Pressure Ulcer Preventive Measures Utilized and Its Perceived Effectiveness Among Nurses in Selected Hospitals in Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria

Background: Pressure ulcers represent a largely  preventable patient safety issue, serving as an indicator of nursing care quality and patient safety within healthcare settings. This study aimed to assess the utilization and effectiveness of pressure ulcer preventive measures among nurses in selecte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:African journal of health sciences 2024-01, Vol.36 (4), p.338-347
Hauptverfasser: Ehwarieme, Timothy A., Abiodun, Oluwaseun O., Josiah, Uzezi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 347
container_issue 4
container_start_page 338
container_title African journal of health sciences
container_volume 36
creator Ehwarieme, Timothy A.
Abiodun, Oluwaseun O.
Josiah, Uzezi
description Background: Pressure ulcers represent a largely  preventable patient safety issue, serving as an indicator of nursing care quality and patient safety within healthcare settings. This study aimed to assess the utilization and effectiveness of pressure ulcer preventive measures among nurses in selected hospitals. Materials and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional survey involved 304 nurses purposefully selected from surgical wards/units in the chosen hospitals. A well-structured, pretested questionnaire with a reliability index of 0.842 was employed for data collection. Descriptive statistics, including mean, frequency, and percentage, were used for data analysis. Results: Findings indicated that risk assessment (mean 3.67±0.56) was the most frequently used preventive measure, followed by skin repositioning every 2 hours (3.46±0.71), use of barrier creams (3.35±0.71), and the utilization of pressure-relieving devices such as air beds (3.33±0.75). Prophylactic sacral dressing (3.14±0.76) and massaging of bony prominences (3.17±0.86) were also commonly employed. The most effective measures were risk assessment (mean 2.66±0.5), repositioning every 2 hours (2.56±0.54), and skin assessment (2.54±0.54). Barriers to preventive measures included limited equipment (3.31±0.96), nursing shortages (3.12±0.77), lack of skill/training (3.09±0.85), and heavy workloads (3.14±0.82). Conclusion And Recommendation: This study highlights that risk assessment was the most used and effective preventive measure among nurses. Challenges, such as the lack of training and heavy workloads, hindered utilization. Recommendations include regular updates on best practices for staff, especially new nurses, to bridge the theory-practice gap and promptly implement research findings.
doi_str_mv 10.4314/ajhs.v36i4.2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_4314_ajhs_v36i4_2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_4314_ajhs_v36i4_2</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_4314_ajhs_v36i4_23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj01OwzAQhS0EEuVnxwHmAGlwnEBhCVVQu6CqVLq2rGRSpkqdasaNVE7BkXEqFmzZzN_73khPqbtMp0WeFfdu-ylpnz9SkZozNcq0MeNnMzHnf-ZLdSWy1bqYPDzlI_W9ZBQ5MMK6rZAhrj36QD3CO7pBEFgHaukLa3C-hnkQWCJXGJEayqbBaqB9_AIvu85vYHFgiS7ysMI2qhGbdbKn4NrT9RV9rFMKxwTKuoNVcAETWNAGmdyNumgiiLe__Volb-XHdDauuBNhbOyeaef4aDNth9R2SG1Pqa3J_4n_AK2sY0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pressure Ulcer Preventive Measures Utilized and Its Perceived Effectiveness Among Nurses in Selected Hospitals in Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria</title><source>Bioline International</source><creator>Ehwarieme, Timothy A. ; Abiodun, Oluwaseun O. ; Josiah, Uzezi</creator><creatorcontrib>Ehwarieme, Timothy A. ; Abiodun, Oluwaseun O. ; Josiah, Uzezi</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Pressure ulcers represent a largely  preventable patient safety issue, serving as an indicator of nursing care quality and patient safety within healthcare settings. This study aimed to assess the utilization and effectiveness of pressure ulcer preventive measures among nurses in selected hospitals. Materials and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional survey involved 304 nurses purposefully selected from surgical wards/units in the chosen hospitals. A well-structured, pretested questionnaire with a reliability index of 0.842 was employed for data collection. Descriptive statistics, including mean, frequency, and percentage, were used for data analysis. Results: Findings indicated that risk assessment (mean 3.67±0.56) was the most frequently used preventive measure, followed by skin repositioning every 2 hours (3.46±0.71), use of barrier creams (3.35±0.71), and the utilization of pressure-relieving devices such as air beds (3.33±0.75). Prophylactic sacral dressing (3.14±0.76) and massaging of bony prominences (3.17±0.86) were also commonly employed. The most effective measures were risk assessment (mean 2.66±0.5), repositioning every 2 hours (2.56±0.54), and skin assessment (2.54±0.54). Barriers to preventive measures included limited equipment (3.31±0.96), nursing shortages (3.12±0.77), lack of skill/training (3.09±0.85), and heavy workloads (3.14±0.82). Conclusion And Recommendation: This study highlights that risk assessment was the most used and effective preventive measure among nurses. Challenges, such as the lack of training and heavy workloads, hindered utilization. Recommendations include regular updates on best practices for staff, especially new nurses, to bridge the theory-practice gap and promptly implement research findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1022-9272</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1022-9272</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4314/ajhs.v36i4.2</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>African journal of health sciences, 2024-01, Vol.36 (4), p.338-347</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ehwarieme, Timothy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abiodun, Oluwaseun O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josiah, Uzezi</creatorcontrib><title>Pressure Ulcer Preventive Measures Utilized and Its Perceived Effectiveness Among Nurses in Selected Hospitals in Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria</title><title>African journal of health sciences</title><description>Background: Pressure ulcers represent a largely  preventable patient safety issue, serving as an