Biomechanical Investigation of the Efficacy of Conventional Bicycle Helmets at Preventing Facial Injury

Many studies indicate that wearing a bicycle helmet significantly reduces the risk of accident-related head injuries. Less is reported, however, about bicycle helmet use, about preventing facial injury. Epidemiological studies typically report incidences of 'head injury,' though rarely cat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Techniques 2022-12, Vol.4 (4), p.95-104
1. Verfasser: Ghaidaa A. Khalid
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 104
container_issue 4
container_start_page 95
container_title Journal of Techniques
container_volume 4
creator Ghaidaa A. Khalid
description Many studies indicate that wearing a bicycle helmet significantly reduces the risk of accident-related head injuries. Less is reported, however, about bicycle helmet use, about preventing facial injury. Epidemiological studies typically report incidences of 'head injury,' though rarely categorize head, brain, and facial injuries separately. Studies that do focus on facial injury suggest that helmets do not provide adequate protection. A 3D biofidelic child head form and two conventional bicycle helmets (that is,” open face") were created in MSC ADAMS™ computer modelling and simulation software. Peak force and linear accelerations were measured for a series of head form impact simulations corresponding to an established testing standard and a newly proposed series of tests derived from modified motorcycle standards, incorporating injury thresholds from the facial bone impact tolerance literature. Almost all impact simulations exceeded the threshold for fracture, soft tissue, and dental trauma. An observational study was conducted using MSC ADAMS™ to assess a helmeted headform's face exposure during impact simulations. Helmets failed to reduce face impact exposure, during all simulations, except for perpendicular cheek impacts. International test standards, therefore, require urgent revision to ensure that face protection is included.
doi_str_mv 10.51173/jt.v4i4.867
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_51173_jt_v4i4_867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_51173_jt_v4i4_867</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_51173_jt_v4i4_8673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj8FqhDAURUNpodK66wfkA6qTGB3T7cgMM7tZdNFdCOFFI5qUJBXy91XpD3T1eJzDhYPQGyVlQ2nLDmMsl9rUJT-2DyirWsILzjh7RBnllBfHhn09ozyEkRBSfdCK0DpD_cm4GdQgrVFywje7QIiml9E4i53GcQB81nqFKm1_51bDbnS1T0YlNQG-wjRDDFhGfPewc9vji1Rmnxx_fHpFT1pOAfK_-4LeL-fP7loo70LwoMW3N7P0SVAi9h4xRrH1iLWH_VP_BYpCVL0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomechanical Investigation of the Efficacy of Conventional Bicycle Helmets at Preventing Facial Injury</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Ghaidaa A. Khalid</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghaidaa A. Khalid</creatorcontrib><description>Many studies indicate that wearing a bicycle helmet significantly reduces the risk of accident-related head injuries. Less is reported, however, about bicycle helmet use, about preventing facial injury. Epidemiological studies typically report incidences of 'head injury,' though rarely categorize head, brain, and facial injuries separately. Studies that do focus on facial injury suggest that helmets do not provide adequate protection. A 3D biofidelic child head form and two conventional bicycle helmets (that is,” open face") were created in MSC ADAMS™ computer modelling and simulation software. Peak force and linear accelerations were measured for a series of head form impact simulations corresponding to an established testing standard and a newly proposed series of tests derived from modified motorcycle standards, incorporating injury thresholds from the facial bone impact tolerance literature. Almost all impact simulations exceeded the threshold for fracture, soft tissue, and dental trauma. An observational study was conducted using MSC ADAMS™ to assess a helmeted headform's face exposure during impact simulations. Helmets failed to reduce face impact exposure, during all simulations, except for perpendicular cheek impacts. International test standards, therefore, require urgent revision to ensure that face protection is included.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1818-653X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2708-8383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.51173/jt.v4i4.867</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of Techniques, 2022-12, Vol.4 (4), p.95-104</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghaidaa A. Khalid</creatorcontrib><title>Biomechanical Investigation of the Efficacy of Conventional Bicycle Helmets at Preventing Facial Injury</title><title>Journal of Techniques</title><description>Many studies indicate that wearing a bicycle helmet significantly reduces the risk of accident-related head injuries. Less is reported, however, about bicycle helmet use, about preventing facial injury. Epidemiological studies typically report incidences of 'head injury,' though rarely categorize head, brain, and facial injuries separately. Studies that do focus on facial injury suggest that helmets do not provide adequate protection. A 3D biofidelic child head form and two conventional bicycle helmets (that is,” open face") were created in MSC ADAMS™ computer modelling and simulation software. Peak force and linear accelerations were measured for a series of head form impact simulations corresponding to an established testing standard and a newly proposed series of tests derived from modified motorcycle standards, incorporating injury thresholds from the facial bone impact tolerance literature. Almost all impact simulations exceeded the threshold for fracture, soft tissue, and dental trauma. An observational study was conducted using MSC ADAMS™ to assess a helmeted headform's face exposure during impact simulations. Helmets failed to reduce face impact exposure, during all simulations, except for perpendicular cheek impacts. International test standards, therefore, require urgent revision to ensure that face protection is included.</description><issn>1818-653X</issn><issn>2708-8383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVj8FqhDAURUNpodK66wfkA6qTGB3T7cgMM7tZdNFdCOFFI5qUJBXy91XpD3T1eJzDhYPQGyVlQ2nLDmMsl9rUJT-2DyirWsILzjh7RBnllBfHhn09ozyEkRBSfdCK0DpD_cm4GdQgrVFywje7QIiml9E4i53GcQB81nqFKm1_51bDbnS1T0YlNQG-wjRDDFhGfPewc9vji1Rmnxx_fHpFT1pOAfK_-4LeL-fP7loo70LwoMW3N7P0SVAi9h4xRrH1iLWH_VP_BYpCVL0</recordid><startdate>20221231</startdate><enddate>20221231</enddate><creator>Ghaidaa A. Khalid</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221231</creationdate><title>Biomechanical Investigation of the Efficacy of Conventional Bicycle Helmets at Preventing Facial Injury</title><author>Ghaidaa A. Khalid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_51173_jt_v4i4_8673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghaidaa A. Khalid</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of Techniques</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghaidaa A. Khalid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomechanical Investigation of the Efficacy of Conventional Bicycle Helmets at Preventing Facial Injury</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Techniques</jtitle><date>2022-12-31</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>95-104</pages><issn>1818-653X</issn><eissn>2708-8383</eissn><abstract>Many studies indicate that wearing a bicycle helmet significantly reduces the risk of accident-related head injuries. Less is reported, however, about bicycle helmet use, about preventing facial injury. Epidemiological studies typically report incidences of 'head injury,' though rarely categorize head, brain, and facial injuries separately. Studies that do focus on facial injury suggest that helmets do not provide adequate protection. A 3D biofidelic child head form and two conventional bicycle helmets (that is,” open face") were created in MSC ADAMS™ computer modelling and simulation software. Peak force and linear accelerations were measured for a series of head form impact simulations corresponding to an established testing standard and a newly proposed series of tests derived from modified motorcycle standards, incorporating injury thresholds from the facial bone impact tolerance literature. Almost all impact simulations exceeded the threshold for fracture, soft tissue, and dental trauma. An observational study was conducted using MSC ADAMS™ to assess a helmeted headform's face exposure during impact simulations. Helmets failed to reduce face impact exposure, during all simulations, except for perpendicular cheek impacts. International test standards, therefore, require urgent revision to ensure that face protection is included.</abstract><doi>10.51173/jt.v4i4.867</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1818-653X
ispartof Journal of Techniques, 2022-12, Vol.4 (4), p.95-104
issn 1818-653X
2708-8383
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_51173_jt_v4i4_867
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
title Biomechanical Investigation of the Efficacy of Conventional Bicycle Helmets at Preventing Facial Injury
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A21%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomechanical%20Investigation%20of%20the%20Efficacy%20of%20Conventional%20Bicycle%20Helmets%20at%20Preventing%20Facial%20Injury&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Techniques&rft.au=Ghaidaa%20A.%20Khalid&rft.date=2022-12-31&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=95-104&rft.issn=1818-653X&rft.eissn=2708-8383&rft_id=info:doi/10.51173/jt.v4i4.867&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_51173_jt_v4i4_867%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true