Productivity or Employment: Is It a Choice?

Traditionally, shocks to total factor productivity (TFP) are considered exogenous and the employment response depends on their effect on aggregate demand. We raise the possibility that in response to labor supply shocks firms adjust efficiency, rendering TFP endogenous to firms’ production decisions...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IMF working paper 2013, Vol.13 (13/97), p.1
1. Verfasser: De Michelis, Andrea
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 13/97
container_start_page 1
container_title IMF working paper
container_volume 13
creator De Michelis, Andrea
description Traditionally, shocks to total factor productivity (TFP) are considered exogenous and the employment response depends on their effect on aggregate demand. We raise the possibility that in response to labor supply shocks firms adjust efficiency, rendering TFP endogenous to firms’ production decisions. We present robust cross-country evidence of a strong negative correlation between growth in TFP and labor inputs over the medium to long run. In addition, when using instruments to capture changes in hours worked that are independent of TFP shocks, we find that cross-country increases in labor input cause reductions in TFP growth. These results have important policy implications, including that low productivity growth in some countries may partly be a side effect of strong labor market performance. By the same token, countries facing a declining workforce, say, because of aging, may see accelerating TFP as firms find better ways of employing workers
doi_str_mv 10.5089/9781484331026.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>econis_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5089_9781484331026_001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>84581852X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1571-180105070533222d692a11b8ba2aa8a1683286fe172c06ce592baeff96d44bf63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVj81Kw0AURgdUsNY-gG7sC6TeO3-5s5RSq1BoFwruwmQyA5GmU2aikLc3UhG6-uCDc-AwdoewUEDm0ZSEkqQQCFwvAPCCzc6-SzZBQCqUkXjNbnL-BFCCc5qw-12KzZfr2--2H-YxzVfdcR-Hzh_6W3YV7D772d9O2fvz6m35Umy269fl06ZwqEoskABBQTkaRyVvtOEWsabacmvJoibBSQePJXegnVeG19aHYHQjZR20mDI8eV2KOScfqmNqO5uGCqH6DazOYqoxcGQeTox38dDmf4KkIiTFP8QPJmdKqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Productivity or Employment: Is It a Choice?</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>De Michelis, Andrea</creator><creatorcontrib>De Michelis, Andrea ; ADe Michelis@imf.org ; MEstevão@imf.org ; BWilson@imf.org</creatorcontrib><description>Traditionally, shocks to total factor productivity (TFP) are considered exogenous and the employment response depends on their effect on aggregate demand. We raise the possibility that in response to labor supply shocks firms adjust efficiency, rendering TFP endogenous to firms’ production decisions. We present robust cross-country evidence of a strong negative correlation between growth in TFP and labor inputs over the medium to long run. In addition, when using instruments to capture changes in hours worked that are independent of TFP shocks, we find that cross-country increases in labor input cause reductions in TFP growth. These results have important policy implications, including that low productivity growth in some countries may partly be a side effect of strong labor market performance. By the same token, countries facing a declining workforce, say, because of aging, may see accelerating TFP as firms find better ways of employing workers</description><identifier>ISSN: 1018-5941</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781484331026</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1484331028</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5089/9781484331026.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund</publisher><ispartof>IMF working paper, 2013, Vol.13 (13/97), p.1</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1571-180105070533222d692a11b8ba2aa8a1683286fe172c06ce592baeff96d44bf63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1571-180105070533222d692a11b8ba2aa8a1683286fe172c06ce592baeff96d44bf63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27904,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Michelis, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ADe Michelis@imf.org</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEstevão@imf.org</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BWilson@imf.org</creatorcontrib><title>Productivity or Employment: Is It a Choice?</title><title>IMF working paper</title><description>Traditionally, shocks to total factor productivity (TFP) are considered exogenous and the employment response depends on their effect on aggregate demand. We raise the possibility that in response to labor supply shocks firms adjust efficiency, rendering TFP endogenous to firms’ production decisions. We present robust cross-country evidence of a strong negative correlation between growth in TFP and labor inputs over the medium to long run. In addition, when using instruments to capture changes in hours worked that are independent of TFP shocks, we find that cross-country increases in labor input cause reductions in TFP growth. These results have important policy implications, including that low productivity growth in some countries may partly be a side effect of strong labor market performance. By the same token, countries facing a declining workforce, say, because of aging, may see accelerating TFP as firms find better ways of employing workers</description><issn>1018-5941</issn><isbn>9781484331026</isbn><isbn>1484331028</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVj81Kw0AURgdUsNY-gG7sC6TeO3-5s5RSq1BoFwruwmQyA5GmU2aikLc3UhG6-uCDc-AwdoewUEDm0ZSEkqQQCFwvAPCCzc6-SzZBQCqUkXjNbnL-BFCCc5qw-12KzZfr2--2H-YxzVfdcR-Hzh_6W3YV7D772d9O2fvz6m35Umy269fl06ZwqEoskABBQTkaRyVvtOEWsabacmvJoibBSQePJXegnVeG19aHYHQjZR20mDI8eV2KOScfqmNqO5uGCqH6DazOYqoxcGQeTox38dDmf4KkIiTFP8QPJmdKqQ</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>De Michelis, Andrea</creator><general>International Monetary Fund</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Productivity or Employment</title><author>De Michelis, Andrea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1571-180105070533222d692a11b8ba2aa8a1683286fe172c06ce592baeff96d44bf63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Michelis, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ADe Michelis@imf.org</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEstevão@imf.org</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BWilson@imf.org</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>IMF working paper</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Michelis, Andrea</au><aucorp>ADe Michelis@imf.org</aucorp><aucorp>MEstevão@imf.org</aucorp><aucorp>BWilson@imf.org</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Productivity or Employment: Is It a Choice?</atitle><jtitle>IMF working paper</jtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>13/97</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>1018-5941</issn><isbn>9781484331026</isbn><isbn>1484331028</isbn><abstract>Traditionally, shocks to total factor productivity (TFP) are considered exogenous and the employment response depends on their effect on aggregate demand. We raise the possibility that in response to labor supply shocks firms adjust efficiency, rendering TFP endogenous to firms’ production decisions. We present robust cross-country evidence of a strong negative correlation between growth in TFP and labor inputs over the medium to long run. In addition, when using instruments to capture changes in hours worked that are independent of TFP shocks, we find that cross-country increases in labor input cause reductions in TFP growth. These results have important policy implications, including that low productivity growth in some countries may partly be a side effect of strong labor market performance. By the same token, countries facing a declining workforce, say, because of aging, may see accelerating TFP as firms find better ways of employing workers</abstract><cop>Washington, D.C</cop><pub>International Monetary Fund</pub><doi>10.5089/9781484331026.001</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1018-5941
ispartof IMF working paper, 2013, Vol.13 (13/97), p.1
issn 1018-5941
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5089_9781484331026_001
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Productivity or Employment: Is It a Choice?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A56%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-econis_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Productivity%20or%20Employment:%20Is%20It%20a%20Choice?&rft.jtitle=IMF%20working%20paper&rft.au=De%20Michelis,%20Andrea&rft.aucorp=ADe%20Michelis@imf.org&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=13/97&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=1018-5941&rft.isbn=9781484331026&rft.isbn_list=1484331028&rft_id=info:doi/10.5089/9781484331026.001&rft_dat=%3Ceconis_cross%3E84581852X%3C/econis_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true