The quality of sputum smear microscopy diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
This study was carried out to determine the rate of agreement or disagreement of microscopy reading and culture positivity rate among smear positive and negative specimens between peripheral tuberculosis diagnostic centres (PDCs) and Central Reference Tuberculosis laboratory (CTRL). In this study 13...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tanzania health research bulletin 2008-03, Vol.9 (3) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Tanzania health research bulletin |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Mfinanga, G.S Ngadaya, E Mtandu, R Mutayoba, B Basra, D Kimaro, G Chonde, T.M Ngowi, P Mfaume, S Kilale, A.M Egwaga, S Kitua, A.Y |
description | This study was carried out to determine the rate of agreement or
disagreement of microscopy reading and culture positivity rate among
smear positive and negative specimens between peripheral tuberculosis
diagnostic centres (PDCs) and Central Reference Tuberculosis laboratory
(CTRL). In this study 13 PDCs in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania were involved.
Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) method was used to collect 222
sputum smear slides. A total of 190 morning sputum specimens with
corresponding slides were selected for culture. First readings were
done by technicians at PDCs and thereafter selected slides and
specimens were sent to CTRL for re-examination and culture. Culture
results were used as a gold standard. Of 222 slides selected, 214 were
suitable for re-examination. Percentage of agreement of smear reading
between PDCs and CTRL was 42.9% and 100% for positive and negative
slides, respectively. Measure of agreement (Kappa statistic) was 0.5,
indicating moderate agreement. Of 190 samples cultured, percentage of
agreement between smear reading from PDCs and CTRL was 37% and 88.9%
for smear positive and negative slides, respectively. Kappa statistic
was 0.3 indicating poor-fair agreements. Comparison of smear reading
from PDCs with culture showed sensitivity of 36.9% and specificity of
88.9%. Comparison of smear readings from CTRL with culture results
showed sensitivity of 95.6% and specificity of 98.6%. In conclusion
there was inadequate performance in diagnosis of TB using smear
microscopy among peripheral diagnostic centres in Dar es Salaam. This
calls for immediate and rigorous measures to improve the quality of
smear microscopy. It is therefore important to strengthen the capacity
of laboratory personnel in smear microscopy techniques through
supportive supervision and training. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4314/thrb.v9i3.14323 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>bioline_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_4314_thrb_v9i3_14323</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>cria_bioline_rb_rb07028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1203-6b449221cb911e0b7dcb673c5533ea80634d90c9d5dfaddb24023738b83922633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZusPIKntcZxkicpTQmJBWVt-hRrlhZ0gla8naQGxmtHMnNHVQeiSkpQD5athG3T6WXpIKQcGR2hBikwkgpfi-F9_is5ifCcky0ieL5DbbB3-GFXthx3uKhz7cRgbHBunAm68CV00Xb_D1qu3tos-zkf9WDddq8IOD6N2wYz1fuNbfDNRLuIXVSvVXOGNar9U69U5OqlUHd3FT12i17vbzfoheXq-f1xfPyWaMgKJ0JyXjFGjS0od0bk1WuRgsgzAqYII4LYkprSZrZS1mnHCIIdCFzBhAmCJVoe_c-4YXCX74JspqKREzpbkbEnOluTe0kSkB0L7rvat-wNM8Er-DicmaJITVsA33H1uYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The quality of sputum smear microscopy diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania</title><source>Bioline International</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mfinanga, G.S ; Ngadaya, E ; Mtandu, R ; Mutayoba, B ; Basra, D ; Kimaro, G ; Chonde, T.M ; Ngowi, P ; Mfaume, S ; Kilale, A.M ; Egwaga, S ; Kitua, A.Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Mfinanga, G.S ; Ngadaya, E ; Mtandu, R ; Mutayoba, B ; Basra, D ; Kimaro, G ; Chonde, T.M ; Ngowi, P ; Mfaume, S ; Kilale, A.M ; Egwaga, S ; Kitua, A.Y</creatorcontrib><description>This study was carried out to determine the rate of agreement or
disagreement of microscopy reading and culture positivity rate among
smear positive and negative specimens between peripheral tuberculosis
diagnostic centres (PDCs) and Central Reference Tuberculosis laboratory
(CTRL). In this study 13 PDCs in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania were involved.
Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) method was used to collect 222
sputum smear slides. A total of 190 morning sputum specimens with
corresponding slides were selected for culture. First readings were
done by technicians at PDCs and thereafter selected slides and
specimens were sent to CTRL for re-examination and culture. Culture
results were used as a gold standard. Of 222 slides selected, 214 were
suitable for re-examination. Percentage of agreement of smear reading
between PDCs and CTRL was 42.9% and 100% for positive and negative
slides, respectively. Measure of agreement (Kappa statistic) was 0.5,
indicating moderate agreement. Of 190 samples cultured, percentage of
agreement between smear reading from PDCs and CTRL was 37% and 88.9%
for smear positive and negative slides, respectively. Kappa statistic
was 0.3 indicating poor-fair agreements. Comparison of smear reading
from PDCs with culture showed sensitivity of 36.9% and specificity of
88.9%. Comparison of smear readings from CTRL with culture results
showed sensitivity of 95.6% and specificity of 98.6%. In conclusion
there was inadequate performance in diagnosis of TB using smear
microscopy among peripheral diagnostic centres in Dar es Salaam. This
calls for immediate and rigorous measures to improve the quality of
smear microscopy. It is therefore important to strengthen the capacity
of laboratory personnel in smear microscopy techniques through
supportive supervision and training.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0856-6496</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0856-6496</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4314/thrb.v9i3.14323</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Health User's Trust Fund (HRUTF)</publisher><subject>tuberculosis, sputum, quality assurance, microscopy, culture, Tanzania</subject><ispartof>Tanzania health research bulletin, 2008-03, Vol.9 (3)</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 - Health User's Trust Fund (HRUTF)</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,79431</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mfinanga, G.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngadaya, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mtandu, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutayoba, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basra, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimaro, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chonde, T.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngowi, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mfaume, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilale, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egwaga, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitua, A.Y</creatorcontrib><title>The quality of sputum smear microscopy diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania</title><title>Tanzania health research bulletin</title><description>This study was carried out to determine the rate of agreement or
disagreement of microscopy reading and culture positivity rate among
smear positive and negative specimens between peripheral tuberculosis
diagnostic centres (PDCs) and Central Reference Tuberculosis laboratory
(CTRL). In this study 13 PDCs in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania were involved.
Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) method was used to collect 222
sputum smear slides. A total of 190 morning sputum specimens with
corresponding slides were selected for culture. First readings were
done by technicians at PDCs and thereafter selected slides and
specimens were sent to CTRL for re-examination and culture. Culture
results were used as a gold standard. Of 222 slides selected, 214 were
suitable for re-examination. Percentage of agreement of smear reading
between PDCs and CTRL was 42.9% and 100% for positive and negative
slides, respectively. Measure of agreement (Kappa statistic) was 0.5,
indicating moderate agreement. Of 190 samples cultured, percentage of
agreement between smear reading from PDCs and CTRL was 37% and 88.9%
for smear positive and negative slides, respectively. Kappa statistic
was 0.3 indicating poor-fair agreements. Comparison of smear reading
from PDCs with culture showed sensitivity of 36.9% and specificity of
88.9%. Comparison of smear readings from CTRL with culture results
showed sensitivity of 95.6% and specificity of 98.6%. In conclusion
there was inadequate performance in diagnosis of TB using smear
microscopy among peripheral diagnostic centres in Dar es Salaam. This
calls for immediate and rigorous measures to improve the quality of
smear microscopy. It is therefore important to strengthen the capacity
of laboratory personnel in smear microscopy techniques through
supportive supervision and training.</description><subject>tuberculosis, sputum, quality assurance, microscopy, culture, Tanzania</subject><issn>0856-6496</issn><issn>0856-6496</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RBI</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZusPIKntcZxkicpTQmJBWVt-hRrlhZ0gla8naQGxmtHMnNHVQeiSkpQD5athG3T6WXpIKQcGR2hBikwkgpfi-F9_is5ifCcky0ieL5DbbB3-GFXthx3uKhz7cRgbHBunAm68CV00Xb_D1qu3tos-zkf9WDddq8IOD6N2wYz1fuNbfDNRLuIXVSvVXOGNar9U69U5OqlUHd3FT12i17vbzfoheXq-f1xfPyWaMgKJ0JyXjFGjS0od0bk1WuRgsgzAqYII4LYkprSZrZS1mnHCIIdCFzBhAmCJVoe_c-4YXCX74JspqKREzpbkbEnOluTe0kSkB0L7rvat-wNM8Er-DicmaJITVsA33H1uYw</recordid><startdate>20080305</startdate><enddate>20080305</enddate><creator>Mfinanga, G.S</creator><creator>Ngadaya, E</creator><creator>Mtandu, R</creator><creator>Mutayoba, B</creator><creator>Basra, D</creator><creator>Kimaro, G</creator><creator>Chonde, T.M</creator><creator>Ngowi, P</creator><creator>Mfaume, S</creator><creator>Kilale, A.M</creator><creator>Egwaga, S</creator><creator>Kitua, A.Y</creator><general>Health User's Trust Fund (HRUTF)</general><scope>RBI</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080305</creationdate><title>The quality of sputum smear microscopy diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania</title><author>Mfinanga, G.S ; Ngadaya, E ; Mtandu, R ; Mutayoba, B ; Basra, D ; Kimaro, G ; Chonde, T.M ; Ngowi, P ; Mfaume, S ; Kilale, A.M ; Egwaga, S ; Kitua, A.Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1203-6b449221cb911e0b7dcb673c5533ea80634d90c9d5dfaddb24023738b83922633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>tuberculosis, sputum, quality assurance, microscopy, culture, Tanzania</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mfinanga, G.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngadaya, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mtandu, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutayoba, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basra, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimaro, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chonde, T.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngowi, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mfaume, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilale, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egwaga, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitua, A.Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Bioline International</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Tanzania health research bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mfinanga, G.S</au><au>Ngadaya, E</au><au>Mtandu, R</au><au>Mutayoba, B</au><au>Basra, D</au><au>Kimaro, G</au><au>Chonde, T.M</au><au>Ngowi, P</au><au>Mfaume, S</au><au>Kilale, A.M</au><au>Egwaga, S</au><au>Kitua, A.Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The quality of sputum smear microscopy diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania</atitle><jtitle>Tanzania health research bulletin</jtitle><date>2008-03-05</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><issn>0856-6496</issn><eissn>0856-6496</eissn><abstract>This study was carried out to determine the rate of agreement or
disagreement of microscopy reading and culture positivity rate among
smear positive and negative specimens between peripheral tuberculosis
diagnostic centres (PDCs) and Central Reference Tuberculosis laboratory
(CTRL). In this study 13 PDCs in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania were involved.
Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) method was used to collect 222
sputum smear slides. A total of 190 morning sputum specimens with
corresponding slides were selected for culture. First readings were
done by technicians at PDCs and thereafter selected slides and
specimens were sent to CTRL for re-examination and culture. Culture
results were used as a gold standard. Of 222 slides selected, 214 were
suitable for re-examination. Percentage of agreement of smear reading
between PDCs and CTRL was 42.9% and 100% for positive and negative
slides, respectively. Measure of agreement (Kappa statistic) was 0.5,
indicating moderate agreement. Of 190 samples cultured, percentage of
agreement between smear reading from PDCs and CTRL was 37% and 88.9%
for smear positive and negative slides, respectively. Kappa statistic
was 0.3 indicating poor-fair agreements. Comparison of smear reading
from PDCs with culture showed sensitivity of 36.9% and specificity of
88.9%. Comparison of smear readings from CTRL with culture results
showed sensitivity of 95.6% and specificity of 98.6%. In conclusion
there was inadequate performance in diagnosis of TB using smear
microscopy among peripheral diagnostic centres in Dar es Salaam. This
calls for immediate and rigorous measures to improve the quality of
smear microscopy. It is therefore important to strengthen the capacity
of laboratory personnel in smear microscopy techniques through
supportive supervision and training.</abstract><pub>Health User's Trust Fund (HRUTF)</pub><doi>10.4314/thrb.v9i3.14323</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0856-6496 |
ispartof | Tanzania health research bulletin, 2008-03, Vol.9 (3) |
issn | 0856-6496 0856-6496 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_4314_thrb_v9i3_14323 |
source | Bioline International; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | tuberculosis, sputum, quality assurance, microscopy, culture, Tanzania |
title | The quality of sputum smear microscopy diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T09%3A12%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-bioline_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20quality%20of%20sputum%20smear%20microscopy%20diagnosis%20of%20pulmonary%20tuberculosis%20in%20Dar%20es%20Salaam,%20Tanzania&rft.jtitle=Tanzania%20health%20research%20bulletin&rft.au=Mfinanga,%20G.S&rft.date=2008-03-05&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.issn=0856-6496&rft.eissn=0856-6496&rft_id=info:doi/10.4314/thrb.v9i3.14323&rft_dat=%3Cbioline_cross%3Ecria_bioline_rb_rb07028%3C/bioline_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |