Alternative approaches to evaluation of cow efficiency

The purpose of this study was to evaluate alternative expressions of genetic merit for cow efficiency. Weights of Pinzgauer cattle taken at birth, weaning, and maturity were extracted from the South African National Database. Average daily gain from birth to weaning (ADG) and cow weight (CWT) were a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:South African journal of animal science 2017-01, Vol.47 (2), p.118-123
Hauptverfasser: Neser, F.W.C., Mokolobate, M.C., MacNeil, M.D., Jordaan, F.J., Scholtz, M.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 123
container_issue 2
container_start_page 118
container_title South African journal of animal science
container_volume 47
creator Neser, F.W.C.
Mokolobate, M.C.
MacNeil, M.D.
Jordaan, F.J.
Scholtz, M.M.
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate alternative expressions of genetic merit for cow efficiency. Weights of Pinzgauer cattle taken at birth, weaning, and maturity were extracted from the South African National Database. Average daily gain from birth to weaning (ADG) and cow weight (CWT) were analyzed with a multi-trait mixed model. The model included direct and maternal genetic effects, a permanent environmental effect attributable to dams on ADG, a direct genetic effect and a permanent environmental effect attributable to there being multiple observations from the same cow on CWT as random effects. Heritability estimates for direct and maternal additive effects on ADG were 0.27 ± 0.04 and 0.06 ± 0.02, respectively. The estimated heritability for CWT was 0.45 ± 0.06. Estimates of repeatability for ADG and CWT were 0.42 and 0.67, respectively. Estimated breeding values based on the preceding results and using the maternal genetic effect on ADG as a proxy for the direct genetic effect on milk production were combined in six indexes of cow efficiency. These indexes sought to increase output and decrease input simultaneously, to increase output holding input constantly, and to hold input constant while decreasing input. The diversity of emphasis applied across these indexes suggests the need for due diligence in developing breeding objectives for improvement of cow efficiency. Indexes that are consistent with the econometric definition of efficiency and seek to simultaneously increase output and reduce input are recommended.
doi_str_mv 10.4314/sajas.v47i2.2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sabinet_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_4314_sajas_v47i2_2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sabinet_id>10520/EJC-567183033</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>10520/EJC-567183033</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-9d52ba2c0a36e0f8c4e2f9d68cf64cb1f6fe58647ce03e7357d98b33d770ffaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjztPwzAURi0EEqUwsmdlSLn29SMZq6q8VIkFZstx7hWpShLFaVH_PaFl-oZz9ElHiHsJC41SP6awDWlx0K5RC3UhZkopmWuw6lLMAJ3JpSnKa3GT0hYAbAluJuxyN9LQhrE5UBb6fuhC_KKUjV1Gh7DbT6Brs46z2P1kxNzEhtp4vBVXHHaJ7v53Lj6f1h-rl3zz_vy6Wm7yiBLGvKyNqoKKENAScBE1KS5rW0S2OlaSLZMprHaRAMmhcXVZVIi1c8AcGOciP__GoUtpIPb90HyH4egl-L9of4r2p2ivJv_h7KdQNS2NE6Z-X022UeDXbytvrJMFAiL-Ag81WbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alternative approaches to evaluation of cow efficiency</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>African Journals Online (Open Access)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Neser, F.W.C. ; Mokolobate, M.C. ; MacNeil, M.D. ; Jordaan, F.J. ; Scholtz, M.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Neser, F.W.C. ; Mokolobate, M.C. ; MacNeil, M.D. ; Jordaan, F.J. ; Scholtz, M.M.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate alternative expressions of genetic merit for cow efficiency. Weights of Pinzgauer cattle taken at birth, weaning, and maturity were extracted from the South African National Database. Average daily gain from birth to weaning (ADG) and cow weight (CWT) were analyzed with a multi-trait mixed model. The model included direct and maternal genetic effects, a permanent environmental effect attributable to dams on ADG, a direct genetic effect and a permanent environmental effect attributable to there being multiple observations from the same cow on CWT as random effects. Heritability estimates for direct and maternal additive effects on ADG were 0.27 ± 0.04 and 0.06 ± 0.02, respectively. The estimated heritability for CWT was 0.45 ± 0.06. Estimates of repeatability for ADG and CWT were 0.42 and 0.67, respectively. Estimated breeding values based on the preceding results and using the maternal genetic effect on ADG as a proxy for the direct genetic effect on milk production were combined in six indexes of cow efficiency. These indexes sought to increase output and decrease input simultaneously, to increase output holding input constantly, and to hold input constant while decreasing input. The diversity of emphasis applied across these indexes suggests the need for due diligence in developing breeding objectives for improvement of cow efficiency. Indexes that are consistent with the econometric definition of efficiency and seek to simultaneously increase output and reduce input are recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0375-1589</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2221-4062</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4314/sajas.v47i2.2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>South African Association of Animal Science (SASAS)</publisher><subject>Genetic parameters ; Multiple trait selection ; Pinzgauer ; Selection index</subject><ispartof>South African journal of animal science, 2017-01, Vol.47 (2), p.118-123</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-9d52ba2c0a36e0f8c4e2f9d68cf64cb1f6fe58647ce03e7357d98b33d770ffaf3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neser, F.W.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokolobate, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacNeil, M.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordaan, F.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholtz, M.