Effects of an Inshore Artificial Reef on the Trophic Dynamics of Three Species of Estuarine Fish

Estuarine habitats are important in the life history of many fish species, yet are being degraded at an alarming rate. Habitat loss is often mitigated by the addition of artificial reefs. Understanding how artificial habitat affects the trophic dynamics of associated fish communities is important to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of marine science 2013-07, Vol.89 (3), p.657-676
Hauptverfasser: Simonsen, Kirsten A, Cowan, James H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 676
container_issue 3
container_start_page 657
container_title Bulletin of marine science
container_volume 89
creator Simonsen, Kirsten A
Cowan, James H
description Estuarine habitats are important in the life history of many fish species, yet are being degraded at an alarming rate. Habitat loss is often mitigated by the addition of artificial reefs. Understanding how artificial habitat affects the trophic dynamics of associated fish communities is important to understanding their role in estuarine environments. This study compared the trophic dynamics of spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus (Cuvier, 1830), Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus (Linnaeus, 1766) , and bay anchovy, Anchoa mitchilli (Valenciennes, 1848), at an inshore artificial reef and a nearby mud-bottom site. Trophic dynamics were assessed using a combination of gut content analysis and stable isotopes for spotted seatrout and Atlantic croaker, and stable isotopes alone for bay anchovy. No significant differences were found in the either the diets or mean values of δ13C, δ15 N, or δ34S of spotted seatrout between habitats. Differences were seen in both the centroid distance and total area of the δ 13 C-δ15N biplot for spotted seatrout indicating greater trophic niche breath at the artificial reef. Diets of Atlantic croaker differed significantly between habitats and specimens were more enriched in δ15N at the artificial reef; however, no differences in trophic niche breadth were observed. Bay anchovy were more depleted in both δ13C and δ34S over the artificial reef and differences in the trophic niche breadth were observed. Results suggest that habitat alterations can affect trophic dynamics of estuarine species in different ways. Therefore, foraging strategy should be considered when evaluating estuarine artificial reefs.
doi_str_mv 10.5343/bms.2012.1013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubtec_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5343_bms_2012_1013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>umrsmas/bullmar/2013/00000089/00000003/art00002</ingid><sourcerecordid>umrsmas/bullmar/2013/00000089/00000003/art00002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-d2893fddb3aa25fdb553e1538dc67c33b0abf4b69bce21834180318832106ba03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v3CAQhn1IpaZpj7lzzMVbYOw1Pkbp5kOKVLXdnicYDzGRjbeAK6W_vng36q1cGKFnHjTvFMWl4JsaKvjcTXEjuZAbwQWcFeec86as2qZ5X3yI8YVzIVolz4unnbVkUmSzZdqzBx-HORC7DslZZ5we2Xciy2bP0kBsH-bD4Az78ur15Myxaz8EIvbjQMbR8WEX06KD88RuXRw-Fu-sHiN9ersvip-3u_3Nffn49e7h5vqxNAAqlb1ULdi-70BrWdu-q2sgUYPqzbbJSMd1Z6tu23aGpFBQCcVBKAVS8G2nOVwUVyfvIcy_FooJJxcNjaP2NC8RRZ0TUKqBNqPlCTVhjjGQxUNwkw6vKDiu6WFOD9f0cE0v83cn3vln8knjy7wEn4fBZQpx0hG7ZRyzYO0B5Mej2reCA-qQ1kJm07f_mJz5J1tXtW4Kf6vWQ3bmEZWsUAjOsSerlzFhyr89_8Eo4S8-8pbn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1500788739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of an Inshore Artificial Reef on the Trophic Dynamics of Three Species of Estuarine Fish</title><source>Ingenta Connect</source><creator>Simonsen, Kirsten A ; Cowan, James H</creator><creatorcontrib>Simonsen, Kirsten A ; Cowan, James H</creatorcontrib><description>Estuarine habitats are important in the life history of many fish species, yet are being degraded at an alarming rate. Habitat loss is often mitigated by the addition of artificial reefs. Understanding how artificial habitat affects the trophic dynamics of associated fish communities is important to understanding their role in estuarine environments. This study compared the trophic dynamics of spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus (Cuvier, 1830), Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus (Linnaeus, 1766) , and bay anchovy, Anchoa mitchilli (Valenciennes, 1848), at an inshore artificial reef and a nearby mud-bottom