Comparison of Nonlinear Models to Describe the Growth of Tuj and Romanov x Tuj (F1) Lambs

This study aimed to identify the most suitable model for explaining weight changes in purebred Tuj (n=35) and Romanov x Tuj (RoxTuj) (F1) (n=25) lambs using non-linear models. Single-born lambs of both breeds and genders were included in the evaluation. Five different non-linear growth models were c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Black Sea Journal of Agriculture 2024-05, Vol.7 (3), p.305-309
Hauptverfasser: Dağdelen, Ülkü, Esenbuğa, Nurinisa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 309
container_issue 3
container_start_page 305
container_title Black Sea Journal of Agriculture
container_volume 7
creator Dağdelen, Ülkü
Esenbuğa, Nurinisa
description This study aimed to identify the most suitable model for explaining weight changes in purebred Tuj (n=35) and Romanov x Tuj (RoxTuj) (F1) (n=25) lambs using non-linear models. Single-born lambs of both breeds and genders were included in the evaluation. Five different non-linear growth models were compared: Brody, Gompertz, Logistic, Richards, and Weibull. The best model for describing growth was chosen based on four criteria: coefficient of determination (R²), mean square error (MSE), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Models with the highest R² and the lowest MSE, AIC, and BIC values were considered the best fit for the data. It was observed that the Brody model had the highest R2 and lowest MSE, AIC and BIC values for Tuj and RoxTuj (F1) female and male lambs. The Gompertz, Logistic, and Richards models exhibited similar predictive performance. In contrast, the Weibull model produced significantly different results compared to the other models when predicting weight changes. Therefore, the Brody model was identified as the most effective model for explaining growth patterns in both Tuj and RoxTuj (F1) lambs.
doi_str_mv 10.47115/bsagriculture.1457139
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_47115_bsagriculture_1457139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_47115_bsagriculture_1457139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c959-36cbffe267343a9aa6e068290b07e3dc0b06694270aa3363c74bfa4f1f2a5cf13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkL1OwzAYRS0EElXpKyCPMKT4L3YyokALUgAJZWGKPjs2DUriyk6Avj1QOsB0rq6u7nAQOqdkKRSl6ZWO8BpaM3XjFOySilRRnh-hGZM0S2SqsuM_-RQtYmw14ZIJQTM-Qy-F77cQ2ugH7B1-9EPXDhYCfvCN7SIePb6x0YRWWzxuLF4H_zFufqbV9IZhaPCz72Hw7_hz31ys6CUuodfxDJ046KJdHDhH1eq2Ku6S8ml9X1yXicnTPOHSaOcsk4oLDjmAtERmLCeaKMsb800pc8EUAeBccqOEdiAcdQxS4yifI_l7a4KPMVhXb0PbQ9jVlNR7RfU_RfVBEf8CpupdzQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Nonlinear Models to Describe the Growth of Tuj and Romanov x Tuj (F1) Lambs</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Dağdelen, Ülkü ; Esenbuğa, Nurinisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Dağdelen, Ülkü ; Esenbuğa, Nurinisa</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to identify the most suitable model for explaining weight changes in purebred Tuj (n=35) and Romanov x Tuj (RoxTuj) (F1) (n=25) lambs using non-linear models. Single-born lambs of both breeds and genders were included in the evaluation. Five different non-linear growth models were compared: Brody, Gompertz, Logistic, Richards, and Weibull. The best model for describing growth was chosen based on four criteria: coefficient of determination (R²), mean square error (MSE), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Models with the highest R² and the lowest MSE, AIC, and BIC values were considered the best fit for the data. It was observed that the Brody model had the highest R2 and lowest MSE, AIC and BIC values for Tuj and RoxTuj (F1) female and male lambs. The Gompertz, Logistic, and Richards models exhibited similar predictive performance. In contrast, the Weibull model produced significantly different results compared to the other models when predicting weight changes. Therefore, the Brody model was identified as the most effective model for explaining growth patterns in both Tuj and RoxTuj (F1) lambs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2618-6578</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2618-6578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.47115/bsagriculture.1457139</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, 2024-05, Vol.7 (3), p.305-309</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c959-36cbffe267343a9aa6e068290b07e3dc0b06694270aa3363c74bfa4f1f2a5cf13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2036-8369 ; 0000-0002-5167-8255</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dağdelen, Ülkü</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esenbuğa, Nurinisa</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Nonlinear Models to Describe the Growth of Tuj and Romanov x Tuj (F1) Lambs</title><title>Black Sea Journal of Agriculture</title><description>This study aimed to identify the most suitable model for explaining weight changes in purebred Tuj (n=35) and Romanov x Tuj (RoxTuj) (F1) (n=25) lambs using non-linear models. Single-born lambs of both breeds and genders were included in the evaluation. Five different non-linear growth models were compared: Brody, Gompertz, Logistic, Richards, and Weibull. The best model for describing growth was chosen based on four criteria: coefficient of determination (R²), mean square error (MSE), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Models with the highest R² and the lowest MSE, AIC, and BIC values were considered the best fit for the data. It was observed that the Brody model had the highest R2 and lowest MSE, AIC and BIC values for Tuj and RoxTuj (F1) female and male lambs. The Gompertz, Logistic, and Richards models exhibited similar predictive performance. In contrast, the Weibull model produced significantly different results compared to the other models when predicting weight changes. Therefore, the Brody model was identified as the most effective model for explaining growth patterns in both Tuj and RoxTuj (F1) lambs.</description><issn>2618-6578</issn><issn>2618-6578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkL1OwzAYRS0EElXpKyCPMKT4L3YyokALUgAJZWGKPjs2DUriyk6Avj1QOsB0rq6u7nAQOqdkKRSl6ZWO8BpaM3XjFOySilRRnh-hGZM0S2SqsuM_-RQtYmw14ZIJQTM-Qy-F77cQ2ugH7B1-9EPXDhYCfvCN7SIePb6x0YRWWzxuLF4H_zFufqbV9IZhaPCz72Hw7_hz31ys6CUuodfxDJ046KJdHDhH1eq2Ku6S8ml9X1yXicnTPOHSaOcsk4oLDjmAtERmLCeaKMsb800pc8EUAeBccqOEdiAcdQxS4yifI_l7a4KPMVhXb0PbQ9jVlNR7RfU_RfVBEf8CpupdzQ</recordid><startdate>20240515</startdate><enddate>20240515</enddate><creator>Dağdelen, Ülkü</creator><creator>Esenbuğa, Nurinisa</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2036-8369</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5167-8255</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240515</creationdate><title>Comparison of Nonlinear Models to Describe the Growth of Tuj and Romanov x Tuj (F1) Lambs</title><author>Dağdelen, Ülkü ; Esenbuğa, Nurinisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c959-36cbffe267343a9aa6e068290b07e3dc0b06694270aa3363c74bfa4f1f2a5cf13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dağdelen, Ülkü</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esenbuğa, Nurinisa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Black Sea Journal of Agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dağdelen, Ülkü</au><au>Esenbuğa, Nurinisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Nonlinear Models to Describe the Growth of Tuj and Romanov x Tuj (F1) Lambs</atitle><jtitle>Black Sea Journal of Agriculture</jtitle><date>2024-05-15</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>305</spage><epage>309</epage><pages>305-309</pages><issn>2618-6578</issn><eissn>2618-6578</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to identify the most suitable model for explaining weight changes in purebred Tuj (n=35) and Romanov x Tuj (RoxTuj) (F1) (n=25) lambs using non-linear models. Single-born lambs of both breeds and genders were included in the evaluation. Five different non-linear growth models were compared: Brody, Gompertz, Logistic, Richards, and Weibull. The best model for describing growth was chosen based on four criteria: coefficient of determination (R²), mean square error (MSE), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Models with the highest R² and the lowest MSE, AIC, and BIC values were considered the best fit for the data. It was observed that the Brody model had the highest R2 and lowest MSE, AIC and BIC values for Tuj and RoxTuj (F1) female and male lambs. The Gompertz, Logistic, and Richards models exhibited similar predictive performance. In contrast, the Weibull model produced significantly different results compared to the other models when predicting weight changes. Therefore, the Brody model was identified as the most effective model for explaining growth patterns in both Tuj and RoxTuj (F1) lambs.</abstract><doi>10.47115/bsagriculture.1457139</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2036-8369</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5167-8255</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2618-6578
ispartof Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, 2024-05, Vol.7 (3), p.305-309
issn 2618-6578
2618-6578
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_47115_bsagriculture_1457139
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Comparison of Nonlinear Models to Describe the Growth of Tuj and Romanov x Tuj (F1) Lambs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T05%3A39%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Nonlinear%20Models%20to%20Describe%20the%20Growth%20of%20Tuj%20and%20Romanov%20x%20Tuj%20(F1)%20Lambs&rft.jtitle=Black%20Sea%20Journal%20of%20Agriculture&rft.au=Da%C4%9Fdelen,%20%C3%9Clk%C3%BC&rft.date=2024-05-15&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=309&rft.pages=305-309&rft.issn=2618-6578&rft.eissn=2618-6578&rft_id=info:doi/10.47115/bsagriculture.1457139&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_47115_bsagriculture_1457139%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true