Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Versus Conventional Flowable Resin Composite to Sound and Affected Dentin: An In Vitro Study

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of self-adhesive flowable composite and conventional bonded flowable composite to sound and caries affected dentin. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, a total of freshly extracted 40 human molar teeth were used....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of health sciences and research 2021-04, Vol.11 (4), p.306-312
Hauptverfasser: Abouelmagd, Dalia M., Abouelseoud, Hanan K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 312
container_issue 4
container_start_page 306
container_title International journal of health sciences and research
container_volume 11
creator Abouelmagd, Dalia M.
Abouelseoud, Hanan K.
description Objectives: This study aimed to compare the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of self-adhesive flowable composite and conventional bonded flowable composite to sound and caries affected dentin. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, a total of freshly extracted 40 human molar teeth were used. The occlusal surface was sectioned to expose dentin for µSBS test. The teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups according to the type of flowable composite used into two groups (n=20): group A: self- adhesive flowable composite (Vertise flow), group B: Filtek Z350-XT flowable composite and one-step self-etch adhesive Adper Easy One. A plastic cylindrical mold was used to construct resin composite cylinders (0.8mm diameter x 1mm length) on the sound and caries affected exposed dentin and filled with flowable composite restorative materials according to manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were then immersed in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, and underwent µSBS test at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using Student's t-test to compare between the two materials as well as to compare between sound and caries affected dentin. Results: The mean values of µSBS of Filtek Z-350XT to sound and caries affected were 26.6 and 26.7 MPa respectively. The mean µSBS of Vertise Flow to sound and affected were 13.2 and 17.9 MPa respectively. With sound dentin FiltekZ-350XT showed statistically significant higher µSBS than Vertise flow. With caries affected dentin, there was no statistically significant difference between the two materials. There was no statistically significant difference between µSBS of sound and caries affected dentin within each material. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the conventional flowable composite yielded the highest µSBS to sound dentin. There was no statistical significant difference in µSBS of self-adhesive and conventional flowable to caries affected dentin. Key words: Composite Resins; Dentin; microshear.
doi_str_mv 10.52403/ijhsr.20210436
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_52403_ijhsr_20210436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_52403_ijhsr_20210436</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c816-499d1876d8e7a1123a983367e9f88070055d835d7f9ff075c3a5b8418f5c204c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkN1KwzAUx4MoOOauvc0LdMtH06Te1bnpYCK4sduSNYnt6JKRZJO9hw9sOxW8OJwD_w84PwDuMRozkiI6aXZ18GOCCEYpza7AgJA0T3LG8fW_-xaMQtghhDBilJNsAL5mJ9keZWychc7A16byLtRaevjorIKr6LX9iHWvrXRrkkLVOjQnDTfah2OAU2dP2vZx2cJ56z7lttXwvfPYTtsfXGiihtHBlTt2fbKbwhhdRa3gUx-0D7CwcGHhpom-s8WjOt-BGyPboEe_ewjW89l6-pIs354X02KZVAJnSZrnCgueKaG5xJhQmQtKM65zIwTiCDGmBGWKm9wYxFlFJduKFAvDKoLSig7B5Ke2_zl4bcqDb_bSn0uMygvW8oK1_MNKvwGB-GzF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Versus Conventional Flowable Resin Composite to Sound and Affected Dentin: An In Vitro Study</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Abouelmagd, Dalia M. ; Abouelseoud, Hanan K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abouelmagd, Dalia M. ; Abouelseoud, Hanan K.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: This study aimed to compare the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of self-adhesive flowable composite and conventional bonded flowable composite to sound and caries affected dentin. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, a total of freshly extracted 40 human molar teeth were used. The occlusal surface was sectioned to expose dentin for µSBS test. The teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups according to the type of flowable composite used into two groups (n=20): group A: self- adhesive flowable composite (Vertise flow), group B: Filtek Z350-XT flowable composite and one-step self-etch adhesive Adper Easy One. A plastic cylindrical mold was used to construct resin composite cylinders (0.8mm diameter x 1mm length) on the sound and caries affected exposed dentin and filled with flowable composite restorative materials according to manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were then immersed in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, and underwent µSBS test at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using Student's t-test to compare between the two materials as well as to compare between sound and caries affected dentin. Results: The mean values of µSBS of Filtek Z-350XT to sound and caries affected were 26.6 and 26.7 MPa respectively. The mean µSBS of Vertise Flow to sound and affected were 13.2 and 17.9 MPa respectively. With sound dentin FiltekZ-350XT showed statistically significant higher µSBS than Vertise flow. With caries affected dentin, there was no statistically significant difference between the two materials. There was no statistically significant difference between µSBS of sound and caries affected dentin within each material. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the conventional flowable composite yielded the highest µSBS to sound dentin. There was no statistical significant difference in µSBS of self-adhesive and conventional flowable to caries affected dentin. Key words: Composite Resins; Dentin; microshear.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2249-9571</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2249-9571</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.52403/ijhsr.20210436</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>International journal of health sciences and research, 2021-04, Vol.11 (4), p.306-312</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abouelmagd, Dalia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abouelseoud, Hanan K.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Versus Conventional Flowable Resin Composite to Sound and Affected Dentin: An In Vitro Study</title><title>International journal of health sciences and research</title><description>Objectives: This study aimed to compare the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of self-adhesive flowable composite and conventional bonded flowable composite to sound and caries affected dentin. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, a total of freshly extracted 40 human molar teeth were used. The occlusal surface was sectioned to expose dentin for µSBS test. The teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups according to the type of flowable composite used into two groups (n=20): group A: self- adhesive flowable composite (Vertise flow), group B: Filtek Z350-XT flowable composite and one-step self-etch adhesive Adper Easy One. A plastic cylindrical mold was used to construct resin composite cylinders (0.8mm diameter x 1mm length) on the sound and caries affected exposed dentin and filled with flowable composite restorative materials according to manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were then immersed in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, and underwent µSBS test at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using Student's t-test to compare between the two materials as well as to compare between sound and caries affected dentin. Results: The mean values of µSBS of Filtek Z-350XT to sound and caries affected were 26.6 and 26.7 MPa respectively. The mean µSBS of Vertise Flow to sound and affected were 13.2 and 17.9 MPa respectively. With sound dentin FiltekZ-350XT showed statistically significant higher µSBS than Vertise flow. With caries affected dentin, there was no statistically significant difference between the two materials. There was no statistically significant difference between µSBS of sound and caries affected dentin within each material. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the conventional flowable composite yielded the highest µSBS to sound dentin. There was no statistical significant difference in µSBS of self-adhesive and conventional flowable to caries affected dentin. Key words: Composite Resins; Dentin; microshear.</description><issn>2249-9571</issn><issn>2249-9571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkN1KwzAUx4MoOOauvc0LdMtH06Te1bnpYCK4sduSNYnt6JKRZJO9hw9sOxW8OJwD_w84PwDuMRozkiI6aXZ18GOCCEYpza7AgJA0T3LG8fW_-xaMQtghhDBilJNsAL5mJ9keZWychc7A16byLtRaevjorIKr6LX9iHWvrXRrkkLVOjQnDTfah2OAU2dP2vZx2cJ56z7lttXwvfPYTtsfXGiihtHBlTt2fbKbwhhdRa3gUx-0D7CwcGHhpom-s8WjOt-BGyPboEe_ewjW89l6-pIs354X02KZVAJnSZrnCgueKaG5xJhQmQtKM65zIwTiCDGmBGWKm9wYxFlFJduKFAvDKoLSig7B5Ke2_zl4bcqDb_bSn0uMygvW8oK1_MNKvwGB-GzF</recordid><startdate>20210419</startdate><enddate>20210419</enddate><creator>Abouelmagd, Dalia M.</creator><creator>Abouelseoud, Hanan K.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210419</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Versus Conventional Flowable Resin Composite to Sound and Affected Dentin: An In Vitro Study</title><author>Abouelmagd, Dalia M. ; Abouelseoud, Hanan K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c816-499d1876d8e7a1123a983367e9f88070055d835d7f9ff075c3a5b8418f5c204c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abouelmagd, Dalia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abouelseoud, Hanan K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of health sciences and research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abouelmagd, Dalia M.</au><au>Abouelseoud, Hanan K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Versus Conventional Flowable Resin Composite to Sound and Affected Dentin: An In Vitro Study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of health sciences and research</jtitle><date>2021-04-19</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>306</spage><epage>312</epage><pages>306-312</pages><issn>2249-9571</issn><eissn>2249-9571</eissn><abstract>Objectives: This study aimed to compare the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of self-adhesive flowable composite and conventional bonded flowable composite to sound and caries affected dentin. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, a total of freshly extracted 40 human molar teeth were used. The occlusal surface was sectioned to expose dentin for µSBS test. The teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups according to the type of flowable composite used into two groups (n=20): group A: self- adhesive flowable composite (Vertise flow), group B: Filtek Z350-XT flowable composite and one-step self-etch adhesive Adper Easy One. A plastic cylindrical mold was used to construct resin composite cylinders (0.8mm diameter x 1mm length) on the sound and caries affected exposed dentin and filled with flowable composite restorative materials according to manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were then immersed in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, and underwent µSBS test at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using Student's t-test to compare between the two materials as well as to compare between sound and caries affected dentin. Results: The mean values of µSBS of Filtek Z-350XT to sound and caries affected were 26.6 and 26.7 MPa respectively. The mean µSBS of Vertise Flow to sound and affected were 13.2 and 17.9 MPa respectively. With sound dentin FiltekZ-350XT showed statistically significant higher µSBS than Vertise flow. With caries affected dentin, there was no statistically significant difference between the two materials. There was no statistically significant difference between µSBS of sound and caries affected dentin within each material. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the conventional flowable composite yielded the highest µSBS to sound dentin. There was no statistical significant difference in µSBS of self-adhesive and conventional flowable to caries affected dentin. Key words: Composite Resins; Dentin; microshear.</abstract><doi>10.52403/ijhsr.20210436</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2249-9571
ispartof International journal of health sciences and research, 2021-04, Vol.11 (4), p.306-312
issn 2249-9571
2249-9571
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_52403_ijhsr_20210436
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Versus Conventional Flowable Resin Composite to Sound and Affected Dentin: An In Vitro Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T10%3A39%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Microshear%20Bond%20Strength%20of%20Self-Adhesive%20Versus%20Conventional%20Flowable%20Resin%20Composite%20to%20Sound%20and%20Affected%20Dentin:%20An%20In%20Vitro%20Study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20health%20sciences%20and%20research&rft.au=Abouelmagd,%20Dalia%20M.&rft.date=2021-04-19&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=306&rft.epage=312&rft.pages=306-312&rft.issn=2249-9571&rft.eissn=2249-9571&rft_id=info:doi/10.52403/ijhsr.20210436&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_52403_ijhsr_20210436%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true