A conceptual enquiry into communities of practice as praxis in international doctoral education

Undertaking a PhD entails diverse and multi-faceted challenges as doctoral researchers enter a distinct academic culture that requires transition to a new level and threshold of learning – with both knowledge acquisition and production at the core. While doctoral researchers are expected to secure d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JPHE : Journal of praxis in higher education 2019-11, Vol.1 (1), p.11-36
Hauptverfasser: Cai, Liexu, Dangeni, Dangeni, Lazarte Elliot, Dely, He, Rui, Liu, Jianshu, Pacheco, Emily-Marie, Makara, Kara A, Shih, Kim, Zhang, Jie, Wang, Wenting
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 36
container_issue 1
container_start_page 11
container_title JPHE : Journal of praxis in higher education
container_volume 1
creator Cai, Liexu
Dangeni, Dangeni
Lazarte Elliot, Dely
He, Rui
Liu, Jianshu
Pacheco, Emily-Marie
Makara, Kara A
Shih, Kim
Zhang, Jie
Wang, Wenting
description Undertaking a PhD entails diverse and multi-faceted challenges as doctoral researchers enter a distinct academic culture that requires transition to a new level and threshold of learning – with both knowledge acquisition and production at the core. While doctoral researchers are expected to secure different dimensions of knowledge, which necessitates meaningful ‘dialogue’ with experts, the colossal task is still ironically associated with isolated doctoral experience and somewhat limited postgraduate supervision provision. With the extra concerns typically confronting the international doctoral cohort, the pressure tends be intensified, and may lead to psychological well-being concerns. Nevertheless, there is evidence from the literature that highlights the often unacknowledged forms of learning opportunities and support mechanisms via community participation. By employing communities of practice as the main framework, this conceptual paper exemplifies the crucial role played by these communities – how these communities serve to scaffold doctoral researchers’ academic progress, support their psychological adjustments, and reinforce the crucial, but perhaps limited, formal doctoral support provision. By featuring effective examples of educational praxis via these communities, our paper offers a holistic understanding of formal and informal infrastructures as part of the wider doctoral ecology with a view to achieving a more holistic and meaningful doctoral experience.
doi_str_mv 10.47989/kpdc74
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_47989_kpdc74</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_47989_kpdc74</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1034-521135a2c4a8fffd983eb80aa85a9eafa5323232cd6c8471ab985c755881e1e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUM1KAzEYDKJgqcVXyM3TarJJdpNjKf5BwYuel6_fJhDtJmuSBfv2dlsPMocZhpk5DCG3nN3L1mjz8DX22MoLsqgZE5VomLr8p6_JKudPxlit20ZyuSDdmmIMaMcywZ7a8D35dKA-lHj0h2EKvnibaXR0TIDFo6WQZ_3j8zE2J20KUHwMx34fscQ0D_UTnswbcuVgn-3qj5fk4-nxffNSbd-eXzfrbYWcCVmpmnOhoEYJ2jnXGy3sTjMArcBYcKBEPQP7BrVsOeyMVtgqpTW33BqxJHfnXUwx52RdNyY_QDp0nHWna7rzNeIXnn5YfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A conceptual enquiry into communities of practice as praxis in international doctoral education</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Cai, Liexu ; Dangeni, Dangeni ; Lazarte Elliot, Dely ; He, Rui ; Liu, Jianshu ; Pacheco, Emily-Marie ; Makara, Kara A ; Shih, Kim ; Zhang, Jie ; Wang, Wenting</creator><creatorcontrib>Cai, Liexu ; Dangeni, Dangeni ; Lazarte Elliot, Dely ; He, Rui ; Liu, Jianshu ; Pacheco, Emily-Marie ; Makara, Kara A ; Shih, Kim ; Zhang, Jie ; Wang, Wenting</creatorcontrib><description>Undertaking a PhD entails diverse and multi-faceted challenges as doctoral researchers enter a distinct academic culture that requires transition to a new level and threshold of learning – with both knowledge acquisition and production at the core. While doctoral researchers are expected to secure different dimensions of knowledge, which necessitates meaningful ‘dialogue’ with experts, the colossal task is still ironically associated with isolated doctoral experience and somewhat limited postgraduate supervision provision. With the extra concerns typically confronting the international doctoral cohort, the pressure tends be intensified, and may lead to psychological well-being concerns. Nevertheless, there is evidence from the literature that highlights the often unacknowledged forms of learning opportunities and support mechanisms via community participation. By employing communities of practice as the main framework, this conceptual paper exemplifies the crucial role played by these communities – how these communities serve to scaffold doctoral researchers’ academic progress, support their psychological adjustments, and reinforce the crucial, but perhaps limited, formal doctoral support provision. By featuring effective examples of educational praxis via these communities, our paper offers a holistic understanding of formal and informal infrastructures as part of the wider doctoral ecology with a view to achieving a more holistic and meaningful doctoral experience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2003-3605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2003-3605</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.47989/kpdc74</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>JPHE : Journal of praxis in higher education, 2019-11, Vol.1 (1), p.11-36</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1034-521135a2c4a8fffd983eb80aa85a9eafa5323232cd6c8471ab985c755881e1e93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cai, Liexu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dangeni, Dangeni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazarte Elliot, Dely</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jianshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacheco, Emily-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makara, Kara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wenting</creatorcontrib><title>A conceptual enquiry into communities of practice as praxis in international doctoral education</title><title>JPHE : Journal of praxis in higher education</title><description>Undertaking a PhD entails diverse and multi-faceted