Retention Initiatives Used by Professional Master's Athletic Training Program Directors
Context: Many professional master's athletic training program directors believe retention is a problem facing athletic training education. However, it remains unknown what steps, if any, are taken to improve retention. Objective: To inquire with program directors about their respective methods...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Athletic training education journal 2015-07, Vol.10 (3), p.205-211 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 211 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 205 |
container_title | Athletic training education journal |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Bowman, Thomas G Dodge, Thomas M Mazerolle, Stephanie M |
description | Context: Many professional master's athletic training program directors believe retention is a problem facing athletic training education. However, it remains unknown what steps, if any, are taken to improve retention. Objective: To inquire with program directors about their respective methods and interventions aimed at increasing retention rates. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: Professional master's athletic training programs. Patients or Other Participants: Fifteen program directors out of 25 responded to an online survey invitation for a response rate of 60%. We also completed follow-up telephone interviews with 8 randomly selected program directors to gather greater insight into the ways they improve retention. Main Outcome Measure(s): We asked directors of all 25 professional master's athletic training programs in the United States to complete an online survey. We also asked 8 program directors from those who responded to complete telephone interviews. Grounded theory guided data analysis and we secured credibility through the use of multiple-analyst triangulation, member checks, and peer review. Results: We identified 3 themes of ways program directors help improve student retention rates. Our participants described adequately "screening admissions packets, providing financial support to defray the cost of pursuing a degree in athletic training at the professional master's level," and "various student initiatives." Conclusions: Based on our findings, we recommend a thorough application process that screens prospective students and identifies those who can complete the program. Program directors should also find ways to help defray the costs of earning a master's degree to allow students to become integrated into the program intellectually, socially, and clinically without increasing stress levels. Finally, providing students with opportunities for early socialization and mentoring should be aimed at explaining program expectations while preparing the students for professional practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4085/1003205 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_4085_1003205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1075544</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1075544</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1255-221e7663aecd0351dc5167cbb835dcd35980ac797f68a18aab577261ca680c633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpN0E9LAzEQBfAgCpZa_ARCbj2tTjabP3sstWpFUaRFb8tsdrZG2l1JgtBvb0uLeHoD78ccHmOXAq4LsOpGAMgc1AkbiLIwmbTwcfrvPmejGL8A9sqUuhiw9zdK1CXfd3ze-eQx-R-KfBmp4fWWv4a-pRh3Na75M8ZEYRz5JH2uKXnHFwF957vV3q0CbvitD-RSH-IFO2txHWl0zCFb3s0W04fs6eV-Pp08ZU7kSmV5LshoLZFcA1KJximhjatrK1XjGqlKC-hMaVptUVjEWhmTa-FQW3BayiEbH_660McYqK2-g99g2FYCqv0k1XGSnbw6SAre_anZowCjVFHIX1FWXHM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retention Initiatives Used by Professional Master's Athletic Training Program Directors</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Bowman, Thomas G ; Dodge, Thomas M ; Mazerolle, Stephanie M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Thomas G ; Dodge, Thomas M ; Mazerolle, Stephanie M</creatorcontrib><description>Context: Many professional master's athletic training program directors believe retention is a problem facing athletic training education. However, it remains unknown what steps, if any, are taken to improve retention. Objective: To inquire with program directors about their respective methods and interventions aimed at increasing retention rates. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: Professional master's athletic training programs. Patients or Other Participants: Fifteen program directors out of 25 responded to an online survey invitation for a response rate of 60%. We also completed follow-up telephone interviews with 8 randomly selected program directors to gather greater insight into the ways they improve retention. Main Outcome Measure(s): We asked directors of all 25 professional master's athletic training programs in the United States to complete an online survey. We also asked 8 program directors from those who responded to complete telephone interviews. Grounded theory guided data analysis and we secured credibility through the use of multiple-analyst triangulation, member checks, and peer review. Results: We identified 3 themes of ways program directors help improve student retention rates. Our participants described adequately "screening admissions packets, providing financial support to defray the cost of pursuing a degree in athletic training at the professional master's level," and "various student initiatives." Conclusions: Based on our findings, we recommend a thorough application process that screens prospective students and identifies those who can complete the program. Program directors should also find ways to help defray the costs of earning a master's degree to allow students to become integrated into the program intellectually, socially, and clinically without increasing stress levels. Finally, providing students with opportunities for early socialization and mentoring should be aimed at explaining program expectations while preparing the students for professional practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1947-380X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1947-380X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4085/1003205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>National Athletic Trainers' Association</publisher><subject>Academic Persistence ; Allied Health Personnel ; Athletics ; Institutional Characteristics ; Intervention ; Interviews ; Masters Programs ; Mentors ; Online Surveys ; Qualitative Research ; School Orientation ; Selective Admission ; Student Financial Aid ; Training</subject><ispartof>Athletic training education journal, 2015-07, Vol.10 (3), p.205-211</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1255-221e7663aecd0351dc5167cbb835dcd35980ac797f68a18aab577261ca680c633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1255-221e7663aecd0351dc5167cbb835dcd35980ac797f68a18aab577261ca680c633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1075544$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Thomas G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodge, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazerolle, Stephanie M</creatorcontrib><title>Retention Initiatives Used by Professional Master's Athletic Training Program Directors</title><title>Athletic training education journal</title><description>Context: Many professional master's athletic training program directors believe retention is a problem facing athletic training education. However, it remains unknown what steps, if any, are taken to improve retention. Objective: To inquire with program directors about their respective methods and interventions aimed at increasing retention rates. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: Professional master's athletic training programs. Patients or Other Participants: Fifteen program directors out of 25 responded to an online survey invitation for a response rate of 60%. We also completed follow-up telephone interviews with 8 randomly selected program directors to gather greater insight into the ways they improve retention. Main Outcome Measure(s): We asked directors of all 25 professional master's athletic training programs in the United States to complete an online survey. We also asked 8 program directors from those who responded to complete telephone interviews. Grounded theory guided data analysis and we secured credibility through the use of multiple-analyst triangulation, member checks, and peer review. Results: We identified 3 themes of ways program directors help improve student retention rates. Our participants described adequately "screening admissions packets, providing financial support to defray the cost of pursuing a degree in athletic training at the professional master's level," and "various student initiatives." Conclusions: Based on our findings, we recommend a thorough application process that screens prospective students and identifies those who can complete the program. Program directors should also find ways to help defray the costs of earning a master's degree to allow students to become integrated into the program intellectually, socially, and clinically without increasing stress levels. Finally, providing students with opportunities for early socialization and mentoring should be aimed at explaining program expectations while preparing the students for professional practice.</description><subject>Academic Persistence</subject><subject>Allied Health Personnel</subject><subject>Athletics</subject><subject>Institutional Characteristics</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Masters Programs</subject><subject>Mentors</subject><subject>Online Surveys</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>School Orientation</subject><subject>Selective Admission</subject><subject>Student Financial Aid</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1947-380X</issn><issn>1947-380X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpN0E9LAzEQBfAgCpZa_ARCbj2tTjabP3sstWpFUaRFb8tsdrZG2l1JgtBvb0uLeHoD78ccHmOXAq4LsOpGAMgc1AkbiLIwmbTwcfrvPmejGL8A9sqUuhiw9zdK1CXfd3ze-eQx-R-KfBmp4fWWv4a-pRh3Na75M8ZEYRz5JH2uKXnHFwF957vV3q0CbvitD-RSH-IFO2txHWl0zCFb3s0W04fs6eV-Pp08ZU7kSmV5LshoLZFcA1KJximhjatrK1XjGqlKC-hMaVptUVjEWhmTa-FQW3BayiEbH_660McYqK2-g99g2FYCqv0k1XGSnbw6SAre_anZowCjVFHIX1FWXHM</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Bowman, Thomas G</creator><creator>Dodge, Thomas M</creator><creator>Mazerolle, Stephanie M</creator><general>National Athletic Trainers' Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Retention Initiatives Used by Professional Master's Athletic Training Program Directors</title><author>Bowman, Thomas G ; Dodge, Thomas M ; Mazerolle, Stephanie M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1255-221e7663aecd0351dc5167cbb835dcd35980ac797f68a18aab577261ca680c633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Academic Persistence</topic><topic>Allied Health Personnel</topic><topic>Athletics</topic><topic>Institutional Characteristics</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Masters Programs</topic><topic>Mentors</topic><topic>Online Surveys</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>School Orientation</topic><topic>Selective Admission</topic><topic>Student Financial Aid</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Thomas G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodge, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazerolle, Stephanie M</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Athletic training education journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bowman, Thomas G</au><au>Dodge, Thomas M</au><au>Mazerolle, Stephanie M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1075544</ericid><atitle>Retention Initiatives Used by Professional Master's Athletic Training Program Directors</atitle><jtitle>Athletic training education journal</jtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>205</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>205-211</pages><issn>1947-380X</issn><eissn>1947-380X</eissn><abstract>Context: Many professional master's athletic training program directors believe retention is a problem facing athletic training education. However, it remains unknown what steps, if any, are taken to improve retention. Objective: To inquire with program directors about their respective methods and interventions aimed at increasing retention rates. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: Professional master's athletic training programs. Patients or Other Participants: Fifteen program directors out of 25 responded to an online survey invitation for a response rate of 60%. We also completed follow-up telephone interviews with 8 randomly selected program directors to gather greater insight into the ways they improve retention. Main Outcome Measure(s): We asked directors of all 25 professional master's athletic training programs in the United States to complete an online survey. We also asked 8 program directors from those who responded to complete telephone interviews. Grounded theory guided data analysis and we secured credibility through the use of multiple-analyst triangulation, member checks, and peer review. Results: We identified 3 themes of ways program directors help improve student retention rates. Our participants described adequately "screening admissions packets, providing financial support to defray the cost of pursuing a degree in athletic training at the professional master's level," and "various student initiatives." Conclusions: Based on our findings, we recommend a thorough application process that screens prospective students and identifies those who can complete the program. Program directors should also find ways to help defray the costs of earning a master's degree to allow students to become integrated into the program intellectually, socially, and clinically without increasing stress levels. Finally, providing students with opportunities for early socialization and mentoring should be aimed at explaining program expectations while preparing the students for professional practice.</abstract><pub>National Athletic Trainers' Association</pub><doi>10.4085/1003205</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1947-380X |
ispartof | Athletic training education journal, 2015-07, Vol.10 (3), p.205-211 |
issn | 1947-380X 1947-380X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_4085_1003205 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free E- Journals |
subjects | Academic Persistence Allied Health Personnel Athletics Institutional Characteristics Intervention Interviews Masters Programs Mentors Online Surveys Qualitative Research School Orientation Selective Admission Student Financial Aid Training |
title | Retention Initiatives Used by Professional Master's Athletic Training Program Directors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T21%3A38%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retention%20Initiatives%20Used%20by%20Professional%20Master's%20Athletic%20Training%20Program%20Directors&rft.jtitle=Athletic%20training%20education%20journal&rft.au=Bowman,%20Thomas%20G&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=205&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=205-211&rft.issn=1947-380X&rft.eissn=1947-380X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4085/1003205&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1075544%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1075544&rfr_iscdi=true |