Subthreshold micropulse laser reduces anti-VEGF injection burden in patients with diabetic macular edema

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of micropulse laser in the early treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and its associated burden of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. Methods: This retrospective comparative study compared a group of 19 eyes with DME treated with micropu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of ophthalmology 2018-01, Vol.28 (1), p.68-73
Hauptverfasser: Moisseiev, Elad, Abbassi, Sam, Thinda, Sumeer, Yoon, Joseph, Yiu, Glenn, Morse, Lawrence S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 73
container_issue 1
container_start_page 68
container_title European journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 28
creator Moisseiev, Elad
Abbassi, Sam
Thinda, Sumeer
Yoon, Joseph
Yiu, Glenn
Morse, Lawrence S.
description Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of micropulse laser in the early treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and its associated burden of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. Methods: This retrospective comparative study compared a group of 19 eyes with DME treated with micropulse laser to a matched control group of 19 eyes with DME treated with ranibizumab injections without micropulse laser. Recorded parameters included previous medical and ocular history, previous and subsequent ranibizumab injections administered for DME, visual acuity (VA), central macular thickness throughout the follow-up period, and the occurrence of any complications. Results: The improvement in VA was comparable in both groups, at 12 months and at the final follow-up. Patients treated with micropulse laser required significantly fewer ranibizumab injections than their controls, both at 12 months (1.7 ± 2.3 vs 5.6 ± 2.1) and by the end of the follow-up (2.6 ± 3.3 vs 9.3 ± 5.1) (p
doi_str_mv 10.5301/ejo.5001000
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5301_ejo_5001000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.5301_ejo.5001000</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.5301_ejo.5001000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-24f89a7af7cba7ebecb7a65fb8d033d00c7d934f4ec6208e245c015a4a9421833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68i45CtJ1kqZN9yjL7iosePDjWtJkalP6RdIi_nsju3ryNMPw8DLvQ8g1g2USA7vHul8mAAwATsicSS6iFFh6GnbGIUolZzNy4X0NwGEl-DmZ8UzGTKzEnFQvUzFWDn3VN4a2Vrt-mBqPtFEeHXVoJo2eqm600ftmt6W2q1GPtu9oMTmDXTjQQY0Wu9HTTztW1FhV4Gg1bZWeGuUoGmzVJTkrVQi-Os4FedtuXteP0f5597R-2Ec65nyMuCizlZKqlLpQEgvUhVRpUhaZgTg2AFqaVSxKgTrlkCEXiQaWKKFCM5bF8YLcHXJDE-8dlvngbKvcV84g__GVB1_50Vegbw70MBUtmj_2V1AAbg-AVx-Y1_3kuvD9v1nfDVR0eg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subthreshold micropulse laser reduces anti-VEGF injection burden in patients with diabetic macular edema</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Moisseiev, Elad ; Abbassi, Sam ; Thinda, Sumeer ; Yoon, Joseph ; Yiu, Glenn ; Morse, Lawrence S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moisseiev, Elad ; Abbassi, Sam ; Thinda, Sumeer ; Yoon, Joseph ; Yiu, Glenn ; Morse, Lawrence S.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of micropulse laser in the early treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and its associated burden of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. Methods: This retrospective comparative study compared a group of 19 eyes with DME treated with micropulse laser to a matched control group of 19 eyes with DME treated with ranibizumab injections without micropulse laser. Recorded parameters included previous medical and ocular history, previous and subsequent ranibizumab injections administered for DME, visual acuity (VA), central macular thickness throughout the follow-up period, and the occurrence of any complications. Results: The improvement in VA was comparable in both groups, at 12 months and at the final follow-up. Patients treated with micropulse laser required significantly fewer ranibizumab injections than their controls, both at 12 months (1.7 ± 2.3 vs 5.6 ± 2.1) and by the end of the follow-up (2.6 ± 3.3 vs 9.3 ± 5.1) (p&lt;0.001 for both). No complications related to the micropulse laser were encountered. Conclusions: Micropulse laser is a safe and effective treatment for DME, which may achieve comparable improvement in VA along with a significant reduction in the burden of anti-VEGF injections. We suggest a treatment approach for its inclusion in the early stages of DME.