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Alternative approaches to evaluation of cow efficiency</title><title>South African journal of animal science</title><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate alternative expressions of genetic merit for cow efficiency. Weights of Pinzgauer cattle taken at birth, weaning, and maturity were extracted from the South African National Database. Average daily gain from birth to weaning (ADG) and cow weight (CWT) were analyzed with a multi-trait mixed model. The model included direct and maternal genetic effects, a permanent environmental effect attributable to dams on ADG, a direct genetic effect and a permanent environmental effect attributable to there being multiple observations from the same cow on CWT as random effects. Heritability estimates for direct and maternal additive effects on ADG were 0.27 ± 0.04 and 0.06 ± 0.02, respectively. The estimated heritability for CWT was 0.45 ± 0.06. Estimates of repeatability for ADG and CWT were 0.42 and 0.67, respectively. Estimated breeding values based on the preceding results and using the maternal genetic effect on ADG as a proxy for the direct genetic effect on milk production were combined in six indexes of cow efficiency. These indexes sought to increase output and decrease input simultaneously, to increase output holding input constantly, and to hold input constant while decreasing input. The diversity of emphasis applied across these indexes suggests the need for due diligence in developing breeding objectives for improvement of cow efficiency. Indexes that are consistent with the econometric definition of efficiency and seek to simultaneously increase output and reduce input are recommended.</description><subject>Genetic parameters</subject><subject>Multiple trait selection</subject><subject>Pinzgauer</subject><subject>Selection index</subject><issn>0375-1589</issn><issn>2221-4062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjztPwzAURi0EEqUwsmdlSLn29SMZq6q8VIkFZstx7hWpShLFaVH_PaFl-oZz9ElHiHsJC41SP6awDWlx0K5RC3UhZkopmWuw6lLMAJ3JpSnKa3GT0hYAbAluJuxyN9LQhrE5UBb6fuhC_KKUjV1Gh7DbT6Brs46z2P1kxNzEhtp4vBVXHHaJ7v53Lj6f1h-rl3zz_vy6Wm7yiBLGvKyNqoKKENAScBE1KS5rW0S2OlaSLZMprHaRAMmhcXVZVIi1c8AcGOciP__GoUtpIPb90HyH4egl-L9of4r2p2ivJv_h7KdQNS2NE6Z-X022UeDXbytvrJMFAiL-Ag81WbQ</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Neser, F.W.C.</creator><creator>Mokolobate, M.C.</creator><creator>MacNeil, M.D.</creator><creator>Jordaan, F.J.</creator><creator>Scholtz, M.M.</creator><general>South African Association of Animal Science (SASAS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Alternative approaches to evaluation of cow efficiency</title><author>Neser, F.W.C. ; Mokolobate, M.C. ; MacNeil, M.D. ; Jordaan, F.J. ; Scholtz, M.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-9d52ba2c0a36e0f8c4e2f9d68cf64cb1f6fe58647ce03e7357d98b33d770ffaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Genetic parameters</topic><topic>Multiple trait selection</topic><topic>Pinzgauer</topic><topic>Selection index</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neser, F.W.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokolobate, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacNeil, M.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordaan, F.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholtz, M.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>South African journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neser, F.W.C.</au><au>Mokolobate, M.C.</au><au>MacNeil, M.D.</au><au>Jordaan, F.J.</au><au>Scholtz, M.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alternative approaches to evaluation of cow efficiency</atitle><jtitle>South African journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>118</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>118-123</pages><issn>0375-1589</issn><eissn>2221-4062</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to evaluate alternative expressions of genetic merit for cow efficiency. Weights of Pinzgauer cattle taken at birth, weaning, and maturity were extracted from the South African National Database. Average daily gain from birth to weaning (ADG) and cow weight (CWT) were analyzed with a multi-trait mixed model. The model included direct and maternal genetic effects, a permanent environmental effect attributable to dams on ADG, a direct genetic effect and a permanent environmental effect attributable to there being multiple observations from the same cow on CWT as random effects. Heritability estimates for direct and maternal additive effects on ADG were 0.27 ± 0.04 and 0.06 ± 0.02, respectively. The estimated heritability for CWT was 0.45 ± 0.06. Estimates of repeatability for ADG and CWT were 0.42 and 0.67, respectively. Estimated breeding values based on the preceding results and using the maternal genetic effect on ADG as a proxy for the direct genetic effect on milk production were combined in six indexes of cow efficiency. These indexes sought to increase output and decrease input simultaneously, to increase output holding input constantly, and to hold input constant while decreasing input. The diversity of emphasis applied across these indexes suggests the need for due diligence in developing breeding objectives for improvement of cow efficiency. Indexes that are consistent with the econometric definition of efficiency and seek to simultaneously increase output and reduce input are recommended.</abstract><pub>South African Association of Animal Science (SASAS)</pub><doi>10.4314/sajas.v47i2.2</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0375-1589
ispartof South African journal of animal science, 2017-01, Vol.47 (2), p.118-123
issn 0375-1589
2221-4062
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_4314_sajas_v47i2_2
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; African Journals Online (Open Access); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Genetic parameters
Multiple trait selection
Pinzgauer
Selection index
title Alternative approaches to evaluation of cow efficiency
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T12%3A28%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sabinet_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alternative%20approaches%20to%20evaluation%20of%20cow%20efficiency&rft.jtitle=South%20African%20journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Neser,%20F.W.C.&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=118&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=118-123&rft.issn=0375-1589&rft.eissn=2221-4062&rft_id=info:doi/10.4314/sajas.v47i2.2&rft_dat=%3Csabinet_cross%3E10520/EJC-567183033%3C/sabinet_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sabinet_id=10520/EJC-567183033&rfr_iscdi=true