Comparison of Health Status Indicators with Multidimensional Scaling and The Multi Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Health is important in determining the development and development levels of countries. One of the goals of the country's health system is to raise the health level of the community as much as possible. The health performance of the community can be calculated and measured with va...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi 2018-12, Vol.5 (3), p.179-187
Hauptverfasser: Boz, Canser, Önder, Emrah, Taş, Nihat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 187
container_issue 3
container_start_page 179
container_title Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi
container_volume 5
creator Boz, Canser
Önder, Emrah
Taş, Nihat
description INTRODUCTION: Health is important in determining the development and development levels of countries. One of the goals of the country's health system is to raise the health level of the community as much as possible. The health performance of the community can be calculated and measured with various indicators. These are called health status indicators. Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the position of Turkey in OECD countries before and after the health transition program and make net performance ranking of countries in terms of health status indicators. METHODS: The Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) was used to determine OECD countries' position and The MOORA method, was used to calculate the net performance ranking of countries according to health status indicators in the study. RESULTS: According to the performance ranking analysis, while Switzerland has the best performance among 34 OECD countries in both 2002 and 2014, Turkey has the worst performance in terms of health status indicators in 2002. As a result of the MDS analysis for 2014, Switzerland and Japan are similar countries in terms of health status indicators and Turkey, Chile, Hungary, Mexico, Slovakia are similar countries. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Despite significant positive developments in terms of Turkey's health outcomes in recent years, there are still considerable differences between Turkey and developed countries. It is suggested that countries should improve their own models in order to achieve excellence in health systems, besides benefiting from each other's experiences based on good examples.
doi_str_mv 10.5222/SHYD.2018.179
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5222_SHYD_2018_179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_904ab7951304425fa7d3779aad31dc8d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_904ab7951304425fa7d3779aad31dc8d</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1879-1b8ac59e0eb32bd65bc2dc701d5b1ec26406c852108ced374d45ee2e697cdd453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkctKAzEUhgdRsGiX7vMCU3Ody7LUSwuVgq2gq3AmybQp00mZpEr15c1YEVfnPz_nfJsvSW4IHglK6e1y-nY3opgUI5KXZ8mAEl6mcX09_5cvk6H3W4wxY4QRygfJ18Tt9tBZ71rkajQ10IQNWgYIB49mrbYKgus8-rCxfjo0wWq7M623roUGLRU0tl0jaDVabczpAC2qrVHBvhu02Ae7s58Q4jmqjui5T2gcX4_e-uvkoobGm-HvvEpeHu5Xk2k6XzzOJuN5qkiRlympClCiNNhUjFY6E5WiWuWYaFERo2jGcaYKQQkulNEs55oLY6jJylzpmNlVMjtxtYOt3Hd2B91ROrDyp3DdWkIXrGqMLDGHKi8FYZhzKmrIIzAvATQjWhU6stITS3XO-87UfzyCZS9C9iJkL0JGEewbt0d9Yg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Health Status Indicators with Multidimensional Scaling and The Multi Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Boz, Canser ; Önder, Emrah ; Taş, Nihat</creator><creatorcontrib>Boz, Canser ; Önder, Emrah ; Taş, Nihat</creatorcontrib><description>INTRODUCTION: Health is important in determining the development and development levels of countries. One of the goals of the country's health system is to raise the health level of the community as much as possible. The health performance of the community can be calculated and measured with various indicators. These are called health status indicators. Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the position of Turkey in OECD countries before and after the health transition program and make net performance ranking of countries in terms of health status indicators. METHODS: The Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) was used to determine OECD countries' position and The MOORA method, was used to calculate the net performance ranking of countries according to health status indicators in the study. RESULTS: According to the performance ranking analysis, while Switzerland has the best performance among 34 OECD countries in both 2002 and 2014, Turkey has the worst performance in terms of health status indicators in 2002. As a result of the MDS analysis for 2014, Switzerland and Japan are similar countries in terms of health status indicators and Turkey, Chile, Hungary, Mexico, Slovakia are similar countries. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Despite significant positive developments in terms of Turkey's health outcomes in recent years, there are still considerable differences between Turkey and developed countries. It is suggested that countries should improve their own models in order to achieve excellence in health systems, besides benefiting from each other's experiences based on good examples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2149-018X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2149-018X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5222/SHYD.2018.179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Association of Nurse Managers</publisher><subject>health management ; health status ; mds ; moora ; oecd</subject><ispartof>Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi, 2018-12, Vol.5 (3), p.179-187</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1879-1b8ac59e0eb32bd65bc2dc701d5b1ec26406c852108ced374d45ee2e697cdd453</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boz, Canser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Önder, Emrah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taş, Nihat</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Health Status Indicators with Multidimensional Scaling and The Multi Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis</title><title>Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi</title><description>INTRODUCTION: Health is important in determining the development and development levels of countries. One of the goals of the country's health system is to raise the health level of the community as much as possible. The health performance of the community can be calculated and measured with various indicators. These are called health status indicators. Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the position of Turkey in OECD countries before and after the health transition program and make net performance ranking of countries in terms of health status indicators. METHODS: The Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) was used to determine OECD countries' position and The MOORA method, was used to calculate the net performance ranking of countries according to health status indicators in the study. RESULTS: According to the performance ranking analysis, while Switzerland has the best performance among 34 OECD countries in both 2002 and 2014, Turkey has the worst performance in terms of health status indicators in 2002. As a result of the MDS analysis for 2014, Switzerland and Japan are similar countries in terms of health status indicators and Turkey, Chile, Hungary, Mexico, Slovakia are similar countries. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Despite significant positive developments in terms of Turkey's health outcomes in recent years, there are still considerable differences between Turkey and developed countries. It is suggested that countries should improve their own models in order to achieve excellence in health systems, besides benefiting from each other's experiences based on good examples.</description><subject>health management</subject><subject>health status</subject><subject>mds</subject><subject>moora</subject><subject>oecd</subject><issn>2149-018X</issn><issn>2149-018X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkctKAzEUhgdRsGiX7vMCU3Ody7LUSwuVgq2gq3AmybQp00mZpEr15c1YEVfnPz_nfJsvSW4IHglK6e1y-nY3opgUI5KXZ8mAEl6mcX09_5cvk6H3W4wxY4QRygfJ18Tt9tBZ71rkajQ10IQNWgYIB49mrbYKgus8-rCxfjo0wWq7M623roUGLRU0tl0jaDVabczpAC2qrVHBvhu02Ae7s58Q4jmqjui5T2gcX4_e-uvkoobGm-HvvEpeHu5Xk2k6XzzOJuN5qkiRlympClCiNNhUjFY6E5WiWuWYaFERo2jGcaYKQQkulNEs55oLY6jJylzpmNlVMjtxtYOt3Hd2B91ROrDyp3DdWkIXrGqMLDGHKi8FYZhzKmrIIzAvATQjWhU6stITS3XO-87UfzyCZS9C9iJkL0JGEewbt0d9Yg</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Boz, Canser</creator><creator>Önder, Emrah</creator><creator>Taş, Nihat</creator><general>Association of Nurse Managers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Comparison of Health Status Indicators with Multidimensional Scaling and The Multi Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis</title><author>Boz, Canser ; Önder, Emrah ; Taş, Nihat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1879-1b8ac59e0eb32bd65bc2dc701d5b1ec26406c852108ced374d45ee2e697cdd453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>health management</topic><topic>health status</topic><topic>mds</topic><topic>moora</topic><topic>oecd</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boz, Canser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Önder, Emrah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taş, Nihat</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boz, Canser</au><au>Önder, Emrah</au><au>Taş, Nihat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Health Status Indicators with Multidimensional Scaling and The Multi Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi</jtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>187</epage><pages>179-187</pages><issn>2149-018X</issn><eissn>2149-018X</eissn><abstract>INTRODUCTION: Health is important in determining the development and development levels of countries. One of the goals of the country's health system is to raise the health level of the community as much as possible. The health performance of the community can be calculated and measured with various indicators. These are called health status indicators. Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the position of Turkey in OECD countries before and after the health transition program and make net performance ranking of countries in terms of health status indicators. METHODS: The Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) was used to determine OECD countries' position and The MOORA method, was used to calculate the net performance ranking of countries according to health status indicators in the study. RESULTS: According to the performance ranking analysis, while Switzerland has the best performance among 34 OECD countries in both 2002 and 2014, Turkey has the worst performance in terms of health status indicators in 2002. As a result of the MDS analysis for 2014, Switzerland and Japan are similar countries in terms of health status indicators and Turkey, Chile, Hungary, Mexico, Slovakia are similar countries. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Despite significant positive developments in terms of Turkey's health outcomes in recent years, there are still considerable differences between Turkey and developed countries. It is suggested that countries should improve their own models in order to achieve excellence in health systems, besides benefiting from each other's experiences based on good examples.</abstract><pub>Association of Nurse Managers</pub><doi>10.5222/SHYD.2018.179</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2149-018X
ispartof Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi, 2018-12, Vol.5 (3), p.179-187
issn 2149-018X
2149-018X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5222_SHYD_2018_179
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects health management
health status
mds
moora
oecd
title Comparison of Health Status Indicators with Multidimensional Scaling and The Multi Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T11%3A43%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Health%20Status%20Indicators%20with%20Multidimensional%20Scaling%20and%20The%20Multi%20Objective%20Optimization%20by%20Ratio%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Sa%C4%9Fl%C4%B1k%20ve%20Hem%C5%9Firelik%20Y%C3%B6netimi%20Dergisi&rft.au=Boz,%20Canser&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=187&rft.pages=179-187&rft.issn=2149-018X&rft.eissn=2149-018X&rft_id=info:doi/10.5222/SHYD.2018.179&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_904ab7951304425fa7d3779aad31dc8d%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_904ab7951304425fa7d3779aad31dc8d&rfr_iscdi=true