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1120-6721</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6016</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5001000</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28731494</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angiogenesis Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage ; Diabetic Retinopathy - complications ; Diabetic Retinopathy - physiopathology ; Diabetic Retinopathy - therapy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intravitreal Injections ; Laser Therapy - methods ; Lasers, Semiconductor - therapeutic use ; Macular Edema - diagnosis ; Macular Edema - etiology ; Macular Edema - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Ranibizumab - administration &amp; dosage ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods ; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A - antagonists &amp; inhibitors ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>European journal of ophthalmology, 2018-01, Vol.28 (1), p.68-73</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-24f89a7af7cba7ebecb7a65fb8d033d00c7d934f4ec6208e245c015a4a9421833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-24f89a7af7cba7ebecb7a65fb8d033d00c7d934f4ec6208e245c015a4a9421833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.5301/ejo.5001000$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5301/ejo.5001000$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28731494$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moisseiev, Elad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbassi, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thinda, Sumeer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiu, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morse, Lawrence S.</creatorcontrib><title>Subthreshold micropulse laser reduces anti-VEGF injection burden in patients with diabetic macular edema</title><title>European journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Eur J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of micropulse laser in the early treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and its associated burden of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. Methods: This retrospective comparative study compared a group of 19 eyes with DME treated with micropulse laser to a matched control group of 19 eyes with DME treated with ranibizumab injections without micropulse laser. Recorded parameters included previous medical and ocular history, previous and subsequent ranibizumab injections administered for DME, visual acuity (VA), central macular thickness throughout the follow-up period, and the occurrence of any complications. Results: The improvement in VA was comparable in both groups, at 12 months and at the final follow-up. Patients treated with micropulse laser required significantly fewer ranibizumab injections than their controls, both at 12 months (1.7 ± 2.3 vs 5.6 ± 2.1) and by the end of the follow-up (2.6 ± 3.3 vs 9.3 ± 5.1) (p&lt;0.001 for both). No complications related to the micropulse laser were encountered. Conclusions: Micropulse laser is a safe and effective treatment for DME, which may achieve comparable improvement in VA along with a significant reduction in the burden of anti-VEGF injections. We suggest a treatment approach for its inclusion in the early stages of DME.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angiogenesis Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Diabetic Retinopathy - complications</subject><subject>Diabetic Retinopathy - physiopathology</subject><subject>Diabetic Retinopathy - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intravitreal Injections</subject><subject>Laser Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Lasers, Semiconductor - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Macular Edema - diagnosis</subject><subject>Macular Edema - etiology</subject><subject>Macular Edema - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ranibizumab - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods</subject><subject>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>1120-6721</issn><issn>1724-6016</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68i45CtJ1kqZN9yjL7iosePDjWtJkalP6RdIi_nsju3ryNMPw8DLvQ8g1g2USA7vHul8mAAwATsicSS6iFFh6GnbGIUolZzNy4X0NwGEl-DmZ8UzGTKzEnFQvUzFWDn3VN4a2Vrt-mBqPtFEeHXVoJo2eqm600ftmt6W2q1GPtu9oMTmDXTjQQY0Wu9HTTztW1FhV4Gg1bZWeGuUoGmzVJTkrVQi-Os4FedtuXteP0f5597R-2Ec65nyMuCizlZKqlLpQEgvUhVRpUhaZgTg2AFqaVSxKgTrlkCEXiQaWKKFCM5bF8YLcHXJDE-8dlvngbKvcV84g__GVB1_50Vegbw70MBUtmj_2V1AAbg-AVx-Y1_3kuvD9v1nfDVR0eg</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Moisseiev, Elad</creator><creator>Abbassi, Sam</creator><creator>Thinda, Sumeer</creator><creator>Yoon, Joseph</creator><creator>Yiu, Glenn</creator><creator>Morse, Lawrence S.