The Effect of Impression Formation on Rejection in the Ultimatum Game

Previous studies have attempted to elucidate people’s motives for rejecting unfair offers in the ultimatum game. One approach assumes that people reject unfair offers to punish ill intentions behind the offers, motivated by retribution and/or deterrence. To disentangle these two motives and investig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science 2021-03, Vol.12 (1), p.12-17
Hauptverfasser: Tham, Yukari Jessica, Hashimoto, Takaaki, Karasawa, Kaori
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; jpn
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 17
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12
container_title Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science
container_volume 12
creator Tham, Yukari Jessica
Hashimoto, Takaaki
Karasawa, Kaori
description Previous studies have attempted to elucidate people’s motives for rejecting unfair offers in the ultimatum game. One approach assumes that people reject unfair offers to punish ill intentions behind the offers, motivated by retribution and/or deterrence. To disentangle these two motives and investigate when each motive drives rejection, we focused on people’s tendency to form moral impressions rapidly. We hypothesized that the deterrence motive would drive rejection when the negative impression of those who have made unfair offers is uncertain, while the retribution motive would drive rejection when the impression is certain. The result of an online experiment (N = 199) of a repeated mini-ultimatum game did not support our hypothesis; the certainty of the negative impression did not have significant effects on rejection of unfairness. We discuss the implications of this result, incorporating the results of exploratory analyses regarding self-reported motives.
doi_str_mv 10.5178/lebs.2021.83
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5178_lebs_2021_83</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5178_lebs_2021_83</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1030-5465137d6183183f3c9098ac7971a4872d247cc943225babe6d6977cc807786c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMtqwzAQFKWFhiS3foA-oHb1sKXVsQQnDQQKJYHchCxL1MWOg-Qe-veVaA-BgZ3dnVmWQeiJkrKmEl4G18aSEUZL4HdoQQGqQjF5vr_hj2gdY98SWgMXRKgFao6fDjfeOzvjyeP9eA0uSaYL3k5hNHNmCR_uKyly01_wnCynYe7T-nvEOzO6FXrwZohu_V-X6LRtjpu34vC-229eD4WlhJOirkRNuewEBZ7guVVEgbFSSWoqkKxjlbRWVZyxujWtE51QMk2ASAnC8iV6_rtrwxRjcF5fQ3oj_GhKdE5B5xR0TkED579r8E7r</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Impression Formation on Rejection in the Ultimatum Game</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tham, Yukari Jessica ; Hashimoto, Takaaki ; Karasawa, Kaori</creator><creatorcontrib>Tham, Yukari Jessica ; Hashimoto, Takaaki ; Karasawa, Kaori</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies have attempted to elucidate people’s motives for rejecting unfair offers in the ultimatum game. One approach assumes that people reject unfair offers to punish ill intentions behind the offers, motivated by retribution and/or deterrence. To disentangle these two motives and investigate when each motive drives rejection, we focused on people’s tendency to form moral impressions rapidly. We hypothesized that the deterrence motive would drive rejection when the negative impression of those who have made unfair offers is uncertain, while the retribution motive would drive rejection when the impression is certain. The result of an online experiment (N = 199) of a repeated mini-ultimatum game did not support our hypothesis; the certainty of the negative impression did not have significant effects on rejection of unfairness. We discuss the implications of this result, incorporating the results of exploratory analyses regarding self-reported motives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1884-927X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1884-927X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5178/lebs.2021.83</identifier><language>eng ; jpn</language><ispartof>Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 2021-03, Vol.12 (1), p.12-17</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-2070-9079 ; 0000-0003-1580-5170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tham, Yukari Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Takaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karasawa, Kaori</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Impression Formation on Rejection in the Ultimatum Game</title><title>Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science</title><description>Previous studies have attempted to elucidate people’s motives for rejecting unfair offers in