYEDoSlohSaLaSiGurtCR5KSQRBDOmWKZyQSzSjKTCOVVWE0mN1plElFtRMnoCLvt79e4bwdhiG9xGha7AqNiFWuxCLfpQk77o9drVpfpw_-DzHptEjFV7zDLMM0q_AQOjgk4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Neuromuscular Profile of the First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle and the Flexor Hallucis Brevis Muscle as Measured by Electromyography</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sugi, Yasuyuki ; Nitahara, Keiichi ; Higa, Kazuo ; Kusumoto, Go ; Shono, Shinjiro</creator><contributor>Karakaya, D. ; Motamed, C.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sugi, Yasuyuki ; Nitahara, Keiichi ; Higa, Kazuo ; Kusumoto, Go ; Shono, Shinjiro ; Karakaya, D. ; Motamed, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Lower limb muscles recover faster than upper limb muscles following administration of nondepolarizing neuromuscular relaxants until the train-of-four ratio (TOFR) reached 0.7. However, no study has been conducted to evaluate the recovery time of the flexor hallucis brevis muscle (FHBM), up to a TOFR of 0.9, which indicates satisfactory recovery of neuromuscular blockade. The aim of this study was to determine electromyographically the relationship between the TOFRs of the FHBM and the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDIM), following 0.1 mg/kg of vecuronium. Eighteen patients were enrolled in this study. Electromyography of the FDIM and the FHBM was monitored. Onset times and recovery times to TOFRs of 0.7 and 0.9 of both muscles after administration of vecuronium were measured. The onset time in the FDIM was not different from that in the FHBM (P = 0.10). Recovery time to TOFR 0.7 was significantly faster in the FHBM than in the FDIM (P &lt; 0.013). There was no significant difference in the meantime to reach TOFR 0.9 between the FDIM and the FHBM (P = 0.11). There is no clinical importance in the difference of neuromuscular recovery between the FHBM and the FDIM after TOFR reached 0.9 following administration of vecuronium.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2090-5548</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2090-5556</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5402/2011/298983</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</publisher><ispartof>ISRN anesthesiology, 2011-12, Vol.2011 (2011), p.1-3</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Yasuyuki Sugi et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1723-7f27d7c4b805cfac829d78272144a46a972f0c42c42193afc283ecc68035f7d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1723-7f27d7c4b805cfac829d78272144a46a972f0c42c42193afc283ecc68035f7d43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3496-0467</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Karakaya, D.</contributor><contributor>Motamed, C.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sugi, Yasuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitahara, Keiichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higa, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusumoto, Go</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shono, Shinjiro</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Neuromuscular Profile of the First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle and the Flexor Hallucis Brevis Muscle as Measured by Electromyography</title><title>ISRN anesthesiology</title><description>Lower limb muscles recover faster than upper limb muscles following administration of nondepolarizing neuromuscular relaxants until the train-of-four ratio (TOFR) reached 0.7. However, no study has been conducted to evaluate the recovery time of the flexor hallucis brevis muscle (FHBM), up to a TOFR of 0.9, which indicates satisfactory recovery of neuromuscular blockade. The aim of this study was to determine electromyographically the relationship between the TOFRs of the FHBM and the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDIM), following 0.1 mg/kg of vecuronium. Eighteen patients were enrolled in this study. Electromyography of the FDIM and the FHBM was monitored. Onset times and recovery times to TOFRs of 0.7 and 0.9 of both muscles after administration of vecuronium were measured. The onset time in the FDIM was not different from that in the FHBM (P = 0.10). Recovery time to TOFR 0.7 was significantly faster in the FHBM than in the FDIM (P &lt; 0.013). There was no significant difference in the meantime to reach TOFR 0.9 between the FDIM and the FHBM (P = 0.11). There is no clinical importance in the difference of neuromuscular recovery between the FHBM and the FDIM after TOFR reached 0.9 following administration of vecuronium.