Breeding objectives for Holstein cattle in South Africa

Well-defined breeding objectives form the basis of sound genetic improvement programmes. Breeding objectives for Holstein cattle in South Africa were developed in the current study. Economic values were calculated for those economically relevant traits that had adequate bio-economic data, namely mil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:South African journal of animal science 2014-01, Vol.44 (3), p.199-214
Hauptverfasser: Neser, F.W.C., Banga, C.B., Garrick, D.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 214
container_issue 3
container_start_page 199
container_title South African journal of animal science
container_volume 44
creator Neser, F.W.C.
Banga, C.B.
Garrick, D.J.
Banga, C.B.
description Well-defined breeding objectives form the basis of sound genetic improvement programmes. Breeding objectives for Holstein cattle in South Africa were developed in the current study. Economic values were calculated for those economically relevant traits that had adequate bio-economic data, namely milk volume, fat yield, protein yield, liveweight, longevity, calving interval and somatic cell score (SCS). A bio-economic herd model for pasture-based and concentrate-fed systems in South Africa was used to calculate economic values by determining changes in profit arising from an independent unit increase in each trait. Alternative payment systems were used from four major milk buyers in South Africa. Relative economic values, standardized to the value of protein yield, were used to compare the relative importance of traits. Protein yield and longevity consistently had positive economic values and the converse was true for liveweight and calving interval. Economic value for volume was positive or negative, depending on whether the payment system rewarded or ignored volume. Sensitivity analysis showed that economic values were reasonably robust against fluctuations in the cost of feed and price of beef; with the exception of fat yield, whose value became negative when feed price exceeded ZAR 3.50. Generally, protein yield was the most important trait, although volume, longevity and SCS were more important in some situations. Calving interval was the least important trait, its value ranging from 4% to 22% of protein yield, although the model may have underestimated its value. Further work should focus on facilitating the wide adoption of these breeding objectives by industry.
doi_str_mv 10.4314/sajas.v44i3.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sabinet_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_4314_sajas_v44i3_1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sabinet_id>10520/EJC158076</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>10520/EJC158076</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-189e410aea7c3af9c797d568fa48af570b07ef172af5f91c4b3b55e4b572d3d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkD1PwzAQhi0EEqUwsmdhTDl_xclYotKCKjEAs2U7Z3BVksp2K_HvSVumu1f36JWeI-SewkxwKh6T2Zg0OwgR-IxekAljjJYCKnZJJsCVLKmsm2tyk9IGAKoG1ISop4jYhf6rGOwGXQ4HTIUfYrEatilj6Atnct5iMW7vwz5_F3MfgzO35MqbbcK7_zkln8-Lj3ZVrt-WL-18XToOVS5p3aCgYNAox41vnGpUJ6vaG1EbLxVYUOipYmPwDXXCcislCisV63hH-ZSU514Xh5Qier2L4cfEX01BH631yVqfrPWRfzjzydjQYx7PuNvbkZYM9OK1HX8AquJ_TM1X_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breeding objectives for Holstein cattle in South Africa</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>African Journals Online (Open Access)</source><creator>Neser, F.W.C. ; Banga, C.B. ; Garrick, D.J. ; Banga, C.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Neser, F.W.C. ; Banga, C.B. ; Garrick, D.J. ; Banga, C.B.</creatorcontrib><description>Well-defined breeding objectives form the basis of sound genetic improvement programmes. Breeding objectives for Holstein cattle in South Africa were developed in the current study. Economic values were calculated for those economically relevant traits that had adequate bio-economic data, namely milk volume, fat yield, protein yield, liveweight, longevity, calving interval and somatic cell score (SCS). A bio-economic herd model for pasture-based and concentrate-fed systems in South Africa was used to calculate economic values by determining changes in profit arising from an independent unit increase in each trait. Alternative payment systems were used from four major milk buyers in South Africa. Relative economic values, standardized to the value of protein yield, were used to compare the relative importance of traits. Protein yield and longevity consistently had positive economic values and the converse was true for liveweight and calving interval. Economic value for volume was positive or negative, depending on whether the payment system rewarded or ignored volume. Sensitivity analysis showed that economic values were reasonably robust against fluctuations in the cost of feed and price of beef; with the exception of fat yield, whose value became negative when feed price exceeded ZAR 3.50. Generally, protein yield was the most important trait, although volume, longevity and SCS were more important in some situations. Calving interval was the least important trait, its value ranging from 4% to 22% of protein yield, although the model may have underestimated its value. Further work should focus on facilitating the wide adoption of these breeding objectives by industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0375-1589</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2221-4062</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4314/sajas.v44i3.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>South African Association of Animal Science (SASAS)</publisher><subject>Butterfat yield ; Economic value ; Liveweight ; Longevity ; Milk yield ; Protein yield ; Relative economic value ; Somatic cell score</subject><ispartof>South African journal of animal science, 2014-01, Vol.44 (3), p.199-214</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-189e410aea7c3af9c797d568fa48af570b07ef172af5f91c4b3b55e4b572d3d13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neser, F.W.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banga, C.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrick, D.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banga, C.