Nutrient digestibility of forage and nonforage rations in the ruminant

Pooled data from forage and nonforage digestibility trials with steers were analyzed. Forages were higher in total fiber content, principally cellulose; nonforages were lower in total fiber content, principally hemicellulose. The fiber fractions of forages and non-forages both together and separatel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico 1975, Vol.59 (1), p.35-42
Hauptverfasser: Arroyo-Aguilu, J.A, Evans, J.L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1
container_start_page 35
container_title The Journal of agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico
container_volume 59
creator Arroyo-Aguilu, J.A
Evans, J.L
description Pooled data from forage and nonforage digestibility trials with steers were analyzed. Forages were higher in total fiber content, principally cellulose; nonforages were lower in total fiber content, principally hemicellulose. The fiber fractions of forages and non-forages both together and separately were regressed upon their respective digestible fractions (P < .01). The results indicated significant linear relationships and coefficients of variation for the digestible fraction estimated from the total ranged from 4 to 20 percent. Regression of digestible upon total holocellulose (P < .01) indicated a greater association than either of the regressions of cellulose or hemicellulose. Cellulose content and lignification contributed 85 percent (P < .01) and 12 percent (P < .01) to digestible cellulose, respectively. Hemicellulose content and lignification explained 74 percent (P < .01) and 0.6 percent, respectively, of the variation in digestible hemicellulose. Neutral detergent soluble digestibility is highly dependent on ration cellulose and hemicellulose content, due possibly to rates of passage and digestion of the fibrous fractions. Differences in digestibility between forages and nonforages were attributed to differences in the total fiber fractions, indicating there was a continuum between concentrates and forage, when all rations were considered.
doi_str_mv 10.46429/jaupr.v59i1.10627
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>fao_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_46429_jaupr_v59i1_10627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US201302723115</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c675-c87889b7d06c72d050d3e6103e6e9e297184c0dce9fdeae7271ff98c2022a2e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM1OAjEUhRujiYi-gBv7AoO3tzPT6dIQEROiCzFx15T-YAl0SFtMeHvJwOacnMV3Fh8hjwwmdVujfN7owz5N_hoZ2IRBi-KKjJBDVzHRyGsyAqhZJWX9c0vuct4AcNnIdkRmH4eSgouF2rB2uYRV2IZypL2nvk967aiOlsY-XlbSJfQx0xBp-T3Nwy5EHcs9ufF6m93DpcdkOXtdTufV4vPtffqyqEwrmsp0ouvkSlhojUALDVjuWgancNKhFKyrDVjjpLdOO4GCeS87g4Co0dV8TPB8a1Kfc3Je7VPY6XRUDNQgQg0i1CBCDSJO0NMZ8rpXep1CVt9fCIwDCuSMNfwf2xNdkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nutrient digestibility of forage and nonforage rations in the ruminant</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Arroyo-Aguilu, J.A ; Evans, J.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Arroyo-Aguilu, J.A ; Evans, J.L</creatorcontrib><description>Pooled data from forage and nonforage digestibility trials with steers were analyzed. Forages were higher in total fiber content, principally cellulose; nonforages were lower in total fiber content, principally hemicellulose. The fiber fractions of forages and non-forages both together and separately were regressed upon their respective digestible fractions (P &lt; .01). The results indicated significant linear relationships and coefficients of variation for the digestible fraction estimated from the total ranged from 4 to 20 percent. Regression of digestible upon total holocellulose (P &lt; .01) indicated a greater association than either of the regressions of cellulose or hemicellulose. Cellulose content and lignification contributed 85 percent (P &lt; .01) and 12 percent (P &lt; .01) to digestible cellulose, respectively. Hemicellulose content and lignification explained 74 percent (P &lt; .01) and 0.6 percent, respectively, of the variation in digestible hemicellulose. Neutral detergent soluble digestibility is highly dependent on ration cellulose and hemicellulose content, due possibly to rates of passage and digestion of the fibrous fractions. Differences in digestibility between forages and nonforages were attributed to differences in the total fiber fractions, indicating there was a continuum between concentrates and forage, when all rations were considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-994X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2308-1759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.46429/jaupr.v59i1.10627</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>animal nutrition ; animal science ; livestock</subject><ispartof>The Journal of agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico, 1975, Vol.59 (1), p.35-42</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,27921,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arroyo-Aguilu, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, J.L</creatorcontrib><title>Nutrient digestibility of forage and nonforage rations in the ruminant</title><title>The Journal of agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico</title><description>Pooled data from forage and nonforage digestibility trials with steers were analyzed. Forages were higher in total fiber