Over de validiteit van indicatoren voor schooleffectiviteit: Een kritische beschouwing

On the validity of school performance indicators School performance indicators are generally considered to be important elements in programs for school improvement and external accountability. In this article five indicators are described, of varying origin. Three are in use by the Dutch Inspectorat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pedagogiek 2016-03, Vol.36 (1), p.29-47
Hauptverfasser: Blok, Henk, Karssen, Merlijn, Meijer, Joost, Roeleveld, Jaap
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 47
container_issue 1
container_start_page 29
container_title Pedagogiek
container_volume 36
creator Blok, Henk
Karssen, Merlijn
Meijer, Joost
Roeleveld, Jaap
description On the validity of school performance indicators School performance indicators are generally considered to be important elements in programs for school improvement and external accountability. In this article five indicators are described, of varying origin. Three are in use by the Dutch Inspectorate of Education, while the other two are used mainly for research purposes; four are based on a value-added approach, one on school mean proficiency. The indicators are compared against a frame of six validity criteria, including for instance measurement precision and topicality. It is concluded that all five indicators show shortcomings, be it in varying degree. In the discussion three factors are explored that hamper the measurement of school performance in terms of learning outcomes. Better understanding of school performance indicators requires insight into the process variables that distinguish effective schools from less effective schools. The stronger process variables like teacher qualities and effective learning time are related to school performance indicators, the more valid these indicators are to be considered.
doi_str_mv 10.5117/PED2016.1.BLOK
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5117_PED2016_1_BLOK</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5117_PED2016_1_BLOK</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5117_PED2016_1_BLOK3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVzrEKwjAYBOAgChbt6pwXaM0fTWJxUyuCQh3cQ0kTjNRGklLw7bXSF3C6G-7gQ2gBJGUAYnnND5QATyHdXYrzCEV0zTcJcEbHKALGRSKAZFMUh_AghNCMMkFZhLZFpz2uNO7K2la21bb91gbbprKqbJ3XDe6c8ziou3O1Nkar1na_4RxNTFkHHQ85Q-kxv-1PifIuBK-NfHn7LP1bApG9Ug5KCbJXrv4-fABPhEUa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Over de validiteit van indicatoren voor schooleffectiviteit: Een kritische beschouwing</title><source>Uopen Journals</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><creator>Blok, Henk ; Karssen, Merlijn ; Meijer, Joost ; Roeleveld, Jaap</creator><creatorcontrib>Blok, Henk ; Karssen, Merlijn ; Meijer, Joost ; Roeleveld, Jaap</creatorcontrib><description>On the validity of school performance indicators School performance indicators are generally considered to be important elements in programs for school improvement and external accountability. In this article five indicators are described, of varying origin. Three are in use by the Dutch Inspectorate of Education, while the other two are used mainly for research purposes; four are based on a value-added approach, one on school mean proficiency. The indicators are compared against a frame of six validity criteria, including for instance measurement precision and topicality. It is concluded that all five indicators show shortcomings, be it in varying degree. In the discussion three factors are explored that hamper the measurement of school performance in terms of learning outcomes. Better understanding of school performance indicators requires insight into the process variables that distinguish effective schools from less effective schools. The stronger process variables like teacher qualities and effective learning time are related to school performance indicators, the more valid these indicators are to be considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1567-7109</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2468-1652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5117/PED2016.1.BLOK</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Pedagogiek, 2016-03, Vol.36 (1), p.29-47</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blok, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karssen, Merlijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Joost</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roeleveld, Jaap</creatorcontrib><title>Over de validiteit van indicatoren voor schooleffectiviteit: Een kritische beschouwing</title><title>Pedagogiek</title><description>On the validity of school performance indicators School performance indicators are generally considered to be important elements in programs for school improvement and external accountability. In this article five indicators are described, of varying origin. Three are in use by the Dutch Inspectorate of Education, while the other two are used mainly for research purposes; four are based on a value-added approach, one on school mean proficiency. The indicators are compared against a frame of six validity criteria, including for instance measurement precision and topicality. It is concluded that all five indicators show shortcomings, be it in varying degree. In the discussion three factors are explored that hamper the measurement of school performance in terms of learning outcomes. Better understanding of school performance indicators requires insight into the process variables that distinguish effective schools from less effective schools. The stronger process variables like teacher qualities and effective learning time are related to school performance indicators, the more valid these indicators are to be considered.</description><issn>1567-7109</issn><issn>2468-1652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVzrEKwjAYBOAgChbt6pwXaM0fTWJxUyuCQh3cQ0kTjNRGklLw7bXSF3C6G-7gQ2gBJGUAYnnND5QATyHdXYrzCEV0zTcJcEbHKALGRSKAZFMUh_AghNCMMkFZhLZFpz2uNO7K2la21bb91gbbprKqbJ3XDe6c8ziou3O1Nkar1na_4RxNTFkHHQ85Q-kxv-1PifIuBK-NfHn7LP1bApG9Ug5KCbJXrv4-fABPhEUa</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Blok, Henk</creator><creator>Karssen, Merlijn</creator><creator>Meijer, Joost</creator><creator>Roeleveld, Jaap</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Over de validiteit van indicatoren voor schooleffectiviteit</title><author>Blok, Henk ; Karssen, Merlijn ; Meijer, Joost ; Roeleveld, Jaap</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5117_PED2016_1_BLOK3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blok, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karssen, Merlijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Joost</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roeleveld, Jaap</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Pedagogiek</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blok, Henk</au><au>Karssen, Merlijn</au><au>Meijer, Joost</au><au>Roeleveld, Jaap</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Over de validiteit van indicatoren voor schooleffectiviteit: Een kritische beschouwing</atitle><jtitle>Pedagogiek</jtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>29-47</pages><issn>1567-7109</issn><eissn>2468-1652</eissn><abstract>On the validity of school performance indicators School performance indicators are generally considered to be important elements in programs for school improvement and external accountability. In this article five indicators are described, of varying origin. Three are in use by the Dutch Inspectorate of Education, while the other two are used mainly for research purposes; four are based on a value-added approach, one on school mean proficiency. The indicators are compared against a frame of six validity criteria, including for instance measurement precision and topicality. It is concluded that all five indicators show shortcomings, be it in varying degree. In the discussion three factors are explored that hamper the measurement of school performance in terms of learning outcomes. Better understanding of school performance indicators requires insight into the process variables that distinguish effective schools from less effective schools. The stronger process variables like teacher qualities and effective learning time are related to school performance indicators, the more valid these indicators are to be considered.</abstract><doi>10.5117/PED2016.1.BLOK</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1567-7109
ispartof Pedagogiek, 2016-03, Vol.36 (1), p.29-47
issn 1567-7109
2468-1652
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5117_PED2016_1_BLOK
source Uopen Journals; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals
title Over de validiteit van indicatoren voor schooleffectiviteit: Een kritische beschouwing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A55%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Over%20de%20validiteit%20van%20indicatoren%20voor%20schooleffectiviteit:%20Een%20kritische%20beschouwing&rft.jtitle=Pedagogiek&rft.au=Blok,%20Henk&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=29-47&rft.issn=1567-7109&rft.eissn=2468-1652&rft_id=info:doi/10.5117/PED2016.1.BLOK&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_5117_PED2016_1_BLOK%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true