Not in our Name: Vexing Care in the Neoliberal University

In this paper, we draw on our collaborative work running a salon for thinking about care in STS research, which quickly became more about fostering an ethico-politics for thinking with care as a mode of academic intervention. Not dissimilar to the origins of the salon in nineteenth-century France, t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nordic journal of science and technology studies 2021-04, p.65-76
Hauptverfasser: Nicholls, Emily Jay, Henry, Jade Vu, Dennis, Fay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 76
container_issue
container_start_page 65
container_title Nordic journal of science and technology studies
container_volume
creator Nicholls, Emily Jay
Henry, Jade Vu
Dennis, Fay
description In this paper, we draw on our collaborative work running a salon for thinking about care in STS research, which quickly became more about fostering an ethico-politics for thinking with care as a mode of academic intervention. Not dissimilar to the origins of the salon in nineteenth-century France, the salon provided a provocative and disruptive space for early career researchers (ECRs) to think together. As attention and critique increasingly point towards the unequal distribution of harms arising from marketization and the vulnerability of ECRs in the ‘neoliberal university,’ we have witnessed a surge in activities that promise a supportive space, such as pre-conference conferences, seminar series, discussion forums and self-care workshops. In this paper, we ask not only what these modes of care might make possible, but also what exclusionary practices and patterns they mask or render more palatable (Ahmed, 2004; Duclos & Criado, 2020; Martin et al., 2015; Murphy, 2015). Reflecting on our experiences of organizing and participating in the salon, with the stated purpose to explore ‘ecologies of care’ as an embodied socio-material practice (Puig de la Bellacasa, 2017), we move from care ‘out there’ in STS research to care ‘in here’. We follow threads spun by and out from the group to rethink our own academic care practices and how to do the academy otherwise.
doi_str_mv 10.5324/njsts.v9i1.3549
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5324_njsts_v9i1_3549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5324_njsts_v9i1_3549</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5324_njsts_v9i1_35493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYBA3NNAzNTYy0c_LKi4p1iuzzDTUMzY1sWRi4DS0sDTRNTEzMWdBYnMw8BYXZxkYGBiampgbm5tyMvD75ZcoZOYp5JcWKfgl5qbyMLCmJeYUp_JCaW4GfTfXEGcP3eSi_OLiotS0-IKizNzEosp4Q4N4kNXxYKvjQVbHg6w2Jl0HAI8-N10</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Not in our Name: Vexing Care in the Neoliberal University</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Nicholls, Emily Jay ; Henry, Jade Vu ; Dennis, Fay</creator><creatorcontrib>Nicholls, Emily Jay ; Henry, Jade Vu ; Dennis, Fay</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we draw on our collaborative work running a salon for thinking about care in STS research, which quickly became more about fostering an ethico-politics for thinking with care as a mode of academic intervention. Not dissimilar to the origins of the salon in nineteenth-century France, the salon provided a provocative and disruptive space for early career researchers (ECRs) to think together. As attention and critique increasingly point towards the unequal distribution of harms arising from marketization and the vulnerability of ECRs in the ‘neoliberal university,’ we have witnessed a surge in activities that promise a supportive space, such as pre-conference conferences, seminar series, discussion forums and self-care workshops. In this paper, we ask not only what these modes of care might make possible, but also what exclusionary practices and patterns they mask or render more palatable (Ahmed, 2004; Duclos &amp; Criado, 2020; Martin et al., 2015; Murphy, 2015). Reflecting on our experiences of organizing and participating in the salon, with the stated purpose to explore ‘ecologies of care’ as an embodied socio-material practice (Puig de la Bellacasa, 2017), we move from care ‘out there’ in STS research to care ‘in here’. We follow threads spun by and out from the group to rethink our own academic care practices and how to do the academy otherwise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1894-4647</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1894-4647</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5324/njsts.v9i1.3549</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Nordic journal of science and technology studies, 2021-04, p.65-76</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-2061-8361 ; 0000-0002-2441-6313 ; 0000-0001-7026-1351</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nicholls, Emily Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Jade Vu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Fay</creatorcontrib><title>Not in our Name: Vexing Care in the Neoliberal University</title><title>Nordic journal of science and technology studies</title><description>In this paper, we draw on our collaborative work running a salon for thinking about care in STS research, which quickly became more about fostering an ethico-politics for thinking with care as a mode of academic