(Re)significaciones suplementarias del dolor en Nefando, de Mónica Ojeda

This article addresses the novel Nefando, by Mónica Ojeda, based on the experience of pain as a supplement, from the theoretical paradigm of Jacques Derrida, since its enunciation functions as a sign of a sign, which does not properly represent affect, rather, it generates a false representative tha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Catedral tomada (Pittsburgh, PA ) PA ), 2022-01, Vol.9 (17), p.120-144
1. Verfasser: Pérez Barreiro, Ana Belén
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 144
container_issue 17
container_start_page 120
container_title Catedral tomada (Pittsburgh, PA )
container_volume 9
creator Pérez Barreiro, Ana Belén
description This article addresses the novel Nefando, by Mónica Ojeda, based on the experience of pain as a supplement, from the theoretical paradigm of Jacques Derrida, since its enunciation functions as a sign of a sign, which does not properly represent affect, rather, it generates a false representative that makes the sign itself present only by its absence. Consequently, the enunciation of affect is articulated as difference insofar as it configures a series of possible disseminated and deferred meanings that put into play the limits of meaning by pointing out its original lack. Thus, the (re)signification of pain makes the production of an original discourse impossible, since it produces other modes of signification that call into question the fixity of the discourse and show the de-centering of the textual structure. 
doi_str_mv 10.5195/ct/2021.504
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5195_ct_2021_504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5195_ct_2021_504</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1154-5ac4332d860774ce008b5fdcafcfcde1504efb91cc1a3507af5f952db29284b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUM1KAzEYDKJgqT35Ajkqum1-9-coxWqhWhA9h-yXL5Ky3S3JevC5fARfzBQ9OJcZBmYYhpBLzuaaN3oB40IwweeaqRMyEbxsClar6vSfPiezlHYsoy5LqcoJWV-94HUK733wASyEocdE08ehwz32o43BJuqwo27ohkixp8_obe-G2-zSp--vPqfodofOXpAzb7uEsz-ekrfV_evysdhsH9bLu00BnGtVaAtKSuHqklWVAsxTWu0dWA8eHPK8Hn3bcABupWaV9do3WrhWNKJWrZZTcvPbC3FIKaI3hxj2Nn4azszxCAOjOR5hcpX8AYVWURY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>(Re)significaciones suplementarias del dolor en Nefando, de Mónica Ojeda</title><source>TestCollectionTL3OpenAccess</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Pérez Barreiro, Ana Belén</creator><creatorcontrib>Pérez Barreiro, Ana Belén</creatorcontrib><description>This article addresses the novel Nefando, by Mónica Ojeda, based on the experience of pain as a supplement, from the theoretical paradigm of Jacques Derrida, since its enunciation functions as a sign of a sign, which does not properly represent affect, rather, it generates a false representative that makes the sign itself present only by its absence. Consequently, the enunciation of affect is articulated as difference insofar as it configures a series of possible disseminated and deferred meanings that put into play the limits of meaning by pointing out its original lack. Thus, the (re)signification of pain makes the production of an original discourse impossible, since it produces other modes of signification that call into question the fixity of the discourse and show the de-centering of the textual structure. </description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-0847</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-0847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5195/ct/2021.504</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Catedral tomada (Pittsburgh, PA ), 2022-01, Vol.9 (17), p.120-144</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1154-5ac4332d860774ce008b5fdcafcfcde1504efb91cc1a3507af5f952db29284b53</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-5172-1631</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pérez Barreiro, Ana Belén</creatorcontrib><title>(Re)significaciones suplementarias del dolor en Nefando, de Mónica Ojeda</title><title>Catedral tomada (Pittsburgh, PA )</title><description>This article addresses the novel Nefando, by Mónica Ojeda, based on the experience of pain as a supplement, from the theoretical paradigm of Jacques Derrida, since its enunciation functions as a sign of a sign, which does not properly represent affect, rather, it generates a false representative that makes the sign itself present only by its absence. Consequently, the enunciation of affect is articulated as difference insofar as it configures a series of possible disseminated and deferred meanings that put into play the limits of meaning by pointing out its original lack. Thus, the (re)signification of pain makes the production of an original discourse impossible, since it produces other modes of signification that call into question the fixity of the discourse and show the de-centering of the textual structure. </description><issn>2169-0847</issn><issn>2169-0847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUM1KAzEYDKJgqT35Ajkqum1-9-coxWqhWhA9h-yXL5Ky3S3JevC5fARfzBQ9OJcZBmYYhpBLzuaaN3oB40IwweeaqRMyEbxsClar6vSfPiezlHYsoy5LqcoJWV-94HUK733wASyEocdE08ehwz32o43BJuqwo27ohkixp8_obe-G2-zSp--vPqfodofOXpAzb7uEsz-ekrfV_evysdhsH9bLu00BnGtVaAtKSuHqklWVAsxTWu0dWA8eHPK8Hn3bcABupWaV9do3WrhWNKJWrZZTcvPbC3FIKaI3hxj2Nn4azszxCAOjOR5hcpX8AYVWURY</recordid><startdate>20220110</startdate><enddate>20220110</enddate><creator>Pérez Barreiro, Ana Belén</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5172-1631</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220110</creationdate><title>(Re)significaciones suplementarias del dolor en Nefando, de Mónica Ojeda</title><author>Pérez Barreiro, Ana Belén</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1154-5ac4332d860774ce008b5fdcafcfcde1504efb91cc1a3507af5f952db29284b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pérez Barreiro, Ana Belén</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Catedral tomada (Pittsburgh, PA )</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pérez Barreiro, Ana Belén</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>(Re)significaciones suplementarias del dolor en Nefando, de Mónica Ojeda</atitle><jtitle>Catedral tomada (Pittsburgh, PA )</jtitle><date>2022-01-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>120</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>120-144</pages><issn>2169-0847</issn><eissn>2169-0847</eissn><abstract>This article addresses the novel Nefando, by Mónica Ojeda, based on the experience of pain as a supplement, from the theoretical paradigm of Jacques Derrida, since its enunciation functions as a sign of a sign, which does not properly represent affect, rather, it generates a false representative that makes the sign itself present only by its absence. Consequently, the enunciation of affect is articulated as difference insofar as it configures a series of possible disseminated and deferred meanings that put into play the limits of meaning by pointing out its original lack. Thus, the (re)signification of pain makes the production of an original discourse impossible, since it produces other modes of signification that call into question the fixity of the discourse and show the de-centering of the textual structure. </abstract><doi>10.5195/ct/2021.504</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5172-1631</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-0847
ispartof Catedral tomada (Pittsburgh, PA ), 2022-01, Vol.9 (17), p.120-144
issn 2169-0847
2169-0847
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5195_ct_2021_504
source TestCollectionTL3OpenAccess; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title (Re)significaciones suplementarias del dolor en Nefando, de Mónica Ojeda
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T00%3A48%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=(Re)significaciones%20suplementarias%20del%20dolor%20en%20Nefando,%20de%20M%C3%B3nica%20Ojeda&rft.jtitle=Catedral%20tomada%20(Pittsburgh,%20PA%20)&rft.au=P%C3%A9rez%20Barreiro,%20Ana%20Bel%C3%A9n&rft.date=2022-01-10&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=120-144&rft.issn=2169-0847&rft.eissn=2169-0847&rft_id=info:doi/10.5195/ct/2021.504&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_5195_ct_2021_504%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true