content, principally cellulose; nonforages were lower in total fiber content, principally hemicellulose. The fiber fractions of forages and non-forages both together and separately were regressed upon their respective digestible fractions (P &lt; .01). The results indicated significant linear relationships and coefficients of variation for the digestible fraction estimated from the total ranged from 4 to 20 percent. Regression of digestible upon total holocellulose (P &lt; .01) indicated a greater association than either of the regressions of cellulose or hemicellulose. Cellulose content and lignification contributed 85 percent (P &lt; .01) and 12 percent (P &lt; .01) to digestible cellulose, respectively. Hemicellulose content and lignification explained 74 percent (P &lt; .01) and 0.6 percent, respectively, of the variation in digestible hemicellulose. Neutral detergent soluble digestibility is highly dependent on ration cellulose and hemicellulose content, due possibly to rates of passage and digestion of the fibrous fractions. Differences in digestibility between forages and nonforages were attributed to differences in the total fiber fractions, indicating there was a continuum between concentrates and forage, when all rations were considered.</description><subject>animal nutrition</subject><subject>animal science</subject><subject>livestock</subject><issn>0041-994X</issn><issn>2308-1759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1975</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkM1OAjEUhRujiYi-gBv7AoO3tzPT6dIQEROiCzFx15T-YAl0SFtMeHvJwOacnMV3Fh8hjwwmdVujfN7owz5N_hoZ2IRBi-KKjJBDVzHRyGsyAqhZJWX9c0vuct4AcNnIdkRmH4eSgouF2rB2uYRV2IZypL2nvk967aiOlsY-XlbSJfQx0xBp-T3Nwy5EHcs9ufF6m93DpcdkOXtdTufV4vPtffqyqEwrmsp0ouvkSlhojUALDVjuWgancNKhFKyrDVjjpLdOO4GCeS87g4Co0dV8TPB8a1Kfc3Je7VPY6XRUDNQgQg0i1CBCDSJO0NMZ8rpXep1CVt9fCIwDCuSMNfwf2xNdkA</recordid><startdate>1975</startdate><enddate>1975</enddate><creator>Arroyo-Aguilu, J.A</creator><creator>Evans, J.L</creator><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1975</creationdate><title>Nutrient digestibility of forage and nonforage rations in the ruminant</title><author>Arroyo-Aguilu, J.A ; Evans, J.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c675-c87889b7d06c72d050d3e6103e6e9e297184c0dce9fdeae7271ff98c2022a2e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1975</creationdate><topic>animal nutrition</topic><topic>animal science</topic><topic>livestock</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arroyo-Aguilu, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, J.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arroyo-Aguilu, J.A</au><au>Evans, J.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nutrient digestibility of forage and nonforage rations in the ruminant</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico</jtitle><date>1975</date><risdate>1975</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>35-42</pages><issn>0041-994X</issn><eissn>2308-1759</eissn><abstract>Pooled data from forage and nonforage digestibility trials with steers were analyzed. Forages were higher in total fiber content, principally cellulose; nonforages were lower in total fiber content, principally hemicellulose. The fiber fractions of forages and non-forages both together and separately were regressed upon their respective digestible fractions (P &lt; .01). The results indicated significant linear relationships and coefficients of variation for the digestible fraction estimated from the total ranged from 4 to 20 percent. Regression of digestible upon total holocellulose (P &lt; .01) indicated a greater association than either of the regressions of cellulose or hemicellulose. Cellulose content and lignification contributed 85 percent (P &lt; .01) and 12 percent (P &lt; .01) to digestible cellulose, respectively. Hemicellulose content and lignification explained 74 percent (P &lt; .01) and 0.6 percent, respectively, of the variation in digestible hemicellulose. Neutral detergent soluble digestibility is highly dependent on ration cellulose and hemicellulose content, due possibly to rates of passage and digestion of the fibrous fractions. Differences in digestibility between forages and nonforages were attributed to differences in the total fiber fractions, indicating there was a continuum between concentrates and forage, when all rations were considered.</abstract><doi>10.46429/jaupr.v59i1.10627</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-994X
ispartof The Journal of agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico, 1975, Vol.59 (1), p.35-42
issn 0041-994X
2308-1759
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_46429_jaupr_v59i1_10627
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects animal nutrition
animal science
livestock
title Nutrient digestibility of forage and nonforage rations in the ruminant
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T09%3A18%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nutrient%20digestibility%20of%20forage%20and%20nonforage%20rations%20in%20the%20ruminant&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20agriculture%20of%20the%20University%20of%20Puerto%20Rico&rft.au=Arroyo-Aguilu,%20J.A&rft.date=1975&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=35-42&rft.issn=0041-994X&rft.eissn=2308-1759&rft_id=info:doi/10.46429/jaupr.v59i1.10627&rft_dat=%3Cfao_cross%3EUS201302723115%3C/fao_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true