Give me 5...The invention of number five in ancient civilizations: A consequence of our limited inborn numerical competence

Precise recognition of small numbers of objects without counting is an archaic, inborn ability of humans. Since almost 140 years it is known that we can recognize precisely only up to four objects if sequential counting is prevented. Vertebrates and invertebrates such as honeybees can recognize and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Communicative & integrative biology 2011-01, Vol.4 (1), p.62-63
1. Verfasser: Gross, Hans J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 63
container_issue 1
container_start_page 62
container_title Communicative & integrative biology
container_volume 4
creator Gross, Hans J.
description Precise recognition of small numbers of objects without counting is an archaic, inborn ability of humans. Since almost 140 years it is known that we can recognize precisely only up to four objects if sequential counting is prevented. Vertebrates and invertebrates such as honeybees can recognize and remember three and up to four objects, respectively. A synopsis of counting systems in ancient civilizations reveals that our limited ability to recognize only four objects without counting influenced our counting and numbering systems and enforced the need for new symbols for numbers beyond four.
doi_str_mv 10.4161/cib.13762
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>landesbioscience_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_4161_cib_13762</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>landesbioscience_primary_cib_article_13762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1612-bb7af734285e0f6f92b15b806405de6292ae641007532387dd322965e9e223033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LwzAYh4MoOKcHv0GuHtrlT5u2xzl0DgZe5jmk6RuMtMlI5mR-ehsnQ_DgKYE8z_v-fkHolpK8oILOtG1zyivBztCENgXLSF0357_ul-gqxjdCBGeUT9B8afeAB8BlnuebV8DW7cHtrHfYG-zehxYCNomxDiun7fiItd3b3n6qhMVrdGFUH-Hm55yil8eHzeIpWz8vV4v5OtNjLpa1baVMxQtWl0CMMA1radnWRBSk7ECwhikQBSWkKjnjddV1nLFGlNAAY5xwPkV3x7k6-BgDGLkNdlDhICmRqbscu8vv7iNLj2yvXAextT6m5BpOTmJV2Fndw8mZ_eMs0-LF6r6QVG47MxrF0bDO-DCoDx_6Tu7UoffBhPRZUfK_4b4A8Jh_vQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Give me 5...The invention of number five in ancient civilizations: A consequence of our limited inborn numerical competence</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gross, Hans J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gross, Hans J.</creatorcontrib><description>Precise recognition of small numbers of objects without counting is an archaic, inborn ability of humans. Since almost 140 years it is known that we can recognize precisely only up to four objects if sequential counting is prevented. Vertebrates and invertebrates such as honeybees can recognize and remember three and up to four objects, respectively. A synopsis of counting systems in ancient civilizations reveals that our limited ability to recognize only four objects without counting influenced our counting and numbering systems and enforced the need for new symbols for numbers beyond four.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-0889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-0889</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4161/cib.13762</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Binding ; Biology ; Bioscience ; Calcium ; Cancer ; Cell ; Cycle ; Landes ; Organogenesis ; Proteins</subject><ispartof>Communicative &amp; integrative biology, 2011-01, Vol.4 (1), p.62-63</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Landes Bioscience 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1612-bb7af734285e0f6f92b15b806405de6292ae641007532387dd322965e9e223033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.4161/cib.13762$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.4161/cib.13762$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27481,27903,27904,59120,59121</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gross, Hans J.</creatorcontrib><title>Give me 5...The invention of number five in ancient civilizations: A consequence of our limited inborn numerical competence</title><title>Communicative &amp; integrative biology</title><description>Precise recognition of small numbers of objects without counting is an archaic, inborn ability of humans. Since almost 140 years it is known that we can recognize precisely only up to four objects if sequential counting is prevented. Vertebrates and invertebrates such as honeybees can recognize and remember three and up to four objects, respectively. A synopsis of counting systems in ancient civilizations reveals that our limited ability to recognize only four objects without counting influenced our counting and numbering systems and enforced the need for new symbols for numbers beyond four.</description><subject>Binding</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Bioscience</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cell</subject><subject>Cycle</subject><subject>Landes</subject><subject>Organogenesis</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><issn>1942-0889</issn><issn>1942-0889</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9LwzAYh4MoOKcHv0GuHtrlT5u2xzl0DgZe5jmk6RuMtMlI5mR-ehsnQ_DgKYE8z_v-fkHolpK8oILOtG1zyivBztCENgXLSF0357_ul-gqxjdCBGeUT9B8afeAB8BlnuebV8DW7cHtrHfYG-zehxYCNomxDiun7fiItd3b3n6qhMVrdGFUH-Hm55yil8eHzeIpWz8vV4v5OtNjLpa1baVMxQtWl0CMMA1radnWRBSk7ECwhikQBSWkKjnjddV1nLFGlNAAY5xwPkV3x7k6-BgDGLkNdlDhICmRqbscu8vv7iNLj2yvXAextT6m5BpOTmJV2Fndw8mZ_eMs0-LF6r6QVG47MxrF0bDO-DCoDx_6Tu7UoffBhPRZUfK_4b4A8Jh_vQ</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Gross, Hans J.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Give me 5...The invention of number five in ancient civilizations</title><author>Gross, Hans J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1612-bb7af734285e0f6f92b15b806405de6292ae641007532387dd322965e9e223033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Binding</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Bioscience</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cell</topic><topic>Cycle</topic><topic>Landes</topic><topic>Organogenesis</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gross, Hans J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Communicative &amp; integrative biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gross, Hans J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Give me 5...The invention of number five in ancient civilizations: A consequence of our limited inborn numerical competence</atitle><jtitle>Communicative &amp; integrative biology</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>62-63</pages><issn>1942-0889</issn><eissn>1942-0889</eissn><abstract>Precise recognition of small numbers of objects without counting is an archaic, inborn ability of humans. Since almost 140 years it is known that we can recognize precisely only up to four objects if sequential counting is prevented. Vertebrates and invertebrates such as honeybees can recognize and remember three and up to four objects, respectively. A synopsis of counting systems in ancient civilizations reveals that our limited ability to recognize only four objects without counting influenced our counting and numbering systems and enforced the need for new symbols for numbers beyond four.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.4161/cib.13762</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1942-0889
ispartof Communicative & integrative biology, 2011-01, Vol.4 (1), p.62-63
issn 1942-0889
1942-0889
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_4161_cib_13762
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Binding
Biology
Bioscience
Calcium
Cancer
Cell
Cycle
Landes
Organogenesis
Proteins
title Give me 5...The invention of number five in ancient civilizations: A consequence of our limited inborn numerical competence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T04%3A35%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-landesbioscience_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Give%20me%205...The%20invention%20of%20number%20five%20in%20ancient%20civilizations:%20A%20consequence%20of%20our%20limited%20inborn%20numerical%20competence&rft.jtitle=Communicative%20&%20integrative%20biology&rft.au=Gross,%20Hans%20J.&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=62-63&rft.issn=1942-0889&rft.eissn=1942-0889&rft_id=info:doi/10.4161/cib.13762&rft_dat=%3Clandesbioscience_cross%3Elandesbioscience_primary_cib_article_13762%3C/landesbioscience_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true