Policy Coordination in South Korea

Coordination has been one of the major problems in the field of public administration (Pressman & Wildavsky, 1984; Peters 1998; Bouckaert, Peters, & Verhoest, 2010). However, as the complexity of policy problems increases and the policy environment changes, coordination is becoming more of a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Korean journal of policy studies 2019-04, Vol.34 (1), p.73-97
1. Verfasser: Lim, Hyunjung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 97
container_issue 1
container_start_page 73
container_title The Korean journal of policy studies
container_volume 34
creator Lim, Hyunjung
description Coordination has been one of the major problems in the field of public administration (Pressman & Wildavsky, 1984; Peters 1998; Bouckaert, Peters, & Verhoest, 2010). However, as the complexity of policy problems increases and the policy environment changes, coordination is becoming more of a serious challenge to administration than ever before (Peters, 2018; Roberts, 2011). The failure of policy coordination can greatly undermine administrative capacity, so a serious approach to coordination is necessary not only theoretically but also practically. This study reviewed policy coordination theories and analyzed prior studies on current Korean policy coordination. In particular, I focused on the concepts, dimensions, mechanisms, and performance of policy coordination. What I found is that the number and variety of coordination studies in Korea is low. Most prior studies on coordination have focused on coordination between central ministries, and their methodology has primary taken the form of a literature review. Empirical studies on coordination performance have been few and far between. Based on these findings, I suggest several implications.
doi_str_mv 10.52372/kjps34104
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_52372_kjps34104</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_52372_kjps34104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1414-2c69c9edfa6a3cde7a40c9c09c0a9eedc3656d5ef1a012a1ceb104bd18df5bd63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j81KAzEURoMoOFY3PsHgUoi9N78zSxm0ioUK6nq4k2QwtU5KUhd9e4uKcODbHb7D2CXCjRbSivnHelukQlBHrBLWaC4asMesQiE014D2lJ2VsgYwKKGp2NVz2kS3r7uUso8T7WKa6jjVL-lr914_pRzonJ2MtCnh4m9n7O3-7rV74MvV4rG7XXKHChUXzrSuDX4kQ9L5YEmBax0coDYE76TRxuswIgEKQheGw83BY-NHPXgjZ-z61-tyKiWHsd_m-El53yP0P3X9f538BrVpQt0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Policy Coordination in South Korea</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Lim, Hyunjung</creator><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hyunjung</creatorcontrib><description>Coordination has been one of the major problems in the field of public administration (Pressman &amp; Wildavsky, 1984; Peters 1998; Bouckaert, Peters, &amp; Verhoest, 2010). However, as the complexity of policy problems increases and the policy environment changes, coordination is becoming more of a serious challenge to administration than ever before (Peters, 2018; Roberts, 2011). The failure of policy coordination can greatly undermine administrative capacity, so a serious approach to coordination is necessary not only theoretically but also practically. This study reviewed policy coordination theories and analyzed prior studies on current Korean policy coordination. In particular, I focused on the concepts, dimensions, mechanisms, and performance of policy coordination. What I found is that the number and variety of coordination studies in Korea is low. Most prior studies on coordination have focused on coordination between central ministries, and their methodology has primary taken the form of a literature review. Empirical studies on coordination performance have been few and far between. Based on these findings, I suggest several implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1225-5017</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2765-2807</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.52372/kjps34104</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Korean journal of policy studies, 2019-04, Vol.34 (1), p.73-97</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hyunjung</creatorcontrib><title>Policy Coordination in South Korea</title><title>The Korean journal of policy studies</title><description>Coordination has been one of the major problems in the field of public administration (Pressman &amp; Wildavsky, 1984; Peters 1998; Bouckaert, Peters, &amp; Verhoest, 2010). However, as the complexity of policy problems increases and the policy environment changes, coordination is becoming more of a serious challenge to administration than ever before (Peters, 2018; Roberts, 2011). The failure of policy coordination can greatly undermine administrative capacity, so a serious approach to coordination is necessary not only theoretically but also practically. This study reviewed policy coordination theories and analyzed prior studies on current Korean policy coordination. In particular, I focused on the concepts, dimensions, mechanisms, and performance of policy coordination. What I found is that the number and variety of coordination studies in Korea is low. Most prior studies on coordination have focused on coordination between central ministries, and their methodology has primary taken the form of a literature review. Empirical studies on coordination performance have been few and far between. Based on these findings, I suggest several implications.</description><issn>1225-5017</issn><issn>2765-2807</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j81KAzEURoMoOFY3PsHgUoi9N78zSxm0ioUK6nq4k2QwtU5KUhd9e4uKcODbHb7D2CXCjRbSivnHelukQlBHrBLWaC4asMesQiE014D2lJ2VsgYwKKGp2NVz2kS3r7uUso8T7WKa6jjVL-lr914_pRzonJ2MtCnh4m9n7O3-7rV74MvV4rG7XXKHChUXzrSuDX4kQ9L5YEmBax0coDYE76TRxuswIgEKQheGw83BY-NHPXgjZ-z61-tyKiWHsd_m-El53yP0P3X9f538BrVpQt0</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Lim, Hyunjung</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Policy Coordination in South Korea</title><author>Lim, Hyunjung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1414-2c69c9edfa6a3cde7a40c9c09c0a9eedc3656d5ef1a012a1ceb104bd18df5bd63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hyunjung</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Korean journal of policy studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lim, Hyunjung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Policy Coordination in South Korea</atitle><jtitle>The Korean journal of policy studies</jtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>73-97</pages><issn>1225-5017</issn><eissn>2765-2807</eissn><abstract>Coordination has been one of the major problems in the field of public administration (Pressman &amp; Wildavsky, 1984; Peters 1998; Bouckaert, Peters, &amp; Verhoest, 2010). However, as the complexity of policy problems increases and the policy environment changes, coordination is becoming more of a serious challenge to administration than ever before (Peters, 2018; Roberts, 2011). The failure of policy coordination can greatly undermine administrative capacity, so a serious approach to coordination is necessary not only theoretically but also practically. This study reviewed policy coordination theories and analyzed prior studies on current Korean policy coordination. In particular, I focused on the concepts, dimensions, mechanisms, and performance of policy coordination. What I found is that the number and variety of coordination studies in Korea is low. Most prior studies on coordination have focused on coordination between central ministries, and their methodology has primary taken the form of a literature review. Empirical studies on coordination performance have been few and far between. Based on these findings, I suggest several implications.</abstract><doi>10.52372/kjps34104</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1225-5017
ispartof The Korean journal of policy studies, 2019-04, Vol.34 (1), p.73-97
issn 1225-5017
2765-2807
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_52372_kjps34104
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Policy Coordination in South Korea
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T22%3A59%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Policy%20Coordination%20in%20South%20Korea&rft.jtitle=The%20Korean%20journal%20of%20policy%20studies&rft.au=Lim,%20Hyunjung&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=73-97&rft.issn=1225-5017&rft.eissn=2765-2807&rft_id=info:doi/10.52372/kjps34104&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_52372_kjps34104%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true