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Subthreshold micropulse laser reduces anti-VEGF injection burden in patients with diabetic macular edema</title><author>Moisseiev, Elad ; Abbassi, Sam ; Thinda, Sumeer ; Yoon, Joseph ; Yiu, Glenn ; Morse, Lawrence S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-24f89a7af7cba7ebecb7a65fb8d033d00c7d934f4ec6208e245c015a4a9421833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angiogenesis Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Diabetic Retinopathy - complications</topic><topic>Diabetic Retinopathy - physiopathology</topic><topic>Diabetic Retinopathy - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intravitreal Injections</topic><topic>Laser Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Lasers, Semiconductor - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Macular Edema - diagnosis</topic><topic>Macular Edema - etiology</topic><topic>Macular Edema - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ranibizumab - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods</topic><topic>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moisseiev, Elad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbassi, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thinda, Sumeer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiu, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morse, Lawrence S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moisseiev, Elad</au><au>Abbassi, Sam</au><au>Thinda, Sumeer</au><au>Yoon, Joseph</au><au>Yiu, Glenn</au><au>Morse, Lawrence S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subthreshold micropulse laser reduces anti-VEGF injection burden in patients with diabetic macular edema</atitle><jtitle>European journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>68</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>68-73</pages><issn>1120-6721</issn><eissn>1724-6016</eissn><abstract>Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of micropulse laser in the early treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and its associated burden of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. Methods: This retrospective comparative study compared a group of 19 eyes with DME treated with micropulse laser to a matched control group of 19 eyes with DME treated with ranibizumab injections without micropulse laser. Recorded parameters included previous medical and ocular history, previous and subsequent ranibizumab injections administered for DME, visual acuity (VA), central macular thickness throughout the follow-up period, and the occurrence of any complications. Results: The improvement in VA was comparable in both groups, at 12 months and at the final follow-up. Patients treated with micropulse laser required significantly fewer ranibizumab injections than their controls, both at 12 months (1.7 ± 2.3 vs 5.6 ± 2.1) and by the end of the follow-up (2.6 ± 3.3 vs 9.3 ± 5.1) (p&lt;0.001 for both). No complications related to the micropulse laser were encountered. Conclusions: Micropulse laser is a safe and effective treatment for DME, which may achieve comparable improvement in VA along with a significant reduction in the burden of anti-VEGF injections. We suggest a treatment approach for its inclusion in the early stages of DME.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28731494</pmid><doi>10.5301/ejo.5001000</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1120-6721
ispartof European journal of ophthalmology, 2018-01, Vol.28 (1), p.68-73
issn 1120-6721
1724-6016
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5301_ejo_5001000
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Aged
Angiogenesis Inhibitors - administration & dosage
Diabetic Retinopathy - complications
Diabetic Retinopathy - physiopathology
Diabetic Retinopathy - therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Intravitreal Injections
Laser Therapy - methods
Lasers, Semiconductor - therapeutic use
Macular Edema - diagnosis
Macular Edema - etiology
Macular Edema - therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Ranibizumab - administration & dosage
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A - antagonists & inhibitors
Visual Acuity
title Subthreshold micropulse laser reduces anti-VEGF injection burden in patients with diabetic macular edema
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A17%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subthreshold%20micropulse%20laser%20reduces%20anti-VEGF%20injection%20burden%20in%20patients%20with%20diabetic%20macular%20edema&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Moisseiev,%20Elad&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=68&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=68-73&rft.issn=1120-6721&rft.eissn=1724-6016&rft_id=info:doi/10.5301/ejo.5001000&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.5301_ejo.5001000%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/28731494&rft_sage_id=10.5301_ejo.5001000&rfr_iscdi=true