</description><issn>2090-5548</issn><issn>2090-5556</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1PwyAYB3BiNHHRnTybcNbM8VroUefmlsyXg54bRsFhurJAq_aD-H1lqc6j5El4kucHhD8AZxhdcYbImCCMxySXuaQHYEBQjkac8-xw3zN5DIYxvqG0MsS5zAfga-I3WxVc9DX0FjZrAx9MG_ymjbqtVIBPwVtXmd_hzIXYwFsfoqrgom5M8DEa30Z4n04kp-qyh5X59AHOVVW12kV4E8y7-1OpMyq2wZRw1cFpZXSTHu38a1DbdXcKjqyqohn-7CfgZTZ9nsxHy8e7xeR6OdJYEDoSlohSaLaSiGurtCR5KSQRBDOmWKZyQSzSjKTCOVVWE0mN1plElFtRMnoCLvt79e4bwdhiG9xGha7AqNiFWuxCLfpQk77o9drVpfpw_-DzHptEjFV7zDLMM0q_AQOjgk4</recordid><startdate>20111222</startdate><enddate>20111222</enddate><creator>Sugi, Yasuyuki</creator><creator>Nitahara, Keiichi</creator><creator>Higa, Kazuo</creator><creator>Kusumoto, Go</creator><creator>Shono, Shinjiro</creator><general>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</general><general>International Scholarly Research Network</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3496-0467</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20111222</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Neuromuscular Profile of the First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle and the Flexor Hallucis Brevis Muscle as Measured by Electromyography</title><author>Sugi, Yasuyuki ; Nitahara, Keiichi ; Higa, Kazuo ; Kusumoto, Go ; Shono, Shinjiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1723-7f27d7c4b805cfac829d78272144a46a972f0c42c42193afc283ecc68035f7d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sugi, Yasuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitahara, Keiichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higa, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusumoto, Go</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shono, Shinjiro</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>ISRN anesthesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sugi, Yasuyuki</au><au>Nitahara, Keiichi</au><au>Higa, Kazuo</au><au>Kusumoto, Go</au><au>Shono, Shinjiro</au><au>Karakaya, D.</au><au>Motamed, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Neuromuscular Profile of the First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle and the Flexor Hallucis Brevis Muscle as Measured by Electromyography</atitle><jtitle>ISRN anesthesiology</jtitle><date>2011-12-22</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>2011</volume><issue>2011</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>3</epage><pages>1-3</pages><issn>2090-5548</issn><eissn>2090-5556</eissn><abstract>Lower limb muscles recover faster than upper limb muscles following administration of nondepolarizing neuromuscular relaxants until the train-of-four ratio (TOFR) reached 0.7. However, no study has been conducted to evaluate the recovery time of the flexor hallucis brevis muscle (FHBM), up to a TOFR of 0.9, which indicates satisfactory recovery of neuromuscular blockade. The aim of this study was to determine electromyographically the relationship between the TOFRs of the FHBM and the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDIM), following 0.1 mg/kg of vecuronium. Eighteen patients were enrolled in this study. Electromyography of the FDIM and the FHBM was monitored. Onset times and recovery times to TOFRs of 0.7 and 0.9 of both muscles after administration of vecuronium were measured. The onset time in the FDIM was not different from that in the FHBM (P = 0.10). Recovery time to TOFR 0.7 was significantly faster in the FHBM than in the FDIM (P &lt; 0.013). There was no significant difference in the meantime to reach TOFR 0.9 between the FDIM and the FHBM (P = 0.11). There is no clinical importance in the difference of neuromuscular recovery between the FHBM and the FDIM after TOFR reached 0.9 following administration of vecuronium.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</pub><doi>10.5402/2011/298983</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3496-0467</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2090-5548
ispartof ISRN anesthesiology, 2011-12, Vol.2011 (2011), p.1-3
issn 2090-5548
2090-5556
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5402_2011_298983
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Comparison of the Neuromuscular Profile of the First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle and the Flexor Hallucis Brevis Muscle as Measured by Electromyography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T08%3A28%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-emarefa_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Neuromuscular%20Profile%20of%20the%20First%20Dorsal%20Interosseous%20Muscle%20and%20the%20Flexor%20Hallucis%20Brevis%20Muscle%20as%20Measured%20by%20Electromyography&rft.jtitle=ISRN%20anesthesiology&rft.au=Sugi,%20Yasuyuki&rft.date=2011-12-22&rft.volume=2011&rft.issue=2011&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=3&rft.pages=1-3&rft.issn=2090-5548&rft.eissn=2090-5556&rft_id=info:doi/10.5402/2011/298983&rft_dat=%3Cemarefa_cross%3E461563%3C/emarefa_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true