Give me 5...The invention of number five in ancient civilizations: A consequence of our limited inborn numerical competence
Precise recognition of small numbers of objects without counting is an archaic, inborn ability of humans. Since almost 140 years it is known that we can recognize precisely only up to four objects if sequential counting is prevented. Vertebrates and invertebrates such as honeybees can recognize and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Communicative & integrative biology 2011-01, Vol.4 (1), p.62-63 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 63 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 62 |
container_title | Communicative & integrative biology |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Gross, Hans J. |
description | Precise recognition of small numbers of objects without counting is an archaic, inborn ability of humans. Since almost 140 years it is known that we can recognize precisely only up to four objects if sequential counting is prevented. Vertebrates and invertebrates such as honeybees can recognize and remember three and up to four objects, respectively. A synopsis of counting systems in ancient civilizations reveals that our limited ability to recognize only four objects without counting influenced our counting and numbering systems and enforced the need for new symbols for numbers beyond four. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4161/cib.13762 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>landesbioscience_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_4161_cib_13762</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>landesbioscience_primary_cib_article_13762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1612-bb7af734285e0f6f92b15b806405de6292ae641007532387dd322965e9e223033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LwzAYh4MoOKcHv0GuHtrlT5u2xzl0DgZe5jmk6RuMtMlI5mR-ehsnQ_DgKYE8z_v-fkHolpK8oILOtG1zyivBztCENgXLSF0357_ul-gqxjdCBGeUT9B8afeAB8BlnuebV8DW7cHtrHfYG-zehxYCNomxDiun7fiItd3b3n6qhMVrdGFUH-Hm55yil8eHzeIpWz8vV4v5OtNjLpa1baVMxQtWl0CMMA1radnWRBSk7ECwhikQBSWkKjnjddV1nLFGlNAAY5xwPkV3x7k6-BgDGLkNdlDhICmRqbscu8vv7iNLj2yvXAextT6m5BpOTmJV2Fndw8mZ_eMs0-LF6r6QVG47MxrF0bDO-DCoDx_6Tu7UoffBhPRZUfK_4b4A8Jh_vQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Give me 5...The invention of number five in ancient civilizations: A consequence of our limited inborn numerical competence</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gross, Hans J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gross, Hans J.</creatorcontrib><description>Precise recognition of small numbers of objects without counting is an archaic, inborn ability of humans. Since almost 140 years it is known that we can recognize precisely only up to four objects if sequential counting is prevented. Vertebrates and invertebrates such as honeybees can recognize and remember three and up to four objects, respectively. A synopsis of counting systems in ancient civilizations reveals that our limited ability to recognize only four objects without counting influenced our counting and numbering systems and enforced the need for new symbols for numbers beyond four.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-0889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-0889</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4161/cib.13762</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Binding ; Biology ; Bioscience ; Calcium ; Cancer ; Cell ; Cycle ; Landes ; Organogenesis ; Proteins</subject><ispartof>Communicative & integrative biology, 2011-01, Vol.4 (1), p.62-63</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Landes Bioscience 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1612-bb7af734285e0f6f92b15b806405de6292ae641007532387dd322965e9e223033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.4161/cib.13762$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.4161/cib.13762$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27481,27903,27904,59120,59121</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gross, Hans J.</creatorcontrib><title>Give me 5...The invention of number five in ancient civilizations: A consequence of our limited inborn numerical competence</title><title>Communicative & integrative biology</title><description>Precise recognition of small numbers of objects without counting is an archaic, inborn ability of humans. Since almost 140 years it is known that we can recognize precisely only up to four objects if sequential counting is prevented. Vertebrates and invertebrates such as honeybees can recognize and remember three and up to four objects, respectively. A synopsis of counting systems in ancient civilizations reveals that our limited ability to recognize only four objects without counting influenced our counting and numbering systems and enforced the need for new symbols for numbers beyond four.</description><subject>Binding</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Bioscience</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cell</subject><subject>Cycle</subject><subject>Landes</subject><subject>Organogenesis</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><issn>1942-0889</issn><issn>1942-0889</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9LwzAYh4MoOKcHv0GuHtrlT5u2xzl0DgZe5jmk6RuMtMlI5mR-ehsnQ_DgKYE8z_v-fkHolpK8oILOtG1zyivBztCENgXLSF0357_ul-gqxjdCBGeUT9B8afeAB8BlnuebV8DW7cHtrHfYG-zehxYCNomxDiun7fiItd3b3n6qhMVrdGFUH-Hm55yil8eHzeIpWz8vV4v5OtNjLpa1baVMxQtWl0CMMA1radnWRBSk7ECwhikQBSWkKjnjddV1nLFGlNAAY5xwPkV3x7k6-BgDGLkNdlDhICmRqbscu8vv7iNLj2yvXAextT6m5BpOTmJV2Fndw8mZ_eMs0-LF6r6QVG47MxrF0bDO-DCoDx_6Tu7UoffBhPRZUfK_4b4A8Jh_vQ</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Gross, Hans J.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Give me 5...The invention of number five in ancient civilizations</title><author>Gross, Hans J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1612-bb7af734285e0f6f92b15b806405de6292ae641007532387dd322965e9e223033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Binding</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Bioscience</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cell</topic><topic>Cycle</topic><topic>Landes</topic><topic>Organogenesis</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gross, Hans J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Communicative & integrative biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gross, Hans J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Give me 5...The invention of number five in ancient civilizations: A consequence of our limited inborn numerical competence</atitle><jtitle>Communicative & integrative biology</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>62-63</pages><issn>1942-0889</issn><eissn>1942-0889</eissn><abstract>Precise recognition of small numbers of objects without counting is an archaic, inborn ability of humans. Since almost 140 years it is known that we can recognize precisely only up to four objects if sequential counting is prevented. Vertebrates and invertebrates such as honeybees can recognize and remember three and up to four objects, respectively. A synopsis of counting systems in ancient civilizations reveals that our limited ability to recognize only four objects without counting influenced our counting and numbering systems and enforced the need for new symbols for numbers beyond four.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.4161/cib.13762</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1942-0889 |
ispartof | Communicative & integrative biology, 2011-01, Vol.4 (1), p.62-63 |
issn | 1942-0889 1942-0889 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_4161_cib_13762 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Binding Biology Bioscience Calcium Cancer Cell Cycle Landes Organogenesis Proteins |
title | Give me 5...The invention of number five in ancient civilizations: A consequence of our limited inborn numerical competence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T04%3A35%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-landesbioscience_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Give%20me%205...The%20invention%20of%20number%20five%20in%20ancient%20civilizations:%20A%20consequence%20of%20our%20limited%20inborn%20numerical%20competence&rft.jtitle=Communicative%20&%20integrative%20biology&rft.au=Gross,%20Hans%20J.&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=62-63&rft.issn=1942-0889&rft.eissn=1942-0889&rft_id=info:doi/10.4161/cib.13762&rft_dat=%3Clandesbioscience_cross%3Elandesbioscience_primary_cib_article_13762%3C/landesbioscience_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |