Effects of an Inshore Artificial Reef on the Trophic Dynamics of Three Species of Estuarine Fish
Estuarine habitats are important in the life history of many fish species, yet are being degraded at an alarming rate. Habitat loss is often mitigated by the addition of artificial reefs. Understanding how artificial habitat affects the trophic dynamics of associated fish communities is important to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of marine science 2013-07, Vol.89 (3), p.657-676 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 676 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 657 |
container_title | Bulletin of marine science |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Simonsen, Kirsten A Cowan, James H |
description | Estuarine habitats are important in the life history of many fish species, yet are being degraded at an alarming rate. Habitat loss is often mitigated by the addition of artificial reefs. Understanding how artificial habitat affects the trophic dynamics of associated fish communities
is important to understanding their role in estuarine environments. This study compared the trophic dynamics of spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus (Cuvier, 1830), Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus (Linnaeus, 1766) , and bay anchovy, Anchoa mitchilli (Valenciennes,
1848), at an inshore artificial reef and a nearby mud-bottom site. Trophic dynamics were assessed using a combination of gut content analysis and stable isotopes for spotted seatrout and Atlantic croaker, and stable isotopes alone for bay anchovy. No significant differences were found in the
either the diets or mean values of δ13C, δ15 N, or δ34S of spotted seatrout between habitats. Differences were seen in both the centroid distance and total area of the δ 13 C-δ15N biplot for spotted seatrout indicating
greater trophic niche breath at the artificial reef. Diets of Atlantic croaker differed significantly between habitats and specimens were more enriched in δ15N at the artificial reef; however, no differences in trophic niche breadth were observed. Bay anchovy were more depleted
in both δ13C and δ34S over the artificial reef and differences in the trophic niche breadth were observed. Results suggest that habitat alterations can affect trophic dynamics of estuarine species in different ways. Therefore, foraging strategy should be considered
when evaluating estuarine artificial reefs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5343/bms.2012.1013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubtec_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5343_bms_2012_1013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>umrsmas/bullmar/2013/00000089/00000003/art00002</ingid><sourcerecordid>umrsmas/bullmar/2013/00000089/00000003/art00002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-d2893fddb3aa25fdb553e1538dc67c33b0abf4b69bce21834180318832106ba03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v3CAQhn1IpaZpj7lzzMVbYOw1Pkbp5kOKVLXdnicYDzGRjbeAK6W_vng36q1cGKFnHjTvFMWl4JsaKvjcTXEjuZAbwQWcFeec86as2qZ5X3yI8YVzIVolz4unnbVkUmSzZdqzBx-HORC7DslZZ5we2Xciy2bP0kBsH-bD4Az78ur15Myxaz8EIvbjQMbR8WEX06KD88RuXRw-Fu-sHiN9ersvip-3u_3Nffn49e7h5vqxNAAqlb1ULdi-70BrWdu-q2sgUYPqzbbJSMd1Z6tu23aGpFBQCcVBKAVS8G2nOVwUVyfvIcy_FooJJxcNjaP2NC8RRZ0TUKqBNqPlCTVhjjGQxUNwkw6vKDiu6WFOD9f0cE0v83cn3vln8knjy7wEn4fBZQpx0hG7ZRyzYO0B5Mej2reCA-qQ1kJm07f_mJz5J1tXtW4Kf6vWQ3bmEZWsUAjOsSerlzFhyr89_8Eo4S8-8pbn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1500788739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of an Inshore Artificial Reef on the Trophic Dynamics of Three Species of Estuarine Fish</title><source>Ingenta Connect</source><creator>Simonsen, Kirsten A ; Cowan, James H</creator><creatorcontrib>Simonsen, Kirsten A ; Cowan, James H</creatorcontrib><description>Estuarine habitats are important in the life history of many fish species, yet are being degraded at an alarming rate. Habitat loss is often mitigated by the addition of artificial reefs. Understanding how artificial habitat affects the trophic dynamics of associated fish communities
is important to understanding their role in estuarine environments. This study compared the trophic dynamics of spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus (Cuvier, 1830), Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus (Linnaeus, 1766) , and bay anchovy, Anchoa mitchilli (Valenciennes,
