A comparison between induction of labor with 3 methods of titrated oral misoprostol, constant dose of oral misoprostol and Foley catheter with extra amniotic saline infusion (EASI), in women with unfavorable cervix

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran 2019-10
Hauptverfasser: Kashanian, Maryam, Bahasadri, Shohreh, Nejat Dehcordi, Ashraf, Sheikhansari, Narges, Eshraghi, Noushin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran
container_volume
creator Kashanian, Maryam
Bahasadri, Shohreh
Nejat Dehcordi, Ashraf
Sheikhansari, Narges
Eshraghi, Noushin
description
doi_str_mv 10.47176/mjiri.33.115
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_47176_mjiri_33_115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_47176_mjiri_33_115</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1915-d64e6250a791e19cd494fc2e51db1318e356bf7e8e0222533cf013d298399d943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUUFOwzAQtBBIlMKR-x5BIsUbJ2lyrBAFJCQOwDly7I1qlNiV7dLyUd6DWzhxWmk0OzO7w9gl8lkxx3l1O34Yb2ZCzBDLIzbJ8xKzqi74MZsgxyrDQvBTdhbCB-eFqGoxYd8LUG5cS2-Cs9BR3BJZMFZvVDQJcT0MsnMetiauQMBIceV02OPRRC8jaXBeDjAmgbV3IbrhJknaEKWNoF2gPfc_BaTVsHQDfYGScUWR_hxol0RBjta4aBQEORhLKU-_Cfs4V_eL16frmwTA1o0p6WFpY3v5mSy6gUCR_zS7c3bSyyHQxd-csvfl_dvdY_b88vB0t3jOFDZYZroqqMpLLucNEjZKF03Rq5xK1B0KrEmUVdfPqSaep28KoXqOQudNLZpGN4WYsuxXV6W7gqe-XXszSv_VIm8PpbSHUloh2lSK-AHikIWx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison between induction of labor with 3 methods of titrated oral misoprostol, constant dose of oral misoprostol and Foley catheter with extra amniotic saline infusion (EASI), in women with unfavorable cervix</title><source>Bioline International</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Kashanian, Maryam ; Bahasadri, Shohreh ; Nejat Dehcordi, Ashraf ; Sheikhansari, Narges ; Eshraghi, Noushin</creator><creatorcontrib>Kashanian, Maryam ; Bahasadri, Shohreh ; Nejat Dehcordi, Ashraf ; Sheikhansari, Narges ; Eshraghi, Noushin</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 1016-1430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2251-6840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.33.115</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2019-10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1915-d64e6250a791e19cd494fc2e51db1318e356bf7e8e0222533cf013d298399d943</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kashanian, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahasadri, Shohreh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nejat Dehcordi, Ashraf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheikhansari, Narges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eshraghi, Noushin</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison between induction of labor with 3 methods of titrated oral misoprostol, constant dose of oral misoprostol and Foley catheter with extra amniotic saline infusion (EASI), in women with unfavorable cervix</title><title>Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran</title><issn>1016-1430</issn><issn>2251-6840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUUFOwzAQtBBIlMKR-x5BIsUbJ2lyrBAFJCQOwDly7I1qlNiV7dLyUd6DWzhxWmk0OzO7w9gl8lkxx3l1O34Yb2ZCzBDLIzbJ8xKzqi74MZsgxyrDQvBTdhbCB-eFqGoxYd8LUG5cS2-Cs9BR3BJZMFZvVDQJcT0MsnMetiauQMBIceV02OPRRC8jaXBeDjAmgbV3IbrhJknaEKWNoF2gPfc_BaTVsHQDfYGScUWR_hxol0RBjta4aBQEORhLKU-_Cfs4V_eL16frmwTA1o0p6WFpY3v5mSy6gUCR_zS7c3bSyyHQxd-csvfl_dvdY_b88vB0t3jOFDZYZroqqMpLLucNEjZKF03Rq5xK1B0KrEmUVdfPqSaep28KoXqOQudNLZpGN4WYsuxXV6W7gqe-XXszSv_VIm8PpbSHUloh2lSK-AHikIWx</recordid><startdate>20191030</startdate><enddate>20191030</enddate><creator>Kashanian, Maryam</creator><creator>Bahasadri, Shohreh</creator><creator>Nejat Dehcordi, Ashraf</creator><creator>Sheikhansari, Narges</creator><creator>Eshraghi, Noushin</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191030</creationdate><title>A comparison between induction of labor with 3 methods of titrated oral misoprostol, constant dose of oral misoprostol and Foley catheter with extra amniotic saline infusion (EASI), in women with unfavorable cervix</title><author>Kashanian, Maryam ; Bahasadri, Shohreh ; Nejat Dehcordi, Ashraf ; Sheikhansari, Narges ; Eshraghi, Noushin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1915-d64e6250a791e19cd494fc2e51db1318e356bf7e8e0222533cf013d298399d943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kashanian, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahasadri, Shohreh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nejat Dehcordi, Ashraf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheikhansari, Narges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eshraghi, Noushin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kashanian, Maryam</au><au>Bahasadri, Shohreh</au><au>Nejat Dehcordi, Ashraf</au><au>Sheikhansari, Narges</au><au>Eshraghi, Noushin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison between induction of labor with 3 methods of titrated oral misoprostol, constant dose of oral misoprostol and Foley catheter with extra amniotic saline infusion (EASI), in women with unfavorable cervix</atitle><jtitle>Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran</jtitle><date>2019-10-30</date><risdate>2019</risdate><issn>1016-1430</issn><eissn>2251-6840</eissn><doi>10.47176/mjiri.33.115</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1016-1430
ispartof Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2019-10
issn 1016-1430
2251-6840
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_47176_mjiri_33_115
source Bioline International; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
title A comparison between induction of labor with 3 methods of titrated oral misoprostol, constant dose of oral misoprostol and Foley catheter with extra amniotic saline infusion (EASI), in women with unfavorable cervix
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T18%3A36%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20between%20induction%20of%20labor%20with%203%20methods%20of%20titrated%20oral%20misoprostol,%20constant%20dose%20of%20oral%20misoprostol%20and%20Foley%20catheter%20with%20extra%20amniotic%20saline%20infusion%20(EASI),%20in%20women%20with%20unfavorable%20cervix&rft.jtitle=Medical%20journal%20of%20the%20Islamic%20Republic%20of%20Iran&rft.au=Kashanian,%20Maryam&rft.date=2019-10-30&rft.issn=1016-1430&rft.eissn=2251-6840&rft_id=info:doi/10.47176/mjiri.33.115&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_47176_mjiri_33_115%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true