Spoofing and its Regulation

Nearly a century after the United States enacted its first securities laws, urgent questions remain as to the scope of manipulation law: whether manipulation is possible in principle, and if so, how the law should respond in practice. Sharp disagreement among courts, economists, and legal scholars a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Columbia business law review 2022-01, Vol.2021 (3)
Hauptverfasser: Merritt B. Fox, Lawrence R. Glosten, Sue S. Guan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page
container_title Columbia business law review
container_volume 2021
creator Merritt B. Fox
Lawrence R. Glosten
Sue S. Guan
description Nearly a century after the United States enacted its first securities laws, urgent questions remain as to the scope of manipulation law: whether manipulation is possible in principle, and if so, how the law should respond in practice. Sharp disagreement among courts, economists, and legal scholars as to whether trading or quoting activity constitutes illegal manipulation has led to a legal framework that lacks precision and cogency. Moreover, the poorly articulated normative basis for court rulings has resulted in enforcement that is both under-inclusive and over-inclusive in ways that do a poor job of discouraging socially harmful transactions and enabling socially beneficial ones.  This Article seeks to clarify this confusion. Drawing on microstructure and financial economics, this Article offers a new understanding of a common kind of quote-driven manipulation, often referred to as “spoofing.” By employing an analytical and normative framework developed previously by two of the authors in assessing another major form of manipulation, trade-driven manipulation, this Article assesses the impact of spoofing on what occurs in the securities markets and carefully evaluates its effects on social welfare and economic efficiency. The result is a new understanding of quote-based manipulation that helps resolve essential questions in manipulation law and provides guidance for future regulation and enforcement. 
doi_str_mv 10.52214/cblr.v2021i3.9109
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_52214_cblr_v2021i3_9109</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_52214_cblr_v2021i3_9109</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_52214_cblr_v2021i3_91093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdzk0KwjAQQOFBFKw_F9BNL9A6k7SkWYviWt2HWJsSqU1JquDtpdITuHqrBx_AhjDNGaNsV94an74ZMrI8lYRyAhEWskhQMJpCRJJjIiTP5rAI4YFIKHgewfbSOWdsW8e6vce2D_G5ql-N7q1rVzAzugnVeuwS2PFw3Z-S0rsQfGVU5-1T-48iVD-GGhhqZKiBwf-avrYmPEo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spoofing and its Regulation</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Merritt B. Fox ; Lawrence R. Glosten ; Sue S. Guan</creator><creatorcontrib>Merritt B. Fox ; Lawrence R. Glosten ; Sue S. Guan</creatorcontrib><description>Nearly a century after the United States enacted its first securities laws, urgent questions remain as to the scope of manipulation law: whether manipulation is possible in principle, and if so, how the law should respond in practice. Sharp disagreement among courts, economists, and legal scholars as to whether trading or quoting activity constitutes illegal manipulation has led to a legal framework that lacks precision and cogency. Moreover, the poorly articulated normative basis for court rulings has resulted in enforcement that is both under-inclusive and over-inclusive in ways that do a poor job of discouraging socially harmful transactions and enabling socially beneficial ones.  This Article seeks to clarify this confusion. Drawing on microstructure and financial economics, this Article offers a new understanding of a common kind of quote-driven manipulation, often referred to as “spoofing.” By employing an analytical and normative framework developed previously by two of the authors in assessing another major form of manipulation, trade-driven manipulation, this Article assesses the impact of spoofing on what occurs in the securities markets and carefully evaluates its effects on social welfare and economic efficiency. The result is a new understanding of quote-based manipulation that helps resolve essential questions in manipulation law and provides guidance for future regulation and enforcement. </description><identifier>ISSN: 1930-7934</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0898-0721</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.52214/cblr.v2021i3.9109</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Columbia business law review, 2022-01, Vol.2021 (3)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Merritt B. Fox</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence R. Glosten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sue S. Guan</creatorcontrib><title>Spoofing and its Regulation</title><title>Columbia business law review</title><description>Nearly a century after the United States enacted its first securities laws, urgent questions remain as to the scope of manipulation law: whether manipulation is possible in principle, and if so, how the law should respond in practice. Sharp disagreement among courts, economists, and legal scholars as to whether trading or quoting activity constitutes illegal manipulation has led to a legal framework that lacks precision and cogency. Moreover, the poorly articulated normative basis for court rulings has resulted in enforcement that is both under-inclusive and over-inclusive in ways that do a poor job of discouraging socially harmful transactions and enabling socially beneficial ones.  