site. Trophic dynamics were assessed using a combination of gut content analysis and stable isotopes for spotted seatrout and Atlantic croaker, and stable isotopes alone for bay anchovy. No significant differences were found in the either the diets or mean values of δ13C, δ15 N, or δ34S of spotted seatrout between habitats. Differences were seen in both the centroid distance and total area of the δ 13 C-δ15N biplot for spotted seatrout indicating greater trophic niche breath at the artificial reef. Diets of Atlantic croaker differed significantly between habitats and specimens were more enriched in δ15N at the artificial reef; however, no differences in trophic niche breadth were observed. Bay anchovy were more depleted in both δ13C and δ34S over the artificial reef and differences in the trophic niche breadth were observed. Results suggest that habitat alterations can affect trophic dynamics of estuarine species in different ways. Therefore, foraging strategy should be considered when evaluating estuarine artificial reefs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-4977</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5343/bms.2012.1013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Miami - Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmos</publisher><subject>Anchoa mitchilli ; Brackish ; Cynoscion nebulosus ; Marine ; Micropogonias undulatus</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of marine science, 2013-07, Vol.89 (3), p.657-676</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-d2893fddb3aa25fdb553e1538dc67c33b0abf4b69bce21834180318832106ba03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>289,314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simonsen, Kirsten A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowan, James H</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of an Inshore Artificial Reef on the Trophic Dynamics of Three Species of Estuarine Fish</title><title>Bulletin of marine science</title><addtitle>BMS</addtitle><description>Estuarine habitats are important in the life history of many fish species, yet are being degraded at an alarming rate. Habitat loss is often mitigated by the addition of artificial reefs. Understanding how artificial habitat affects the trophic dynamics of associated fish communities is important to understanding their role in estuarine environments. This study compared the trophic dynamics of spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus (Cuvier, 1830), Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus (Linnaeus, 1766) , and bay anchovy, Anchoa mitchilli (Valenciennes, 1848), at an inshore artificial reef and a nearby mud-bottom site. Trophic dynamics were assessed using a combination of gut content analysis and stable isotopes for spotted seatrout and Atlantic croaker, and stable isotopes alone for bay anchovy. No significant differences were found in the either the diets or mean values of δ13C, δ15 N, or δ34S of spotted seatrout between habitats. Differences were seen in both the centroid distance and total area of the δ 13 C-δ15N biplot for spotted seatrout indicating greater trophic niche breath at the artificial reef. Diets of Atlantic croaker differed significantly between habitats and specimens were more enriched in δ15N at the artificial reef; however, no differences in trophic niche breadth were observed. Bay anchovy were more depleted in both δ13C and δ34S over the artificial reef and differences in the trophic niche breadth were observed. Results suggest that habitat alterations can affect trophic dynamics of estuarine species in different ways. Therefore, foraging strategy should be considered when evaluating estuarine artificial reefs.</description><subject>Anchoa mitchilli</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Cynoscion nebulosus</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Micropogonias undulatus</subject><issn>0007-4977</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1v3CAQhn1IpaZpj7lzzMVbYOw1Pkbp5kOKVLXdnicYDzGRjbeAK6W_vng36q1cGKFnHjTvFMWl4JsaKvjcTXEjuZAbwQWcFeec86as2qZ5X3yI8YVzIVolz4unnbVkUmSzZdqzBx-HORC7DslZZ5we2Xciy2bP0kBsH-bD4Az78ur15Myxaz8EIvbjQMbR8WEX06KD88RuXRw-Fu-sHiN9ersvip-3u_3Nffn49e7h5vqxNAAqlb1ULdi-70BrWdu-q2sgUYPqzbbJSMd1Z6tu23aGpFBQCcVBKAVS8G2nOVwUVyfvIcy_FooJJxcNjaP2NC8RRZ0TUKqBNqPlCTVhjjGQxUNwkw6vKDiu6WFOD9f0cE0v83cn3vln8knjy7wEn4fBZQpx0hG7ZRyzYO0B5Mej2reCA-qQ1kJm07f_mJz5J1tXtW4Kf6vWQ3bmEZWsUAjOsSerlzFhyr89_8Eo4S8-8pbn</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Simonsen, Kirsten