challenges as doctoral researchers enter a distinct academic culture that requires transition to a new level and threshold of learning – with both knowledge acquisition and production at the core. While doctoral researchers are expected to secure different dimensions of knowledge, which necessitates meaningful ‘dialogue’ with experts, the colossal task is still ironically associated with isolated doctoral experience and somewhat limited postgraduate supervision provision. With the extra concerns typically confronting the international doctoral cohort, the pressure tends be intensified, and may lead to psychological well-being concerns. Nevertheless, there is evidence from the literature that highlights the often unacknowledged forms of learning opportunities and support mechanisms via community participation. By employing communities of practice as the main framework, this conceptual paper exemplifies the crucial role played by these communities – how these communities serve to scaffold doctoral researchers’ academic progress, support their psychological adjustments, and reinforce the crucial, but perhaps limited, formal doctoral support provision. By featuring effective examples of educational praxis via these communities, our paper offers a holistic understanding of formal and informal infrastructures as part of the wider doctoral ecology with a view to achieving a more holistic and meaningful doctoral experience.</description><issn>2003-3605</issn><issn>2003-3605</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUM1KAzEYDKJgqcVXyM3TarJJdpNjKf5BwYuel6_fJhDtJmuSBfv2dlsPMocZhpk5DCG3nN3L1mjz8DX22MoLsqgZE5VomLr8p6_JKudPxlit20ZyuSDdmmIMaMcywZ7a8D35dKA-lHj0h2EKvnibaXR0TIDFo6WQZ_3j8zE2J20KUHwMx34fscQ0D_UTnswbcuVgn-3qj5fk4-nxffNSbd-eXzfrbYWcCVmpmnOhoEYJ2jnXGy3sTjMArcBYcKBEPQP7BrVsOeyMVtgqpTW33BqxJHfnXUwx52RdNyY_QDp0nHWna7rzNeIXnn5YfA</recordid><startdate>20191108</startdate><enddate>20191108</enddate><creator>Cai, Liexu</creator><creator>Dangeni, Dangeni</creator><creator>Lazarte Elliot, Dely</creator><creator>He, Rui</creator><creator>Liu, Jianshu</creator><creator>Pacheco, Emily-Marie</creator><creator>Makara, Kara A</creator><creator>Shih, Kim</creator><creator>Zhang, Jie</creator><creator>Wang, Wenting</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191108</creationdate><title>A conceptual enquiry into communities of practice as praxis in international doctoral education</title><author>Cai, Liexu ; Dangeni, Dangeni ; Lazarte Elliot, Dely ; He, Rui ; Liu, Jianshu ; Pacheco, Emily-Marie ; Makara, Kara A ; Shih, Kim ; Zhang, Jie ; Wang, Wenting</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1034-521135a2c4a8fffd983eb80aa85a9eafa5323232cd6c8471ab985c755881e1e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cai, Liexu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dangeni, Dangeni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazarte Elliot, Dely</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jianshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacheco, Emily-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makara, Kara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wenting</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>JPHE : Journal of praxis in higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cai, Liexu</au><au>Dangeni, Dangeni</au><au>Lazarte Elliot, Dely</au><au>He, Rui</au><au>Liu, Jianshu</au><au>Pacheco, Emily-Marie</au><au>Makara, Kara A</au><au>Shih, Kim</au><au>Zhang, Jie</au><au>Wang, Wenting</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A conceptual enquiry into communities of practice as praxis in international doctoral education</atitle><jtitle>JPHE : Journal of praxis in higher education</jtitle><date>2019-11-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>11-36</pages><issn>2003-3605</issn><eissn>2003-3605</eissn><abstract>Undertaking a PhD entails diverse and multi-faceted challenges as doctoral researchers enter a distinct academic culture that requires transition to a new level and threshold of learning – with both knowledge acquisition and production at the core. While doctoral researchers are expected to secure different dimensions of knowledge, which necessitates meaningful ‘dialogue’ with experts, the colossal task is still ironically associated with isolated doctoral experience and somewhat limited postgraduate supervision provision. With the extra concerns typically confronting the international doctoral cohort, the pressure tends be intensified, and may lead to psychological well-being concerns. Nevertheless, there is evidence from the literature that highlights the often unacknowledged forms of learning opportunities and support mechanisms via community participation. By employing communities of practice as the main framework, this conceptual paper exemplifies the crucial role played by these communities – how these communities serve to scaffold doctoral researchers’ academic progress, support their psychological adjustments, and reinforce the crucial, but perhaps limited, formal doctoral support provision. By featuring effective examples of educational praxis via these communities, our paper offers a holistic understanding of formal and informal infrastructures as part of the wider doctoral ecology with a view to achieving a more holistic and meaningful doctoral experience.</abstract><doi>10.47989/kpdc74</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2003-3605
ispartof JPHE : Journal of praxis in higher education, 2019-11, Vol.1 (1), p.11-36
issn 2003-3605
2003-3605
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_47989_kpdc74
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
title A conceptual enquiry into communities of practice as praxis in international doctoral education
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T14%3A20%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20conceptual%20enquiry%20into%20communities%20of%20practice%20as%20praxis%20in%20international%20doctoral%20education&rft.jtitle=JPHE%20:%20Journal%20of%20praxis%20in%20higher%20education&rft.au=Cai,%20Liexu&rft.date=2019-11-08&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=11-36&rft.issn=2003-3605&rft.eissn=2003-3605&rft_id=info:doi/10.47989/kpdc74&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_47989_kpdc74%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true