The form-based development plan: bridging the gap between theory and practice in urban morphology

The format of local development plans and site-specific guidance tends to be based on land-use allocations rather than physical form. This approach has serious limitations, especially when dealing with urban design issues. A solution is available in a format that takes the outline of physical form a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urban morphology 2022-08, Vol.12 (2), p.77-95
1. Verfasser: Hall, Tony
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 95
container_issue 2
container_start_page 77
container_title Urban morphology
container_volume 12
creator Hall, Tony
description The format of local development plans and site-specific guidance tends to be based on land-use allocations rather than physical form. This approach has serious limitations, especially when dealing with urban design issues. A solution is available in a format that takes the outline of physical form as its starting point with land use as a subsidiary consideration. This approach can be incorporated into spatial planning policy. Furthermore, urban design principles imply perimeter block structures whose approximate sizes are largely predetermined and can be incorporated in site-specific guidance. This paper draws attention to innovation in planning practice in Britain and a particular example is described in detail. Local spatial policy for the town of Chelmsford made physical implications explicit. Planning briefs identifying both the perimeter block form and the location and character of the urban spaces were successful in improving the standard of design of new development.
doi_str_mv 10.51347/jum.v12i2.3942
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_51347_jum_v12i2_3942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_51347_jum_v12i2_3942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c862-f8da1c25b0794d602ff4219c27a9dbeb7e8a008e00d5da6a63f1af09b41f81303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNot0L1qwzAUBWANLTRNO3fVC9i5kmVb7lZC_yDQJbu5sq4cB1syspOSt2-SZjocOJzhY-xFQJqLTJWr_WFIj0J2Ms0qJe_YQoAsEyVL_cAep2kPUIhCqwXD7Y64C3FIDE5kuaUj9WEcyM987NG_chM723a-5fN52eLIDc2_RP7SQzxx9JaPEZu5a4h3nh-iQc-HEMdd6EN7emL3DvuJnm-5ZNuP9-36K9n8fH6v3zZJowuZOG1RNDI3UFbKFiCdU1JUjSyxsoZMSRoBNAHY3GKBReYEOqiMEk6LDLIlW_3fNjFMUyRXj7EbMJ5qAfUVpT6j1FeU-oKS_QGlRlop</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The form-based development plan: bridging the gap between theory and practice in urban morphology</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Hall, Tony</creator><creatorcontrib>Hall, Tony</creatorcontrib><description>The format of local development plans and site-specific guidance tends to be based on land-use allocations rather than physical form. This approach has serious limitations, especially when dealing with urban design issues. A solution is available in a format that takes the outline of physical form as its starting point with land use as a subsidiary consideration. This approach can be incorporated into spatial planning policy. Furthermore, urban design principles imply perimeter block structures whose approximate sizes are largely predetermined and can be incorporated in site-specific guidance. This paper draws attention to innovation in planning practice in Britain and a particular example is described in detail. Local spatial policy for the town of Chelmsford made physical implications explicit. Planning briefs identifying both the perimeter block form and the location and character of the urban spaces were successful in improving the standard of design of new development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1027-4278</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.51347/jum.v12i2.3942</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Urban morphology, 2022-08, Vol.12 (2), p.77-95</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c862-f8da1c25b0794d602ff4219c27a9dbeb7e8a008e00d5da6a63f1af09b41f81303</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hall, Tony</creatorcontrib><title>The form-based development plan: bridging the gap between theory and practice in urban morphology</title><title>Urban morphology</title><description>The format of local development plans and site-specific guidance tends to be based on land-use allocations rather than physical form. This approach has serious limitations, especially when dealing with urban design issues. A solution is available in a format that takes the outline of physical form as its starting point with land use as a subsidiary consideration. This approach can be incorporated into spatial planning policy. Furthermore, urban design principles imply perimeter block structures whose approximate sizes are largely predetermined and can be incorporated in site-specific guidance. This paper draws attention to innovation in planning practice in Britain and a particular example is described in detail. Local spatial policy for the town of Chelmsford made physical implications explicit. Planning briefs identifying both the perimeter block form and the location and character of the urban spaces were successful in improving the standard of design of new development.</description><issn>1027-4278</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNot0L1qwzAUBWANLTRNO3fVC9i5kmVb7lZC_yDQJbu5sq4cB1syspOSt2-SZjocOJzhY-xFQJqLTJWr_WFIj0J2Ms0qJe_YQoAsEyVL_cAep2kPUIhCqwXD7Y64C3FIDE5kuaUj9WEcyM987NG_chM723a-5fN52eLIDc2_RP7SQzxx9JaPEZu5a4h3nh-iQc-HEMdd6EN7emL3DvuJnm-5ZNuP9-36K9n8fH6v3zZJowuZOG1RNDI3UFbKFiCdU1JUjSyxsoZMSRoBNAHY3GKBReYEOqiMEk6LDLIlW_3fNjFMUyRXj7EbMJ5qAfUVpT6j1FeU-oKS_QGlRlop</recordid><startdate>20220827</startdate><enddate>20220827</enddate><creator>Hall, Tony</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220827</creationdate><title>The form-based development plan: bridging the gap between theory and practice in urban morphology</title><author>Hall, Tony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c862-f8da1c25b0794d602ff4219c27a9dbeb7e8a008e00d5da6a63f1af09b41f81303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hall, Tony</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Urban morphology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hall, Tony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The form-based development plan: bridging the gap between theory and practice in urban morphology</atitle><jtitle>Urban morphology</jtitle><date>2022-08-27</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>77-95</pages><issn>1027-4278</issn><abstract>The format of local development plans and site-specific guidance tends to be based on land-use allocations rather than physical form. This approach has serious limitations, especially when dealing with urban design issues. A solution is available in a format that takes the outline of physical form as its starting point with land use as a subsidiary consideration. This approach can be incorporated into spatial planning policy. Furthermore, urban design principles imply perimeter block structures whose approximate sizes are largely predetermined and can be incorporated in site-specific guidance. This paper draws attention to innovation in planning practice in Britain and a particular example is described in detail. Local spatial policy for the town of Chelmsford made physical implications explicit. Planning briefs identifying both the perimeter block form and the location and character of the urban spaces were successful in improving the standard of design of new development.</abstract><doi>10.51347/jum.v12i2.3942</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1027-4278
ispartof Urban morphology, 2022-08, Vol.12 (2), p.77-95
issn 1027-4278
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_51347_jum_v12i2_3942
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title The form-based development plan: bridging the gap between theory and practice in urban morphology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A46%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20form-based%20development%20plan:%20bridging%20the%20gap%20between%20theory%20and%20practice%20in%20urban%20morphology&rft.jtitle=Urban%20morphology&rft.au=Hall,%20Tony&rft.date=2022-08-27&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=77-95&rft.issn=1027-4278&rft_id=info:doi/10.51347/jum.v12i2.3942&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_51347_jum_v12i2_3942%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true