the ultimatum game. One approach assumes that people reject unfair offers to punish ill intentions behind the offers, motivated by retribution and/or deterrence. To disentangle these two motives and investigate when each motive drives rejection, we focused on people’s tendency to form moral impressions rapidly. We hypothesized that the deterrence motive would drive rejection when the negative impression of those who have made unfair offers is uncertain, while the retribution motive would drive rejection when the impression is certain. The result of an online experiment (N = 199) of a repeated mini-ultimatum game did not support our hypothesis; the certainty of the negative impression did not have significant effects on rejection of unfairness. We discuss the implications of this result, incorporating the results of exploratory analyses regarding self-reported motives.</description><issn>1884-927X</issn><issn>1884-927X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUMtqwzAQFKWFhiS3foA-oHb1sKXVsQQnDQQKJYHchCxL1MWOg-Qe-veVaA-BgZ3dnVmWQeiJkrKmEl4G18aSEUZL4HdoQQGqQjF5vr_hj2gdY98SWgMXRKgFao6fDjfeOzvjyeP9eA0uSaYL3k5hNHNmCR_uKyly01_wnCynYe7T-nvEOzO6FXrwZohu_V-X6LRtjpu34vC-229eD4WlhJOirkRNuewEBZ7guVVEgbFSSWoqkKxjlbRWVZyxujWtE51QMk2ASAnC8iV6_rtrwxRjcF5fQ3oj_GhKdE5B5xR0TkED579r8E7r</recordid><startdate>20210330</startdate><enddate>20210330</enddate><creator>Tham, Yukari Jessica</creator><creator>Hashimoto, Takaaki</creator><creator>Karasawa, Kaori</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2070-9079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1580-5170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210330</creationdate><title>The Effect of Impression Formation on Rejection in the Ultimatum Game</title><author>Tham, Yukari Jessica ; Hashimoto, Takaaki ; Karasawa, Kaori</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1030-5465137d6183183f3c9098ac7971a4872d247cc943225babe6d6977cc807786c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; jpn</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tham, Yukari Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Takaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karasawa, Kaori</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tham, Yukari Jessica</au><au>Hashimoto, Takaaki</au><au>Karasawa, Kaori</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Impression Formation on Rejection in the Ultimatum Game</atitle><jtitle>Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science</jtitle><date>2021-03-30</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>12-17</pages><issn>1884-927X</issn><eissn>1884-927X</eissn><abstract>Previous studies have attempted to elucidate people’s motives for rejecting unfair offers in the ultimatum game. One approach assumes that people reject unfair offers to punish ill intentions behind the offers, motivated by retribution and/or deterrence. To disentangle these two motives and investigate when each motive drives rejection, we focused on people’s tendency to form moral impressions rapidly. We hypothesized that the deterrence motive would drive rejection when the negative impression of those who have made unfair offers is uncertain, while the retribution motive would drive rejection when the impression is certain. The result of an online experiment (N = 199) of a repeated mini-ultimatum game did not support our hypothesis; the certainty of the negative impression did not have significant effects on rejection of unfairness. We discuss the implications of this result, incorporating the results of exploratory analyses regarding self-reported motives.</abstract><doi>10.5178/lebs.2021.83</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2070-9079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1580-5170</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1884-927X
ispartof Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 2021-03, Vol.12 (1), p.12-17
issn 1884-927X
1884-927X
language eng ; jpn
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5178_lebs_2021_83
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title The Effect of Impression Formation on Rejection in the Ultimatum Game
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A05%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Impression%20Formation%20on%20Rejection%20in%20the%20Ultimatum%20Game&rft.jtitle=Letters%20on%20Evolutionary%20Behavioral%20Science&rft.au=Tham,%20Yukari%20Jessica&rft.date=2021-03-30&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=12-17&rft.issn=1884-927X&rft.eissn=1884-927X&rft_id=info:doi/10.5178/lebs.2021.83&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_5178_lebs_2021_83%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true