This Article seeks to clarify this confusion. Drawing on microstructure and financial economics, this Article offers a new understanding of a common kind of quote-driven manipulation, often referred to as “spoofing.” By employing an analytical and normative framework developed previously by two of the authors in assessing another major form of manipulation, trade-driven manipulation, this Article assesses the impact of spoofing on what occurs in the securities markets and carefully evaluates its effects on social welfare and economic efficiency. The result is a new understanding of quote-based manipulation that helps resolve essential questions in manipulation law and provides guidance for future regulation and enforcement. </description><issn>1930-7934</issn><issn>0898-0721</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdzk0KwjAQQOFBFKw_F9BNL9A6k7SkWYviWt2HWJsSqU1JquDtpdITuHqrBx_AhjDNGaNsV94an74ZMrI8lYRyAhEWskhQMJpCRJJjIiTP5rAI4YFIKHgewfbSOWdsW8e6vce2D_G5ql-N7q1rVzAzugnVeuwS2PFw3Z-S0rsQfGVU5-1T-48iVD-GGhhqZKiBwf-avrYmPEo</recordid><startdate>20220128</startdate><enddate>20220128</enddate><creator>Merritt B. Fox</creator><creator>Lawrence R. Glosten</creator><creator>Sue S. Guan</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220128</creationdate><title>Spoofing and its Regulation</title><author>Merritt B. Fox ; Lawrence R. Glosten ; Sue S. Guan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_52214_cblr_v2021i3_91093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Merritt B. Fox</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence R. Glosten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sue S. Guan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Columbia business law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Merritt B. Fox</au><au>Lawrence R. Glosten</au><au>Sue S. Guan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spoofing and its Regulation</atitle><jtitle>Columbia business law review</jtitle><date>2022-01-28</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>2021</volume><issue>3</issue><issn>1930-7934</issn><eissn>0898-0721</eissn><abstract>Nearly a century after the United States enacted its first securities laws, urgent questions remain as to the scope of manipulation law: whether manipulation is possible in principle, and if so, how the law should respond in practice. Sharp disagreement among courts, economists, and legal scholars as to whether trading or quoting activity constitutes illegal manipulation has led to a legal framework that lacks precision and cogency. Moreover, the poorly articulated normative basis for court rulings has resulted in enforcement that is both under-inclusive and over-inclusive in ways that do a poor job of discouraging socially harmful transactions and enabling socially beneficial ones.  This Article seeks to clarify this confusion. Drawing on microstructure and financial economics, this Article offers a new understanding of a common kind of quote-driven manipulation, often referred to as “spoofing.” By employing an analytical and normative framework developed previously by two of the authors in assessing another major form of manipulation, trade-driven manipulation, this Article assesses the impact of spoofing on what occurs in the securities markets and carefully evaluates its effects on social welfare and economic efficiency. The result is a new understanding of quote-based manipulation that helps resolve essential questions in manipulation law and provides guidance for future regulation and enforcement. </abstract><doi>10.52214/cblr.v2021i3.9109</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1930-7934
ispartof Columbia business law review, 2022-01, Vol.2021 (3)
issn 1930-7934
0898-0721
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_52214_cblr_v2021i3_9109
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Spoofing and its Regulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A59%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spoofing%20and%20its%20Regulation&rft.jtitle=Columbia%20business%20law%20review&rft.au=Merritt%20B.%20Fox&rft.date=2022-01-28&rft.volume=2021&rft.issue=3&rft.issn=1930-7934&rft.eissn=0898-0721&rft_id=info:doi/10.52214/cblr.v2021i3.9109&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_52214_cblr_v2021i3_9109%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true