1848), at an inshore artificial reef and a nearby mud-bottom site. Trophic dynamics were assessed using a combination of gut content analysis and stable isotopes for spotted seatrout and Atlantic croaker, and stable isotopes alone for bay anchovy. No significant differences were found in the
either the diets or mean values of δ13C, δ15 N, or δ34S of spotted seatrout between habitats. Differences were seen in both the centroid distance and total area of the δ 13 C-δ15N biplot for spotted seatrout indicating
greater trophic niche breath at the artificial reef. Diets of Atlantic croaker differed significantly between habitats and specimens were more enriched in δ15N at the artificial reef; however, no differences in trophic niche breadth were observed. Bay anchovy were more depleted
in both δ13C and δ34S over the artificial reef and differences in the trophic niche breadth were observed. Results suggest that habitat alterations can affect trophic dynamics of estuarine species in different ways. Therefore, foraging strategy should be considered
when evaluating estuarine artificial reefs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-4977</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5343/bms.2012.1013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Miami - Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmos</publisher><subject>Anchoa mitchilli ; Brackish ; Cynoscion nebulosus ; Marine ; Micropogonias undulatus</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of marine science, 2013-07, Vol.89 (3), p.657-676</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-d2893fddb3aa25fdb553e1538dc67c33b0abf4b69bce21834180318832106ba03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>289,314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simonsen, Kirsten A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowan, James H</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of an Inshore Artificial Reef on the Trophic Dynamics of Three Species of Estuarine Fish</title><title>Bulletin of marine science</title><addtitle>BMS</addtitle><description>Estuarine habitats are important in the life history of many fish species, yet are being degraded at an alarming rate. Habitat loss is often mitigated by the addition of artificial reefs. Understanding how artificial habitat affects the trophic dynamics of associated fish communities
is important to understanding their role in estuarine environments. This study compared the trophic dynamics of spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus (Cuvier, 1830), Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus (Linnaeus, 1766) , and bay anchovy, Anchoa mitchilli (Valenciennes,
1848), at an inshore artificial reef and a nearby mud-bottom site. Trophic dynamics were assessed using a combination of gut content analysis and stable isotopes for spotted seatrout and Atlantic croaker, and stable isotopes alone for bay anchovy. No significant differences were found in the
either the diets or mean values of δ13C, δ15 N, or δ34S of spotted seatrout between habitats. Differences were seen in both the centroid distance and total area of the δ 13 C-δ15N biplot for spotted seatrout indicating
greater trophic niche breath at the artificial reef. Diets of Atlantic croaker differed significantly between habitats and specimens were more enriched in δ15N at the artificial reef; however, no differences in trophic niche breadth were observed. Bay anchovy were more depleted
in both δ13C and δ34S over the artificial reef and differences in the trophic niche breadth were observed. Results suggest that habitat alterations can affect trophic dynamics of estuarine species in different ways. Therefore, foraging strategy should be considered
when evaluating estuarine artificial reefs.</description><subject>Anchoa mitchilli</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Cynoscion nebulosus</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Micropogonias undulatus</subject><issn>0007-4977</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1v3CAQhn1IpaZpj7lzzMVbYOw1Pkbp5kOKVLXdnicYDzGRjbeAK6W_vng36q1cGKFnHjTvFMWl4JsaKvjcTXEjuZAbwQWcFeec86as2qZ5X3yI8YVzIVolz4unnbVkUmSzZdqzBx-HORC7DslZZ5we2Xciy2bP0kBsH-bD4Az78ur15Myxaz8EIvbjQMbR8WEX06KD88RuXRw-Fu-sHiN9ersvip-3u_3Nffn49e7h5vqxNAAqlb1ULdi-70BrWdu-q2sgUYPqzbbJSMd1Z6tu23aGpFBQCcVBKAVS8G2nOVwUVyfvIcy_FooJJxcNjaP2NC8RRZ0TUKqBNqPlCTVhjjGQxUNwkw6vKDiu6WFOD9f0cE0v83cn3vln8knjy7wEn4fBZQpx0hG7ZRyzYO0B5Mej2reCA-qQ1kJm07f_mJz5J1tXtW4Kf6vWQ3bmEZWsUAjOsSerlzFhyr89_8Eo4S8-8pbn</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Simonsen, Kirsten