Nutritional suitability of viscid and whitethorn acacia for ruminants
Leaves and pods of viscid acacia (Acacia neovernicosa Isley) and whitethorn acacia (Acacia constricta Benth) shrubs were analyzed for their nutritional suitability for livestock and wildlife. Leaves and pods were collected in mid-summer and at the end of the growing season in 1993 and 1994 from two...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of plant science 2008, Vol.88 (2), p.299-306 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 306 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 299 |
container_title | Canadian journal of plant science |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Ishaque, M Beck, R.F Pieper, R.D |
description | Leaves and pods of viscid acacia (Acacia neovernicosa Isley) and whitethorn acacia (Acacia constricta Benth) shrubs were analyzed for their nutritional suitability for livestock and wildlife. Leaves and pods were collected in mid-summer and at the end of the growing season in 1993 and 1994 from two sites in southern New Mexico in the Chihuahuan Desert. Chemical composition was determined by standard laboratory procedures. Pods of both species generally contained more crude protein, and phosphorus than the leaves. The difference in protein content between leaves and pods was not as great for whitethorn acacia as for viscid acacia. Calcium content of leaves for both species in 1994 (a drought year) was nearly double the calcium content measured in 1993 (near average precipitation). The amounts of crude protein, phosphorus and calcium in leaves and pods were adequate to meet the nutrient requirements of young immature animals and lactating females of livestock and wildlife during the summer and fall seasons. However, besides having thorns, both species also have secondary compounds including tannins and phenols, which reduce palatability and may limit intake and negate any benefit of the high crude protein content. Although a direct comparison was not possible, whitethorn acacia appears to have a higher potential forage value than viscid acacia because of higher protein content and lower tannin and phenol content. In southern New Mexico, desert grasslands, once common, are today dominated by many shrub species of low palatability. Both viscid acacia and whitethorn acacia species appear to have palatabilities similar to or higher than the two most common shrubs on these desert rangelands, mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa Torrey) and creosotebush [Larrea tridentata (D. C.) Coville]. With the continued decrease of herbaceous forage on these rangelands, and the continued expansion of the populations of these two acacia species, both have the potential to become more valuable as browse components in the diets of grazing animals. Key words: Viscid acacia, whitethorn acacia, crude proteins, condensed tannins, total phenolics, Chihuahuan Desert |
doi_str_mv | 10.4141/CJPS06068 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>fao_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_4141_CJPS06068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US201300890296</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-22d9b0f56adf1a261778f5e721d6582f564a0c713b67b6cad5b1e8aae6a537203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90E1PwzAMBuAIgcQYHPgF5MKBQ8FO2iQ7oml8aQKksXPlpg0L6topyUD79xQN7WRZfmzpNWOXCLc55ng3fXlfgAJljtgIJ2gyNFIesxEAmCwXAk7ZWYxfQ6vRwIjNXrcp-OT7jloetz5R5Vufdrx3_NtH62tOXc1_Vj41adWHjpMl64m7PvCwXfuOuhTP2YmjNjYX_3XMlg-zj-lTNn97fJ7ezzMrjEyZEPWkAlcoqh2SUKi1cUWjBdaqMGIY5ARWo6yUrpSluqiwMUSNokJqAXLMbvZ3behjDI0rN8GvKexKhPIvf3nIP9jrvd1QtNS6QJ318bAgQEwA9Z-72jtHfUmfYTDLhQCUw8cmA1LyF5CMY8k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nutritional suitability of viscid and whitethorn acacia for ruminants</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ishaque, M ; Beck, R.F ; Pieper, R.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Ishaque, M ; Beck, R.F ; Pieper, R.D</creatorcontrib><description>Leaves and pods of viscid acacia (Acacia neovernicosa Isley) and whitethorn acacia (Acacia constricta Benth) shrubs were analyzed for their nutritional suitability for livestock and wildlife. Leaves and pods were collected in mid-summer and at the end of the growing season in 1993 and 1994 from two sites in southern New Mexico in the Chihuahuan Desert. Chemical composition was determined by standard laboratory procedures. Pods of both species generally contained more crude protein, and phosphorus than the leaves. The difference in protein content between leaves and pods was not as great for whitethorn acacia as for viscid acacia. Calcium content of leaves for both species in 1994 (a drought year) was nearly double the calcium content measured in 1993 (near average precipitation). The amounts of crude protein, phosphorus and calcium in leaves and pods were adequate to meet the nutrient requirements of young immature animals and lactating females of livestock and wildlife during the summer and fall seasons. However, besides having thorns, both species also have secondary compounds including tannins and phenols, which reduce palatability and may limit intake and negate any benefit of the high crude protein content. Although a direct comparison was not possible, whitethorn acacia appears to have a higher potential forage value than viscid acacia because of higher protein content and lower tannin and phenol content. In southern New Mexico, desert grasslands, once common, are today dominated by many shrub species of low palatability. Both viscid acacia and whitethorn