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Breeding objectives for Holstein cattle in South Africa</title><title>South African journal of animal science</title><description>Well-defined breeding objectives form the basis of sound genetic improvement programmes. Breeding objectives for Holstein cattle in South Africa were developed in the current study. Economic values were calculated for those economically relevant traits that had adequate bio-economic data, namely milk volume, fat yield, protein yield, liveweight, longevity, calving interval and somatic cell score (SCS). A bio-economic herd model for pasture-based and concentrate-fed systems in South Africa was used to calculate economic values by determining changes in profit arising from an independent unit increase in each trait. Alternative payment systems were used from four major milk buyers in South Africa. Relative economic values, standardized to the value of protein yield, were used to compare the relative importance of traits. Protein yield and longevity consistently had positive economic values and the converse was true for liveweight and calving interval. Economic value for volume was positive or negative, depending on whether the payment system rewarded or ignored volume. Sensitivity analysis showed that economic values were reasonably robust against fluctuations in the cost of feed and price of beef; with the exception of fat yield, whose value became negative when feed price exceeded ZAR 3.50. Generally, protein yield was the most important trait, although volume, longevity and SCS were more important in some situations. Calving interval was the least important trait, its value ranging from 4% to 22% of protein yield, although the model may have underestimated its value. Further work should focus on facilitating the wide adoption of these breeding objectives by industry.</description><subject>Butterfat yield</subject><subject>Economic value</subject><subject>Liveweight</subject><subject>Longevity</subject><subject>Milk yield</subject><subject>Protein yield</subject><subject>Relative economic value</subject><subject>Somatic cell score</subject><issn>0375-1589</issn><issn>2221-4062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkD1PwzAQhi0EEqUwsmdhTDl_xclYotKCKjEAs2U7Z3BVksp2K_HvSVumu1f36JWeI-SewkxwKh6T2Zg0OwgR-IxekAljjJYCKnZJJsCVLKmsm2tyk9IGAKoG1ISop4jYhf6rGOwGXQ4HTIUfYrEatilj6Atnct5iMW7vwz5_F3MfgzO35MqbbcK7_zkln8-Lj3ZVrt-WL-18XToOVS5p3aCgYNAox41vnGpUJ6vaG1EbLxVYUOipYmPwDXXCcislCisV63hH-ZSU514Xh5Qier2L4cfEX01BH631yVqfrPWRfzjzydjQYx7PuNvbkZYM9OK1HX8AquJ_TM1X_Q</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Neser, F.W.C.</creator><creator>Banga, C.B.</creator><creator>Garrick, D.J.</creator><creator>Banga, C.B.</creator><general>South African Association of Animal Science (SASAS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Breeding objectives for Holstein cattle in South Africa</title><author>Neser, F.W.C. ; Banga, C.B. ; Garrick, D.J. ; Banga, C.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-189e410aea7c3af9c797d568fa48af570b07ef172af5f91c4b3b55e4b572d3d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Butterfat yield</topic><topic>Economic value</topic><topic>Liveweight</topic><topic>Longevity</topic><topic>Milk yield</topic><topic>Protein yield</topic><topic>Relative economic value</topic><topic>Somatic cell score</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neser, F.W.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banga, C.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrick, D.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banga, C.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>South African journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neser, F.W.C.</au><au>Banga, C.B.</au><au>Garrick, D.J.</au><au>Banga, C.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breeding objectives for Holstein cattle in South Africa</atitle><jtitle>South African journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>214</epage><pages>199-214</pages><issn>0375-1589</issn><eissn>2221-4062</eissn><abstract>Well-defined breeding objectives form the basis of sound genetic improvement programmes. Breeding objectives for Holstein cattle in South Africa were developed in the current study. Economic values were calculated for those economically relevant traits that had adequate bio-economic data, namely milk volume, fat yield, protein yield, liveweight, longevity, calving interval and somatic cell score (SCS). A bio-economic herd model for pasture-based and concentrate-fed systems in South Africa was used to calculate economic values by determining changes in profit arising from an independent unit increase in each trait. Alternative payment systems were used from four major milk buyers in South Africa. Relative economic values, standardized to the value of protein yield, were used to compare the relative importance of traits. Protein yield and longevity consistently had positive economic values and the converse was true for liveweight and calving interval. Economic value for volume was positive or negative, depending on whether the payment system rewarded or ignored volume. Sensitivity analysis showed that economic values were reasonably robust against fluctuations in the cost of feed and price of beef; with the exception of fat yield, whose value became negative when feed price exceeded ZAR 3.50. Generally, protein yield was the most important trait, although volume, longevity and SCS were more important in some situations. Calving interval was the least important trait, its value ranging from 4% to 22% of protein yield, although the model may have underestimated its value. Further work should focus on facilitating the wide adoption of these breeding objectives by industry.</abstract><pub>South African Association of Animal Science (SASAS)</pub><doi>10.4314/sajas.v44i3.1</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0375-1589
ispartof South African journal of animal science, 2014-01, Vol.44 (3), p.199-214
issn 0375-1589
2221-4062
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_4314_sajas_v44i3_1
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; African Journals Online (Open Access)
subjects Butterfat yield
Economic value
Liveweight
Longevity
Milk yield
Protein yield
Relative economic value
Somatic cell score
title Breeding objectives for Holstein cattle in South Africa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T17%3A22%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sabinet_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breeding%20objectives%20for%20Holstein%20cattle%20in%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=South%20African%20journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Neser,%20F.W.C.&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=214&rft.pages=199-214&rft.issn=0375-1589&rft.eissn=2221-4062&rft_id=info:doi/10.4314/sajas.v44i3.1&rft_dat=%3Csabinet_cross%3E10520/EJC158076%3C/sabinet_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sabinet_id=10520/EJC158076&rfr_iscdi=true