A</creator><creator>Cowan, James H</creator><general>University of Miami - Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmos</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Effects of an Inshore Artificial Reef on the Trophic Dynamics of Three Species of Estuarine Fish</title><author>Simonsen, Kirsten A ; Cowan, James H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-d2893fddb3aa25fdb553e1538dc67c33b0abf4b69bce21834180318832106ba03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Anchoa mitchilli</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Cynoscion nebulosus</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Micropogonias undulatus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simonsen, Kirsten A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowan, James H</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of marine science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simonsen, Kirsten A</au><au>Cowan, James H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of an Inshore Artificial Reef on the Trophic Dynamics of Three Species of Estuarine Fish</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of marine science</jtitle><stitle>BMS</stitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>657</spage><epage>676</epage><pages>657-676</pages><issn>0007-4977</issn><abstract>Estuarine habitats are important in the life history of many fish species, yet are being degraded at an alarming rate. Habitat loss is often mitigated by the addition of artificial reefs. Understanding how artificial habitat affects the trophic dynamics of associated fish communities
is important to understanding their role in estuarine environments. This study compared the trophic dynamics of spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus (Cuvier, 1830), Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus (Linnaeus, 1766) , and bay anchovy, Anchoa mitchilli (Valenciennes,
1848), at an inshore artificial reef and a nearby mud-bottom site. Trophic dynamics were assessed using a combination of gut content analysis and stable isotopes for spotted seatrout and Atlantic croaker, and stable isotopes alone for bay anchovy. No significant differences were found in the
either the diets or mean values of δ13C, δ15 N, or δ34S of spotted seatrout between habitats. Differences were seen in both the centroid distance and total area of the δ 13 C-δ15N biplot for spotted seatrout indicating
greater trophic niche breath at the artificial reef. Diets of Atlantic croaker differed significantly between habitats and specimens were more enriched in δ15N at the artificial reef; however, no differences in trophic niche breadth were observed. Bay anchovy were more depleted
in both δ13C and δ34S over the artificial reef and differences in the trophic niche breadth were observed. Results suggest that habitat alterations can affect trophic dynamics of estuarine species in different ways. Therefore, foraging strategy should be considered
when evaluating estuarine artificial reefs.</abstract><pub>University of Miami - Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmos</pub><doi>10.5343/bms.2012.1013</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-4977 |
ispartof | Bulletin of marine science, 2013-07, Vol.89 (3), p.657-676 |
issn | 0007-4977 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_5343_bms_2012_1013 |
source | Ingenta Connect |
subjects | Anchoa mitchilli Brackish Cynoscion nebulosus Marine Micropogonias undulatus |
title | Effects of an Inshore Artificial Reef on the Trophic Dynamics of Three Species of Estuarine Fish |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T13%3A23%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubtec_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20an%20Inshore%20Artificial%20Reef%20on%20the%20Trophic%20Dynamics%20of%20Three%20Species%20of%20Estuarine%20Fish&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20marine%20science&rft.au=Simonsen,%20Kirsten%20A&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=657&rft.epage=676&rft.pages=657-676&rft.issn=0007-4977&rft_id=info:doi/10.5343/bms.2012.1013&rft_dat=%3Cpubtec_cross%3Eumrsmas/bullmar/2013/00000089/00000003/art00002%3C/pubtec_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1500788739&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ingid=umrsmas/bullmar/2013/00000089/00000003/art00002&rfr_iscdi=true |