A</creator><creator>Cowan, James H</creator><general>University of Miami - Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmos</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Effects of an Inshore Artificial Reef on the Trophic Dynamics of Three Species of Estuarine Fish</title><author>Simonsen, Kirsten A ; Cowan, James H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-d2893fddb3aa25fdb553e1538dc67c33b0abf4b69bce21834180318832106ba03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Anchoa mitchilli</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Cynoscion nebulosus</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Micropogonias undulatus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simonsen, Kirsten A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowan, James H</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of marine science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simonsen, Kirsten A</au><au>Cowan, James H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of an Inshore Artificial Reef on the Trophic Dynamics of Three Species of Estuarine Fish</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of marine science</jtitle><stitle>BMS</stitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>657</spage><epage>676</epage><pages>657-676</pages><issn>0007-4977</issn><abstract>Estuarine habitats are important in the life history of many fish species, yet are being degraded at an alarming rate. Habitat loss is often mitigated by the addition of artificial reefs. Understanding how artificial habitat affects the trophic dynamics of associated fish communities is important to understanding their role in estuarine environments. This study compared the trophic dynamics of spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus (Cuvier, 1830), Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus (Linnaeus, 1766) , and bay anchovy, Anchoa mitchilli (Valenciennes, 1848), at an inshore artificial reef and a nearby mud-bottom site. Trophic dynamics were assessed using a combination of gut content analysis and stable isotopes for spotted seatrout and Atlantic croaker, and stable isotopes alone for bay anchovy. No significant differences were found in the either the diets or mean values of δ13C, δ15 N, or δ34S of spotted seatrout between habitats. Differences were seen in both the centroid distance and total area of the δ 13 C-δ15N biplot for spotted seatrout indicating greater trophic niche breath at the artificial reef. Diets of Atlantic croaker differed significantly between habitats and specimens were more enriched in δ15N at the artificial reef; however, no differences in trophic niche breadth were observed. Bay anchovy were more depleted in both δ13C and δ34S over the artificial reef and differences in the trophic niche breadth were observed. Results suggest that habitat alterations can affect trophic dynamics of estuarine species in different ways. Therefore, foraging strategy should be considered when evaluating estuarine artificial reefs.</abstract><pub>University of Miami - Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmos</pub><doi>10.5343/bms.2012.1013</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-4977
ispartof Bulletin of marine science, 2013-07, Vol.89 (3), p.657-676
issn 0007-4977
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5343_bms_2012_1013
source Ingenta Connect
subjects Anchoa mitchilli
Brackish
Cynoscion nebulosus
Marine
Micropogonias undulatus
title Effects of an Inshore Artificial Reef on the Trophic Dynamics of Three Species of Estuarine Fish
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T13%3A23%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubtec_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20an%20Inshore%20Artificial%20Reef%20on%20the%20Trophic%20Dynamics%20of%20Three%20Species%20of%20Estuarine%20Fish&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20marine%20science&rft.au=Simonsen,%20Kirsten%20A&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=657&rft.epage=676&rft.pages=657-676&rft.issn=0007-4977&rft_id=info:doi/10.5343/bms.2012.1013&rft_dat=%3Cpubtec_cross%3Eumrsmas/bullmar/2013/00000089/00000003/art00002%3C/pubtec_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1500788739&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ingid=umrsmas/bullmar/2013/00000089/00000003/art00002&rfr_iscdi=true