acacia species appear to have palatabilities similar to or higher than the two most common shrubs on these desert rangelands, mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa Torrey) and creosotebush [Larrea tridentata (D. C.) Coville]. With the continued decrease of herbaceous forage on these rangelands, and the continued expansion of the populations of these two acacia species, both have the potential to become more valuable as browse components in the diets of grazing animals. Key words: Viscid acacia, whitethorn acacia, crude proteins, condensed tannins, total phenolics, Chihuahuan Desert</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4220</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1918-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4141/CJPS06068</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CPLSAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa, ON: Agricultural Institute of Canada</publisher><subject>Acacia ; Acacia constricta ; Acacia neovernicosa ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; browsing ; calcium ; chemical constituents of plants ; crude protein ; females ; forage legumes ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; lactation ; leaves ; livestock ; nutritive value ; palatability ; phenolic compounds ; phosphorus ; pods ; shrubs ; species differences ; tannins ; temporal variation ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates ; wildlife</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of plant science, 2008, Vol.88 (2), p.299-306</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-22d9b0f56adf1a261778f5e721d6582f564a0c713b67b6cad5b1e8aae6a537203</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20290178$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ishaque, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, R.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieper, R.D</creatorcontrib><title>Nutritional suitability of viscid and whitethorn acacia for ruminants</title><title>Canadian journal of plant science</title><description>Leaves and pods of viscid acacia (Acacia neovernicosa Isley) and whitethorn acacia (Acacia constricta Benth) shrubs were analyzed for their nutritional suitability for livestock and wildlife. Leaves and pods were collected in mid-summer and at the end of the growing season in 1993 and 1994 from two sites in southern New Mexico in the Chihuahuan Desert. Chemical composition was determined by standard laboratory procedures. Pods of both species generally contained more crude protein, and phosphorus than the leaves. The difference in protein content between leaves and pods was not as great for whitethorn acacia as for viscid acacia. Calcium content of leaves for both species in 1994 (a drought year) was nearly double the calcium content measured in 1993 (near average precipitation). The amounts of crude protein, phosphorus and calcium in leaves and pods were adequate to meet the nutrient requirements of young immature animals and lactating females of livestock and wildlife during the summer and fall seasons. However, besides having thorns, both species also have secondary compounds including tannins and phenols, which reduce palatability and may limit intake and negate any benefit of the high crude protein content. Although a direct comparison was not possible, whitethorn acacia appears to have a higher potential forage value than viscid acacia because of higher protein content and lower tannin and phenol content. In southern New Mexico, desert grasslands, once common, are today dominated by many shrub species of low palatability. Both viscid acacia and whitethorn acacia species appear to have palatabilities similar to or higher than the two most common shrubs on these desert rangelands, mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa Torrey) and creosotebush [Larrea tridentata (D. C.) Coville]. With the continued decrease of herbaceous forage on these rangelands, and the continued expansion of the populations of these two acacia species, both have the potential to become more valuable as browse components in the diets of grazing animals. Key words: Viscid acacia, whitethorn acacia, crude proteins, condensed tannins, total phenolics, Chihuahuan Desert</description><subject>Acacia</subject><subject>Acacia constricta</subject><subject>Acacia neovernicosa</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>browsing</subject><subject>calcium</subject><subject>chemical constituents of plants</subject><subject>crude protein</subject><subject>females</subject><subject>forage legumes</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>lactation</subject><subject>leaves</subject><subject>livestock</subject><subject>nutritive value</subject><subject>palatability</subject><subject>phenolic compounds</subject><subject>phosphorus</subject><subject>pods</subject><subject>shrubs</subject><subject>species differences</subject><subject>tannins</subject><subject>temporal variation</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>wildlife</subject><issn>0008-4220</issn><issn>1918-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo90E1PwzAMBuAIgcQYHPgF5MKBQ8FO2iQ7oml8aQKksXPlpg0L6topyUD79xQN7WRZfmzpNWOXCLc55ng3fXlfgAJljtgIJ2gyNFIesxEAmCwXAk7ZWYxfQ6vRwIjNXrcp-OT7jloetz5R5Vufdrx3_NtH62tOXc1_Vj41adWHjpMl64m7PvCwXfuOuhTP2YmjNjYX_3XMlg-zj-lTNn97fJ7ezzMrjEyZEPWkAlcoqh2SUKi1cUWjBdaqMGIY5ARWo6yUrpSluqiwMUSNokJqAXLMbvZ3behjDI0rN8GvKexKhPIvf3nIP9jrvd1QtNS6QJ318bAgQEwA9Z-72jtHfUmfYTDLhQCUw8cmA1LyF5CMY8k</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Ishaque, M</creator><creator>Beck, R.F</creator><creator>Pieper, R.D</creator><general>Agricultural Institute of Canada</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Nutritional suitability of viscid and whitethorn acacia for ruminants</title><author>Ishaque, M ; Beck, R.F ; Pieper, R.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-22d9b0f56adf1a261778f5e721d6582f564a0c713b67b6cad5b1e8aae6a537203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Acacia</topic><topic>Acacia constricta</topic><topic>Acacia neovernicosa</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>browsing</topic><topic>calcium</topic><topic>chemical constituents of plants</topic><topic>crude protein</topic><topic>females</topic><topic>forage legumes</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>lactation</topic><topic>leaves</topic><topic>livestock</topic><topic>nutritive value</topic><topic>palatability</topic><topic>phenolic compounds</topic><topic>phosphorus</topic><topic>pods</topic><topic>shrubs</topic><topic>species differences</topic><topic>tannins</topic><topic>temporal variation</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>wildlife</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ishaque, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, R.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieper, R.D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of plant science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ishaque, M</au><au>Beck, R.F</au><au>Pieper, R.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nutritional suitability of viscid and whitethorn acacia for ruminants</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of plant science</jtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>299</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>299-306</pages><issn>0008-4220</issn><eissn>1918-1833</eissn><coden>CPLSAY</coden><abstract>Leaves and pods of viscid acacia (Acacia neovernicosa Isley) and whitethorn acacia (Acacia constricta Benth) shrubs were analyzed for their nutritional suitability for livestock and wildlife. Leaves and pods were collected in mid-summer and at the end of the growing season in 1993 and 1994 from two sites in southern New Mexico in the Chihuahuan Desert. Chemical composition was determined by standard laboratory procedures. Pods of both species generally contained more crude protein, and phosphorus than the leaves. The difference in protein content between leaves and pods was not as great for whitethorn acacia as for viscid acacia. Calcium content of leaves for both species in 1994 (a drought year) was nearly double the calcium content measured in 1993 (near average precipitation). The amounts of crude protein, phosphorus and calcium in leaves and pods were adequate to meet the nutrient requirements of young immature animals and lactating females of livestock and wildlife during the summer and fall seasons. However, besides having thorns, both species also have secondary compounds including tannins and phenols, which reduce palatability and may limit intake and negate any benefit of the high crude protein content. Although a direct comparison was not possible, whitethorn acacia appears to have a higher potential forage value than viscid acacia because of higher protein content and lower tannin and phenol content. In southern New Mexico, desert grasslands, once common, are today dominated by many shrub species of low palatability. Both viscid acacia and whitethorn acacia species appear to have palatabilities similar to or higher than the two most common shrubs on these desert rangelands, mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa Torrey) and creosotebush [Larrea tridentata (D. C.) Coville]. With the continued decrease of herbaceous forage on these rangelands, and the continued expansion of the populations of these two acacia species, both have the potential to become more valuable as browse components in the diets of grazing animals. Key words: Viscid acacia, whitethorn acacia, crude proteins, condensed tannins, total phenolics, Chihuahuan Desert</abstract><cop>Ottawa, ON</cop><pub>Agricultural Institute of Canada</pub><doi>10.4141/CJPS06068</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-4220 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of plant science, 2008, Vol.88 (2), p.299-306 |
issn | 0008-4220 1918-1833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_4141_CJPS06068 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Acacia Acacia constricta Acacia neovernicosa Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Animal productions Biological and medical sciences browsing calcium chemical constituents of plants crude protein females forage legumes Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology lactation leaves livestock nutritive value palatability phenolic compounds phosphorus pods shrubs species differences tannins temporal variation Terrestrial animal productions Vertebrates wildlife |
title | Nutritional suitability of viscid and whitethorn acacia for ruminants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T22%3A55%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nutritional%20suitability%20of%20viscid%20and%20whitethorn%20acacia%20for%20ruminants&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20plant%20science&rft.au=Ishaque,%20M&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=299-306&rft.issn=0008-4220&rft.eissn=1918-1833&rft.coden=CPLSAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.4141/CJPS06068&rft_dat=%3Cfao_cross%3EUS201300890296%3C/fao_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |