Comparison Of The Motivation Differences Between Script Teaching Mode And Traditional Teaching Mode For International Business Students in Guangdong Communication Polytechnic

This study examined the differences in motivation between two classes at Guangdong Communication Polytechnic. One class was taught using a traditional teaching method, while the other was instructed using a script teaching mode. This article will explore the motivational differences observed between...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Technium Social Sciences Journal 2024-10, Vol.62, p.69-82
Hauptverfasser: Weiwei Tu, Mohamad Jafre Bin Zainol Abidin, Fengfeng Zhang, Weizhi Chen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study examined the differences in motivation between two classes at Guangdong Communication Polytechnic. One class was taught using a traditional teaching method, while the other was instructed using a script teaching mode. This article will explore the motivational differences observed between the two groups. Students completed the Questionnaire of International Business Motivation, which consists of 30 Likert-type questions designed to assess their motivations for studying international business. This questionnaire, adapted from Glynn (2009), aims to provide valuable insights for international business educators and researchers. Motivation in this context was conceptualized through five dimensions: internal motivation and personal relevance, self-efficacy and test anxiety, autonomy, career motivation, and degree motivation (Glynn, 2009). Students initially filled out the questionnaire before the class began and then completed it again after the class had concluded. The results of this study indicate that there are significant differences between the two classes in terms of exam anxiety, self-confidence, autonomy, personal relevance, external motivation, and internal motivation (p < 0.05). Class 3, which adopted the new teaching model, demonstrated superior performance across all these dimensions. In contrast, Class 4, which followed the traditional teaching model, showed notably lower levels in these areas.
ISSN:2668-7798
2668-7798
DOI:10.47577/tssj.v62i1.11746