intervention. Not dissimilar to the origins of the salon in nineteenth-century France, the salon provided a provocative and disruptive space for early career researchers (ECRs) to think together. As attention and critique increasingly point towards the unequal distribution of harms arising from marketization and the vulnerability of ECRs in the ‘neoliberal university,’ we have witnessed a surge in activities that promise a supportive space, such as pre-conference conferences, seminar series, discussion forums and self-care workshops. In this paper, we ask not only what these modes of care might make possible, but also what exclusionary practices and patterns they mask or render more palatable (Ahmed, 2004; Duclos &amp; Criado, 2020; Martin et al., 2015; Murphy, 2015). Reflecting on our experiences of organizing and participating in the salon, with the stated purpose to explore ‘ecologies of care’ as an embodied socio-material practice (Puig de la Bellacasa, 2017), we move from care ‘out there’ in STS research to care ‘in here’. We follow threads spun by and out from the group to rethink our own academic care practices and how to do the academy otherwise.</description><issn>1894-4647</issn><issn>1894-4647</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYBA3NNAzNTYy0c_LKi4p1iuzzDTUMzY1sWRi4DS0sDTRNTEzMWdBYnMw8BYXZxkYGBiampgbm5tyMvD75ZcoZOYp5JcWKfgl5qbyMLCmJeYUp_JCaW4GfTfXEGcP3eSi_OLiotS0-IKizNzEosp4Q4N4kNXxYKvjQVbHg6w2Jl0HAI8-N10</recordid><startdate>20210419</startdate><enddate>20210419</enddate><creator>Nicholls, Emily Jay</creator><creator>Henry, Jade Vu</creator><creator>Dennis, Fay</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2061-8361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2441-6313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7026-1351</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210419</creationdate><title>Not in our Name</title><author>Nicholls, Emily Jay ; Henry, Jade Vu ; Dennis, Fay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5324_njsts_v9i1_35493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nicholls, Emily Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Jade Vu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Fay</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Nordic journal of science and technology studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nicholls, Emily Jay</au><au>Henry, Jade Vu</au><au>Dennis, Fay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Not in our Name: Vexing Care in the Neoliberal University</atitle><jtitle>Nordic journal of science and technology studies</jtitle><date>2021-04-19</date><risdate>2021</risdate><spage>65</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>65-76</pages><issn>1894-4647</issn><eissn>1894-4647</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we draw on our collaborative work running a salon for thinking about care in STS research, which quickly became more about fostering an ethico-politics for thinking with care as a mode of academic intervention. Not dissimilar to the origins of the salon in nineteenth-century France, the salon provided a provocative and disruptive space for early career researchers (ECRs) to think together. As attention and critique increasingly point towards the unequal distribution of harms arising from marketization and the vulnerability of ECRs in the ‘neoliberal university,’ we have witnessed a surge in activities that promise a supportive space, such as pre-conference conferences, seminar series, discussion forums and self-care workshops. In this paper, we ask not only what these modes of care might make possible, but also what exclusionary practices and patterns they mask or render more palatable (Ahmed, 2004; Duclos &amp; Criado, 2020; Martin et al., 2015; Murphy, 2015). Reflecting on our experiences of organizing and participating in the salon, with the stated purpose to explore ‘ecologies of care’ as an embodied socio-material practice (Puig de la Bellacasa, 2017), we move from care ‘out there’ in STS research to care ‘in here’. We follow threads spun by and out from the group to rethink our own academic care practices and how to do the academy otherwise.</abstract><doi>10.5324/njsts.v9i1.3549</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2061-8361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2441-6313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7026-1351</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1894-4647
ispartof Nordic journal of science and technology studies, 2021-04, p.65-76
issn 1894-4647
1894-4647
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5324_njsts_v9i1_3549
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Not in our Name: Vexing Care in the Neoliberal University
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T10%3A16%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Not%20in%20our%20Name:%20Vexing%20Care%20in%20the%20Neoliberal%20University&rft.jtitle=Nordic%20journal%20of%20science%20and%20technology%20studies&rft.au=Nicholls,%20Emily%20Jay&rft.date=2021-04-19&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=65-76&rft.issn=1894-4647&rft.eissn=1894-4647&rft_id=info:doi/10.5324/njsts.v9i1.3549&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_5324_njsts_v9i1_3549%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true