indicator of nursing care quality and patient safety within healthcare settings. This study aimed to assess the utilization and effectiveness of pressure ulcer preventive measures among nurses in selected hospitals. Materials and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional survey involved 304 nurses purposefully selected from surgical wards/units in the chosen hospitals. A well-structured, pretested questionnaire with a reliability index of 0.842 was employed for data collection. Descriptive statistics, including mean, frequency, and percentage, were used for data analysis. Results: Findings indicated that risk assessment (mean 3.67±0.56) was the most frequently used preventive measure, followed by skin repositioning every 2 hours (3.46±0.71), use of barrier creams (3.35±0.71), and the utilization of pressure-relieving devices such as air beds (3.33±0.75). Prophylactic sacral dressing (3.14±0.76) and massaging of bony prominences (3.17±0.86) were also commonly employed. The most effective measures were risk assessment (mean 2.66±0.5), repositioning every 2 hours (2.56±0.54), and skin assessment (2.54±0.54). Barriers to preventive measures included limited equipment (3.31±0.96), nursing shortages (3.12±0.77), lack of skill/training (3.09±0.85), and heavy workloads (3.14±0.82). Conclusion And Recommendation: This study highlights that risk assessment was the most used and effective preventive measure among nurses. Challenges, such as the lack of training and heavy workloads, hindered utilization. Recommendations include regular updates on best practices for staff, especially new nurses, to bridge the theory-practice gap and promptly implement research findings.</description><issn>1022-9272</issn><issn>1022-9272</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVj01OwzAQhS0EEuVnxwHmAGlwnEBhCVVQu6CqVLq2rGRSpkqdasaNVE7BkXEqFmzZzN_73khPqbtMp0WeFfdu-ylpnz9SkZozNcq0MeNnMzHnf-ZLdSWy1bqYPDzlI_W9ZBQ5MMK6rZAhrj36QD3CO7pBEFgHaukLa3C-hnkQWCJXGJEayqbBaqB9_AIvu85vYHFgiS7ysMI2qhGbdbKn4NrT9RV9rFMKxwTKuoNVcAETWNAGmdyNumgiiLe__Volb-XHdDauuBNhbOyeaef4aDNth9R2SG1Pqa3J_4n_AK2sY0Q</recordid><startdate>20240126</startdate><enddate>20240126</enddate><creator>Ehwarieme, Timothy A.</creator><creator>Abiodun, Oluwaseun O.</creator><creator>Josiah, Uzezi</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240126</creationdate><title>Pressure Ulcer Preventive Measures Utilized and Its Perceived Effectiveness Among Nurses in Selected Hospitals in Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria</title><author>Ehwarieme, Timothy A. ; Abiodun, Oluwaseun O. ; Josiah, Uzezi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_4314_ajhs_v36i4_23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ehwarieme, Timothy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abiodun, Oluwaseun O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josiah, Uzezi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>African journal of health sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ehwarieme, Timothy A.</au><au>Abiodun, Oluwaseun O.</au><au>Josiah, Uzezi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pressure Ulcer Preventive Measures Utilized and Its Perceived Effectiveness Among Nurses in Selected Hospitals in Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria</atitle><jtitle>African journal of health sciences</jtitle><date>2024-01-26</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>338</spage><epage>347</epage><pages>338-347</pages><issn>1022-9272</issn><eissn>1022-9272</eissn><abstract>Background: Pressure ulcers represent a largely  preventable patient safety issue, serving as an indicator of nursing care quality and patient safety within healthcare settings. This study aimed to assess the utilization and effectiveness of pressure ulcer preventive measures among nurses in selected hospitals. Materials and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional survey involved 304 nurses purposefully selected from surgical wards/units in the chosen hospitals. A well-structured, pretested questionnaire with a reliability index of 0.842 was employed for data collection. Descriptive statistics, including mean, frequency, and percentage, were used for data analysis. Results: Findings indicated that risk assessment (mean 3.67±0.56) was the most frequently used preventive measure, followed by skin repositioning every 2 hours (3.46±0.71), use of barrier creams (3.35±0.71), and the utilization of pressure-relieving devices such as air beds (3.33±0.75). Prophylactic sacral dressing (3.14±0.76) and massaging of bony prominences (3.17±0.86) were also commonly employed. The most effective measures were risk assessment (mean 2.66±0.5), repositioning every 2 hours (2.56±0.54), and skin assessment (2.54±0.54). Barriers to preventive measures included limited equipment (3.31±0.96), nursing shortages (3.12±0.77), lack of skill/training (3.09±0.85), and heavy workloads (3.14±0.82). Conclusion And Recommendation: This study highlights that risk assessment was the most used and effective preventive measure among nurses. Challenges, such as the lack of training and heavy workloads, hindered utilization. Recommendations include regular updates on best practices for staff, especially new nurses, to bridge the theory-practice gap and promptly implement research findings.</abstract><doi>10.4314/ajhs.v36i4.2</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1022-9272
ispartof African journal of health sciences, 2024-01, Vol.36 (4), p.338-347
issn 1022-9272
1022-9272
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_4314_ajhs_v36i4_2
source Bioline International
title Pressure Ulcer Preventive Measures Utilized and Its Perceived Effectiveness Among Nurses in Selected Hospitals in Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A53%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pressure%20Ulcer%20Preventive%20Measures%20Utilized%20and%20Its%20Perceived%20Effectiveness%20Among%20Nurses%20in%20Selected%20Hospitals%20in%20Benin%20City,%20Edo%20State,%20Nigeria&rft.jtitle=African%20journal%20of%20health%20sciences&rft.au=Ehwarieme,%20Timothy%20A.&rft.date=2024-01-26&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=338&rft.epage=347&rft.pages=338-347&rft.issn=1022-9272&rft.eissn=1022-9272&rft_id=info:doi/10.4314/ajhs.v36i4.2&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_4314_ajhs_v36i4_2%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true