Evaluation of ultrafiltration and multimedia filtration as pretreatment process for forward osmosis
In order to reduce scaling in a multistage flash (MSF) desalination plant, the brine reject can be diluted using forward osmosis (FO) before recycling. In this FO process, the brine is used as the draw solution (DS) and seawater is used as the feed solution (FS). However, the FO process suffers from...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Desalination and water treatment 2020-08, Vol.196, p.84-92 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 92 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 84 |
container_title | Desalination and water treatment |
container_volume | 196 |
creator | Hawari, Alaa H. Hafiz, MhdAmmar Yasir, Ahmed T. Alfahel, Radwan Altaee, Ali |
description | In order to reduce scaling in a multistage flash (MSF) desalination plant, the brine reject can be diluted using forward osmosis (FO) before recycling. In this FO process, the brine is used as the draw solution (DS) and seawater is used as the feed solution (FS). However, the FO process suffers from low water flux owing to membrane fouling. The water flux in FO can be enhanced by reducing the foulant concentration in the FO feed solution (FS). Thus, in this paper seawater, multimedia sand filtered seawater, and ultrafiltrated seawater is being used as feed solution for the FO process. The flowrate of the feed solution was kept constant at 2.0 L/min. However, the flowrate of the draw solution (DS) were tested at 2.0 and 0.8 L/min. When the flowrate of the DS was 0.8 L/min, the highest initial flux of 44.1 L/m2 h were obtained using ultrafiltrated seawater as FS. After the initial run, the membrane was cleaned and during the second run, 83% of the initial flux was recovered using the ultrafiltrated seawater as FS. For ultrafiltrated seawater, the water recovery rate and specific energy consumption was 36.2% and 0.065 kWh/m3, respectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5004/dwt.2020.25941 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5004_dwt_2020_25941</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1944398624102354</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1944398624102354</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-cc215c0b16e85fc17587b88affa3306c1a3e22fac75ebd08099ddfcae52706f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1rwzAMhn3YYKXrdWf_gWS2EyfOcZTuAwq7bGej2jJ4NHGx3Zb9-zntDrtMIAlJvEJ6CHngrJaMtY_2nGvBBKuFHFp-QxZ8aNuqGVR3R1YpfbFisu1lKxbEbE6wP0L2YaLB0eM-R3B-jpcWTJaOpelHtB7o30mih4g5IuQRp1yKYDAl6kKc_QzR0pDGkHy6J7cO9glXv3lJPp83H-vXavv-8rZ-2lZGSJUrYwSXhu14h0o6w3up-p1S4Bw0DesMhwaFcGB6iTvLFBsGa50BlKJnnVPNktTXvSaGlCI6fYh-hPitOdMzGV3I6JmMvpApAnUVYLnq5DHqZDxOpvwa0WRtg_9P-gOImm94</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of ultrafiltration and multimedia filtration as pretreatment process for forward osmosis</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hawari, Alaa H. ; Hafiz, MhdAmmar ; Yasir, Ahmed T. ; Alfahel, Radwan ; Altaee, Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Hawari, Alaa H. ; Hafiz, MhdAmmar ; Yasir, Ahmed T. ; Alfahel, Radwan ; Altaee, Ali</creatorcontrib><description>In order to reduce scaling in a multistage flash (MSF) desalination plant, the brine reject can be diluted using forward osmosis (FO) before recycling. In this FO process, the brine is used as the draw solution (DS) and seawater is used as the feed solution (FS). However, the FO process suffers from low water flux owing to membrane fouling. The water flux in FO can be enhanced by reducing the foulant concentration in the FO feed solution (FS). Thus, in this paper seawater, multimedia sand filtered seawater, and ultrafiltrated seawater is being used as feed solution for the FO process. The flowrate of the feed solution was kept constant at 2.0 L/min. However, the flowrate of the draw solution (DS) were tested at 2.0 and 0.8 L/min. When the flowrate of the DS was 0.8 L/min, the highest initial flux of 44.1 L/m2 h were obtained using ultrafiltrated seawater as FS. After the initial run, the membrane was cleaned and during the second run, 83% of the initial flux was recovered using the ultrafiltrated seawater as FS. For ultrafiltrated seawater, the water recovery rate and specific energy consumption was 36.2% and 0.065 kWh/m3, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-3986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2020.25941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Forward osmosis ; Pretreatment ; Sand filtration ; Ultrafiltration ; Water flux</subject><ispartof>Desalination and water treatment, 2020-08, Vol.196, p.84-92</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-cc215c0b16e85fc17587b88affa3306c1a3e22fac75ebd08099ddfcae52706f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-cc215c0b16e85fc17587b88affa3306c1a3e22fac75ebd08099ddfcae52706f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hawari, Alaa H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hafiz, MhdAmmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasir, Ahmed T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfahel, Radwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altaee, Ali</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of ultrafiltration and multimedia filtration as pretreatment process for forward osmosis</title><title>Desalination and water treatment</title><description>In order to reduce scaling in a multistage flash (MSF) desalination plant, the brine reject can be diluted using forward osmosis (FO) before recycling. In this FO process, the brine is used as the draw solution (DS) and seawater is used as the feed solution (FS). However, the FO process suffers from low water flux owing to membrane fouling. The water flux in FO can be enhanced by reducing the foulant concentration in the FO feed solution (FS). Thus, in this paper seawater, multimedia sand filtered seawater, and ultrafiltrated seawater is being used as feed solution for the FO process. The flowrate of the feed solution was kept constant at 2.0 L/min. However, the flowrate of the draw solution (DS) were tested at 2.0 and 0.8 L/min. When the flowrate of the DS was 0.8 L/min, the highest initial flux of 44.1 L/m2 h were obtained using ultrafiltrated seawater as FS. After the initial run, the membrane was cleaned and during the second run, 83% of the initial flux was recovered using the ultrafiltrated seawater as FS. For ultrafiltrated seawater, the water recovery rate and specific energy consumption was 36.2% and 0.065 kWh/m3, respectively.</description><subject>Forward osmosis</subject><subject>Pretreatment</subject><subject>Sand filtration</subject><subject>Ultrafiltration</subject><subject>Water flux</subject><issn>1944-3986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1rwzAMhn3YYKXrdWf_gWS2EyfOcZTuAwq7bGej2jJ4NHGx3Zb9-zntDrtMIAlJvEJ6CHngrJaMtY_2nGvBBKuFHFp-QxZ8aNuqGVR3R1YpfbFisu1lKxbEbE6wP0L2YaLB0eM-R3B-jpcWTJaOpelHtB7o30mih4g5IuQRp1yKYDAl6kKc_QzR0pDGkHy6J7cO9glXv3lJPp83H-vXavv-8rZ-2lZGSJUrYwSXhu14h0o6w3up-p1S4Bw0DesMhwaFcGB6iTvLFBsGa50BlKJnnVPNktTXvSaGlCI6fYh-hPitOdMzGV3I6JmMvpApAnUVYLnq5DHqZDxOpvwa0WRtg_9P-gOImm94</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Hawari, Alaa H.</creator><creator>Hafiz, MhdAmmar</creator><creator>Yasir, Ahmed T.</creator><creator>Alfahel, Radwan</creator><creator>Altaee, Ali</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Evaluation of ultrafiltration and multimedia filtration as pretreatment process for forward osmosis</title><author>Hawari, Alaa H. ; Hafiz, MhdAmmar ; Yasir, Ahmed T. ; Alfahel, Radwan ; Altaee, Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-cc215c0b16e85fc17587b88affa3306c1a3e22fac75ebd08099ddfcae52706f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Forward osmosis</topic><topic>Pretreatment</topic><topic>Sand filtration</topic><topic>Ultrafiltration</topic><topic>Water flux</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hawari, Alaa H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hafiz, MhdAmmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasir, Ahmed T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfahel, Radwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altaee, Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Desalination and water treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hawari, Alaa H.</au><au>Hafiz, MhdAmmar</au><au>Yasir, Ahmed T.</au><au>Alfahel, Radwan</au><au>Altaee, Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of ultrafiltration and multimedia filtration as pretreatment process for forward osmosis</atitle><jtitle>Desalination and water treatment</jtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>196</volume><spage>84</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>84-92</pages><issn>1944-3986</issn><abstract>In order to reduce scaling in a multistage flash (MSF) desalination plant, the brine reject can be diluted using forward osmosis (FO) before recycling. In this FO process, the brine is used as the draw solution (DS) and seawater is used as the feed solution (FS). However, the FO process suffers from low water flux owing to membrane fouling. The water flux in FO can be enhanced by reducing the foulant concentration in the FO feed solution (FS). Thus, in this paper seawater, multimedia sand filtered seawater, and ultrafiltrated seawater is being used as feed solution for the FO process. The flowrate of the feed solution was kept constant at 2.0 L/min. However, the flowrate of the draw solution (DS) were tested at 2.0 and 0.8 L/min. When the flowrate of the DS was 0.8 L/min, the highest initial flux of 44.1 L/m2 h were obtained using ultrafiltrated seawater as FS. After the initial run, the membrane was cleaned and during the second run, 83% of the initial flux was recovered using the ultrafiltrated seawater as FS. For ultrafiltrated seawater, the water recovery rate and specific energy consumption was 36.2% and 0.065 kWh/m3, respectively.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.5004/dwt.2020.25941</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1944-3986 |
ispartof | Desalination and water treatment, 2020-08, Vol.196, p.84-92 |
issn | 1944-3986 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_5004_dwt_2020_25941 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Forward osmosis Pretreatment Sand filtration Ultrafiltration Water flux |
title | Evaluation of ultrafiltration and multimedia filtration as pretreatment process for forward osmosis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T14%3A05%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20ultrafiltration%20and%20multimedia%20filtration%20as%20pretreatment%20process%20for%20forward%20osmosis&rft.jtitle=Desalination%20and%20water%20treatment&rft.au=Hawari,%20Alaa%20H.&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=196&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=84-92&rft.issn=1944-3986&rft_id=info:doi/10.5004/dwt.2020.25941&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES1944398624102354%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1944398624102354&rfr_iscdi=true |