Policy Coordination in South Korea
Coordination has been one of the major problems in the field of public administration (Pressman & Wildavsky, 1984; Peters 1998; Bouckaert, Peters, & Verhoest, 2010). However, as the complexity of policy problems increases and the policy environment changes, coordination is becoming more of a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Korean journal of policy studies 2019-04, Vol.34 (1), p.73-97 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 97 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 73 |
container_title | The Korean journal of policy studies |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Lim, Hyunjung |
description | Coordination has been one of the major problems in the field of public administration (Pressman & Wildavsky, 1984; Peters 1998; Bouckaert, Peters, & Verhoest, 2010). However, as the complexity of policy problems increases and the policy environment changes, coordination is becoming more of a serious challenge to administration than ever before (Peters, 2018; Roberts, 2011). The failure of policy coordination can greatly undermine administrative capacity, so a serious approach to coordination is necessary not only theoretically but also practically. This study reviewed policy coordination theories and analyzed prior studies on current Korean policy coordination. In particular, I focused on the concepts, dimensions, mechanisms, and performance of policy coordination. What I found is that the number and variety of coordination studies in Korea is low. Most prior studies on coordination have focused on coordination between central ministries, and their methodology has primary taken the form of a literature review. Empirical studies on coordination performance have been few and far between. Based on these findings, I suggest several implications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.52372/kjps34104 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_52372_kjps34104</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_52372_kjps34104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1414-2c69c9edfa6a3cde7a40c9c09c0a9eedc3656d5ef1a012a1ceb104bd18df5bd63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j81KAzEURoMoOFY3PsHgUoi9N78zSxm0ioUK6nq4k2QwtU5KUhd9e4uKcODbHb7D2CXCjRbSivnHelukQlBHrBLWaC4asMesQiE014D2lJ2VsgYwKKGp2NVz2kS3r7uUso8T7WKa6jjVL-lr914_pRzonJ2MtCnh4m9n7O3-7rV74MvV4rG7XXKHChUXzrSuDX4kQ9L5YEmBax0coDYE76TRxuswIgEKQheGw83BY-NHPXgjZ-z61-tyKiWHsd_m-El53yP0P3X9f538BrVpQt0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Policy Coordination in South Korea</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Lim, Hyunjung</creator><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hyunjung</creatorcontrib><description>Coordination has been one of the major problems in the field of public administration (Pressman & Wildavsky, 1984; Peters 1998; Bouckaert, Peters, & Verhoest, 2010). However, as the complexity of policy problems increases and the policy environment changes, coordination is becoming more of a serious challenge to administration than ever before (Peters, 2018; Roberts, 2011). The failure of policy coordination can greatly undermine administrative capacity, so a serious approach to coordination is necessary not only theoretically but also practically. This study reviewed policy coordination theories and analyzed prior studies on current Korean policy coordination. In particular, I focused on the concepts, dimensions, mechanisms, and performance of policy coordination. What I found is that the number and variety of coordination studies in Korea is low. Most prior studies on coordination have focused on coordination between central ministries, and their methodology has primary taken the form of a literature review. Empirical studies on coordination performance have been few and far between. Based on these findings, I suggest several implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1225-5017</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2765-2807</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.52372/kjps34104</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Korean journal of policy studies, 2019-04, Vol.34 (1), p.73-97</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hyunjung</creatorcontrib><title>Policy Coordination in South Korea</title><title>The Korean journal of policy studies</title><description>Coordination has been one of the major problems in the field of public administration (Pressman & Wildavsky, 1984; Peters 1998; Bouckaert, Peters, & Verhoest, 2010). However, as the complexity of policy problems increases and the policy environment changes, coordination is becoming more of a serious challenge to administration than ever before (Peters, 2018; Roberts, 2011). The failure of policy coordination can greatly undermine administrative capacity, so a serious approach to coordination is necessary not only theoretically but also practically. This study reviewed policy coordination theories and analyzed prior studies on current Korean policy coordination. In particular, I focused on the concepts, dimensions, mechanisms, and performance of policy coordination. What I found is that the number and variety of coordination studies in Korea is low. Most prior studies on coordination have focused on coordination between central ministries, and their methodology has primary taken the form of a literature review. Empirical studies on coordination performance have been few and far between. Based on these findings, I suggest several implications.</description><issn>1225-5017</issn><issn>2765-2807</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j81KAzEURoMoOFY3PsHgUoi9N78zSxm0ioUK6nq4k2QwtU5KUhd9e4uKcODbHb7D2CXCjRbSivnHelukQlBHrBLWaC4asMesQiE014D2lJ2VsgYwKKGp2NVz2kS3r7uUso8T7WKa6jjVL-lr914_pRzonJ2MtCnh4m9n7O3-7rV74MvV4rG7XXKHChUXzrSuDX4kQ9L5YEmBax0coDYE76TRxuswIgEKQheGw83BY-NHPXgjZ-z61-tyKiWHsd_m-El53yP0P3X9f538BrVpQt0</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Lim, Hyunjung</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Policy Coordination in South Korea</title><author>Lim, Hyunjung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1414-2c69c9edfa6a3cde7a40c9c09c0a9eedc3656d5ef1a012a1ceb104bd18df5bd63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hyunjung</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Korean journal of policy studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lim, Hyunjung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Policy Coordination in South Korea</atitle><jtitle>The Korean journal of policy studies</jtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>73-97</pages><issn>1225-5017</issn><eissn>2765-2807</eissn><abstract>Coordination has been one of the major problems in the field of public administration (Pressman & Wildavsky, 1984; Peters 1998; Bouckaert, Peters, & Verhoest, 2010). However, as the complexity of policy problems increases and the policy environment changes, coordination is becoming more of a serious challenge to administration than ever before (Peters, 2018; Roberts, 2011). The failure of policy coordination can greatly undermine administrative capacity, so a serious approach to coordination is necessary not only theoretically but also practically. This study reviewed policy coordination theories and analyzed prior studies on current Korean policy coordination. In particular, I focused on the concepts, dimensions, mechanisms, and performance of policy coordination. What I found is that the number and variety of coordination studies in Korea is low. Most prior studies on coordination have focused on coordination between central ministries, and their methodology has primary taken the form of a literature review. Empirical studies on coordination performance have been few and far between. Based on these findings, I suggest several implications.</abstract><doi>10.52372/kjps34104</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1225-5017 |
ispartof | The Korean journal of policy studies, 2019-04, Vol.34 (1), p.73-97 |
issn | 1225-5017 2765-2807 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_52372_kjps34104 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
title | Policy Coordination in South Korea |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T22%3A59%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Policy%20Coordination%20in%20South%20Korea&rft.jtitle=The%20Korean%20journal%20of%20policy%20studies&rft.au=Lim,%20Hyunjung&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=73-97&rft.issn=1225-5017&rft.eissn=2765-2807&rft_id=info:doi/10.52372/kjps34104&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_52372_kjps34104%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |