Chromium(VI) removal from industrial wastewater using hydrogen peroxide assisted electrocoagulation

Chromium(VI) removal from industrial wastewater using hydrogen peroxide assisted electrocoagulation

In this study, removal of hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), from real industrial wastewater using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) assisted electrocoagulation was investigated. The material for anode and cathode was iron. The impact of operating parameters including pH, current density and the H2O2 concentration...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Desalination and water treatment 2019-06, Vol.153, p.402-407
Hauptverfasser: Onpeker, Suzan, Un, U. Tezcan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Electrocoagulation
Fenton effect
Hexavalent chrome
Hydrogen peroxide
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 407
container_issue
container_start_page 402
container_title Desalination and water treatment
container_volume 153
creator Onpeker, Suzan
Un, U. Tezcan
description In this study, removal of hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), from real industrial wastewater using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) assisted electrocoagulation was investigated. The material for anode and cathode was iron. The impact of operating parameters including pH, current density and the H2O2 concentration on removal efficiency and energy consumption was explored in detail. The results showed that the chrome removal efficiency improved at acidic conditions (lower pH) and also with the increase of current density whereas the addition of H2O2 at any concentration decreased the removal efficiency. An initial Cr(VI) concentration of 518.9 mg/L was reduced to 0.523 mg/L after 60 min which was equal to overall removal efficiency of 99.92% when current density of 10 mA/cm2 and pH 3.0 were applied while no H2O2 was added. At these conditions, 1.61 kWh/m3 energy was consumed and the estimated operational cost was 0.803 USD/m3of wastewater. Our findings showed that the electrocoagulation was an effective treatment method for chromium rich wastewater but the hydrogen peroxide did not improve the outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.5004/dwt.2019.23971
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5004_dwt_2019_23971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S194439862408425X</els_id><sourcerecordid>S194439862408425X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-ee2c78d9d9f46daf0c2b7e5e93e7c27e5e57b25e8506ecf5676fbd61e98540063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EElXpyuwRhgTHseN4RBXQSpVYgNVy7UtrlMSVnbT03-NSBhZuuXene6e7D6HbguScEPZgD0NOSSFzWkpRXKBJIRnLSllXl3_0NZrF-ElScCY4oxNk5tvgOzd2dx_Lexyg83vd4ib1sOvtGIfgUn3QcYCDHiDgMbp-g7dHG_wGeryD4L-cBaxjdGnIYmjBDMEbrzdjqwfn-xt01eg2wuw3T9H789PbfJGtXl-W88dVZkpaDxkANaK20sqGVVY3xNC1AA6yBGHoSXGxphxqTiowDa9E1axtVYCsOSOkKqcoP-81wccYoFG74Dodjqog6kRJJUrqREn9UEqG-myAdNXeQVDROOgNWBfSE8p695_1GwtBcQ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chromium(VI) removal from industrial wastewater using hydrogen peroxide assisted electrocoagulation</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Onpeker, Suzan ; Un, U. Tezcan</creator><creatorcontrib>Onpeker, Suzan ; Un, U. Tezcan</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, removal of hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), from real industrial wastewater using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) assisted electrocoagulation was investigated. The material for anode and cathode was iron. The impact of operating parameters including pH, current density and the H2O2 concentration on removal efficiency and energy consumption was explored in detail. The results showed that the chrome removal efficiency improved at acidic conditions (lower pH) and also with the increase of current density whereas the addition of H2O2 at any concentration decreased the removal efficiency. An initial Cr(VI) concentration of 518.9 mg/L was reduced to 0.523 mg/L after 60 min which was equal to overall removal efficiency of 99.92% when current density of 10 mA/cm2 and pH 3.0 were applied while no H2O2 was added. At these conditions, 1.61 kWh/m3 energy was consumed and the estimated operational cost was 0.803 USD/m3of wastewater. Our findings showed that the electrocoagulation was an effective treatment method for chromium rich wastewater but the hydrogen peroxide did not improve the outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-3986</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-3986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2019.23971</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Electrocoagulation ; Fenton effect ; Hexavalent chrome ; Hydrogen peroxide</subject><ispartof>Desalination and water treatment, 2019-06, Vol.153, p.402-407</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-ee2c78d9d9f46daf0c2b7e5e93e7c27e5e57b25e8506ecf5676fbd61e98540063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-ee2c78d9d9f46daf0c2b7e5e93e7c27e5e57b25e8506ecf5676fbd61e98540063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Onpeker, Suzan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Un, U. Tezcan</creatorcontrib><title>Chromium(VI) removal from industrial wastewater using hydrogen peroxide assisted electrocoagulation</title><title>Desalination and water treatment</title><description>In this study, removal of hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), from real industrial wastewater using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) assisted electrocoagulation was investigated. The material for anode and cathode was iron. The impact of operating parameters including pH, current density and the H2O2 concentration on removal efficiency and energy consumption was explored in detail. The results showed that the chrome removal efficiency improved at acidic conditions (lower pH) and also with the increase of current density whereas the addition of H2O2 at any concentration decreased the removal efficiency. An initial Cr(VI) concentration of 518.9 mg/L was reduced to 0.523 mg/L after 60 min which was equal to overall removal efficiency of 99.92% when current density of 10 mA/cm2 and pH 3.0 were applied while no H2O2 was added. At these conditions, 1.61 kWh/m3 energy was consumed and the estimated operational cost was 0.803 USD/m3of wastewater. Our findings showed that the electrocoagulation was an effective treatment method for chromium rich wastewater but the hydrogen peroxide did not improve the outcomes.</description><subject>Electrocoagulation</subject><subject>Fenton effect</subject><subject>Hexavalent chrome</subject><subject>Hydrogen peroxide</subject><issn>1944-3986</issn><issn>1944-3986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EElXpyuwRhgTHseN4RBXQSpVYgNVy7UtrlMSVnbT03-NSBhZuuXene6e7D6HbguScEPZgD0NOSSFzWkpRXKBJIRnLSllXl3_0NZrF-ElScCY4oxNk5tvgOzd2dx_Lexyg83vd4ib1sOvtGIfgUn3QcYCDHiDgMbp-g7dHG_wGeryD4L-cBaxjdGnIYmjBDMEbrzdjqwfn-xt01eg2wuw3T9H789PbfJGtXl-W88dVZkpaDxkANaK20sqGVVY3xNC1AA6yBGHoSXGxphxqTiowDa9E1axtVYCsOSOkKqcoP-81wccYoFG74Dodjqog6kRJJUrqREn9UEqG-myAdNXeQVDROOgNWBfSE8p695_1GwtBcQ0</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Onpeker, Suzan</creator><creator>Un, U. Tezcan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Chromium(VI) removal from industrial wastewater using hydrogen peroxide assisted electrocoagulation</title><author>Onpeker, Suzan ; Un, U. Tezcan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-ee2c78d9d9f46daf0c2b7e5e93e7c27e5e57b25e8506ecf5676fbd61e98540063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Electrocoagulation</topic><topic>Fenton effect</topic><topic>Hexavalent chrome</topic><topic>Hydrogen peroxide</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Onpeker, Suzan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Un, U. Tezcan</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Desalination and water treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Onpeker, Suzan</au><au>Un, U. Tezcan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chromium(VI) removal from industrial wastewater using hydrogen peroxide assisted electrocoagulation</atitle><jtitle>Desalination and water treatment</jtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>153</volume><spage>402</spage><epage>407</epage><pages>402-407</pages><issn>1944-3986</issn><eissn>1944-3986</eissn><abstract>In this study, removal of hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), from real industrial wastewater using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) assisted electrocoagulation was investigated. The material for anode and cathode was iron. The impact of operating parameters including pH, current density and the H2O2 concentration on removal efficiency and energy consumption was explored in detail. The results showed that the chrome removal efficiency improved at acidic conditions (lower pH) and also with the increase of current density whereas the addition of H2O2 at any concentration decreased the removal efficiency. An initial Cr(VI) concentration of 518.9 mg/L was reduced to 0.523 mg/L after 60 min which was equal to overall removal efficiency of 99.92% when current density of 10 mA/cm2 and pH 3.0 were applied while no H2O2 was added. At these conditions, 1.61 kWh/m3 energy was consumed and the estimated operational cost was 0.803 USD/m3of wastewater. Our findings showed that the electrocoagulation was an effective treatment method for chromium rich wastewater but the hydrogen peroxide did not improve the outcomes.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.5004/dwt.2019.23971</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1944-3986
ispartof Desalination and water treatment, 2019-06, Vol.153, p.402-407
issn 1944-3986
1944-3986
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5004_dwt_2019_23971
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Electrocoagulation
Fenton effect
Hexavalent chrome
Hydrogen peroxide
title Chromium(VI) removal from industrial wastewater using hydrogen peroxide assisted electrocoagulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T23%3A41%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chromium(VI)%20removal%20from%20industrial%20wastewater%20using%20hydrogen%20peroxide%20assisted%20electrocoagulation&rft.jtitle=Desalination%20and%20water%20treatment&rft.au=Onpeker,%20Suzan&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=153&rft.spage=402&rft.epage=407&rft.pages=402-407&rft.issn=1944-3986&rft.eissn=1944-3986&rft_id=info:doi/10.5004/dwt.2019.23971&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES194439862408425X%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S194439862408425X&rfr_iscdi=true